收稿日期: 2019-10-10
网络出版日期: 2020-02-20
基金资助
北京市科学技术委员会“首都特色临床应用研究”项目(Z181100001718130)
Evaluation of mandibular stability and condylar volume after orthognathic surgery in patients with severe temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis
Received date: 2019-10-10
Online published: 2020-02-20
Supported by
Supported by the Clinical Research Projects by Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission(Z181100001718130)
目的:探讨下颌后缩伴颞下颌关节重度骨关节病患者正颌手术前的髁突表面骨质结构完整性对术后颌骨稳定性及髁突体积变化的影响。方法:选择2014年至2019年就诊于北京大学口腔医院诊断为下颌后缩畸形伴颞下颌关节重度骨关节病,并接受正颌手术且满足条件的患者37例进行回顾性分析,其中男性1例,女性36例,年龄(28.03±6.52)岁(21~34岁),依据术前髁突表面骨质情况分为表面光滑组和表面不光滑组,其中光滑组19例,不光滑组18例,分别于术前1周,术后1周、3个月、6个月及1年拍摄头颅侧位片及锥形束CT(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT), 对头颅侧位片进行坐标系建立及头影测量分析明确术后颌骨稳定性,对CBCT进行三维重建分割获取髁突的三维模型及体积,评价术后髁突体积的变化,通过CBCT影像资料评估术后髁突骨质改变情况,明确术后髁突骨质改变与颌骨稳定性的相关性,应用SPSS 20.0软件,采用Fisher确切概率法、Spearman相关系数分析及Mann-Whitney检验对所获数据进行统计学分析。结果:术前髁突表面光滑组在术后3个月(T1)、术后6个月(T2)、术后12个月(T3)颌骨复发率分别为36.85%、47.37%、42.11%,术前髁突表面不光滑组T1、T2、T3颌骨复发率分别为27.78%、44.44%、55.56%,两组在各时间段的复发率差异无统计学意义,术前髁突表面光滑组与不光滑组在各时间段的髁突体积的变化差异无统计学意义,不光滑组术后3个月的髁突进展与颌骨的稳定性有相关性。结论:对于下颌后缩伴颞下颌关节重度骨关节病且术前观察髁突一年无显著变化者,术前髁突表面是否光滑对于术后颌骨的稳定性没有确切影响,对于术前髁突不光滑的重度骨关节病患者,术后3个月出现髁突吸收会引起正颌术后颌骨位置的不稳定,术前髁突表面是否光滑对术后髁突体积的改建没有明确的影响。
侯磊 , 叶国华 , 刘筱菁 , 李自力 . 下颌后缩伴颞下颌关节重度骨关节病患者正颌术后颌骨稳定性及髁突体积变化的评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020 , 52(1) : 113 -118 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.018
Objective: To investigate the effect of preoperative condylar condition for mandible retrognathism deformities with severe temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis on the stability of the jaw after orthognathic surgery and on the postoperative condylar volume changes. Methods: In this retrospective study, from 2014 to 2019, 37 patients including 1 male and 36 female, aged between 21 to 34 years old with an average age of (28.03±6.52) years, were diagnosed with mandible retrognathism deformities with severe temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis by Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology and received orthognathic surgery, meeting the inclusion criteria were included. According to the preoperative condylar condition. There were divided into smooth group and non-smooth group, the lateral cephalometric films 1 week (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2) and 1 year (T3) after surgery were used to establish the coordinate system and cephalometric analysis to determine the stability of the jaw after operation. The three-dimensional model of the condyle was segmented by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) 1 week (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2) and 1 year (T3) after surgery and the volume was obtained to evaluate the change of the condyle volume after surgery. CBCT image data was used to evaluate the changes of the condylar condition after surgery, and to clarify the correlation between the postoperative condylar condition and jaw stability. SPSS 20.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis, Fisher’s exact probability methods were used to compare whether there were statistically significant differences in the stability of the mandibular joint at stages T1, T2 and T3 with different preoperative condylar condition.Spearman correlation coefficient analysis and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare whether there were statistically significant differences in the volume changes at stages T1, T2 and T3 after surgery between the two groups. Results: The recurrence rates of the mandible in the condylar smooth group were T1 36.85%, T2 47.37% and T3 42.11%, respectively. The recurrence rates in the non-smooth condylar group were T1 27.78%, T2 44.44% and T3 55.56%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the recurrence rates between the two groups at different time points. There was no significant difference in the condylar volume change between smooth group and non-smooth group. Conclusion: For patients with mandible retrognathism deformities with severe temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and no significant changes in the condyle observed for one year before surgery, there is no difference in the influence of the preoperative condylar condition on the stability of jaw after operation, and no definite influence on the volume of the condyle after operation. Condylar resorption 3 months after surgery can cause instability of the jaw after orthognathic surgery.
