收稿日期: 2021-02-14
网络出版日期: 2021-06-16
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of parenting sense of competence scale in mothers of preschool children
Received date: 2021-02-14
Online published: 2021-06-16
目的: 对育儿胜任感量表在中国学龄前儿童母亲中应用的信效度进行检验,探究北京市延庆区学龄前儿童母亲的育儿胜任感现状。方法: 采用方便样本对1 384名学龄前儿童母亲进行调查,运用SPSS 21.0和Mplus 7.4软件进行统计分析,检验量表的结构效度、效标关联效度、内部一致性和分半信度,分析量表使用的得分情况及其影响因素。结果: 探索性因子分析显示,量表的各条目在效能或满意度维度上的载荷均大于0.4,且无双载荷现象。验证性因子分析显示,效能分量表和满意度分量表的因子负荷为0.212~0.843(P<0.05),模型拟合优度检验显示各拟合指数均在可接受范围内。总量表、效能分量表、满意度分量表均与抑郁自评呈显著负相关,与一般自尊呈显著正相关。总量表、效能分量表和满意度分量表的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.872、0.802和0.874,总量表的Spearman-Brown系数为0.851。总量表、效能分量表、满意度分量表的平均得分分别为(72.33±11.31)分、(35.54±5.91)分、(36.79±7.11)分,得分受母亲文化程度、家庭年收入的影响。结论: 育儿胜任感量表在中国学龄前儿童母亲中具有良好的信效度,可以作为衡量中国学龄前儿童母亲育儿胜任感、自我感知效能及满意度的测评工具。北京市延庆地区学龄前儿童母亲的育儿胜任感较好,可能与纳入本研究的母亲的文化程度、家庭年收入较高有关。
李雪莹 , 毛康娜 , 弭小艺 , 高玲玲 , 杨晓 , 陶惠芬 , 张迎武 , 陈敬 , 王行 , 沈丽娟 , 袁洁铃 , 苗淼 , 周虹 . 育儿胜任感量表在学龄前儿童母亲中应用的信效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021 , 53(3) : 479 -484 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.007
Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of parenting sense of competence scale (PSOC) in Chinese mothers of preschool children, and to explore the perception of preschool children’s mothers on their own parenting skills and their comfort of being a parent in Yanqing District of Beijing. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a convenience sample in 1 384 preschool children’s mothers in Yanqing District of Beijing. SPSS 21.0 and Mplus 7.4 software were used for statistical analysis to test the structural validity, criterion related validity, internal consistency and split half reliability of the scale, and to analyze the score of the scale and its influencing factors. Results: The PSOC had good reliability and validity. Exploratory factor analysis showed that each item of the PSOC had more than 0.4 factor loading in efficacy factor or satisfaction factor, and there was no double load phenomenon. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the factor loadings ranged from 0.212 to 0.843 in efficacy factor and satisfaction factor, respectively. The goodness of fit test showed that all the fitting indexes were within the acceptable range, and the correlation between the effectiveness subscale and the satisfaction subscale was high. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the whole scale, the efficacy subscale and the satisfaction subscale were 0.872, 0.802, and 0.874, respectively. The Spearman-Brown coefficient of PSOC was 0.851. The average score of the whole scale, the efficacy subscale, and the satisfaction subscale were 72.33±11.31, 35.54±5.91, and 36.79±7.11, respectively, and the score of parenting competence in Chinese mothers of preschool children was influenced by the mother’s educational level and the annual income of her family. Conclusion: The PSOC has satisfactory reliability and validity in Chinese mothers of preschool children. It can be used as an evaluation instrument for measuring the parenting competency, self perceived efficacy and satisfaction in the mainland Chinese mothers of preschool children. The competency of preschool children’s mothers in Yanqing District of Beijing is very good, which may be related to the higher education level of the mothers and the higher annual income of their families in this study.
Key words: Parenting sense of competence; Mothers; Reliability; Validity
| [1] | Zuckerman B, Elansary M, Needlman R. Book sharing: In-home strategy to advance early child development globally[J]. Pediatrics, 2019,143(3):1-3. |
| [2] | Knudsen EI. Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior[J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2004,16(8):1412-1425. |
| [3] | Jones TL, Prinz RJ. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review[J]. Clin Psychol Rev, 2005,25(3):341-363. |
| [4] | Gibaud-Wallston J, Wandersman LP. Development and utility of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale: proceedings of the American Psychological Association in American Psychological Association[C]. Toronto: the American Psychological Association in American Psychological Association, 1978. |
| [5] | Ngai FW, Wai-Chi Chan S, Holroyd E. Translation and validation of a chinese version of the parenting sense of competence scale in Chinese mothers[J]. Nurs Res, 2007,56(5):348-354. |
| [6] | 杨晓, 高玲玲, 张振香, 等. 中文版育儿胜任感量表在产妇中应用的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014,49(7):881-885. |
| [7] | 张洪. 拉萨市学龄前儿童父母育儿胜任感现状及影响因素的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017. |
| [8] | Johnston C, Mash EJ. A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy[J]. J Clin Child Psychol, 1989,18(2):167-175. |
| [9] | Chou KL, Chi I. Social comparison in Chinese older adults[J]. Aging Ment Health, 2001,5(3):242-252. |
| [10] | 杨芳, 刘烁, 杨冰香, 等. 抑郁情绪自我管理量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 护理研究, 2020,34(19):3413-3417. |
| [11] | 田银娣, 王怡恺, 李静, 等. 焦虑和抑郁量表在肝硬化患者临床应用中的信效度评价[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2019,22(1):105-107. |
| [12] | 茅亦馨, 张子君, 潘姝丞, 等. 威斯康星州肾结石生活质量量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理与康复, 2019,18(10):12-17. |
| [13] | 李牧玲, 王晓艳, 白雪洁, 等. 脑卒中患者病耻感量表结构效度的验证研究[J]. 现代临床护理, 2020,19(5):1-6. |
| [14] | 朱荷燕, 葛丽娜, 陈丹铃. 脑卒中患者保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理与康复, 2020,19(4):1-4. |
| [15] | Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications[M]. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2004. |
| [16] | 程慧慧. 湖南省醴陵地区产褥期女性育儿胜任感现状及其影响因素研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2019. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |