275 nm和310 nm紫外线对去卵巢骨质疏松大鼠骨代谢的影响

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.02.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探究275 nm与310 nm紫外线对去卵巢骨质疏松大鼠骨代谢的影响。方法: 24只3月龄雌性SD(Sprague-Dawley)大鼠随机分为对照组、假手术组、275 nm紫外线照射组与310 nm紫外线照射组,每组6只。275 nm紫外线照射组与310 nm紫外线照射组施行双侧卵巢摘除手术,假手术组行卵巢旁少许脂肪组织摘除,对照组未行手术处理。术后24周测定大鼠颈椎、腰椎、股骨近心端、股骨中段和股骨远心端骨密度。骨质疏松大鼠模型制备成功后,分别给予骨质疏松大鼠275 nm、310 nm紫外线照射,辐照强度均为15 μW/cm ²,每日照射90 min,每周照射7 d,共16周,每周定时剃去大鼠背部毛发(面积为6 cm×8 cm)。照射16周后,测定大鼠颈椎、腰椎、股骨近心端、股骨中段和股骨远心端骨密度。处死动物后,取血并分离血清,测定血清25(OH)D、Ⅰ型原胶原N-端前肽(procollagen type Ⅰ N-peptide, PINP)与骨钙素(osteocalcin, OC)的含量。结果: 双侧卵巢摘除术24周后,与对照组[(238.78±26.74) mg/cm³]相比,275 nm紫外线照射组[(193.34±13.28) mg/cm³]和310 nm紫外线照射组[(191.19±18.48) mg/cm³]大鼠骨密度均显著下降(P=0.002,P=0.001); 假手术组[(227.20±14.32) mg/cm³]与对照组相比差异无统计学意义。对骨质疏松大鼠进行紫外线照射16周后,275 nm紫外线照射组大鼠全身平均骨密度显著增加[(193.34±13.28) mg/cm³ vs. (221.68±25.52) mg/cm ³,P=0.005], 310 nm紫外线照射组大鼠全身平均骨密度显著增加[(191.19±18.48) mg/cm³ vs. (267.48±20.54) mg/cm ³,P<0.001]。275 nm紫外线照射组大鼠腰椎、股骨近心端、股骨中段和股骨远心端的骨密度平均水平均增加; 310 nm紫外线照射组大鼠颈椎、腰椎、股骨近心端、股骨中段和股骨远心端5个部位的骨密度平均水平均显著提高。275 nm紫外线照射组大鼠血清25(OH)D及OC含量均显著高于对照组[(46.78±5.59) μg/L vs. (21.32±6.65) μg/L,P=0.002;(2.05±0.53) U/L vs. (1.32±0.07) U/L,P=0.022];310 nm紫外线照射组大鼠血清25(OH)D[(58.05±12.74) μg/L]、PINP[(176.16±24.18) U/L]和OC[(2.04±0.53) U/L]水平也均显著高于对照组(P<0.001,P=0.015,P=0.005)。假手术组与对照组相比,大鼠血清25(OH)D、PINP及OC含量差异无统计学意义。结论: 275 nm和310 nm紫外线均能促进大鼠维生素D合成,显著改善骨质疏松大鼠骨质状况,310 nm紫外线照射对于骨质状况的改善作用更强。

