论著

无症状中国年轻人颈椎矢状位曲度正常值及其与全脊柱平衡的关系

  • 唐彦超 ,
  • 赵文奎 ,
  • 于淼 ,
  • 刘晓光
展开
  • 1. 北京大学第三医院骨科,北京 100191
    2. 北京大学第三医院疼痛科,北京 100191

收稿日期: 2021-05-25

  网络出版日期: 2022-08-11

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81972103)

Normative values of cervical sagittal alignment according to the whole spine balance: Based on 126 asymptomatic Chinese young adults

  • Yan-chao TANG ,
  • Wen-kui ZHAO ,
  • Miao YU ,
  • Xiao-guang LIU
Expand
  • 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Pain Medicine Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China

Received date: 2021-05-25

  Online published: 2022-08-11

Supported by

General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81972103)

摘要

目的: 探讨无症状中国年轻人颈椎矢状位曲度的正常值及其与全脊柱平衡的关系。方法: 2011年11月—2014年12月招募并选择年龄18~30岁的志愿者行全脊柱侧位X线检查,在X线片上测量指标包括C0-C2角、从C2-C3到C6-C7的间盘角、从C3到C7的椎体角、T1倾斜角、胸椎后凸角(thoracic kyphosis, TK)、腰椎前凸角(lumbar lordosis, LL)、骨盆入射角(pelvic incidence, PI)、骶骨倾斜角(sacral slope, SS)、C2-C7矢状轴向垂线(C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, C2-C7SVA)、头重心至C7的矢状位轴向垂线(center of gravity of head to C7SVA, CGH-C7SVA)、C7到S1的矢状位轴向垂线(C7-S1SVA)。依据脊柱骨盆矢状位形态进行Roussouly分型,比较不同Roussouly分型下的颈椎曲度及形态。结果: 共纳入126名志愿者参与研究,其中男性67名,女性59名,平均年龄(21.4±2.3)岁。C0-C7前凸角平均为26.0°±12.8°,其中C0-C2前凸角平均为15.2°±6.7°,C2-C3到C6-C7间盘前凸角总和平均为9.1°±12.1°,C3到C7的椎体前凸角总和平均仅为1.4°±10.2°。C2-C7SVA(18.6±7.9) mm和CGH-C7SVA[(22.9±12.3) mm]由C7-S1SVA[(-21.6±31.0) mm]完美代偿。不同的Roussouly分型间颈椎曲度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。颈椎曲度与T1倾斜角(P < 0.01)、胸椎后凸角(P < 0.01)有显着相关性。从T1倾斜角到C0-C2角,相邻节段间盘角之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.05)。结论: 测量并计算了无症状中国年轻人颈椎椎体角和间盘角的正常值,发现颈椎前凸主要发生在C0-C2和椎间盘水平,这些角度受到其他脊柱部位形态(T1倾斜角、胸椎后凸角和Roussouly分型)的影响,且相邻间盘角之间存在显著的相关性。

本文引用格式

唐彦超 , 赵文奎 , 于淼 , 刘晓光 . 无症状中国年轻人颈椎矢状位曲度正常值及其与全脊柱平衡的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022 , 54(4) : 712 -718 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.04.021

Abstract

Objective: To explore the normal distribution of cervical sagittal alignment and the relationship between cervical alignment and global spine balance in asymptomatic young adults. Methods: A cohort of 272 asymptomatic Chinese adults (including 161 males and 111 females, with an average age of (23.2±4.4) years, ranging from 18 to 45 years) were prospectively recruited from November 2011 to December 2014. The C0-C2 angle, disk angles from C2-C3 to C6-C7, vertebral angles from C3 to C7, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7SVA), center of gravity of head to C7SVA (CGH-C7SVA), C7-S1SVA were measured and statistically analyzed. All the subjects were categorized with the Roussouly classification and the cervical morphologies were evaluated as lordotic, straight, sigmoid or kyphotic. Spinal sagittal alignment parameters were compared between different sexes and Roussouly classifications with independent student t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Chi-square test. Correlations between cervical sagittal alignment and global spine sagittal alignment were calculated using the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient. Linear regression analysis was performed. Results: Sixty-seven males and 59 females aged from 18 to 30 years old were included in the study. The mean value of C0-C7 was 26.0°±12.8°, composed of 15.2°±6.7° for C0-C2, 9.1°±12.1° for sum of disk angles from C2-C3 to C6-C7, and 1.4°±10.2° for sum of vertebral angles from C3 to C7. C2-C7SVA [(18.6±7.9) mm] and CGH-C7SVA [(22.9±12.3) mm]were offset ideally by C7-S1SVA [(-21.6±31.0) mm]. Males had a larger T1 slope (P < 0.05) and accordingly, a larger cervical lordosis C2-C7 (P < 0.01) and C0-C7 angle (P < 0.01) than females. Males had a smaller C7-S1SVA (P < 0.01) and accordingly, a smaller CGH-C7SVA (P=0.165) than females. Significant difference was found between cervical alignment of different Roussouly types (P < 0.01). In general, a larger LL was consistent with a set of larger TK, C2-C7angle, C0-C7 angle, and vice versa. There was no significant correlation between cervical morphology and the Roussouly classification (Chi-square=10.548, P=0.308). There was significant correlation between cervical alignment and T1 slope (P < 0.01), TK (P < 0.01). There was significant correlation between adjacent segmental angles from T1 slope up to C0-C2 angle (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Normative values of each vertebral angle and disk angle were established. The cervical lordosis occurred mainly at C0-C2 and disk levels, which was influenced by parameters of other parts of the spine, such as T1 slope, TK and the Roussouly classification. There was significant correlation between adjacent disk angles.

