Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 93-98. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.01.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Risk factors of perioperative hypertension in dental implant surgeries with bone augmentation

Xiaoqiang LIU1,Yin ZHOU2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-10-10 Online:2024-02-18 Published:2024-02-06
  • Contact: Yin ZHOU E-mail:zhouyin@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the Chinese Stomatological Association Research Fund(CSA-SIS2022-18);Research Seed Fund of Peking University First Hospital(2019SF36)

RICH HTML

   

PDF (PC)

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the characteristics and risk factors of perioperative hypertension during dental implant surgeries with bone augmentation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Seven hundred and twenty-eight cases underwent dental implant placement and bone augmentation in Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from September 2021 to August 2022 were recruited in this study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were divided into different groups according to the exposure factors which were gender, age, surgical time, and surgical approach. The correlation between perioperative hypertension and the exposure factors was analyzed. Results: The average systolic blood pressure variability was 9.93%±6.63% (maximum 50.41%), the average diastolic blood pressure variability was 12.45%±8.79% (maximum 68.75%), and the average mean arterial pressure variability was 10.02%±6.61% (maximum 49.48%). The incidence rate of perioperative hypertension was 26.77%. Male, age ≥ 60 years, and surgical time > 60 minutes were risk factors for perioperative hypertension (P < 0.05), and the relative risks (95%CI) were 1.74 (1.21-2.50), 2.35 (1.54-3.58), and 1.65 (1.15-2.38), respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative hypertension among the guided bone regeneration, sinus floor elevation with transalveolar approach, and sinus floor elevation with lateral window approach (P>0.05). However, the risk factors varied according to bone augmentation approaches. For the patients underwent guided bone rege-neration, the risk factors for perioperative hypertension included male, age ≥ 60 years, and surgical time > 60 minutes (P < 0.05). For the patients underwent maxillary sinus lift with transalveolar approach, the risk factor for perioperative hypertension was age ≥60 years (P < 0.05). For the patients underwent maxillary sinus lift with lateral window approach, male, age ≥60 years, and surgical time >60 minutes were not risk factors for perioperative hypertension (P>0.05). Conclusion: There was a certain risk of perioperative hypertension in oral implantation with bone augmentation. The influence of male, age ≥60 years and surgical time > 60 minutes on perioperative hypertension was related to the approach of bone augmentation.

Key words: Dental implantation, Bone regeneration, Blood pressure, Risk factors, Cohort studies

CLC Number: 

  • R782.12

Table 1

Characteristics and influencing factors of perioperative blood pressure changes (n = 728)"

Items Hemodynamic changes/%
Systolic blood pressure Diastolic blood pressure Mean arterial pressure
Gender
  Male (n=318) 9.23±5.83 11.84±7.87 9.51±5.92
  Female (n=410) 10.47±7.16 12.93±9.42 10.42±7.07
  t -2.574 -1.710 -1.887
  P 0.010 0.088 0.060
Age
  ≥60 years (n=166) 10.79±6.94 11.68±7.57 9.93±6.28
  ＜60 years (n=562) 9.67±6.53 12.68±9.11 10.05±6.70
  t -1.915 1.438 0.202
  P 0.056 0.152 0.840
Surgical time
  ＞60 min (n=380) 10.44±7.16 12.37±8.70 10.11±6.82
  ≤60 min (n=348) 9.37±5.96 12.54±8.89 9.92±6.37
  t -2.209 0.264 -0.402
  P 0.028 0.792 0.688
Bone augmentation
  GBR (n=540) 9.74±6.59 12.30±8.50 9.87±6.62
  SFE-TA (n=143) 10.63±6.83 13.09±9.84 10.59±6.52
  SFE-LW (n=45) 10.01±6.48 12.23±8.70 9.95±6.75
  F 1.023 0.471 0.665
  P 0.360 0.625 0.515

Table 2

Characteristics and influencing factors of perioperative hypertension in the patients with preoperative normotensive blood pressure (n = 609)"

Items Perioperative hypertension χ2 P RR (95%CI)
(+) (-)
Gender 9.147 0.002 1.74 (1.21-2.50)
  Male (n=253) 84 (33.20) 169 (66.80)
  Female (n=356) 79 (22.19) 277 (77.81)
Age 16.267 ＜0.001 2.35 (1.54-3.58)
  ≥60 years (n=118) 49 (41.53) 69 (58.47)
  ＜60 years (n=491) 114 (23.22) 377 (76.78)
Surgical time 7.304 0.007 1.65 (1.15-2.38)
  ＞60 min (n=311) 98 (31.51) 213 (68.49)
  ≤60 min (n=298) 65 (21.81) 233 (78.19)

Bone augmentation approach
 0.242 0.886 -
  GBR (n=457) 120 (26.26) 337 (73.74)
  SFE-TA (n=117) 33 (28.21) 84 (71.79)
  SFE-LW (n=35) 10 (28.57) 25 (71.43)

