论著

18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数、表皮生长因子受体和间变淋巴瘤激酶基因突变对肺腺癌患者预后评估的价值

  • 廖栩鹤 ,
  • 王荣福 ,
  • 刘萌 ,
  • 陈雪祺 ,
  • 熊焰 ,
  • 农琳 ,
  • 殷雷 ,
  • 张炳晔 ,
  • 杜毓菁
展开
  • 1.核医学科, 北京大学第一医院 北京 100034
    2.病理科, 北京大学第一医院 北京 100034

收稿日期: 2019-02-25

  网络出版日期: 2021-04-21

基金资助

十二五国家科技支撑项目(2014BAA03B03);北京大学临床医学+X青年专项(PKU2018LCXQ012);北京大学第一医院自然科学基金(2017QN14)

Semiquantitative parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT, gene mutation states of epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase in prognosis evaluation of patients with lung adenocarcinoma

  • Xu-he LIAO ,
  • Rong-fu WANG ,
  • Meng LIU ,
  • Xue-qi CHEN ,
  • Yan XIONG ,
  • Lin NONG ,
  • Lei YIN ,
  • Bing-ye ZHANG ,
  • Yu-jing DU
Expand
  • 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China

Received date: 2019-02-25

  Online published: 2021-04-21

Supported by

National Science and Technology Support Program for the “12th Five-Year Plan”(2014BAA03B03);Cli-nical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project of Peking University(PKU2018LCXQ012);Science Foundation of Peking University First Hospital(2017QN14)

摘要

目的: 评估18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数、表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)和间变淋巴瘤激酶(anaplastic lymphoma kinase,ALK)基因突变状态对肺腺癌患者预后评估的价值。方法: 回顾性收集84名肺腺癌患者术前18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数,EGFRALK基因突变检查结果。18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数分别为:最大标准化摄取值(maximum standardized uptake value,SUVmax)、平均标准化摄取值(average of standardized uptake value,SUVmean)、肿瘤代谢体积(metabolic tumor volume,MTV)和总糖酵解量(total lesion glycolysis,TLG)。连续变量用ROC曲线分析法转为分类变量,生存分析采用Cox比例风险回归分析,生存曲线经Log-rank检验和Kaplan-Meier法获得。结果: 患者平均随访期31个月(24~58个月)。单因素分析显示,原发灶SUVmax、SUVmean、MTV及TLG与无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)显著相关。多因素Cox比例风险回归分析显示,不论年龄、性别、合并症、EGFRALK基因突变与否及治疗情况,TLG(≥55.02,HR=4.965,95%CI:1.360~18.133)、TNM分期(Ⅲ/Ⅳ期,HR=7.811,95%CI:2.977~20.489)、胃泌素释放肽前体(pro-gastrin releasing peptide,proGRP)(≥45.65 ng/L,HR=4.070,95%CI:1.442~11.487)、组织多肽抗原(tissue polypeptide antigen,TPA)(≥68.20 U/L,HR=6.996,95%CI:1.458~33.574)、碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphatase,ALP)(≥82.50 IU/L,HR=4.160,95%CI:1.416~12.219)和活化部分凝血活酶时间比值(ratio of activated partial thromboplastin time,aPTTR)(≥1.16,HR=4.576,95%CI:1.913~10.946)为独立显著预后因素。EGFR(P=0.343)或ALK(P=0.608)基因突变状态均与PFS无显著相关。结论: 原发灶高水平18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数(SUVmax、SUVmean、MTV和TLG)对肺腺癌患者具有不同程度的预后评估价值,TNM分期、proGRP、TPA、ALP和aPTTR均与PFS存在独立、显著关联,EGFRALK基因突变状态与PFS未见明确相关。

本文引用格式

廖栩鹤 , 王荣福 , 刘萌 , 陈雪祺 , 熊焰 , 农琳 , 殷雷 , 张炳晔 , 杜毓菁 . 18F-FDG PET/CT半定量参数、表皮生长因子受体和间变淋巴瘤激酶基因突变对肺腺癌患者预后评估的价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021 , 53(2) : 246 -254 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.02.003

Abstract

Objective: To explore the valuable predictors for evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, we analyzed the potential roles of standardized uptake value (SUV)-derived parameters from 18F-FDG PET/CT, combining with the gene mutation states of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and other clinical characteristics. Methods: Data of 84 lung adenocarcinoma patients pre-treated, who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scans, EGFR gene mutations test, ALK rearrangement assay and other relative tests, were retrospectively collected. Then a series of clinical parameters including EGFR/ALK mutation status and SUV-derived features [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average of standardized uptake value (SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)] were evaluated. Best possible cutoff points for all measuring parameters were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards model to determine the prognostic markers for progression-free survival (PFS). Survival curves were obtained through Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curve. Results: The median follow-up period was 31 months (24 to 58 months). It was found that SUVmax (≥3.01), SUVmean (≥2.25), MTV (≥25.41 cm 3), and TLG (≥55.02) of the primary tumors were significantly associated with PFS in univariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Then regardless of age, gender, co-morbidity, EGFR/ALK mutation status, and treatment program, TLG (≥ 55.02, HR=4.965, 95%CI: 1.360-18.133), TNM stage (Ⅲ/Ⅳ, HR=7.811, 95%CI: 2.977-20.489), pro-gastrin releasing peptide (proGRP) (≥45.65 ng/L, HR=4.070, 95%CI: 1.442-11.487), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) (≥68.20 U/L, HR=6.996, 95%CI: 1.458-33.574), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (≥82.50 IU/L, HR=4.160, 95%CI: 1.416-12.219) and ratio of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTTR) (≥1.16: HR=4.58, 95%CI: 1.913-10.946) showed the independently relevant to PFS through multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. The EGFR mutant (P=0.343) and ALK rearrangement (P=0.608) were not significant either in survival analysis. Conclusion: High SUV-derived parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG) might provide prognostic value to some extent. Especially, TLG, and other clinical features [TNM stage, proGRP, TPA, ALP, and aPTTR] could be independently and significantly associated with PFS of lung adenocarcinoma patients. However, EGFR/ALK gene status could not be effectively relevant to PFS in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

