论著

替格瑞洛对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行急诊介入治疗的中期随访

  • 夏经钢 ,
  • 曲杨 ,
  • 胡少东 ,
  • 许骥 ,
  • 尹春琳 ,
  • 徐东
展开
  • (1 首都医科大学宣武医院心脏科,北京 100053;2 首都医科大学北京胸科医院病理科,北京 101149)

网络出版日期: 2015-06-18

Midterm follow-up outcomes of ticagrelor on acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention

  • XIA Jing-Gang ,
  • QU Yang ,
  • HU Shao-Dong ,
  • XU Ji ,
  • YIN Chun-Lin ,
  • XU Dong
Expand
  • (1. Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China; 2. Deparment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital,Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China)

Online published: 2015-06-18

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy of ticagrelor on patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods: In the study, 96 patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction onset within 12 h undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from May to October in 2013 were randomly divided into ticagrelor group (n=48) and clopidogrel group (n=48) by using the method of random number table. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel antiplatelet treatment were used before and after operation. Their baseline data, coronary artery disease characteristics, platelet count, adenosine diphosphate(ADP)-induced platelet inhibition rate by thrombelastograph after 5 days of treatment, the major adverse cardiovascular events of the follow up for 6 months and bleeding complications were observed and compared in the two groups. Results:  The differences between the two groups of patients with their baseline data, the features of coronary artery lesions, platelet count before and after 5 days of treatment had no statistical significance (P>0.05). ADP induced platelet inhibition rate [(80.2±10.7)%] after 5 days of treatment in ticagrelor group was significantly higher than that in clopidogrel group [(75.3±12.1)%, P<0.05]. The two groups of patients were followed up for 6 months, 8 cases of major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in clopidogrel group, 2 cases of major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in ticagrelor group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The two groups (7 cases of 48 patients in ticagrelor group vs. 3 cases of 48 patients in clopidogrel group) had no statistically significant difference in bleeding complications (P>0.05).Conclusion: Antiplatelet therapy of ticagrelor on patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency PCI has good efficacy and safety.

本文引用格式

夏经钢 , 曲杨 , 胡少东 , 许骥 , 尹春琳 , 徐东 . 替格瑞洛对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行急诊介入治疗的中期随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015 , 47(3) : 494 -498 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.03.023

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy of ticagrelor on patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Methods: In the study, 96 patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction onset within 12 h undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from May to October in 2013 were randomly divided into ticagrelor group (n=48) and clopidogrel group (n=48) by using the method of random number table. Ticagrelor and clopidogrel antiplatelet treatment were used before and after operation. Their baseline data, coronary artery disease characteristics, platelet count, adenosine diphosphate(ADP)-induced platelet inhibition rate by thrombelastograph after 5 days of treatment, the major adverse cardiovascular events of the follow up for 6 months and bleeding complications were observed and compared in the two groups. Results:  The differences between the two groups of patients with their baseline data, the features of coronary artery lesions, platelet count before and after 5 days of treatment had no statistical significance (P>0.05). ADP induced platelet inhibition rate [(80.2±10.7)%] after 5 days of treatment in ticagrelor group was significantly higher than that in clopidogrel group [(75.3±12.1)%, P<0.05]. The two groups of patients were followed up for 6 months, 8 cases of major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in clopidogrel group, 2 cases of major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in ticagrelor group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The two groups (7 cases of 48 patients in ticagrelor group vs. 3 cases of 48 patients in clopidogrel group) had no statistically significant difference in bleeding complications (P>0.05).Conclusion: Antiplatelet therapy of ticagrelor on patients suffering from acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency PCI has good efficacy and safety.
文章导航

/