论著

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的Spike蛋白点突变后与受体蛋白质及潜在抗病毒药物结合能力的同源建模分析

  • 曹泽 ,
  • 王乐童 ,
  • 刘振明
展开
  • 北京大学药学院天然药物及仿生药物国家重点实验室,北京 100191

收稿日期: 2020-07-06

  网络出版日期: 2021-02-07

Homologous modeling and binding ability analysis of Spike protein after point mutation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to receptor proteins and potential antiviral drugs

  • Ze CAO ,
  • Le-tong WANG ,
  • Zhen-ming LIU
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Peking University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China

Received date: 2020-07-06

  Online published: 2021-02-07

摘要

目的: 分析严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2)的全长测序信息中,其刺突蛋白(Spike protein,S蛋白)的自发突变情况,以及S蛋白突变前后与宿主相关受体蛋白质和潜在抗病毒药物结合能力的变化。方法: 对SARS-CoV-2的一级序列进行生物信息学分析,确定高频突变位点,利用PolyPhen-2软件逐一对S蛋白突变后的功能进行预测和分析。使用SWISS-MODEL系统对突变后的S蛋白序列进行基于相似性的同源建模,利用ZDOCK程序对所建模型与血管紧张素转化酶2(angiotensin-converting enzyme 2,ACE2)、二肽基肽酶-4(dipeptidyl peptidase-4,DPP4,又称CD26)以及氨基肽酶N(aminopeptidase N,APN,又称CD13)进行蛋白质对接,用FiPD软件对结合能力评价结果进行分析,最后采用AutoDock-Chimera 1.14对突变前后的S蛋白与潜在抗病毒药物的结合能力进行预测和比较分析。结果: S蛋白的某些特定区域发生突变能够更大程度地影响其功能,突变之后,S蛋白与ACE2的结合能力趋向于减弱,而与DPP4的结合能力趋向于增强,与APN的结合能力无显著变化。抗人类免疫缺陷病毒(human immunodeficiency virus,HIV)药物aplaviroc与S蛋白的亲和能力显著高于其他候选小分子药物。结论: SARS-CoV-2在自然状态下发生突变,其S蛋白第400~1 100个氨基酸的区域为点突变高频区,突变趋势为与DPP4结合力增强,DPP4可能成为SARS-CoV-2感染细胞的新受体,aplaviroc可能成为一种SARS-CoV-2治疗药物的潜在选择。

本文引用格式

曹泽 , 王乐童 , 刘振明 . 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的Spike蛋白点突变后与受体蛋白质及潜在抗病毒药物结合能力的同源建模分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021 , 53(1) : 150 -158 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.023

Abstract

Objective: To explore the natural mutations in Spike protein (S protein) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the changes of affinity between virus and associated receptors or drug molecules before and after the mutation based on whole length sequencing results.Methods: In the study, the bioinformatics analysis of all the published sequences of SARS-CoV-2 was conducted and thus the high frequency mutation sites were affirmed. Taking advantages of PolyPhen-2, the functional influence of each mutation in S protein was prospected. The 3D homologous modelling was performed by SWISS-MODEL to establish mutated S protein structural model, in which the protein-docking was then implemented with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) and aminopeptidase N (APN) by ZDOCK, and the combining capacity of each mutated S protein evaluated by FiPD. Finally, the binding ability between mutated S proteins and anti-virus drugs were prospected and evaluated through AutoDock-Chimera 1.14.Results: The mutations in specific region of S protein had greater tendency to destroy the S protein function by analysis of mutated S protein structure. Protein-receptor docking analysis between naturally mutated S protein and host receptors showed that, in the case of spontaneous mutation, the binding ability of S protein to ACE2 tended to be weakened, while the binding ability of DPP4 tended to be enhanced, and there was no significant change in the binding ability of APN. According to the computational simulation results of affinity binding between small molecular drugs and S protein, the affinity of aplaviroc with S protein was significantly higher than that of other small molecule drug candidates.Conclusion: The region from 400-1 100 amino acid in S protein of SARS-CoV-2 is the mutation sensitive part during natural state, which was more potential to mutate than other part in S protein during natural state. The mutated SARS-CoV-2 might tend to target human cells with DPP4 as a new receptor rather than keep ACE2 as its unique receptor for human infection. At the same time, aplaviroc, which was used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, may become a new promising treatment for SARS-CoV-2 and could be a potential choice for the development of SARS-CoV-2 drugs.

