北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 938-941. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清25-羟维生素D与系统性红斑狼疮活动的关系

邹健梅,武丽君(),罗采南,石亚妹,吴雪   

  1. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院风湿免疫科,乌鲁木齐 830001
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-23 出版日期:2021-10-18 发布日期:2021-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 武丽君 E-mail:wwlj330@126.com

Relationship of serum 25- hydroxy vitamin D and systemic lupus erythematosus

ZOU Jian-mei,WU Li-jun(),LUO Cai-nan,SHI Ya-mei,WU Xue   

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People’s Hospital, Urumqi 830001, China
  • Received:2019-10-23 Online:2021-10-18 Published:2021-10-11
  • Contact: Li-jun WU E-mail:wwlj330@126.com

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 探讨血清25-羟维生素D[25-dihydroxy vitamin D,25(OH)D]在系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus,SLE)活动中的应用价值。方法: 收集2016年7月至2019年7月就诊新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院风湿免疫科158例SLE患者。根据SLE疾病活动指数评分(systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index,SLEADI)将158例SLE患者分为两组:活动组59例(SLEADI>4),非活动组99例(SLEDAI≤4)。选取新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院风湿免疫科体检中心性别、年龄相匹配的健康人群50例作为健康对照组。收集入选患者的一般资料、实验室数据及血清25(OH)D水平。结果: (1)SLE组25(OH)D水平[10.4(5.6,15.8)μg/L]明显低于健康对照组[25.5(22.8,32.3) μg/L,P <0.01];SLE活动组25(OH)D水平为[6.2(3.7,13.8)μg/L],非活动组为[12.3(7.2,16.7) μg/L],组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);狼疮肾炎(lupus nephritis,LN)组患者血清25(OH)D水平[6.7(4.4,12.9) μg/L]明显低于SLE无肾脏损害患者[13.3(7.4,18.7) μg/L,P <0.01]。(2)SLE患者中25(OH)D水平与SLEDAI、24h尿蛋白定量(24h urinary protein quantification,24h-pro)升高均呈负相关(r=-0.35和-0.39,P<0.01);与补体C3降低呈正相关(r=0.24,P<0.01)。(3)通过单因素分析发现抗双链DNA抗体(anti-ds DNA antibodies,ds-DNA)、抗史密斯抗体(anti-Smith antibodies,Sm)、IgG、C3、C4、红细胞沉降率(erythrocyte sedimentation rate,ESR)、24h-pro以及25(OH)D与SLE患者疾病活动相关,通过多因素Logistic回归分析发现25(OH)D降低是SLE患者疾病活动的独立危险因素。结论: 血清25(OH)D的下降与SLE患者病情活动有相关性,而且可能与LN相关,在SLE的发生、发展中有重要作用。

关键词: 系统性红斑狼疮, 狼疮肾炎, 25-羟维生素D, 疾病活动

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the application value of serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Data of 158 patients with SLE in Department of Rheumatology and Immunology in the People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from July 2016 to July 2019. All the SLE patients were divided into two groups by SLE scores of the disease activity index (SLEADI): 59 cases of active group (SLEADI>4), 99 cases of non-active group (SLEDAI ≤4). Fifty healthy people were selected as healthy control group. The patients’ general information and their laboratory data including serum 25(OH)D levels were collected. Statistical methods used were t-test, Spearman’s correalation analysis and Logistic regression analysis. Results: (1) A total of 208 cases were included in this study. The level of 25(OH)D in SLE group [10.4(5.6,15.8) μg/L] was significantly lower than that in healthy control group [25.5(22.8,32.3) μg/L, P<0.01]. 25(OH)D level in active SLE patients [6.2(3.7,13.8) μg/L] was significantly lower than that in remission SLE patients [12.3(7.2,16.7) μg/L, P<0.01]. The serum 25(OH)D level in lupus nephritis [6.7 (4.4, 12.9) μg/L] was significantly lower than that in SLE without renal involvement [13.3 (7.4, 18.7) μg/L, P<0.01]. (2) A significant negative correlation was demonstrated between the serum level of 25(OH)D and SLEDAI (r=-0.35,P<0.01), and the 24h urinary protein excretion (r=-0.39, P<0.01).Positive correlation was demonstrated between the serum level of 25(OH)D and C3 that decreased (r=0.249, P<0.05). (3) Univariate analysis showed anti- dsDNA antibodies(ds-DNA), anti-Sm antibodies(Sm), IgG, C3, C4, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), 24h urinary protein quantification(24h-pro) and 25(OH)D were associated with disease activity in the SLE patients; Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that 25(OH)D was associated with the disease activity of the lupus patients. Conclusion: The decrease of vitamin D level is related to the disease activity of SLE patients, and may be related to lupus nephritis, which plays an important role in the occurrence and development of SLE.

Key words: Systemic lupus erythematosus, Lupus nephritis, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, Disease activity

中图分类号: 

  • R593.24

表1

SLE患者活动组与非活动组一般数据对比"

Items Active group Non-active group P
Cases, n(%) 59 (37) 99 (63) 0.95
Gender, n(%)
Female 55 (34.8) 92 (58.3)
Male 4 (2.5) 7 (4.4)
Age/year, x ?±s 25.1±12.9 24.8±12.7 0.88
Course of disease/month, M (P25, P75) 9.6 (4.8, 12.0) 13.2 (10.8, 36.0) <0.01
ANA, n(%), M (P25, P75) 59 (100) 97 (98.0) 0.82
ds-DNA, n(%), M (P25, P75) 30 (50.8) 12 (12.1) <0.01
Sm, n(%), M (P25, P75) 19 (32.2) 12 (12.2) <0.05
SSA, n(%), M (P25, P75) 30 (50.8) 53 (54.1) 0.70
SSB, n(%), M (P25, P75) 7 (11.9) 10 (10.2) 0.75
Acl/(RU/mL), M (P25, P75) 3.4 (2.0, 8.3) 2.3 (2.0, 4.8) 0.06
β2-GPI/(RU/mL), M (P25, P75) 5.1 (2.0, 12.9) 5.9 (2.2, 13.3) 0.67
C1q/(AU/mL), M (P25, P75) 49.0 (8.3, 174.0) 7.7 (3.9, 26.9) <0.01
Complement C1q/(mg/L), M (P25, P75) 169.0 (129.8, 210.9) 165.4 (138.0, 26.9) 0.98
IgG/(g/L), M (P25, P75) 13.5 (8.6, 22.1) 12.5 (10.1, 16.4) 0.33
IgA/(g/L), M (P25, P75) 2.6 (1.6, 3.4) 2.3 (1.5, 3.3) 0.61
IgM/(g/L), M (P25, P75) 1.0 (0.6, 1.3) 0.9 (0.6, 0.9) 0.61
C3/(g/L), M (P25, P75)
C4/(g/L), M (P25, P75)
ESR/(mm/H), M (P25, P75)
CRP/(mg/L), M (P25, P75)
24h-pro/(g), M (P25, P75)
BUN/(mmol/L), M (P25, P75)
Cr/(μmol/L), M (P25, P75)
BGP/(μg/L), M (P25, P75)
25(OH)D/(μg/L), M (P25, P75)
0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
0.1 (0.0, 0.1)
41.0 (20.3, 54.0)
5.0 (2.5, 15.0)
0.3 (0.1, 1.9)
5.6 (3.9, 8.2)
56.7 (48.2, 71.2)
8.0 (5.0, 13.8)
6.2 (3.7, 13.8)
0.8 (0.9, 0.6)
0.1 (0.1, 0.2)
18.0 (10.8, 28.0)
2.8 (1.9, 5.0)
0.1 (0.0, 0.1)
4.6 (3.6, 5.4)
57.8 (49.8, 64.3)
10.0 (7.0, 14.0)
12.3 (7.2, 16.7)
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.58
0.11
<0.01
[1] Cutolo M, Otsa K. Review: Vitamin D, immunity and lupus [J]. Lupus, 2008, 17(1):6-10.
pmid: 18089676
[2] Kamen DL. Vitamin D in lupus-new kid on the block? [J]. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 2010, 68(3):218-222.
[3] Ritterhouse LL, Crowe SR, Niewold TB, et al. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased autoimmune response in healthy individuals and in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2011, 70(9):1569-1574.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.148494 pmid: 21586442
[4] Amital H, Szekanecz Z, Szücs G, et al. Serum concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are inversely related to disease activity: is it time to routinely supplement patients with SLE with vitamin D? [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010, 69(6):1155-1157.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.120329 pmid: 20439290
[5] Yeap SS, Othman AZ, Zain AA, et al. Vitamin D levels: Its relationship to bone mineral density response and disease activity in premenopausal Malaysian systemic lupus erythematosus patients on corticosteroids [J]. Int J Rheum Dis, 2012, 15(1):17-24
doi: 10.1111/apl.2012.15.issue-1
[6] Souto M, Coelho A, Guo C, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency in Brazilian patients with SLE: Prevalence, associated factors, and relationship with activity [J]. Lupus, 2011, 20(10):1019-1026.
doi: 10.1177/0961203311401457 pmid: 21646315
[7] De Souza VA, Bastos MG, Fernandes NM, et al. Association of hypovitaminosis D with systemic lupus erythematosus and inflammation [J]. Bras Nefrol, 2014, 36(4):430-436.
[8] Leventis P, Patel S. Clinical aspects of vitamin D in the management of rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2008, 47(11):1617-1621.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken296 pmid: 18682414
[9] Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus [J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1997, 40(9):1725-1734.