关键词: 紫外线, 去卵巢SD大鼠, 骨代谢, 维生素D

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the effect of 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet irradiation on ovariectomized rats’ bone metabolism. Methods: Twenty four 3-month-old female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rat were randomly divided into control group, sham operated group, 275 nm ultraviolet (UV) irradiation group and 310 nm UV irradiation group. Each group contained 6 rats. The rats in the two irradiation groups were treated with bilateral ovariectomy. The rats in sham operated group received sham operation (They were given the same back incision and a bit of par-ovarian fat were removed). Control group received no disposition. About 24 weeks after operation, all the rats received detailed bone mineral density (BMD) detection again. Detection regions include cervical vertebra, lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur. Next, osteopenia rats in 275 nm irradiation group were UV irradiated 275 nm with fixed illumination intensity (15 μW/cm²) everyday for 16 weeks. The osteopenia rats in 310 nm irradiation group were UV irradiated 310 nm with fixed illumination intensity (15 μW/cm ²) everyday for 16 weeks. The backs of the rats were shaved regularly as irradiation area (6 cm×8 cm). After 16-week irradiation, all the rats’ BMD of cervical vertebra, lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur were measured. At the end of the trial, all the rats’ blood specimens were obtained and serum 25(OH)D, procollagen type Ⅰ N-peptide (PINP) and osteocalcin (OC) were measured. Results: Compared with control group [(238.78±26.74) mg/cm³], the BMD of the whole body were significantly lower in 275 nm [(193.34±13.28) mg/cm³] and 310 nm [(191.19±18.48) mg/cm³] irradiation groups (P=0.002,P=0.001). There were no significant difference between sham operated group [(227.20±14.32) mg/cm³] and control group. After 16-week ultraviolet irradiation, the BMD of the whole body were significantly increased in 275 nm [(193.34±13.28) mg/cm³ vs. (221.68±25.52) mg/cm ³,P=0.005] and 310 nm groups [(191.19±18.48) mg/cm³ vs. (267.48±20.54) mg/cm ³,P<0.001] after corresponding irradiation. The BMD of the four body regions (lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur) had significantly increased after irradiation in 275 nm irradiation group. For 310 nm irradiation group, the BMD in cervical vertebra, lumbar vertebra, proximal femur, mid femur and distal femur also had increased significantly after 310 nm ultraviolet irradiation. The concentration of serum 25(OH)D and OC was higher in 275 nm irradiation group than in control group [(46.78±5.59) μg/L vs. (21.32±6.65) μg/L, P=0.002;(2.05±0.53) U/L vs. (1.32±0.07) U/L,P=0.022]. Compared with the control, the concentration of serum 25(OH)D [(58.05±12.74) μg/L], OC [(2.04±0.53) U/L] and PINP [(176.16±24.18) U/L] was significantly higher (P<0.001, P=0.015, P=0.005) in 310 nm irradiation group. However, there were no significantly difference between sham operated group and the control. Conclusion: Both 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet could improve rats’ vitamin D synthesis. Both 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet could improve osteopenia rats’ bone condition. The irradiation of 310 nm might be more effective on bone condition improvement.

Key words: Ultraviolet, Ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats, Bone metabolism, Vitamin D

中图分类号:

R173.4

何伟,杨思雯,陈娟,朱晓俊,陈志忠,马文军. 275 nm和310 nm紫外线对去卵巢骨质疏松大鼠骨代谢的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(2): 236-243.

HE Wei,YANG Si-wen,CHEN Juan,ZHU Xiao-jun,CHEN Zhi-zhong,MA Wen-jun. Effects of 275 nm and 310 nm ultraviolet irradiation on bone metabolism in ovariectomized osteoporotic rats[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 236-243.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 26