参考文献

[1] Liu J, Zheng X, Tong Q, et al. Overlapping and discrete aspects of the pathology and pathogenesis of the emerging human patho-genic coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 2019-nCoV[J]. J Med Virol, 2020,92(5):491-494.
[2] Wang C, Liu Z, Chen Z, et al. The establishment of reference sequence for SARS-CoV-2 and variation analysis[J]. J Med Virol, 2020,10(1002):25762.
[3] Ma Y, Wu L, Shaw N, et al. Structural basis and functional analysis of the SARS coronavirus nsp14-nsp10 complex[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015,112(30):9436-9441.
[4] Kim D, Lee JY, Yang JS, et al. The architecture of SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome[J]. Cell, 2020,181(4):914-921.
[5] Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding[J]. Lancet, 2020,395(10224):565-574.
[6] Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin[J]. Nature, 2020,579(7798):270-273.
[7] Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2[J]. Science, 2020,367(6485):1444-1448.
[8] Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein[J]. Cell, 2020,181(2):281-292.
[9] Chan CM, Chu H, Wang Y, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 is an important surface attachment factor that facilitates entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus[J]. J Virol, 2016,90(20):9114-9127.
[10] Cui J, Li F, Shi ZL. Origin and evolution of pathogenic corona-viruses[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2019,17(3):181-192.
[11] Chu H, Chan CM, Zhang X, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and bat coronavirus HKU9 both can utilize GRP78 for attachment onto host cells[J]. J Biol Chem, 2018,293(30):11709-11726.
[12] Satija N, Lal SK. The molecular biology of SARS coronavirus[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2007,1102(1):26-38.
[13] Chen L, Gui C, Luo X, et al. Cinanserin is an inhibitor of the 3C-like proteinase of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and strongly reduces virus replication in vitro[J]. J Virol, 2005,79(11):7095-7103.
[14] Emmelkamp JM, Rockstroh JK. CCR5 antagonists: comparison of efficacy, side effects, pharmacokinetics and interactions: review of the literature[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2007,12(9):409-417.
[15] Lagadinou ED, Sach A, Callahan K, et al. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2013,12(3):329-341.
[16] Andersen PI, Krpina K, Ianevski A, et al. Novel antiviral activities of obatoclax, emetine, niclosamide, brequinar, and homoharringtonine[J]. Viruses, 2019,11(10):964.
[17] Wen CC, Kuo YH, Jan JT, et al. Specific plant terpenoids and lignoids possess potent antiviral activities against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus[J]. J Med Chem, 2007,50(17):4087-4095.
[18] Aliyari Serej Z, Ebrahimi Kalan A, Mehdipour A, et al. Regulation and roles of CD26/DPPIV in hematopoiesis and diseases[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2017,91:88-94.
[19] Cheng F, Yuan G, He J, et al. Dysregulation of DPP4 is associa-ted with the AMPK/JAK2/STAT3 pathway in adipocytes under insulin resistance status and liraglutide intervention[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2019,12:2635-2644.
[20] Song Z, Xu Y, Bao L, et al. From SARS to MERS, thrusting coronaviruses into the spotlight[J]. Viruses, 2019,11(1):59.
[21] Li Y, Zhang Z, Yang L, et al. The MERS-CoV receptor DPP4 as a candidate binding target of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike[J]. iScience, 2020,23(6):101160.
[22] Nichols WG, Steel HM, Bonny T, et al. Hepatotoxicity observed in clinical trials of aplaviroc[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2008,52(3):858-865.
[23] Kitrinos KM, Amrine-Madsen H, Irlbeck DM, et al. Virologic failure in therapy-naive subjects on aplaviroc plus lopinavir-ritonavir: detection of aplaviroc resistance requires clonal analysis of envelope[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2009,53(3):1124-1131.
文章导航

/