论著

妊娠合并炎症性肠病的临床特点

  • 马会超 ,
  • 李军 ,
  • 王永清
展开
  • 1. 北京大学第三医院妇产科,国家妇产疾病临床医学研究中心,辅助生殖教育部重点实验室,生殖内分泌与辅助生殖技术北京市重点实验室,北京 100191
    2. 北京大学第三医院消化科,北京 100191
    3. 河北省宁晋县医院妇产科,河北邢台 055550

收稿日期: 2022-12-03

  网络出版日期: 2024-04-10

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2022YFC2703504)

Clinical characteristics of pregnancy complicated with inflammatory bowel disease

  • Huichao MA ,
  • Jun LI ,
  • Yongqing WANG
Expand
  • 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinolgy and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ningjin County Hospital of Hebei, Xingtai 055550, Hebei, China

Received date: 2022-12-03

  Online published: 2024-04-10

Supported by

the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFC2703504)

摘要

目的: 分析炎症性肠病(inflammatory bowel diseases,IBD)病例妊娠前、妊娠期及哺乳期的临床特点。方法: 收集2011年9月至2022年6月北京大学第三医院产科收治的妊娠合并IBD并分娩的病例资料,回顾分析其临床特点;按照妊娠前、妊娠期及哺乳期的疾病状态分为疾病活动组和缓解组,比较两组妊娠前咨询、营养状况、妊娠及分娩并发症、分娩孕周、分娩方式及新生儿结局。结果: 共纳入妊娠合并IBD 33位,其中7位分娩二胎,共40例分娩,包括自然受孕36例(90.0%)和辅助生殖4例(10.0%)。40例分娩中,妊娠前、妊娠期及哺乳期IBD持续处于缓解期21例(52.5%),活动期19例(47.5%),其中8例(42.1%)因自行停用药物或未按医嘱规律服药疾病发生活动。疾病缓解组与活动组相比,妊娠前咨询率更高(57.1% vs. 15.8%,P=0.010),血红蛋白[(112.67±8.53) g/L vs. (102.84±5.23) g/L,P<0.001]、血清总蛋白[(66.58±6.34) g/L vs. (60.83±6.25) g/L,P=0.006]、血清白蛋白[36.4(35.1,38.3) g/L vs. 34.3(31.1,35.6) g/L,P=0.006]、血钙[(2.25±0.10) μmol/L vs. (2.13±0.15) μmol/L,P=0.004]水平更高,妊娠期高血压疾病发生率更低(0 vs. 31.6%,P=0.007)。40例中经阴道分娩27例(67.5%),剖宫产13例(32.5%)。新生儿结局分析结果表明,足月产38例,早产2例;巨大儿1例,小于胎龄儿1例,低出生体重儿1例,出生缺陷3例;转入新生儿重症监护病房10例,其中新生儿感染4例,新生儿黄疸2例。结论: 妊娠前咨询和评估对IBD患者至关重要,经过妊娠期精细管理,大多数病例可以得到良好的妊娠结局。

本文引用格式

马会超 , 李军 , 王永清 . 妊娠合并炎症性肠病的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024 , 56(2) : 260 -266 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.02.009

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in pre-pregnancy, pregancy and loctation. Methods: The clinical data of pregnancy complicated with IBD in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Peking University Third Hospital and deli-very from September 2011 to June 2022 were collected. The clinical characteristics of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. According to the state of diseases during pre-pregnancy, pregnancy and lactation, the patients were divided into active and remission group, and the two groups were compared interms of pre-pregnancy counseling, nutritional status, pregnancy and delivery complications, gestational week, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcome. Results: A total of 33 pregnant women with IBD were included in this study, of which 7 delivered a second child, for a total of 40 deliveries, with 36 natural pregnancies (90.0%) and 4 assisted reproductions (10.0%). Among the 40 cases, 21 cases (52.5%) were sustained in remission in pre-pregnancy, pregnancy and lactation, and 19 cases (47.5%) in disease activity, of which 8 cases (42.1%) were due to self-withdrawal of drugs or failure to take medicine regularly. Compared with the activity group, the disease remission group had a higher rate of pre-pregnancy counseling (57.1% vs. 15.8%, P=0.010), and higher levels of hemoglobin [(112.67±8.53) g/L vs. (102.84±5.23) g/L, P < 0.001], serum total protein [(66.58±6.34) g/L vs. (60.83±6.25) g/L, P=0.006], serum albumin [36.4 (35.1, 38.3) g/L vs. 34.3 (31.1, 35.6) g/L, P=0.006], serum calcium [(2.25±0.10) μmol/L vs. (2.13±0.15) μmol/L, P=0.004], but a lower incidence of gestational hypertensive disorders (0 vs. 31.6%, P=0.007). In 40 deliveries, there were 27 cases of vaginal delivery (67.5%), 13 cases of cesarean section (32.5%). The analysis of neonatal outcomes showed 38 full-term deliveries and 2 preterm deliveries; 1 case of macrosomia, 1 case of small-for-gestational-age, 1 case of low birth weight and 3 cases of birth defects. There were 10 newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care unit, including 4 cases of neonatal infections and 2 cases of neonatal jaundice. Conclusion: Pre-pregnancy counseling and evaluation of IBD patients are very important, and good pregnancy outcomes can be obtained through careful management during pregnancy in the most of the patients.

参考文献

1 van der Giessen J , Huang VW , van der Woude CJ , et al. Modulatory effects of pregnancy on inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2019, 10 (3): e00009.
2 Bandoli G , Singh N , Strouse J , et al. Mediation of adverse pregnancy outcomes in autoimmune conditions by pregnancy complications: A mediation analysis of autoimmune conditions and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2020, 72 (2): 256- 264.
3 Torres J , Chaparro M , Julsgaard M , et al. European Crohn's and colitis guidelines on sexuality, fertility, pregnancy, and lactation[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2023, 17 (1): 1- 27.
4 中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病学组. 炎症性肠病诊断与治疗的共识意见(2018年, 北京)[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2018, 38 (5): 292- 311.
5 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛, 等. 妇产科学[M]. 9版 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
6 中国营养学会. 中国妇女妊娠期体重监测与评价: T/CNSS 009—2021[S]. 北京: 中国营养学会, 2021: 1-4.
7 Laube R , Yau Y , Selinger CP , et al. Knowledge and attitudes towards pregnancy in females with inflammatory bowel disease: An international, multi-centre study[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2020, 14 (9): 1248- 1255.
8 中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病学组. 炎症性肠病妊娠期管理的专家共识意见[J]. 中华炎性肠病杂志(中英文), 2019, 3 (4): 284- 295.
9 中华医学会消化病学分会炎症性肠病学组, 中华医学会肠外与肠内营养学分会胃肠病与营养协作组. 炎症性肠病营养支持治疗专家共识(第二版)[J]. 中华炎性肠病杂志(中英文), 2018, 2 (3): 154- 172.
10 Bell SJ , Flanagan EK . Updates in the management of inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy[J]. Med J Aust, 2019, 210 (6): 276- 280.
11 Zhang Y , Zhang L , Gao X , et al. Validation of the GLIM criteria for diagnosis of malnutrition and quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter, prospective, observational study[J]. Clin Nutr, 2022, 41 (6): 1297- 1306.
12 Ives CW , Sinkey R , Rajapreyar I , et al. Preeclampsia-patho-physiology and clinical presentations: JACC state-of-the-art review[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020, 76 (14): 1690- 1702.
13 Tarar ZI , Farooq U , Zafar MU , et al. A national study of pregnancy- related maternal and fetal outcomes in women with inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2022, 37 (7): 1535- 1543.
14 Stevens GA , Finucane MM , De-Regil LM , et al. Global, regio-nal, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995-2011: A systematic analysis of population-representative data[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2013, 1 (1): e16- e25.
15 赵思宇, 景文展, 刘珏, 等. 中国妇女2012—2016年妊娠期贫血患病状况的Meta分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2018, 52 (9): 951- 957.
16 Abdul SA , West J , Ban L , et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study from England[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2016, 22 (7): 1621- 1630.
17 Meyer A , Drouin J , Weill A , et al. Pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease: A French nationwide study 2010-2018[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2020, 52 (9): 1480- 1490.
18 Chaparro M , Kunovsky L , Aguas M , et al. Surgery due to inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy: Mothers and offspring outcomes from an ECCO confer multicentre case series [scar study][J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2022, 16 (9): 1428- 1435.
19 国家卫生和计划生育委员会办公厅. 早产儿保健工作规范[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2017, 20 (6): 6.
20 Li HT , Hellerstein S , Zhou YB , et al. Trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008-2018[J]. JAMA, 2020, 323 (1): 89- 91.
21 Burgess CJ , Schnier C , Wood R , et al. Prematurity, delivery method, and infant feeding type are not associated with paediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease risk: A Scottish retrospective birth cohort study[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2022, 16 (8): 1235- 1242.
22 Foulon A , Dupas JL , Sabbagh C , et al. Defining the most appropriate delivery mode in women with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2017, 23 (5): 712- 720.
23 Lever G , Chipeta H , Glanville T , et al. Perineal outcomes after delivery in 179 mothers with inflammatory bowel disease compared to 31 258 controls: A single-centre cohort study[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2022, 16 (3): 511- 514.
24 Burnett D , Brown MM , Otley A , et al. The association between caesarean section and inflammatory bowel disease in childhood and young adulthood: Findings from 2 retrospective cohort studies[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2020, 71 (3): e84- e89.
25 Peyrin-Biroulet L , Panés J , Sandborn WJ , et al. Defining disease severity in inflammatory bowel diseases: Current and future directions[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 14 (3): 348- 354.
26 Kane S , Lemieux N . The role of breastfeeding in postpartum disease activity in women with inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005, 100 (1): 102- 105.
27 Ananthakrishnan AN , Bernstein CN , Iliopoulos D , et al. Environmental triggers in IBD: A review of progress and evidence[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 15 (1): 39- 49.
28 Gubatan J , Nielsen OH , Levitte S , et al. Biologics during pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease and risk of infantile infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2021, 116 (2): 243- 253.
文章导航

/