收稿日期: 2021-10-08
网络出版日期: 2022-02-21
基金资助
国家重大疾病多学科合作诊疗能力建设项目(PKUSSNMP-202004);国家自然科学基金(82071171);兰州市创新人才项目(2019-RC-22)
Preliminary clinical application verification of complete digital workflow of design lips symmetry reference plane based on posed smile
Received date: 2021-10-08
Online published: 2022-02-21
Supported by
National Program for Multidisciplinary Cooperative Treatment on Major Diseases(PKUSSNMP-202004);National Natural Science Foundation of China(82071171);Lanzhou Innovative Talents Foundation(2019-RC-22)
目的: 探索数字化技术构建姿势微笑(posed smile)位口唇对称参考平面(symmetry reference plane, SRP)的方法,实现姿势微笑位口唇SRP的自动化构建,并评价其初步应用效果。方法: 收集18名研究对象的三维面部和牙列数据,基于赋权普氏分析(weighted Procrustes analysis,WPA)算法和区域迭代最近点(iterative closest point,ICP)算法,分别构建每位受试者WPA算法和初学者ICP算法的姿势微笑位口唇SRP作为实验组,以专家定义的“真值平面(truth plane,TP)”作为对照组,比较WPA算法和初学者ICP算法确定的SRP与TP间的角度差异。将姿势微笑位下WPA算法自动获得的口唇SRP应用于前牙美学修复的数字化设计,进行临床初步应用评价。结果: 18名受试者姿势微笑位下WPA算法建立的口唇SRP与TP角度差异为1.78°±1.24°,初学者ICP算法建立的口唇SRP与TP角度差异为7.41°±4.31°,二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在前牙美学设计时,参照姿势微笑位下WPA算法自动获得的口唇SRP进行前牙修复体美学设计,受试者评分为(8.48±0.57)分;常规数字化方案按照原有牙列对称平面进行修复体设计,受试者评分为(5.20±1.31)分,二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论: WPA算法自动构建的姿势微笑位口唇SRP较初学者ICP算法更准确,与“真值平面”非常相近,可以为口腔美学分析和设计提供重要参考,参照WPA算法自动构建的口唇SRP进行前牙修复体设计,能有效促进医患交流,提高患者对修复效果的满意度。
邱淑婷 , 朱玉佳 , 王时敏 , 王飞龙 , 叶红强 , 赵一姣 , 刘云松 , 王勇 , 周永胜 . 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022 , 54(1) : 193 -199 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.031
Objective: To automatically construct lips symmetry reference plane (SRP) based on posed smile, and to evaluate its advantages over conventional digital aesthetic design. Methods: Eighteen subjects’ three-dimensional facial and dentition data were gathered in this study. The lips SRP of experimental groups were used with the standard weighted Procrustes analysis (WPA) algorithm and iterative closest point (ICP), respectively. A reference plane defined by experts based on regional ICP algorithm, served as the truth plane. The angle error values between the lips SRP of WPA algorithm in the experimental groups and the truth plane were evaluated in this study, and the lips SRP of ICP algorithm of the experimental groups was calculated in the same way. The lips SRP based on posed smile as a reference for aesthetic design and evaluate preliminary clinical application. Results: The average angle error between the lips SRP of WPA algorithm and the truth plane was 1.78°±1.24°, which was smaller than that between the lips SRP of ICP and the truth plane 7.41°±4.31°. There were significant differences in the angle errors among the groups (P<0.05). In the aesthetic design of anterior teeth, automatically constructing the lips SRP of WPA algorithm based on posed smile and the original symmetry plane by re-ference compared with the prosthetic design, the subjects’ scores on the lips SRP of WPA algorithm based on posed smile (8.48±0.57) were higher than those on the original symmetry plane (5.20±1.31). Conclusion: Automatically constructing the lips SRP of WPA algorithm based on posed smile was more accurate than ICP algorithm, which was consistent with the truth plane. Moreover, it can provide an important reference for oral aesthetic diagnosis and aesthetic analysis of the restoration effect. In the aesthetic design of anterior teeth, automatically constructing the lips SRP of WPA algorithm based on posed smile can improve the patients’ satisfaction in esthetic rehabilitation.
