论著

我国18岁及以上人群家庭健康功能、大五人格与吸烟的关系

  • 闵鹤葳 ,
  • 吴一波 ,
  • 孙昕霙
展开
  • 北京大学公共卫生学院社会医学与健康教育学系, 北京 100191

收稿日期: 2022-02-10

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-14

Relation of smoking status to family health and personality traits in residents aged over 18 years in China

  • He-wei MIN ,
  • Yi-bo WU ,
  • Xin-ying SUN
Expand
  • Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China

Received date: 2022-02-10

  Online published: 2022-06-14

摘要

目的: 探究我国18岁及以上人群家庭健康功能、大五人格与吸烟行为的关系。方法: 选取《2021年中国家庭健康指数调查报告》中18岁及以上人群作为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、家庭健康量表简版、大五人格量表简版收集信息,采用二分类Logistic回归分析人口学特征、家庭健康功能、大五人格对吸烟行为的影响情况。结果: 纳入的18岁及以上人群共10 315例,其中有2 171例吸烟者,吸烟率为21.05%,男性吸烟率为41.76%,女性吸烟率为3.69%,城市吸烟率为20.03%,农村吸烟率为23.77%。吸烟者在总体家庭健康功能、家庭内部情感交流、家庭健康生活方式、家庭健康资源、家庭外部社会支持以及宜人性、神经质、开放性中的得分低于不吸烟者,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄>35岁、文化程度低、离异是我国成人吸烟的危险因素(P < 0.05);女性、未婚、核心家庭、家庭内部情感交流良好、家庭健康资源丰富、人格特质为宜人性、神经质、开放性是我国成人吸烟的保护因素(P < 0.05)。结论: 除性别、年龄、常住地、文化程度、婚姻状况、家庭人均月收入、家庭类型等吸烟的传统影响因素外,家庭健康功能及大五人格亦是我国成人吸烟行为的影响因素。今后可针对不同人群家庭健康功能状况及人格的多样性,采取个性化的控烟措施。

本文引用格式

闵鹤葳 , 吴一波 , 孙昕霙 . 我国18岁及以上人群家庭健康功能、大五人格与吸烟的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 54(3) : 483 -489 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.013

Abstract

Objective: To explore the relation of smoking status to family health and personality traits in residents aged over 18 years in China by binary Logistic regression analysis, to identify the psychosocial factors that influence tobacco use, and to provide evidence to predict smoking susceptibility based on personality traits and prevent smoking at individual and family levels. Methods: Residents aged over 18 years in China were selected from "the Survey of Chinese Family Health Index (2021)". General characteristic questionnaire, short-form of family health scale, 10-item big five inventory were used to collect sociodemographic information, family health function and personality traits. And the relation of smoking status to family health and personality traits were analyzed by binary Logistic regression analysis. Results: Totally 10 315 adults were collected, of whom there were 2 171 smokers. The smoking rate was 21.05%, 41.76% of the residents were male, 3.69% female, 20.03% urban, 23.77% rural, 12.60% aged between 18 and 35 years, 27.11% aged between 36 and 59 years, 34.35% aged over 60 years, and the smoking rate varied in gender, location, age, education, marital status, family types, and average household monthly income (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the scores of family health, family social and emotional health processes, family healthy lifestyle, family health resources, family external social support, agreeableness, openness, and neuroticism among smokers were lower than those of the non-smokers (P < 0.05). The results of binary Logistic regression analysis showed that the residents over 35 years old, with low educational level and divorced were the risk factors to smoking (P < 0.05), while female, unmarried, nuclear family, high scores of family social and emotional health processes and family health resources, openness, neuroticism, and agreeableness were the protective factors to smoking (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Besides gender, age, location, education, marital status, family types and average household monthly income, family health, and personality traits were also important factors influencing smoking status. Tobacco control based on personality traits and family health is essential, and more convincing research is necessary to determine the relation of tobacco use, tobacco dependence and smoking cessation to family health and personality traits.

