Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 641-645. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.04.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Classification and microsurgical treatment of primary tethered cord syndrome in adults

Guo-zhong LIN,Jing-cheng XIE*(),Xiao-dong CHEN,Jun YANG   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital; Precision Neurosurgery and Tumor Research Center, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2020-09-28 Online:2023-08-18 Published:2023-08-03
  • Contact: Jing-cheng XIE E-mail:ab1965@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81601200);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project(PKU2020LCXQ004)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To summarize the clinical manifestation, classification, and experience of surgical treatment of primary tethered cord syndrome (TCS) in adults. Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed a series of 171 adult patients with primary TCS who were surgically treated under microscope from March 2007 to October 2019. There were 61 males and 110 females whose ages were 18-65 years, with an average age of (39.02±11.81) years. Clinically, the patients presented with various neurological symptoms and signs including lower back and legs pain, reflex changes, sensory disturbances, muscle weakness, and sphincter problems. They were divided into 5 types by clinical manifestations and neuro-imaging features: (1) filum terminale traction in 69 cases, (2) split cord malformation in 21 cases, (3) myelomeningocele in 20 cases, (4) lipomyelomeningocele in 36 cases, and (5) dermal sinus traction in 25 cases. All the patients underwent microsurgery to untether the spinal cord. The patients kept prone position 7 days postoperatively. The Kirollos grading was used to evaluate the outcome of intraoperative untethering. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain, the score of critical muscle strength was used to evaluate the lower extremity motor function, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) sphincter function score was used to evaluate the bladder function. Results: All of the 171 patients were treated with microsurgery to release the adhesion and cut off the filum terminalis. 61 cases of them received resection of the lesions according to the etiology. All the tethered spinal cord reached Kirollos grade Ⅰ untethering and the dural sac was reconstructed. Other than 5 patients had cerebrospinal fluid leakage and incision laceration and underwent re-suture, there was no surgical complication. The local pain was relieved, the lower limbs weakness or bowel and bladder dysfunction gradually recovered postoperatively. The period of follow-up ranged from 6 months to 12.5 years with an average of (5.62±2.31) years. The neurological function was improved in 153 cases and stable in 18 cases. There was no recurrence of tethered cord be found during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The primary TCS in adulthood could be classified into 5 types by clinical manifestations and neuro-imaging features and surgical treatment should be undertaken in regard to the classifications including dissection and resection of the lesion detethering the spinal cord and reconstruction of the dura sac under microscope. The outcome of surgical treatment is satisfactory.

Key words: Tethered cord syndrome, Filum terminale, Spina bifida, Microsurgery

CLC Number: 

  • R651.2

Figure 1

Preoperative sagittal MRI of five types of primary TCS in adults A, filum terminalis stretch; B, split cord malformation; C, myelomeningocele; D, lipomyelomeningocele; E, dermal sinus traction. TCS, tethered cord syndrome; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging."

