CLC Number:
[1] |
Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Onol FF, et al. Modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation improves early postoperative functional recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a propensity score-matched analysis [J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 78(6):875-884.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041 |
[2] | Salazar A, Regis L, Planas J, et al. [A randomised controlled trial to assess the benefit of posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction in early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[ [J/OL]. Eur Urol Oncol, 2021 [2021-6-1]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.005 . |
[3] | Kim JW, Kim DK, Ahn HK, et al. Effect of bladder neck preservation on long-term urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2019, 8(12) [2021-6-1]. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122068 . |
[4] |
Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3):405-417.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045 |
[5] |
Ahlering TE, Gordon A, Morales B, et al. Preserving continence during robotic prostatectomy [J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2013, 14(1):52-58.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0295-4 pmid: 23239360 |
[6] |
Kang SG, Shim JS, Onol F, et al. Lessons learned from 12,000 robotic radical prostatectomies: is the journey as important as the outcome [J]. Investig Clin Urol, 2020, 61(1):1-10.
doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.1 |
[7] | Wenzel M, Preisser F, Mueller M, et al. Effect of prostatic apex shape (Lee types) and urethral sphincter length in preoperative MRI on very early continence rates after radical prostatectomy [J/OL]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2021 [2021-6-1]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02809-7 . |
[8] |
Liao H, Duan X, Du Y, et al. Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: oncological, surgical and functional outcomes: a meta-analysis [J]. World J Urol, 2020, 38(8):1919-1932.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02986-2 pmid: 31679064 |
[9] |
Bessede T, Sooriakumaran P, Takenaka A, et al. Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy [J]. World J Urol, 2017, 35(4):549-565.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1901-8 pmid: 27484205 |
[10] |
Grasso AA, Mistretta FA, Sandri M, et al. Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis [J]. BJU Int, 2016, 118(1):20-34.
doi: 10.1111/bju.13480 |
[11] |
Checcucci E, Pecoraro A, De Cillis S, et al. The importance of anatomical reconstruction for continence recovery after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis from referral centres [J]. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021, 73(2):165-177.
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.04146-6 pmid: 33200906 |
[12] | Rocco F, Gadda F, Acquati P, et al. Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter [J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2001, 73(3):127-137. |
[13] | 廖晓星, 邢念增, 乔鹏, 等. “三明治”法尿道重建技术改善腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术后早期尿控的效果 [J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(4):601-604. |
[14] |
Bartoletti R, Mogorovich A, Francesca F, et al. Combined bladder neck preservation and posterior musculofascial reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on early and long term urinary continence recovery [J]. BMC Urol, 2017, 17(1):119.
doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0308-1 pmid: 29246146 |
[15] |
Ficarra V, Wiklund PN, Rochat CH, et al. The European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) survey of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) [J]. BJU Int, 2013, 111(4):596-603.
doi: 10.1111/bju.2013.111.issue-4 |
[16] |
Brunocilla E, Schiavina R, Borghesi M, et al. Preservation of the smooth muscular internal (vesical) sphincter and of the proximal urethra during retropubic radical prostatectomy: a technical modification to improve the early recovery of continence [J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2014, 86(2):132-134.
doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.2.132 |
[17] |
Nyarangi-Dix JN, Radtke JP, Hadaschik B, et al. Impact of complete bladder neck preservation on urinary continence, quality of life and surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a randomized, controlled, single blind trial [J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(3):891-898.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.082 pmid: 23017512 |
[18] |
Ma X, Tang K, Yang C, et al. Bladder neck preservation improves time to continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(41):67463-67475.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.v7i41 |
[19] |
Martini A, Falagario UG, Villers A, et al. Contemporary techniques of prostate dissection for robot-assisted prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2020, 78(4):583-591.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.017 |
[20] |
Preisser F, Busto Martin L, Pompe RS, et al. Effect of bladder neck sparing at robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on postoperative continence rates and biochemical recurrence [J]. Urol Oncol, 2020, 38(1): 1.e11-1.e16.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.005 pmid: 31586543 |
[21] | Bhat KRS, Moschovas MC, Onol FF, et al. Evidence-based evolution of our robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) technique through 13,000 cases [J/OL]. J Robot Surg, 2020, 10 [2021-6-1]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01157-5 . |
[22] |
Reeves F, Preece P, Kapoor J, et al. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(4):692-704.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.020 |
[23] |
Weng H, Zeng XT, Li S, et al. Intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):11454.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11878-7 |
[24] |
Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, et al. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(3):559-568.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.011 pmid: 25457018 |
[25] |
Michl U, Tennstedt P, Feldmeier L, et al. Nerve-sparing surgery technique, not the preservation of the neurovascular bundles, leads to improved long-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(4):584-589.
doi: S0302-2838(15)00696-X pmid: 26277303 |
[26] |
Ficarra V, Rossanese M, Crestani A, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the novel urethral fixation technique versus standard vesicourethral anastomosis [J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 79(4):530-536.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.028 |
[27] |
Ficarra V, Crestani A, Rossanese M, et al. Urethral-fixation technique improves early urinary continence recovery in patients who undergo retropubic radical prostatectomy [J]. BJU Int, 2017, 119(2):245-253.
doi: 10.1111/bju.2017.119.issue-2 |
[28] |
Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, et al. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes [J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 56(3):472-478.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007 |
[29] |
Mungovan SF, Sandhu JS, Akin O, et al. Preoperative membranous urethral length measurement and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Urol, 2017, 71(3):368-378.
doi: S0302-2838(16)30341-4 pmid: 27394644 |
[30] | Song W, Kim CK, Park BK, et al. Impact of preoperative and postoperative membranous urethral length measured by 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging on urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2017, 11(3/4):E93-E99. |
[31] | 张帆, 马潞林, 黄毅, 等. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后控尿功能恢复与术前膜性尿道长度的相关性研究 [J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2013, 34(1):41-44. |
[32] |
Yang B, Zhang F, Xiao C, et al. Impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging anatomic features on urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J]. Urol Int, 2020, 104(3/4):239-246.
doi: 10.1159/000506021 |
[33] |
Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, et al. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60(2):320-329.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.040 |
[1] | Shuai LIU,Lei LIU,Zhuo LIU,Fan ZHANG,Lulin MA,Xiaojun TIAN,Xiaofei HOU,Guoliang WANG,Lei ZHAO,Shudong ZHANG. Clinical treatment and prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 624-630. |
[2] | 佳佳 乔,聪 田,晓波 黄,军 刘. [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 745-749. |
[3] | Zhan-yi ZHANG,Fan ZHANG,Ye YAN,Cai-guang CAO,Chang-jian LI,Shao-hui DENG,Yue-hao SUN,Tian-liang HUANG,Yun-he GUAN,Nan LI,Min LU,Zhen-hua HU,Shu-dong ZHANG. Near-infrared targeted probe designed for intraoperative imaging of prostatic neurovascular bundles [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 843-850. |
[4] | Jin-hui LAI,Qi WANG,Jia-xiang JI,Ming-rui WANG,Xin-wei TANG,Ke-xin XU,Tao XU,Hao HU. Effects of delayed ureteral stents removal during the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life and psychological status of postoperative patients with urinary calculi [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 857-864. |
[5] | Yu-chao HUANG-FU,Yi-qing DU,Lu-ping YU,Tao XU. Risk factors of persistent hypertension in primary aldosteronism patients after surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 686-691. |
[6] | WANG Jian-wei,XU Xiao,BAO Zheng-qing,LIU Zhen-hua,HE Feng,HUANG Guang-lin,MAN Li-bo. Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 798-802. |
[7] | Jian-wei WANG,Li-bo MAN,Xiao XU,Zhen-hua LIU,Feng HE,Guang-lin HUANG,Jian-po ZHAI,Ning ZHOU,Wei LI. Combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty for patients with complex male pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 646-650. |
[8] | Chun-long ZHANG,He LI,Qing LI,Wen-jun BAI,Tao XU,Xiao-wei ZHANG. Decision regret analysis among Chinese patients receiving penile girth enhancement with acellular dermal matrix [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 678-683. |
[9] | Lian-ming ZHAO,Hui JIANG,Kai HONG,Hao-cheng LIN,Wen-hao TANG,De-feng LIU,Jia-ming MAO,Zhe ZHANG,Sheng-li LIN,Lu-lin MA. Analysis of intratesticular condition in micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction era [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 632-635. |
[10] | Jian-wei WANG,Li-bo MAN,Guang-lin HUANG,Feng HE,Hai WANG,Hai-dong WANG,Xiao XU,Wei LI,Jian-po ZHAI,Zhen-hua LIU. Single-stage repair of penile urethral stricture using combined dorsal onlay oral mucosa grafting with ventral onlay penile skin flap [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 641-645. |
[11] | Hai-yue ZHAO,Xiong-jun YE,Wei-nan CHEN,Li-zhe AN,Jun LIU,Liu-lin XIONG,Xiao-bo HUANG. Treatment of crossing vessels in laparoscopic pyeloplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 660-664. |
[12] | Xian-hui LIU,Wei-yu ZHANG,Hao HU,Qi WANG,Tao WANG,Yong-xin HE,Ke-xin XU. Long-term follow-up of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape and trans-obturator tape for different types of stress urinary incontinence [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 694-697. |
[13] | Zhong-cheng XIN,Bi-cheng YANG,Meng LI,Yi-ming YUAN,Wan-shou CUI,Yuan TANG,Dong FANG,Wei-dong SONG. Appllication of human acellular dermal matrix in surgical treatment of genitourinary disease [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 778-782. |
[14] | Chen LIANG,Wei-yu ZHANG,Hao HU,Qi WANG,Zhi-wei FANG,Ke-xin XU. Comparison of effectiveness and complications between two different methods of augmentation cystoplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 293-297. |
[15] | ZHANG Fan, ZHANG Shu-dong, XIAO Chun-lei, HUANG Yi, MA Lu-lin. Perioperative parameters and prognosis analysis of patients aged 80 years or older treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(5): 822-827. |
|