[1]	孙伟明, 刘爽. 雌激素影响绝经后骨质疏松分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(2):499-502.
[2]	武密山, 赵素芝, 武中建, 等. 中波紫外线照射治疗绝经后骨质疏松的临床研究[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2009, 29(15):1867-1869.
[3]	Micic I, Jeon IH, Park SH, et al. The effect of short-term low-energy ultraviolet B irradiation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A randomized single-blinded controlled clinical trial[J]. Srp Arh Celok Lek, 2013, 141(9/10):615-622. doi: 10.2298/SARH1310615M
[4]	Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(3):266-281. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra070553
[5]	Yang D, Atkings GJ, Turner AG, et al. Differential effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D on mineralisation and differentiation in two different types of osteoblast-like cultures[J/OL]. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2013, 136: 166-170 [2020-02-01]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.11.016.
[6]	Charoenngam N, Shirvani A, Holick MF. Vitamin D for skeletal and non-skeletal health: What we should know[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019, 10(6):1082-1093.
[7]	夏维波, 廖二元, 章振林, 等. 补钙和维生素D对骨骼健康的必要性[J]. 中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志, 2018, 11(1):20-25.
[8]	卓滋泽, 刘玲, 马文军, 等. 长波紫外线和中波紫外线对去卵巢骨质疏松大鼠1,25-二羟基维生素D₃和骨代谢影响的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(3):392-397.
[9]	Purdie DW. Consequences of long-term hormone replacement therapy[J]. Br Med Bull, 2000, 56(3):809-823. doi: 10.1258/0007142001903382
[10]	王春生, 苏峰, 宗治国, 等. 骨质疏松模型建立的研究进展[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2015, 21(9):1143-1148.
[11]	郭鱼波, 马如风, 王丽丽, 等. 骨质疏松动物模型及其评价方法的研究进展[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2015, 21(9):1149-1154.
[12]	夏维波, 章振林, 林华, 等. 原发性骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2017)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2019, 25(3):281-309.
[13]	Sirola J, Koistinen AK, Salovaara K, et al. Bone loss rate may interact with other risk factors for fractures among elderly women: A 15-year population-based study[J/OL]. J Osteoporos, 2010, 2010: 736391 [2020-02-01]. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/736391.
[14]	中华医学会骨质疏松与骨矿盐疾病分会, 国际骨矿盐学会, 国际华人骨研学会. 第六届国际骨质疏松及骨矿盐疾病学术会议论文集[C], 西安: 中华医学会, 2012.
[15]	Pike JW, Christakos S. Biology and Mechanisms of action of the vitamin D hormone[J]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2017, 46(4):815-843. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2017.07.001
[16]	廖祥鹏, 张增利, 张红红, 等. 维生素D与成年人骨骼健康应用指南(2014年简化版)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2014, 20(6):718-722.
[17]	Holick MF. Ultraviolet B radiation: The vitamin D connection[J/OL]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2017, 996: 137-154 [2020-02-01]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56017-5_12.
[18]	Guo R, Du Y, Zhang, et al. The effects of ultraviolet supplementation to the artificial lighting on rats’ bone metabolism, bone mineral density, and skin[J/OL]. J Photochem Photobiol B, 2018, 188: 12-18 [2020-02-01]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.08.202.
[19]	Krege JH, Lane NE, Harris JM, et al. PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2014, 25(9):2159-2171. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2646-0 pmid: 24599274
[20]	张金山, 罗良平. 绝经前期妇女血清PINP、ICTP和25-OH-VitD_3水平的变化及其与BMD的相关性分析[J]. 放射免疫学杂志, 2010, 23(6):603-605.
[21]	欧萌萌, 黄建荣. 绝经后妇女骨质疏松症患者血清β-Crosslaps、PINP和N-MID检测的评价[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2011, 18(4):238-240.
[22]	丁瑞, 阳毅, 侯俊霞, 等. 骨形成指标PINP与骨吸收指标β-CTX在2型糖尿病合并骨质疏松中作用的研究[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2017, 23(3):318-321.
[23]	Singh S, Kumar D, Lal AK. Serum osteocalcin as a diagnostic biomarker for primary osteoporosis in women[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015, 9(8):C4-C7.
[24]	张萌萌, 张秀珍, 邓伟民, 等. 骨代谢生化指标临床应用专家共识(2019)[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2019, 25(10):1357-1372.
[25]	邓琳, 冯倩倩, 凌斌, 等. 卵巢切除手术对大鼠骨质的影响[J]. 中日友好医院学报, 2020, 34(1):19-22.
[26]	Bokhari RA, Lau SF, Mohamed S. Orthosiphon stamineus (Misai Kucing) ameliorated postmenopausal osteoporosis in rat model[J]. Menopause, 2018, 25(2):202-210.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Items	BMD of whole body	Cervical vertebra	Lumbar vertebra	Proximal femur	Mid femur	Distal femur
Control	238.78±26.74	190.31±24.05	251.21±75.13	351.04±31.27	365.68±28.92	345.73±36.87
Sham operated	227.20±14.32	250.06±75.01	225.27±45.15	373.56±41.64	370.31±23.55	377.89±45.75
275 nm	193.34±13.28^*#	210.88±9.99	260.42±35.29	298.48±11.59^*#	317.88±15.59^*#	307.02±14.06^*#
310 nm	191.19±18.48^*#	197.69±34.42	300.98±23.66	297.32±14.62^*#	302.62±25.83^*#	301.33±14.04^*#
F value	8.09	2.38	2.56	12.42	12.57	9.07
P value	<0.001	0.099	0.083	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

Items	BMD of whole body	Cervical vertebra	Lumbar vertebra	Proximal femur	Mid femur	Distal femur
Control	233.17±39.74	191.66±25.91	231.39±41.02	343.53±37.72	357.12±26.26	329.21±19.56
Sham operated	233.68±6.02	222.85±64.86	232.55±49.59	352.10±34.42	357.58±38.74	350.18±35.73
275 nm	221.68±25.52^★	224.62±48.72	289.51±27.61^★	323.69±45.79^★	358.44±48.86^★	353.33±44.63^★
310 nm	267.48±20.54^★	249.59±56.49^★	399.60±80.90^*#★	389.77±51.37^★	424.00±95.52^★	430.37±89.81^1★
F value	3.64	1.3	13.57	2.63	1.98	4.11
P value	0.027	0.301	<0.001	0.077	0.149	0.019

Items	25(OH)D/(μg/L)	PINP/(U/L)	OC/(U/L)
Control	21.32±6.65	129.41±2.14	1.32±0.07
Sham operated	20.42±5.76	130.12±10.17	1.32±0.08
275 nm	46.78±5.59^*#	157.07±13.80	2.05±0.53^*#
310 nm	58.05±12.74^*#	176.16±24.18^*#	2.04±0.53^*#
F value	19.6	7.68	7.06
P value	<0.001	0.001	0.002