Key words: Severe osteoarthrosis; Retrognathia; Orthognathic surgery; Relapse
| [1] | Rocha VA, Neto AI, Rebello IM , et al. Skeletal stability in orthognathic surgery: evaluation of methods of rigid internal fixation after counterclockwise rotation in patients with class Ⅱ deformities[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,53(8):730-735. |
| [2] | Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G , et al. The prevalence of TMJ osteoarthritis in asymptomatic patients with dentofacial deformities: a cone-beam CT study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,41(6):690-695. |
| [3] | Chen S, Lei J, Fu KY , et al. Cephalometric analysis of the facial skeletal morphology of female patients exhibiting skeletal class ii deformity with and without temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(10):e0139743. |
| [4] | Nogami S, Yamauchi K, Satomi N , et al. Risk factors related to aggressive condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery for females: retrospective study[J]. Cranio, 2017,35(4):250-258. |
| [5] | Posnick JC, Fantuzzo JJ . Idiopathic condylar resorption: current clinical perspectives[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007,65(8):1617-1623. |
| [6] | Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ , et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007,132(4):429-438. |
| [7] | Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS , et al. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012,81(8):1812-1816. |
| [8] | Kadesjo N, Benchimol D, Falahat B , et al. Evaluation of the effective dose of cone beam CT and multislice CT for temporomandibular joint examinations at optimized exposure levels [J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2015, 44(8): 20150041[2019-09-10]. |
| [9] | Tecco S, Saccucci M, Nucera R , et al. Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2010,31(10):28. |
| [10] | Xi T, Schreurs R, van Loon B , et al. 3D analysis of condylar remodelling and skeletal relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2015,43(4):462-468. |
| [11] | Jung J, Kim J H, Lee J W , et al. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis of condylar head and glenoid cavity after mandibular advancement[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2018,46(9):1470-1475. |
| [12] | da Silva RJ, Valadares Souza CV, Souza GA , et al. Changes in condylar volume and joint spaces after orthognathic surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018,47(4):511-517. |
| [13] | 雷杰, 秦思思, 傅开元 . 锥体束CT影像评估颞下颌关节重度骨关节病髁突骨改变的稳定性[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2017,24(4):212-216. |
| [14] | Alexiou K, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K . Evaluation of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2009,38(3):141-147. |
| [15] | Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q , et al. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009,107(6):844-860. |
| [16] | Talaat W, Al Bayatti S, Al Kawas S . CBCT analysis of bony changes associated with temporomandibular disorders[J]. Cranio, 2016,34(2):88-94. |
| [17] | Tamimi D, Jalali E, Hatcher D . Temporomandibular joint imaging[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2018,56(1):157-175. |
| [18] | Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C . The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension[J]. Head Face Med, 2007,30(3):21. |
| [19] | Massilla Mani F, Sivasubramanian SS . A study of temporoman-dibular joint osteoarthritis using computed tomographic imaging[J]. Biomed J, 2016,39(3):201-206. |
| [20] | Joss CU, Vassalli IM . Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009,67(2):301-313. |
| [21] | Zarb GA, Carlsson GE . Temporomandibular disorders: osteoarthritis[J]. J Orofac Pain, 1999,13(4):295-306. |
| [22] | Hoppenreijs TJ, Stoelinga PJ, Grace KL , et al. Long-term evaluation of patients with progressive condylar resorption following orthognathic surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999,28(6):411-418. |
| [23] | Kobayashi T, Izumi N, Kojima T , et al. Progressive condylar resorption after mandibular advancement[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012,50(2):176-180. |
| [24] | Hussain AM, Packota G, Major PW , et al. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2008,37(2):63-71. |
| [25] | Valladares-Neto J, Cevidanes LH, Rocha WC , et al. TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2014,22(1):2-14. |
| [26] | He Z, Ji H, Du W , et al. Management of condylar resorption before or after orthognathic surgery: a systematic review[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2019,47(7):1007-1014. |
| [27] | 秦思思, 雷杰, 傅开元 . 锥形束CT评估颞下颌关节重度骨关节病患者正颌术后髁突骨质再吸收[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2016,30(5):261-265. |
| [28] | Haas Junior OL, Guijarro-Martinez R, de Sousa Gil AP , et al. Hierarchy of surgical stability in orthognathic surgery: overview of systematic reviews[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019,48(11):1415-1433. |
| [29] | Bailey L, Cevidanes LH, Proffit WR . Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004,126(3):273-277. |
| [30] | Franco AA, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C , et al. Long-term 3-dimensional stability of mandibular advancement surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013,71(9):1588-1597. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |