论著

有限切开复位髓内外联合固定技术治疗股骨转子下骨折的临床随访

  • 刘中砥 ,
  • 许庭珉 ,
  • 党育 ,
  • 张殿英 ,
  • 付中国
展开
  • 北京大学人民医院创伤救治中心,北京大学人民医院创伤骨科,北京 100044

收稿日期: 2020-06-09

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-13

基金资助

教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT_16R01);北京大学医学部学院建设项目(BMU2019XY007-01)

Clinical effectiveness of less invasive intramedullary nail fixation combined with titanium cable cerclage for subtrochanteric fractures

  • Zhong-di LIU ,
  • Ting-min XU ,
  • Yu DANG ,
  • Dian-ying ZHANG ,
  • Zhong-guo FU
Expand
  • Trauma Medicine Center, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China

Received date: 2020-06-09

  Online published: 2020-12-13

Supported by

Ministry of Education Innovation Program of China(IRT_16R01);Key Laboratory of Trauma and Neural Regeneration (Peking University), Ministry of Education(BMU2019XY007-01)

摘要

目的:探讨有限切开辅助复位下钛缆环扎联合髓内钉固定治疗股骨转子下骨折的手术技术及临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2017年12月期间46例股骨转子下骨折患者病例资料,其中男性14例,女性32例;年龄44~92岁,平均(77.83±10.66)岁;左侧17例,右侧29例,致伤原因包括高处坠落、交通事故及意外跌倒。按照Seinsheimer 分型:ⅢA 型26例,ⅢB 型11 例,Ⅳ型9 例,均为闭合性损伤。所有患者采用有限切开辅助复位下钛缆环扎联合髓内钉固定的方法进行治疗。记录手术时间、出血量、骨折愈合时间等数据,分别采用Sanders 创伤性髋关节功能评分、Harris评分等指标评价术后康复效果。结果:46例患者均获得随访,时间12~36个月,平均28个月。所有患者均获得骨性愈合,愈合时间3~6个月。平均手术时间(131.09±20.36) min,平均术中失血量(191.96±111.03) mL,平均住院天数(10.61±2.85) d。术后Sanders评分和Harris评分优良率分别为86.96%和91.30%。随访病例未出现骨折部位感染、内固定松动断裂、畸形愈合等并发症。结论:有限切开辅助复位技术可很好解决股骨转子下骨折的术中复位问题,钛缆环扎联合髓内钉固定可获得骨折断端良好的对位对线和稳定性,是治疗股骨转子下骨折的有效方法。

本文引用格式

刘中砥 , 许庭珉 , 党育 , 张殿英 , 付中国 . 有限切开复位髓内外联合固定技术治疗股骨转子下骨折的临床随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020 , 52(6) : 1102 -1106 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.06.019

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the surgical technique and clinical effect of less invasive intrame-dullary nail fixation combined with titanium cable cerclage in the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 46 cases of subtrochanteric fractures in Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2015 to December 2017. Among them, there were 14 males and 32 females, with an average age of (77.83±10.66) years (44-92 years); 17 cases on the left side and 29 cases on the right side. The causes of injury included crash from a height, traffic accident and accidental fall. According to Seinsheimer classification, there were 26 cases of type Ⅱ, 11 cases of type Ⅲ, 9 cases of type Ⅳ, and these cases were all closed injury. After admission, these patients underwent continuous tibial tuberosity bone traction to maintain the length and force line of the lower extremity, so as to reduce the difficulty of intraoperative fracture reduction. Anticoagulant therapy was given before operation to reduce perioperative thrombotic complications. All the patients were treated with less invasive intramedullary nail fixation combined with titanium cable cerclage. Operation time, blood loss during surgery, time of fracture healing were recorded, Harris and Sanders scoring system were used to assess hip function after operation at each follow-up time point. Results: All the included patients underwent surgery successfully. Average operative time and intraoperative blood loss of these patients were (131.09 ± 20.06) min and (191.96±111.03) mL, respectively. All the patients were followed up satisfactorily, with an average follow-up time of 28 months. The fractures received bone healing within 3-6 months, average hospital stay was (10.61±2.85) days. The Sanders score was excellent in 3 cases, good in 37 cases and common in 6 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 86.96%. The Harris score was excellent in 6 cases, good in 36 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 91.30%. There were no cases of wound infection, loss of reduction, nonunion of fracture or internal fixation failure. Hip pain symptoms were effectively relieved in most patients. Conclusion: Less invasive intramedullary nail fixation combined with titanium cable cerclage can obtain good alignment and stability of fracture ends, which is an effective method for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures.

参考文献

[1] Mattisson L, Bojan A, Enocson A. Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2018,19(1):369.
[2] Munson M. Operative treatment of subtrochanteric fractures[J]. Orthopedics, 1983,6(7):874-879.
[3] Sun Q, Ge W, Li R, et al. Intramedullary fixation with minimally invasive clamp-assisted reduction for the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and subtrochanteric fractures: A technical trick[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017,31(11):e390-e394.
[4] Mingo-Robinet J, Torres-Torres M, Moreno-Barrero M, et al. Minimally invasive clamp-assisted reduction and cephalomedullary nailing without cerclage cables for subtrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: Surgical technique and results[J]. Injury, 2015,46(6):1036-1041.
[5] Cech O, Sosna A. Principles of the surgical treatment of subtrochanteric fractures[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1974,5(3):651-662.
[6] Saarenp?? I, Heikkinen T, Jalovaara P. Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: Short-term outcome in 58 patients[J]. Int Orthop, 2007,31(1):65-70.
[7] Leonidis S, Panagopoulos N. Surgical treatment of subtrochanteric fractures[J]. Injury, 1974,6(1):70-76.
[8] Müller T, Topp T, Kühne CA, et al. The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: A biomechanical study[J]. Int Orthop, 2011,35(8):1237-1243.
[9] Oh CW, Kim JJ, Byun YS, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynjournal of subtrochanteric femur fractures with a locking plate: A prospective series of 20 fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009,129(12):1659-1665.
[10] Lundy DW, Acevedo JI, Ganey TM, et al. Mechanical comparison of plates used in the treatment of unstable subtrochanteric femur fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1999,13(8):534-538.
[11] Hu SJ, Zhang SM, Yu GR. Treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures with proximal lateral femur locking plates[J]. Acta Ortop Bras, 2012,20(6):329-333.
[12] Apóstol-González SA. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Treatment with locking intramedullary nailing. An experience without C-Arc. The guide-wire stopping method for verify distal locking is described[J]. Injury, 2017,48(11):2563-2568.
[13] Shin WC, Moon NH, Jang JH, et al. Comparative study between biologic plating and intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures: Is biologic plating using LCP-DF superior to intramedullary nailing?[J]. Injury, 2017,48(10):2207-2213.
[14] Ekstr?m W, Karlsson-Thur C, Larsson S, et al. Functional outcome in treatment of unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures with the proximal femoral nail and the Medoff sliding plate[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007,21(1):18-25.
[15] Aronoff PM, Davis PM Jr., Wickstrom JK. Intramedullary nail fixation as treatment of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur[J]. J Trauma, 1971,11(8):637-650.
文章导航

/