[10] Ding Y, Liao W, He XJ, et al. Effects of 1,25(OH)2 D3 and vitamin D receptor on peripheral CD4+/CD8+double-positive T lymphocytes in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus [J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2017, 21(5):975-985.
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13037 pmid: 28063200
[11] Mok CC. Vitamin D and systemic lupus erythematosus: an update [J]. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 2013, 9(5):453-463.
doi: 10.1586/eci.13.19
[12] 张竞, 罗静, 王静, 等. 血清25(OH)D水平与初诊系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动度的相关性研究 [J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2019, 23(1):36-41.
[13] 方慧玲, 禹松林, 韩建华, 等. 中国北方健康人群血清 25羟维生素D3和25羟维生素D2水平 [J]. 中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志, 2014, 7(3):199-205.
[14] Cashman KD, Dowling KG. Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: Pandemic? [J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2016, 103(4):1033-1044.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.120873 pmid: 26864360
[15] 张永锋, 郑毅. 初发系统性红斑狼疮患者血清25-羟-维生素D和维生素D抗体水平变化及意义 [J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2012, 16(10):661-664.
[16] 卢勤燕, 蔡小燕, 林小军, 等. 系统性红斑狼疮患者外周血维生素D水平及其临床意义 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(7):1123-1125.
[17] 洪琼. 25羟基维生素D与类风湿关节炎及系统性红斑狼疮的相关性研究 [D]. 安徽, 安徽医科大学, 2013: 1-108.
[18] Shoenfeld N, Amital H, Shoenfeld Y. The effect of melanism and vitamin D synjournal on the incidence of autoimmune disease [J]. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol, 2009, 5(2):99-105.
doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0989 pmid: 19182816
[19] 陈铭聿, 孙彬, 张波, 等. 狼疮肾炎患者血维生素D3水平与疾病活动度的相关性研究 [J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2015, 31(2):881-886.
[1] 武志慧, 胡明智, 赵巧英, 吕凤凤, 张晶莹, 张伟, 王永福, 孙晓林, 王慧. miR-125b-5p修饰脐带间充质干细胞对系统性红斑狼疮的免疫调控机制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 860-867.
[2] 乔佳佳,田聪,黄晓波,刘军. 肾结石合并系统性红斑狼疮行经皮肾镜碎石取石术的安全性和有效性评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 745-749.
[3] 任立敏,赵楚楚,赵义,周惠琼,张莉芸,王友莲,沈凌汛,范文强,李洋,厉小梅,王吉波,程永静,彭嘉婧,赵晓珍,邵苗,李茹. 系统性红斑狼疮低疾病活动度及缓解状况的真实世界研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 273-278.
[4] 罗芷筠,吴佳佳,宋优,梅春丽,杜戎. 伴神经精神系统病变的系统性红斑狼疮相关巨噬细胞活化综合征2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1111-1117.
[5] 姚海红,杨帆,唐素玫,张霞,何菁,贾园. 系统性红斑狼疮及成人Still病合并巨噬细胞活化综合征的临床特点及诊断指标[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 966-974.
[6] 赵祥格,刘佳庆,黄会娜,陆智敏,白自然,李霞,祁荆荆. 干扰素-α介导系统性红斑狼疮外周血CD56dimCD57+自然杀伤细胞功能的损伤[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 975-981.
[7] 张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 体重指数与类风湿关节炎临床特征的相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 993-999.
[8] 邵苗,郭惠芳,雷玲彦,赵清,丁艳杰,林进,吴锐,于峰,李玉翠,苗华丽,张莉芸,杜燕,焦瑞英,庞丽霞,龙丽,栗占国,李茹. 短间期小剂量环磷酰胺治疗系统性红斑狼疮耐受性的多中心对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1112-1116.
[9] 李敏,侯林卿,金月波,何菁. 系统性红斑狼疮合并视网膜病变的临床及免疫学特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1106-1111.
[10] 张琳崎,赵静,王红彦,王宗沂,李英妮,汤稷旸,李思莹,曲进锋,赵明威. 抗ENO1抗体与狼疮性视网膜病变的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1099-1105.
[11] 张璐,陈澄,翁梅婷,郑爱萍,苏美玲,王庆文,蔡月明. 狼疮肾炎患者肾小管间质损伤的自身抗体特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1094-1098.
[12] 张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎患者生活质量与疾病活动度的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1086-1093.
[13] 田佳宜,张霞,程功,刘庆红,王世阳,何菁. 系统性红斑狼疮患者血清白细胞介素-2受体α水平及其临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1083-1087.
[14] 夏芳芳,鲁芙爱,吕慧敏,杨国安,刘媛. 系统性红斑狼疮伴间质性肺炎的临床特点及相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 266-272.
[15] 耿研,李伯睿,张卓莉. 系统性红斑狼疮患者有症状关节病变的肌肉骨骼超声特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 163-168.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!