1 Garceau GJ . The filum terminale syndrome (the cord-traction syndrome)[J]. J Bong Joint Surg Am, 1953, 35 (3): 711- 716.
doi: 10.2106/00004623-195335030-00020
2 Hoffman HJ , Hendrick EB , Humphreys RP . The tethered spinal cord: Its protean manifestations, diagnosis and surgical correction[J]. Childs Brain, 1976, 2 (3): 145- 155.
3 Yamada S , Zinke DE , Sanders D . Pathophysiology of "tethered cord syndrome"[J]. J Neurosurg, 1981, 54 (4): 494- 503.
doi: 10.3171/jns.1981.54.4.0494
4 Bradko V , Castillo H , Janardhan S , et al. Towards guideline-based management of tethered cord syndrome in spina bifida: A global health paradigm shift in the era of prenatal surgery[J]. Neurospine, 2019, 16 (4): 715- 727.
doi: 10.14245/ns.1836342.171
5 Hoffman HJ , Taecholarn C , Hendrick EB , et al. Management of lipomyelomeningoceles. Experience at the hospital for sick children, Toronto[J]. J Neurosurg, 1985, 62 (1): 1- 8.
doi: 10.3171/jns.1985.62.1.0001
6 Pang D , Dias MS , Ahab-Barmada M . Split cord malformation: Part Ⅰ: A unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations[J]. Neurosurgery, 1992, 31 (3): 451- 480.
doi: 10.1227/00006123-199209000-00010
7 Chapman PH . Congenital intraspinal lipomas: Anatomic conside-rations and surgical treatment[J]. Childs Brain, 1982, 9 (1): 37- 47.
8 Kirollos RW , van Hille PT . Evaluation of surgery for the tethered cord syndrome using a new grading system[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 1996, 10 (3): 253- 260.
doi: 10.1080/02688699650040106
9 Hukuda S , Mochizuki T , Ogata M , et al. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1985, 67 (4): 609- 615.
10 Copp AJ , Stanier P , Greene ND . Neural tube defects: Recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12 (8): 799- 810.
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70110-8
11 Gupta A , Rajshekhar V . Fatty filum terminale (FFT) as a secondary tethering element in children with closed spinal dysraphism[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2018, 34 (5): 925- 932.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3700-y
12 Thompson EM , StrongMJ , Warren G , et al. Clinical significance of imaging and histological characteristics of filum terminale in tethered cord syndrome[J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2014, 13 (3): 255- 259.
doi: 10.3171/2013.12.PEDS13370
13 Hendson G , Dunham C , Steinbok P . Histopathology of the filum terminale in children with and without tethered cord syndrome with attention to the elastic tissue within the filum[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2016, 32 (9): 1683- 1692.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3123-1
14 Nasr AY , Hussein AM , Zaghloul SA . Morphometric parameters and histological study of the filum terminale of adult human cadavers and magnetic resonance images[J]. Folia Morphol, 2018, 77 (4): 609- 619.
15 Lee JY , Phi JH , Cheon JE , et al. Preuntethering and postunte-thering courses of syringomyelia associated with tethered spinal cord[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 71 (1): 23- 29.
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824cebc6
16 Pang D , Zovickian J , Wong ST , et al. Surgical treatment of complex spinal cord lipomas[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2013, 29 (9): 1485- 1513.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2187-4
17 Arai H , Sato K , Okuda O , et al. Surgical experience of 120 patients with lumbosacral lipomas[J]. Acta Neurochir, 2001, 143 (9): 857- 864.
doi: 10.1007/s007010170015
18 Huang SL , Shi W , Zhang LG . Surgical treatment for lipomyelomeningocele in children[J]. World J Pediatr, 2010, 6 (4): 361- 365.
doi: 10.1007/s12519-010-0210-3
19 Muthukumar N . Congenital spinal lipomatous malformations: Part Ⅰ: Classification[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2009, 151 (3): 179- 188.
doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0208-6
20 Goodrich DJ , Patel D , Loukas M , et al. Symptomatic retethering of the spinal cord in postoperative lipomyelomeningocele patients: A meta-analysis[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2016, 32 (1): 121- 126.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2839-7
21 Viswanathan VK , Minnema AJ , Farhadi HF . Surgical management of adult type Ⅰ split cord malformation. Report of two cases with literature review[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2018, 52 (5): 119- 121.
22 D'Agostino EN , Calnan DR , Makler VI , et al. Type Ⅰ split cord malformation and tethered cord syndrome in an adult patient: A case report and literature review[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2019, 10, 90.
doi: 10.25259/SNI-66-2019
23 Erşahin Y . Split cord malformation types Ⅰ and Ⅱ: A personal series of 131 patients[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2013, 29 (9): 1515- 1526.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2115-7
24 Karim Ahmed A , Howell EP , Harward S , et al. Split cord malformation in adults: Literature review and classification[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2020, 193 (1): 1- 6.
25 Atta CA , Fiest KM , Frolkis AD , et al. Global birth prevalence of spina bifida by folic acid fortification status: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Public Health, 2016, 106 (1): e24- e34.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302902
26 Adzick NS , Thom EA , Spong CY , et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele[J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 364 (11): 993- 1004.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014379
27 Singh I , Rohilla S , Kumar P , et al. Spinal dorsal dermal sinus tract: An experience of 21 cases[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2015, 6 (Suppl 17): S429- S434.
28 Radmanesh F , Nejat F , El Khashab M . Dermal sinus tract of the spine[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2010, 26 (3): 349- 357.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0962-z
29 Jindal A , Mahapatra AK . Spinal congenital dermal sinus: an experience of 23 cases over 7 years[J]. Neurol India, 2001, 49 (3): 243- 246.
30 Mete M , Umur AS , Duransoy YK , et al. Congenital dermal sinus tract of the spine: Experience of 16 patients[J]. J Child Neurol, 2014, 29 (10): 1277- 1282.
doi: 10.1177/0883073813520501
31 O'Neill BR , Gallegos D , Herron A , et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to detect occult spinal dysraphism in infants[J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2017, 19 (2): 217- 226.
doi: 10.3171/2016.8.PEDS16128
32 Dulfer SE , Drost G , Lange F , et al. Long-term evaluation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring-assisted tethered cord surgery[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2017, 33 (11): 1985- 1995.
doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3478-y
[1] Jing-cheng XIE,Xiao-dong CHEN,Jun YANG. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of tethered cord syndrome accompanied by congenital dermal sinus tract in adults [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1163-1166.
[2] YUAN Chang-wei,WANG Ying-jin,ZHANG Shu-jie,SHEN Sheng-li,DUAN Hong-zhou. Clinical outcomes following microsurgery and endovascular embolization in the management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: A meta-analysis study [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 304-314.
[3] LIN Guo-zhong, MA Chang-cheng, WANG Zhen-yu, XIE Jing-cheng, LIU Bin, CHEN Xiao-dong. Minimally invasive treatment of cervical1-2 epidural neurilemmoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(3): 586-589.
[4] Guo-zhong LIN,Zhen-yu WANG,Jing-cheng XIE,Bin LIU,Chang-cheng MA,Xiao-dong CHEN. Clinical study of 21 cases of sacral cysts containing fila terminale [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(3): 582-585.
[5] CHEN Li-hua, YANG Yi, WEI Qun, LI Yun-jun, LI Wen-de, GAO Jin-bao,YU Bin, ZHAO Hao, XU Ru-xiang. Microsurgical management of petroclival meningiomas combined trans-subtemporal and suboccipital retrosigmoid keyhole approach [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 738-742.
[6] DUAN Hong-Zhou, LI Liang, ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Jia-Yong, BAO Sheng-De. Surgical treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(4): 679-684.
[7] PENG Jing, LONG Hai, YUAN Yi-Ming, CUI Wan-Shou, ZHANG Zhi-Chao, PAN Wen-Bo. Comparison of the outcomes of microscopic varicocelectomy and laparoscopic varicocelectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2014, 46(4): 541-543.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 505 -515 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 310 -314 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 341 .