参考文献

[1] Noone A, Howlader N, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review (CRS), 1975-2015[EB/OL]. (2018-09-10) [2018-09-10]. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/.
[2] Brundage MD, Davies D, Mackillop WJ. Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress[J]. Chest, 2002,122(3):1037-1057.
[3] Sharma A, Mohan A, Bhalla AS, et al. Role of various metabolic parameters derived from baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as prognostic markers in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2018,43(1):e8-e17.
[4] Salavati A, Duan F, Snyder BS, et al. Optimal FDG PET/CT volumetricparameters for risk stratification in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2017,44(12):1969-1983.
[5] Wang WT, Li Y, Ma J, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels before initial treatment are associated with EGFR mutations and EML4-ALK fusion gene in lung adenocarcinoma patients[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014,15(9):3927-3932.
[6] Chung HW, Lee KY, Kim HJ, et al. FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict prognosis in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2014,140(1):89-98.
[7] Nisman B, Amir G, Lafair J, et al. Prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1, TPS and CEA in different histologic types of non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 1999,19(4C):3549-3552.
[8] Ma W, Wang M, Li X, et al. Quantitative 18F-FDG PET analysis in survival rate prediction of patients with non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018,16(4):4129-4136.
[9] Melloni G, Gajate AM, Sestini S, et al. New positron emission tomography derived parameters as predictive factors for recurrence in resected stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013,39(11):1254-1261.
[10] Hyun SH, Choi JY, Kim K, et al. Volume-based parameters of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography improve outcome prediction in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection[J]. Ann Surg, 2013,257(2):364-370.
[11] Kurtipek E, Cayci M, Duzgun N, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT mean SUV and metabolic tumor volume for mean survival time in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2015,40(6):459-463.
[12] Camidge DR, Kono SA, Lu X, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer are associated with prolonged progression-free survival on pemetrexed[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2011,6(4):774-780.
[13] Izar B, Sequist L, Lee M, et al. The impact of EGFR mutation status on outcomes in patients with resected stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancers[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013,96(3):962-968.
[14] Nisman B, Biran H, Ramu N, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of ProGRP in lung cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2009,29(11):4827-4832.
[15] Cistaro A, Quartuccio N, Mojtahedi A, et al. Prediction of 2 years-survival in patients with stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ non-small cell lung cancer utilizing (18)F-FDG PET/CT SUV quantification[J]. Radiol Oncol, 2013,47(3):219-223.
[16] Soussan M, Chouahnia K, Maisonobe JA, et al. Prognostic implications of volume-based measurements on FDG PET/CT in stage Ⅲ non-small-cell lung cancer after induction chemotherapy[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2013,40(5):668-676.
[17] Liu J, Dong M, Sun X, et al. Prognosticvalue of 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgical non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2016,11(1):e146195.
[18] Ohtaka K, Hida Y, Kaga K, et al. Outcome analysis of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in patients with lung cancer after partial volume correction[J]. Anticancer Res, 2013,33(11):5193-5198.
[19] Caicedo C, Garcia-Velloso MJ, Lozano MD, et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET in prediction of KRAS and EGFR mutation status in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2014,41(11):2058-2065.
[20] Liu A, Han A, Zhu H, et al. The role of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measured by [18F] FDG PET/CT in predicting EGFR gene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Oncotarget, 2017,8(20):33736-33744.
[21] Li Q, Zhang J, Cheng W, et al. Prognostic value of maximum standard uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017,96(37):e8084.
[22] Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009,361(10):947-957.
[23] Koizumi T, Fukushima T, Gomi D, et al. Correlation of early PET findings with tumor response to molecular targeted agents in patients with advanced driver-mutated non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Med Oncol, 2017,34(10):169.
[24] Foa P, Fornier M, Miceli R, et al. Tumour markers CEA, NSE, SCC, TPA and CYFRA 21.1 in resectable non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 1999,19(4C):3613-3618.
[25] Alatas F, Alatas O, Metintas M, et al. Usefulness of bone mar-kers for detection of bone metastases in lung cancer patients[J]. Clin Biochem, 2002,35(4):293-296.
[26] Qi Y, Fu J. Research on the coagulation function changes in non small cell lung cancer patients and analysis of their correlation with metastasis and survival[J]. J BUON, 2017,22(2):462-467.
[27] Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: non-small cell lung cancer (2019V2)[EB/OL]. (2018-11-21) [2018-11-21]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx.
文章导航

/