Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 748-752. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Laparoscopic modified transcystic biliary drainage for the treatment of biliary stones and diagnosis of biliary disease

Lingfu ZHANG, Gang WANG, Chunsheng HOU*(), Long CUI, Lixin WANG, Xiaofeng LING, Zhi XU   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-03-20 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2025-08-02
  • Contact: Chunsheng HOU
  • Supported by:
    the Innovation and Transformation Fund Project of Peking University Third Hospital(2023105)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the safety of laparoscopic modified transcystic biliary drainage (modified C-tube technique) in the treatment of biliary stones and application of diagnosing biliary disease. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 68 cases of biliary stones successfully treated with laparoscopic modified C-tube technique from August 2021 to December 2023. The safety, effectiveness, and area of applications were analyzed. The reliability of the principle of the modified fixation method was verified by using an ex vivo gallbladder. Results: Three cases of ex vivo gallbladder demonstrated that the strength of the modified fixation method was reliable, and the sinus tract formed by suture after immediate extraction of the C tube could be dislocated and closed, resisting the bile outflow caused by the weight of the gallbladder. Among the 68 patients, 42 were difficult biliary stones, 6 were suspected common bile duct stones, and 5 were extrahepatic bile duct stones combined with intrahepatic bile duct stones. Among them, 48 cases underwent choledochoscopy assisted trans-choledochal approach for stone removal, and 10 cases underwent transcystic approach stone removal, Six patients underwent simply basket exploration and removal of stones through the cystic duct (5 patients had no residual stones on postoperative C-tube angiography, 1 patient had suspected residual stones, and the patient refused further examination and treatment for no symptom), and 4 patients only underwent biliary drainage through the cystic duct; two patients with retained stone passed after the use of topical nitrate drip infusion via C-tube, seven cases underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP), stone removal with the assistance of a C-tube after laparoscopic surgery, and the results were uneventful. The mean surgical time was (131±44) min (76-279 min), the maximum daily drainage volume of the C-tube was (401±235) mL/d (10-1 150 mL/d), the hospital stay was (8.6±3.6) d (2-19 d), and the mean time of C-tube removal was (11±6.9) d (5-46 d). There were 14 overall complications, including 2 residual stones, and 12 C-tube related complications, comprising of 1 grade Ⅲa, 2 grade Ⅱ, and 9 grade Ⅰ. There were 9 cases of C-tube related adverse events that did not cause complications, including 3 of early detachment, 2 of displacement, and 4 of deep insertion. The median follow-up time after surgery was 21 (2-30) months, and 5 patients had recurrent stones. Among them, 4 patients had slow contrast outflow during cholangiogram, and 1 patient had obvious pancreaticobiliary reflux. 55 patients underwent C-tube amylase measurement, and 9 cases showed a significant increase in bile amylase (349-44 936 U/L), suggesting the presence of pancreaticobiliary reflux. Conclusion: Laparoscopic modified C-tube technique can be effectively used in the treatment of biliary stones, which is relatively safe and can be attempted in the diagnosis of biliary diseases.

Key words: Common bile duct stone, Transcystic biliary drainage, Pancreaticobiliary reflux, Laparoscopy

CLC Number: 

  • R657.4

Figure 1

In vitro gallbladder validation of modified C-tube fixation method for suturing strength and tissue sinus closure A, 7F triple lumen central venous catheter placement and suturing status in vitro gallbladder; B, the gallbladder has no slip at the fixed position of the catheter under the action of gravity; C, the C-tube was lifted, slightly more force was added, and the catheter could be pulled out slightly; D, after removing the catheter, there is no bile leakage."

1
管辉球, 景岚, 徐锁青. 胆总管一期缝合经胆囊管胆管引流与鼻胆管引流的对比研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56 (2): 130- 134.
2
de Araujo TB , Jotz GP , Zaki CH , et al. Intraoperative cholangiography with filling defects: Comparative complication analysis of postoperative transcystic duct (TCD) catheter maintenance[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35 (12): 6438- 6448.
3
张铃福, 侯纯升, 徐智, 等. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆管引流联合胆总管探查取石术治疗复杂胆管结石的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54 (6): 1185- 1189.

doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.06.021
4
张铃福, 辛春艳, 王立新, 等. 腹腔镜改进C管技术联合术后十二指肠镜下取石治疗急诊胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2023, 23 (4): 294- 297.
5
Gurusamy KS , Koti R , Davidson BR . T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013 (6): CD005641.
6
Ma Z , Zhou J , Yao L , et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36 (1): 718- 727.
7
Zhang J , Ling X . Risk factors and management of primary choledocholithiasis: A systematic review[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91 (4): 530- 536.
8
Yun SP , Lee JY , Jo HJ , et al. Long-term follow-up may be needed for pancreaticobiliary reflux in healthy adults[J]. J Korean Surg Soc, 2013, 84 (2): 101- 106.
[1] Huanrui WANG, Shicong LAI, Haopu HU, Zehua DING, Tao XU, Hao HU. Efficacy analysis of laparoscopy combined with flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of complex ureteral stricture [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(4): 784-788.
[2] Min QIU,You-long ZONG,Bin-shuai WANG,Bin YANG,Chu-xiao XU,Zheng-hui SUN,Min LU,Lei ZHAO,Jian LU,Cheng LIU,Xiao-jun TIAN,Lu-lin MA. Treatment outcome of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors of moderate to high complexity [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[3] Hui-li LIU,Yan-han LV,Xiao-xiao WANG,Min LI. Factors influencing the chronic post-surgical pain after laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with urinary tract tumors [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 851-856.
[4] Ling-fu ZHANG,Chun-sheng HOU,Zhi XU,Li-xin WANG,Xiao-feng LING,Gang WANG,Long CUI,Dian-rong XIU. Clinical effect of laparoscopic transcystic drainage combined with common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1185-1189.
[5] Li-zhe AN,Liu-lin XIONG,Liang CHEN,Huan-rui WANG,Wei-nan CHEN,Xiao-bo HUANG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy via nephroscope for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with renal calculi [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 746-750.
[6] ZHANG Fan,CHEN Qu,HAO Yi-chang,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,HUANG Yi,MA Lu-lin. Relationship between recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and preoperative/postoperative membranous urethral length [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 299-303.
[7] ZHANG Fan,HUANG Xiao-juan,YANG Bin,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,ZHANG Shu-dong,HUANG Yi,MA Lu-lin. Relationship between prostate apex depth and early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 692-696.
[8] Bing-wei HUANG,Jie WANG,Peng ZHANG,Zhe LI,Si-cheng BI,Qiang WANG,Cai-bo YUE,Kun-lin YANG,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of indocyanine green in complex upper urinary tract repair surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 651-656.
[9] Shu-dong ZHANG,Peng HONG,Bin-shuai WANG,Shao-hui DENG,Fan ZHANG,Li-yuan TAO,Cai-guang CAO,Zhen-hua HU,Lu-lin MA. Usefulness of the indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technique in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 657-662.
[10] Si-da CHENG,Xin-fei LI,Sheng-wei XIONG,Shu-bo FAN,Jie WANG,Wei-jie ZHU,Zi-ao LI,Guang-pu DING,Ting YU,Wan-qiang LI,Yong-ming SUN,Kun-lin YANG,Lei ZHANG,Han HAO,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery: A review of 108 cases by a single surgeon [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 771-779.
[11] Hai-wen HUANG,Bing YAN,Mei-xia SHANG,Li-bo LIU,Han HAO,Zhi-jun XI. Propensity-matched comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for female patients with bladder cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 698-705.
[12] Hai-yue ZHAO,Xiong-jun YE,Wei-nan CHEN,Li-zhe AN,Jun LIU,Liu-lin XIONG,Xiao-bo HUANG. Treatment of crossing vessels in laparoscopic pyeloplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 660-664.
[13] Si-da CHENG,Wan-qiang LI,Li MU,Guang-pu DING,Bo ZHANG,Cheng SHEN,Ze-wei YING,Kun-lin YANG,Han HAO,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of totally extraperitoneal renal autotransplantation with Boari flap-pelvis anastomosis in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas treatment [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 758-763.
[14] Ling-fu ZHANG,Chun-sheng HOU,Yong-hui HUANG,Zhi XU,Li-xin WANG,Xiao-feng LING,Gang WANG,Long CUI,Dian-rong XIU. Comparison of the minimally invasive treatments of laparoscopic and endosopic for common bile duct stones after gastrojejunostomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 345-348.
[15] Xiao-jun TIAN,Min QIU,Zhuo LIU,Ruo-tao XIAO,Yi HUANG,Guo-liang WANG,Xiao-fei HOU,Shu-dong ZHANG,Shen-rong ZHUANG,Lu-lin MA. Single-center study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with Mayo 0-2 level inferior vena cava thrombectomy [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1053-1056.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!