| [1] | Havens DC, Mcnamara JA, Sigler LM, et al. The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics[J]. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80(2):322-328. |
| [2] | van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Age-related changes of the dental aesthetic zone at rest and during spontaneous smiling and speech[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2008, 30(4):366-373. |
| [3] | Kokich V. Esthetics and anterior tooth position: An orthodontic perspective. Part Ⅲ: Mediolateral relationships[J]. J Esthet Dent, 1993, 5(5):200-207. |
| [4] | Haraguchi S, Iguchi Y, Takada K. Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2008, 78(3):421-426. |
| [5] | O’Grady KF, Antonyshyn OM. Facial asymmetry: Three-dimensional analysis using laser surface scanning[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1999, 104(4):928-937. |
| [6] | Momi ED, Chapuis J, Pappas I, et al. Automatic extraction of the mid-facial plane for cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006, 35(7):636-642. |
| [7] | Du S, Xu Y, Wan T, et al. Robust iterative closest point algorithm based on global reference point for rotation invariant registration[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(11):e0188039. |
| [8] | Verhoeven TJ, Nolte JW, Maal TJJ, et al. Unilateral condylar hyperplasia: A 3-dimensional quantification of asymmetry[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(3):e59391. |
| [9] | Gateno J, Jajoo A, Nicol M, et al. The primal sagittal plane of the head: A new concept[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 45(3):399-405. |
| [10] | Chetverikov D, Stepanov D, Krsek P. Robust Euclidean alignment of 3D point sets: The trimmed iterative closest point algorithm[J]. Image Vis Comput, 2005, 23(3):299-309. |
| [11] | 朱玉佳, 赵一姣, 郑盛文, 等. 基于赋权形态学分析的三维面部对称参考平面构建方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1):220-226. |
| [12] | 李立美, 李风兰, 杨红霞. 140名山西籍青年人微笑美学定性指标初步分析[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2021, 22(2):129-133. |
| [13] | 徐成华, 王蕴红, 谭铁牛. 三维人脸建模与应用[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2004, 9(8):1-11. |
| [14] | 刘云松, 叶红强, 谷明, 等. 患者参与的数字化设计在前牙美学修复中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(1):90-94. |
| [15] | Zhao JM, Ji LL, Han MQ, et al. Lip morphology estimation models based on three-dimensional images in a modern adult population from China[J]. Int J Legal Med, 2021, 135(5):1887-1901. |
| [16] | Zhu Y, Zheng S, Yang G, et al. A novel method for 3D face symmetry reference plane based on weighted Procrustes analysis algorithm[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1):319. |
| [17] | 叶红强, 柳玉树, 王冠博, 等. 三维数字化仿真设计与实现技术在前牙美学修复中的应用[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(10):729-736. |
| [18] | 骆小平. 数字化技术在牙科全瓷美学修复中的应用[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2017, 10(8):449-451. |
| [19] | McNamara L, McNamara JA Jr, Ackerman MB, et al. Hard- and soft-tissue contributions to the esthetics of the posed smile in growing patients seeking orthodontic treatment[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(4):491-499. |
| [20] | 王时敏, 李峥, 王冠博, 等. 全程数字化夜磨牙保护牙合垫的制作和初步应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1):105-110. |
| [21] | Sun KM, Joo LE, Song IJ, et al. The location of midfacial landmarks according to the method of establishing the midsagittal reference plane in three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of facial asymmetry[J]. Imaging Sci Dent, 2015, 45(4):227-232. |
| [22] | Young CK. Analysis of facial asymmetry[J]. Arch Craniofac Surg, 2015, 16(1):1-10. |
| [23] | 黄佳梦, 李娟, 林军. 面部不对称畸形评估的研究进展[J]. 中国医疗美容, 2019, 9(6):121-128. |
| [24] | 米雁翎, 西文琼, 邓延伟, 等. 骨性Ⅲ类错伴骨性偏颌的正畸-正颌联合治疗[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(6):391-395. |
| [25] | 胡祥莹, 肖燕, 王璧霞, 等. 成人错牙合畸形患者正颌手术治疗决策的质性研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(5):513-517. |
| [26] | Silva BP, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Finkel S, et al. Layperson’s preference regarding orientation of the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line from the frontal perspective[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 117(4):513-516. |
| [27] | Silva BP, Mahn E, Stanley K, et al. The facial flow concept: An organic orofacial analysis, the vertical component[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 121(2):189-194. |
| [28] | Koseoglu M, Bayindir F. Effect of variations in facial flow curves on the perceptions of smile esthetics by laypeople [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, S0022-3913(21)00320-6. |
| [29] | Gibelli D, Pucciarelli V, Poppa P, et al. Three-dimensional facial anatomy evaluation: Reliability of laser scanner consecutive scans procedure in comparison with stereophotogrammetry[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2018, 46(10):1807-1813. |
| [30] | Wu J, Heike C, Birgfeld C, et al. Measuring symmetry in children with unrepaired cleft lip: Defining a standard for the three-dimensional midfacial reference plane[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2016, 53(6):695-704. |
| [31] | 卢长宝, 黄桂艳. 过多选择效应:概念演化、发生前提及行为决策机制[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 32(5):108-117. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