Table 3

Characteristics and influencing factors of perioperative hypertension during guided bone regeneration (n = 457)"

Items Perioperative hypertension χ2 P RR (95%CI)
(+) (-)
Gender 6.827 0.009 1.75 (1.15-2.67)
  Male (n=179) 59 (32.96) 120 (67.04)
  Female (n=278) 61 (21.94) 217 (78.06)
Age 10.184 0.001 2.22 (1.35-3.64)
  ≥60 years (n=85) 34 (40.00) 51 (60.00)
  ＜60 years (n=372) 86 (23.12) 286 (76.88)
Surgical time 7.291 0.007 1.80 (1.17-2.77)
  ＞60 min (n=245) 77 (31.43) 168 (68.57)
  ≤60 min (n=212) 43 (20.28) 169 (79.70)

Table 4

Characteristics and influencing factors of perioperative hypertension during sinus floor elevation with transalveolar approach (n = 117)"

Items Perioperative hypertension χ2 P RR (95%CI)
(+) (-)
Gender 2.600 0.107 1.95 (0.86-4.44)
  Male (n=57) 20 (35.09) 37 (64.91)
  Female (n=60) 13 (21.67) 47 (78.33)
Age 7.083 0.008 3.42 (1.34-8.77)
  ≥60 years (n=24) 12 (50.00) 12 (50.00)
  ＜60 years (n=93) 21 (22.58) 72 (77.42)
Surgical time 1.002 0.317 1.53 (0.66-3.56)
  ＞60 min (n=38) 13 (34.21) 25 (65.79)
  ≤60 min (n=79) 20 (25.32) 59 (74.68)

Table 5

Characteristics and influencing factors of perioperative hypertension during sinus floor elevation with lateral window approach (n = 35)"