参考文献

1 Le Huec JC , Demezon H , Aunoble S . Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24 (1): 63- 71.
2 Lee SH , Son ES , Seo EM , et al. Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment[J]. Spine J, 2015, 15 (4): 705- 712.
3 Nunez-Pereira S , Hitzl W , Bullmann V , et al. Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: an analysis of occipitocervical and spinopelvic interdependence, with C-7 slope as a marker of cervical and spinopelvic alignment[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 23 (1): 16- 23.
4 Sakai K , Yoshii T , Hirai T , et al. Cervical sagittal imbalance is a predictor of kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41 (4): 299- 305.
5 Kato M , Namikawa T , Matsumura A , et al. Effect of cervical sagittal balance on laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy[J]. Global Spine J, 2017, 7 (2): 154- 161.
6 Theologis AA , Iyer S , Lenke LG , et al. Cervical and cervicothoracic sagittal alignment according to Roussouly thoracolumbar subtypes[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019, 44 (11): E634- E639.
7 Pepke W , Almansour H , Lafage R , et al. Cervical spine alignment following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): A pre-to-post analysis of 81 patients[J]. BMC Surg, 2019, 19 (1): 7.
8 Khalil N , Bizdikian AJ , Bakouny Z , et al. Cervical and postural strategies for maintaining horizontal gaze in asymptomatic adults[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27 (11): 2700- 2709.
9 Yu M , Zhao WK , Li M , et al. Analysis of cervical and global spine alignment under Roussouly sagittal classification in Chinese cervical spondylotic patients and asymptomatic subjects[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24 (6): 1265- 1273.
10 Hardacker JW , Shuford RF , Capicotto PN , et al. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22 (13): 1472- 1480.
11 Ohara A , Miyamoto K , Naganawa T , et al. Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31 (22): 2585.
12 Roussouly P , Gollogly S , Berthonnaud E , et al. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2005, 30 (3): 346- 353.
13 Diebo BG , Challier V , Henry JK , et al. Predicting cervical alignment required to maintain horizontal gaze based on global spinal alignment[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41 (23): 1795- 1800.
14 Patwardhan AG , Khayatzadeh S , Havey RM , et al. Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27 (Suppl 1): 25- 38.
15 Nori S , Shiraishi T , Aoyama R , et al. Upper cervical lordosis compensates lower cervical kyphosis to maintain whole cervical lordosis after selective laminectomy[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2018, 58, 64- 69.
16 Kim JT , Lee HJ , Choi DY , et al. Sequential alignment change of the cervical spine after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the lower cervical spine[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25 (7): 2223- 2232.
17 Kim JH , Park JY , Yi S , et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion alters whole-spine sagittal alignment[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2015, 56 (4): 1060- 1070.
18 Tang R , Ye IB , Cheung ZB , et al. Age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment: A radiographic analysis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019, 44 (19): E1144- E1150.
19 Iyer S , Lenke LG , Nemani VM , et al. Variations in occipitocervical and cervicothoracic alignment parameters based on age: A prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41 (23): 1837- 1844.
20 Yang BS , Lee SK , Song KS , et al. The use of T1 sagittal angle in predicting cervical disc degeneration[J]. Asian Spine J, 2015, 9 (5): 757- 761.
21 Mac-Thiong JM , Roussouly P , Berthonnaud E , et al. Sagittal parameters of global spinal balance: normative values from a prospective cohort of seven hundred nine Caucasian asymptomatic adults[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35 (22): E1193- E1198.
22 Lee CS , Chung SS , Kang KC , et al. Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2011, 36 (25): E1648- E1654.
23 Zhu Z , Xu L , Zhu F , et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39 (1): E1- E6.
24 Gutman G , Labelle H , Barchi S , et al. Normal sagittal parameters of global spinal balance in children and adolescents: A prospective study of 646 asymptomatic subjects[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25 (11): 3650- 3657.
文章导航

/