参考文献

1 中国疾病预防控制中心. 2018中国成人烟草调查内容摘要[EB/OL]. (2019-08-14)[2021-12-20]. https://www.chinacdc.cn/jkzt/sthd_3844/slhd_12885/201908/t20190814_204616.html.
2 张晗, 贺小桃, 张金良, 等. 淮河流域农村女性被动吸烟状况及相关因素分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2021, 29 (12): 910- 913.
3 Sharma R , Martins N , Tripathi A , et al. Influence of family environment and tobacco addiction: A short report from a post-graduate teaching hospital, India[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17 (8): 2868.
4 Steeger CM , Epstein M , Hill KG , et al. Time-varying effects of family smoking and family management on adolescent daily smoking: The moderating roles of behavioral disinhibition and anxiety[J]. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2019, 204, 107572.
5 Luk TT , Wang MP , Leung LT , et al. Perceived family relationship quality and use of poly-tobacco products during early and late adolescence[J]. Addict Behav, 2018, 85, 38- 42.
6 陈霄雯, 陈昊, 施莉莉, 等. 妊娠期家庭控烟现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2015, 18 (30): 3697- 3703.
7 曹蓉, 蔡秋茂, 许燕君, 等. 广东省居民现在吸烟行为与家庭环境因素关系的研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2014, 35 (5): 479- 483.
8 Chen Y , Gao L , Lippke S , et al. Harmonious personality and work-family conflicts: The multiple mediating roles of social support and self-control[J]. Psych J, 2021, 10 (6): 889- 897.
9 Perkins PS , Slane JD , Klump KL . Personality clusters and family relationships in women with disordered eating symptoms[J]. Eat Behav, 2013, 14 (3): 299- 308.
10 赵雅芬, 何冠豪, 黄丽华, 等. 学龄前儿童多动行为与父母D型人格及家庭环境的关系[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2021, 25 (5): 583- 588.
11 吴沁芳. 人格和谐: 现代家庭和谐的重要构成维度[J]. 学术论坛, 2007, (9): 48- 52.
12 Hakulinen C , Hintsanen M , Munafo MR , et al. Personality and smoking: Individual-participant meta-analysis of nine cohort studies[J]. Addiction, 2015, 110 (11): 1844- 1852.
13 Sallis HM , Smith GD , Munafo MR . Cigarette smoking and perso-nality: Interrogating causality using Mendelian randomisation[J]. Psychol Med, 2019, 49 (13): 2197- 2205.
14 冯永辉, 虞质叶, 李荔. 压力、人格与社会支持对青少年吸烟行为影响[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2016, 32 (5): 580- 583.
15 Weiss-Laxer NS , Crandall A , Okano L , et al. Building a foundation for family health measurement in national surveys: A modified Delphi expert process[J]. Matern Child Health J, 2020, 24 (3): 259- 266.
16 Crandall A , Weiss-Laxer NS , Broadbent E , et al. The family health scale: Reliability and validity of a short-and long-form[J]. Front Public Health, 2020, 8, 587125.
17 Carciofo R , Yang J , Song N , et al. Psychometric evaluation of Chinese-language 44-item and 10-item Big Five personality inventories, including correlations with chronotype, mindfulness and mind wandering[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11 (2): e0149963.
18 Nikcevic AV , Marino C , Kolubinski DC , et al. Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. J Affect Disord, 2021, 279, 578- 584.
19 Johann D , Steinbrecher M , Thomas K . Channels of participation: Political participant types and personality[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15 (10): e0240671.
20 Eichenberg C , Schott M , Schroiff A . Problematic smartphone use-comparison of students with and without problematic smartphone use in light of personality[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2020, 11, 599241.
21 苏弘博, 范俐娟, 吕艺, 等. 沈阳市18岁以上城市居民吸烟行为及影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2021, 38 (4): 572- 574.
22 丛舒, 王宁, 樊静, 等. 我国40岁及以上吸烟人群烟草依赖严重程度及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2021, 42 (5): 807- 813.
23 李春青, 王骏. 教育对健康的影响: 基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的分析[J]. 北京社会科学, 2017, (11): 56- 69.
24 袁斌, 崔玉虎, 岳方舟. 居民收入水平对非健康消费行为的影响: 以吸烟为例[J]. 消费经济, 2021, 37 (5): 56- 66.
25 邓雅丽, 刘晓芬, 何莹, 等. 北京市房山区居民吸烟行为的调查分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2019, 27 (7): 528- 532.
26 Daines CL , Hansen D , Novilla MLB , et al. Effects of positive and negative childhood experiences on adult family health[J]. BMC Public Health, 2021, 21 (1): 651.
27 卢灿广, 郑频频, 刘晓晓, 等. 上海市青浦区成年男性吸烟者戒烟意愿及影响因素[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2016, 33 (5): 466- 470.
28 van den Berg SM , de Moor MH , Verweij KJ , et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for extraversion: Findings from the genetics of personality consortium[J]. Behav Genet, 2016, 46 (2): 170- 182.
29 Haas SA , Schaefer DR . With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation[J]. J Health Soc Behav, 2014, 55 (2): 126- 143.
文章导航

/