Group Perioperative hypertension P RR (95%CI)
(+) (-)
Gender >0.999 1.08 (0.25-4.70)
  Male (n=17) 5 (29.41) 12 (70.59)
  Female (n=18) 5 (27.78) 13 (72.22)
Age 0.694 1.36 (0.26-6.94)
  ≥60 years (n=9) 3 (33.33) 6 (66.67)
  ＜60 years (n=26) 7 (26.92) 19 (73.08)
Surgical time >0.999 1.00 (0.16-6.26)
  ＞60 min (n=28) 8 (28.57) 20 (71.43)
  ≤60 min (n=7) 2 (28.57) 5 (71.43)
1 Ezzati M , Oza S , Danaei G , et al. Trends and cardiovascular mortality effects of state-level blood pressure and uncontrolled hypertension in the United States[J]. Circulation, 2008, 117 (7): 905- 914.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.732131
2 Getsios D , Wang Y , Stolar M , et al. Improved perioperative blood pressure control leads to reduced hospital costs[J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2013, 14 (10): 1285- 1293.
doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.798646
3 Wang Z , Chen Z , Zhang L , et al. Status of hypertension in China: Results from the China hypertension survey, 2012-2015[J]. Circulation, 2018, 137 (22): 2344- 2356.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032380
4 Abu-Naim H , Ahmad O , Akelah D , et al. Vital signs changes during different dental procedures: A prospective longitudinal cross-over clinical trial[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2019, 127 (1): 30- 39.
doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.08.002
5 Sabbagh A , Nakata H , Abdou A , et al. Fluctuation in salivary alpha-amylase activity and vital signs during dental implant surgery[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2021, 7 (1): 58.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00339-6
6 中国心胸血管麻醉学会, 北京高血压防治协会. 围术期高血压管理专家共识[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32 (3): 295- 297.
7 Brand HS , Abraham-Inpijn L . Cardiovascular responses induced by dental treatment[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 1996, 104 (3): 245- 252.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00074.x
8 Fukayama H , Yagiela JA . Monitoring of vital signs during dental care[J]. Int Dent J, 2006, 56 (2): 102- 108.
doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2006.tb00081.x
9 陈红涛, 王文英, 王津, 等. 不同高血压分级患者急性牙髓炎开髓治疗的风险评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48 (1): 89- 93.
10 刘晓强, 杨洋, 周建锋, 等. 640例单牙种植术对血压和心率影响的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53 (2): 390- 395.
11 Jayasekera PSA , Kai A , Lawrence CM . Preoperative hypertension increases intraoperative bleeding in patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2019, 80 (2): 562- 564.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.08.005
12 Morton RP , Vandal AC . Postoperative systolic blood pressure as a risk factor for haematoma following thyroid surgery[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2015, 40 (5): 462- 467.
doi: 10.1111/coa.12407
13 Howell SJ , Sear JW , Foex P . Hypertension, hypertensive heart disease and perioperative cardiac risk[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2004, 92 (4): 570- 583.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh091
14 Varon J , Marik PE . The diagnosis and management of hypertensive crises[J]. Chest, 2000, 118 (1): 214- 227.
doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.214
15 Kwon AH , Flood P . Genetics and gender in acute pain and perioperative opioid analgesia[J]. Anesthesiol Clin, 2020, 38 (2): 341- 355.
doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2020.01.003
16 Mizuno J , Kato S , Sato T , et al. Pre-anesthesia systolic blood pressure increases with age regardless of sex[J]. J Anesth, 2012, 26 (4): 496- 502.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1379-5
17 Berger V , Munk MR , Lersch F , et al. Association of intravitreal injections with blood pressure increase: The following excitement and anxiety response under intravitreal injection study[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2019, 137 (1): 87- 90.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4892
18 Wright JT Jr , Fine LJ , Lackland DT , et al. Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mmHg in patients aged 60 years or older: The minority view[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2014, 160 (7): 499- 503.
doi: 10.7326/M13-2981
19 Nagao H , Munakata M , Tachikawa N , et al. Clinical study of risk management for dental implant treatment: Changes of blood pressure and pulse rate during implant surgery under local anesthesia[J]. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi, 2002, 69 (1): 27- 33.
doi: 10.5357/koubyou.69.27
[1] Zheng LI, Longwei LV, Xiao ZHANG, Dandan XIA, Ping ZHANG, Yunsong LIU, Yongsheng ZHOU. Advances in oral and craniofacial bone regeneration modulated by stem cells and biomaterials [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(2): 272-277.
[2] Hui WEI, Jingfeng ZHANG, Zhongqiang YAO, Jinxia ZHAO. Clinical characteristics and relevant factors of rheumatoid arthritis patients with anemia of chronic disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(2): 307-312.
[3] Jie ZHAO, Chun FU, Xiujuan ZHAO, Haiyan XUE, Shu LI, Zhenzhou WANG, Fengxue ZHU. Risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with chest trauma in intensive care unit [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(2): 351-358.
[4] Yongtao YANG, Yuwen TIAN, Shenyao SHAN, Wenbo LI, Xiangyi SHANG, Yizhen WANG, Shuwei GUO, Zixiang GAO, Aonan WEN, Yijiao ZHAO, Yong WANG. A multi-view stereo vision methodology for digital soft-tissue impressions in fixed implant rehabilitation of edentulous patients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(1): 126-132.
[5] Meng FAN, Mengying WANG, Siyue WANG, Hexiang PENG, Xueheng WANG, Huangda GUO, Tianjiao HOU, Xueying QIN, Dafang CHEN, Yonghua HU, Jin LI, Yiqun WU, Tao WU. Association between indicators of arterial stiffness and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular deaths: A prospective cohort study [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(6): 1153-1159.
[6] Bowen LI, Qiang ZHANG, Yixin SUN. Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for scoliosis after Nuss procedure in children and young adults with pectus excavatum [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(5): 941-946.
[7] Xiaoyong YANG, Fan ZHANG, Lulin MA, Cheng LIU. Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of extraglandular invasion of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[8] Wei LIU, Wen GUO, Zhe GUO, Chunyan LI, Yunlong LI, Siqi LIU, Liang ZHANG, Hui SONG. Risk factors associated with non-radiographic bone erosion in patients with gout [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(4): 735-739.
[9] Mengxi LU, Qiuping LIU, Tianjing ZHOU, Xiaofei LIU, Yexiang SUN, Peng SHEN, Hongbo LIN, Xun TANG, Pei GAO. Association of triglyceride-glucose index and cardiovascular disease in a community-based Chinese cohort [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(3): 430-435.
[10] Huaqiu GUO, Zhe WANG, Xue YANG, Jie BAI. Clinical features and risk factors of patients with oral bleeding in dental emergency [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(1): 142-147.
[11] Minting DENG, Nan WANG, Bin XIA, Yuming ZHAO, Junxia ZHU. Factors associated with spontaneous re-eruption of traumatically intruded permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[12] Hong LI, Feifei MA, Jinlong WENG, Yang DU, Binzhang WU, Feng SUN. Accuracy of dynamic navigation system for immediate dental implant placement [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(1): 85-90.
[13] Yukai LI, Hongyan WANG, Liang LUO, Yun LI, Chun LI. Clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in Behcet disease with thrombosis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1036-1040.
[14] Yang TIAN, Yongzheng HAN, Jiao LI, Mingya WANG, Yinyin QU, Jingchao FANG, Hui JIN, Min LI, Jun WANG, Mao XU, Shenglin WANG, Xiangyang GUO. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative epidural hematoma following anterior cervical spine surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1058-1064.
[15] Mingrui WANG, Jinhui LAI, Jiaxiang JI, Xinwei TANG, Haopu HU, Qi WANG, Kexin XU, Tao XU, Hao HU. Risk factors for decreased quality of life in patients with kidney stones predicted by the Chinese version of Wisconsin stone quality of life questionnaire [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1069-1074.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd