Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 277-282. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.02.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of the modified internal fixation method of minimally invasive percuta-neous plate osteosynthesis in treatment of proximal humeral fracture

Bing-chuan LIU,Zhong-wei YANG,Fang ZHOU,Hong-quan JI,Zhi-shan ZHANG,Yan GUO,Yun TIAN()   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2017-05-14 Online:2019-04-18 Published:2019-04-26
  • Contact: Yun TIAN E-mail:tiany@bjmu.edu.cn

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To study the clinical outcomes and characteristics of fracture healing of a modified internal fixation method, which was implemented by placing four and two screws respectively at the proximal and distal end of the locking plate in the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) for patients with proximal humeral fractures.Methods: Patients in Peking University Third Hospital from February 2010 to December 2016 were brought into this retrospective study. Based on different operation methods, they were divided into minimally invasive (MI) group and non-minimally invasive (non-MI) group, and the patients in MI group were performed with the modified internal fixation. In order to observe the varying efficacy for different fracture types between the two groups, we further investigated the patients with Neer two-part and three-part fracture, respectively. The follow-up parameters included general physical examination, X-ray, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley score.Results: A total of 117 patients with an average age of (61.5±16.2) years met the inclusion criteria, and MI group included 45 patients, non-MI group included 72 patients. According to the Neer classification, there were 46 cases of two-part fracture, 63 cases of three-part fracture and 8 cases of four-part fracture. In MI group, there were 17 males and 28 males with an average age of (62.2±17.1) years, including 18 cases of two-part fracture, 23 cases of three-part fracture and 4 cases of four-part fracture. In non-MI group, there were 27 males and 45 females with an average age of (60.1±17.7) years, including 28 cases of two-part fracture, 40 cases of three-part fracture and 4 cases of four-part fracture. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender (P=0.975), age (P=0.545) and fracture type (P=0.756). The average hospital-stay in MI group and non-MI group was (2.8±1.1) days and (4.3±1.3) days (P=0.023), the operation time was (67.8±14.9) min and (102.3±34.1) min (P<0.001), the blood loss was (21.3±6.5) mL and (181.5±55.6) mL (P<0.001), the Constant-Murley score was 6.1±0.9 and 6.5±0.8 (P=0.032) one week after surgery, and the Constant-Murley score was 66.1±4.3 and 63.4±4.9 (P=0.006) three months after surgery, MI group had significant advantages in these aspects. In terms of Neer two-part and three-part fracture, the VAS score (5.9±0.8) one week postoperatively and the Constant-Murley score (66.6±3.7) three months postoperatively were significantly superior in MI group (P<0.05). In MI group, delayed fracture healing occurred in 1 case (2.2%) and abduction was restricted in 1 case (2.2%). In non-MI group, delayed fracture healing occurred in 3 cases (4.2%) and abduction was restricted in 2 cases (2.8%). There were no internal fixation complications and humeral head necrosis in both groups.Conclusion: Applying the modified internal fixation in MIPPO to cure proximal humeral fractures is effective clinically with thick callus formation occurring at the fracture site. The fracture can achieve normal healing and the shoulder functions can restore well, indicating the modified surgical method is a good treatment option.

Key words: Proximal humeral fractures, Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis, Clinical effects

CLC Number: 

  • R683.4

Table 1

Comparison of preoperative clinical data between two groups"

Items MI group non-MI group P
Male/female
Age/years
17/28
62.2±17.1
27/45
60.1±17.7
0.976
0.545
Neer classification
(two-part/three-part /four-part), n
18/23/4 28/40/4 0.756

Table 2

Comparison of postoperative clinical data between groups"

Items MI group non-MI group P
Postoperative hospital stay/d 2.8±1.1 4.3±1.3 0.023
Operation time/min
Blood loss/mL
Clinical union time of
fracture /month
67.8±14.9
21.3±6.5

3.1±0.5
102.3±34.1
181.5±55.6

3.6±0.7
0.000
0.000

0.244
VAS score
1 week 6.1±0.9 6.5±0.8 0.032
1 month 2.9±0.5 3.1±0.7 0.106
C-M score
3 months 66.1±4.3 63.4±4.9 0.006
6 months 76.1±3.8 74.9±3.5 0.096

Figure 1

Typical case, 64 years-old, female, left proximal humerus fracture A,B, CT reconstruction images before operation; C,D, X-ray images 1 d after operation; E,F, X-ray images 1 month and 3 months respectively after operation; G,H, X-ray image 7 months after operation; I-L, function of shoulder joint 7 months after operation. The growth situation of fracture callus is displayed in yellow circle."

Table 3

Comparison of postoperative clinical data based on different Neer classifications between two groups"

Items Neer two-part P Neer three-part P
MI group non-MI group MI group non-MI group
VAS score
1 week 5.9±0.8 6.4±0.7 0.034 6.1±0.9 6.6±0.8 0.017
1 month 2.9±0.6 3.1±0.6 0.258 2.9±0.4 3.2±0.8 0.189
C-M score
3 months 66.6±3.7 63.5±4.5 0.027 65.9±4.2 62.9±4.8 0.020
6 months 75.4±4.7 73.6±3.3 0.161 76.7±3.1 75.7±3.5 0.286

Figure 2

Typical case, 76 years old, female, comminuted fractures of right proximal humerus A,B, X-ray image before operation; C,D, CT reconstruction images before operation; E,F, X-ray image 1 d after operation; G,H, X-ray image 1 month and 3 months respectively after operation; I,J, X-ray image 6 months after operation; K,L, function of shoulder joint 6 months after operation. The growth situation of fracture callus is displayed in yellow circle."

[1] Roux A, Decroocq L, Batti SE , et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012,98(6):715-719.
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.013
[2] Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H , et al. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013,22(4):542-549.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.008
[3] Maier D, Jäger M, Strohm PC , et al. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a review of current concepts enlightened by basic principles[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2012,79(4):307-316.
[4] Burkhart KJ, Dietz SO, Bastian L , et al. The treatment of proximal humeral fracture in adults[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2013,110(35):591-597.
[5] Jung SW . Indirect reduction maneuver and minimally invasive approach for displaced proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2013,5(1):66-73.
doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.1.66
[6] Sohn HS, Shin SJ . Minimally invasive plate osteosynjournal for proximal humeral fractures: clinical and radiologic outcomes according to fracture type[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014,23(9):1334-1340.
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.018
[7] 赵弟庆, 张丽娜, 杨广忠 , 等. MIPPO技术结合PHILOS治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2014,22(6):508-511.
[8] Gavaskar AS, Muthukumar S, Chowdary N . Biological osteosynjournal of complex proximal humerus fractures: surgical technique and results from a prospective single center trial[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010,130(5):667-672.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-1028-0
[9] 刘振东, 马梦然 . 骨折愈合理论研究现状[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2010,18(16):87-91.
[10] Parren SM . Evolution of the internal fixation of long bong fracture. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002,84(8):1093-1110.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B8.13752
[11] Sonderegger J, Grob KR, Kuster MS . Dynamic plate osteosynjournal for fracture stabilization: how to do it[J]. Orthop Rev, 2010,2(1):e4.
doi: 10.4081/or.2010.e4
[12] 夏和桃, 李刚 . 现代骨外固定概念的生物学基础及应用原则[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2011,13(10):964-968.
[13] Koljonen PA, Fang C, Lau TW , et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynjournal for proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Orthop Surg, 2015,23(2):160-163.
doi: 10.1177/230949901502300208
[14] Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Dines JS , et al. The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus[J]. Clin Orthop, 2005,434(434):123-129.
[15] Falez F, Papalia M, Greco A , et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynjournal in proximal humeral fractures: one-year results of a prospective multicenter study[J]. Int Orthop, 2016,40(3):579-585.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3069-z
[1] Shi-kai XIONG,Wei-li SHI,An-hong WANG,Xing XIE,Qin-wei GUO. Radiographic diagnosis of distal fibula avulsion fractures: Comparison of ankle X-ray and three-dimensional reconstruction of CT [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 156-159.
[2] Guo-jin HOU,Fang ZHOU,Yun TIAN,Hong-quan JI,Zhi-shan ZHANG,Yan GUO,yang LV,Zhong-wei YANG. Related factors of revision of distal femoral fractures treated with lateral locking plate [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1172-1177.
[3] Zhong-di LIU,Ting-min XU,Yu DANG,Dian-ying ZHANG,Zhong-guo FU. Clinical effectiveness of less invasive intramedullary nail fixation combined with titanium cable cerclage for subtrochanteric fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(6): 1102-1106.
[4] Bing-chuan LIU,Chuan SUN,Yong XING,Fang ZHOU,Yun TIAN,Hong-quan JI,Zhi-shan ZHANG,Yan GUO,Yang LV,Zhong-wei YANG,Guo-jin HOU,Shan GAO. Analysis of risk factors for necrosis of femoral head after internal fixation surgery in young and mid-aged patients with femoral neck fracture [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 290-297.
[5] Yun-peng CUI,Chuan MI,Bing WANG,Yuan-xing PAN,Yun-fei LIN,Xue-dong SHI. Perioperative clinical characteristics of patients with pathological fracture of proximal femur [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 875-880.
[6] LIU Zhong-di, MA Ming-tai, CHEN Jian-hai, FU Zhong-guo, JIANG Bao-guo. “Time-angle measurement” reduction evaluation technique and clinical evaluation of proximal humerus fracture [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1003-1007.
[7] ZHANG Bo-song, LI Wen-yi, LIU Xing-hua, WEI Jie, HE Liang, WANG Man-yi. Comparative results of non-operative and operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 851-854.
[8] LI Xu, LI Feng-long, LU Yi, ZHU Yi-ming, GUO Si-yi, LI Yi-jun, JIANG Chun-yan. Clinical study on locking plate for the treatment of non-osteoporotic complex proximal humeral fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.
[9] ZHANG Bo-song, LI Wen-yi, LIU Xing-hua, WEI Jie, HE Liang, WANG Man-yi. Comparative results of non-operative and operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 0, (): 851-854.
[10] LI Xu, LI Feng-long, LU Yi, ZHU Yi-ming, GUO Si-yi, LI Yi-jun, JIANG Chun-yan. Clinical study on locking plate for the treatment of non-osteoporotic complex proximal humeral fractures#br# [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 0, (): 855-860.
[11] GAO Zhi-qiang, AN Gui-sheng, LI Shao-liang. Treatment of complicated intra-articular distal radius fractures with extended flexor carpi radialis approach [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 349-353.
[12] LI Ying, CHA Ye-jun, LI Ting, GONG Mao-qi, JIANG Xie-yuan. Analysis of anterolateral approach and lateral approach for the treatment of coronal shear fracture of the distal humeral [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(6): 1026-1031.
[13] WU Jing-wei, SHEN Hui-liang, LIU Li-min, GAO Zhi-hua. Analysis of early failure of the PHILOS in proximal humerus fractures [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 683-685.
[14] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(4): 751-封三.
[15] ZHANG Jian, JIANG Xie-yuan, HUANG Xiao-wen. Separate vertical wiring combined with tension band and Kirschner-wire plus cerclage wire in the treatment of displaced inferior pole fractures of the patella [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(3): 534-538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!