儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探究影响儿童及青少年外伤挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的影响因素。方法: 回顾性分析2015年6月至2024年8月就诊于北京大学口腔医院儿童口腔科5~17岁发生恒前牙挫入患者的临床资料，记录外伤年龄、性别、牙根发育程度、挫入程度、挫入方向、是否伴有冠折露髓、是否伴有牙龈撕裂伤、邻牙是否发生移位性损伤、邻牙是否处于破骨后萌出期，以外伤挫入牙在建议观察时间内是否有自行再萌出作为结局变量，采用单因素分析及多因素二元Logistic回归模型进行影响因素分析。结果: 共纳入139例患者170颗患牙，包括男性84例，女性55例；年龄范围为5.3~16.3岁，平均年龄(9.0±2.1)岁。根据判断标准，在建议观察期间出现自行再萌出的患牙有112颗，无自行再萌出的患牙有58颗。挫入程度在3 mm以下患牙45颗(26.47%)，3~7 mm患牙102颗(60.00%)，>7 mm患牙23颗(13.53%)；根向挫入的患牙117颗(68.82%)，近远中向挫入的患牙17颗(10.00%)，颊舌向挫入的患牙36颗(21.18%)。二元Logistic回归分析显示，近远中向挫入(OR=0.167，95%CI: 0.031~0.9048，P=0.038)、挫入>7 mm(OR=0.065，95%CI: 0.014~0.299，P < 0.001)、邻牙发生移位性损伤(OR=0.369，95%CI: 0.144~0.944，P=0.037)是挫入牙自行再萌出的独立危险因素。挫入 < 3 mm(OR=9.860，95%CI: 2.430~40.009，P=0.001)和邻牙处于破骨后萌出期(OR=4.712，95%CI: 1.528~14.531，P=0.007)是外伤挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的独立保护性因素，Cvek牙根发育分期每增加一个分期单位(OR=0.611，95%CI: 0.408~0.914，P=0.017)，挫入牙自行再萌出可能性降低61.1%。年龄(OR=1.077，95%CI: 0.763~1.521，P=0.673)、牙龈撕裂伤(OR=0.865，95%CI: 0.290~2.578，P=0.794)并不会对挫入恒前牙自行再萌出产生影响。结论: 近远中向挫入、挫入程度>7 mm、邻牙发生移位性损伤是儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的独立危险因素，挫入程度 < 3 mm、相邻恒牙处于破骨后萌出期是挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的独立保护性因素。

关键词: 牙撕脱, 恒牙列, 牙萌出, 危险因素, 儿童, 青少年

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the factors related to spontaneous re-eruption after intruded injury in permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents. Methods: Clinical data from 5- to 17-year-old patients who sustained intrusive luxation of permanent anterior teeth and treated in the Department of Pedia-tric Dentistry of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from June 2015 to August 2024 were reviewed. Information of age, gender, degree of intrusion, direction of intrusion, tooth development, concomitant injuries, luxation and post-osteoclastic eruption of the adjacent teeth were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they showed spontaneous re-eruption during advised observation after intrusion. Univariate and multifactor analysis were performed using Logistic regression. Results: Data from 170 teeth in 139 patients whose age ranging from 5.3-16.3 years [mean age (9.0± 2.1) years] were examined. A gender disparity was observed among the patients, with 84 being male and 55 being female. Among the 170 teeth, 112 were categorized as successfully spontaneous re-eruption during advised observation after intrusion, while 58 were not. In terms of the degree of intrusion, 45 teeth (26.47%) had intrusion less than 3 mm, 102 teeth (60.00%) experienced intrusion between 3-7 mm, and 23 teeth (13.53%) were faced with intrusion exceeding 7 mm. As for the direction of intrusion, 117 teeth (68.82%) were straight intrusion while mesial-distal and buccal-lingual intrusion respectively accounting for 17 (10.00%) and 23 (13.53%). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that mesial-distal intrusion (OR=0.167, 95%CI: 0.031-0.9048, P=0.038), intrusion of >7 mm (OR=0.065, 95%CI: 0.014-0.299, P < 0.001) and luxation of adjacent teeth (OR=0.369, 95%CI: 0.144-0.944, P=0.037) were independent risk factors for spontaneous re-eruption of traumatically intruded permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents during advised observation after intrusion, while intrusion of < 3 mm (OR=9.860, 95%CI: 2.430-40.009, P=0.001) and post-osteoclastic eruption of adjacent teeth (OR=4.712, 95%CI: 1.528-14.531, P=0.007) were independent protective factors. The possibility of spontaneous re-eruption in permanent anterior teeth during advised observation after intrusion was decreased by 61.1% with the increase of root development using Cvek' s classification (OR=0.611, 95%CI: 0.408-0.914, P=0.017). Age (OR=1.077, 95%CI: 0.763-1.521, P=0.673) and laceration of gingival (OR=0.865, 95%CI: 0.290-2.578, P=0.794) didn't significantly affect the spontaneous re-eruption during advised observation after intrusion. Conclusion: In this study, mesial-distal intrusion, intrusion of >7 mm and luxation of adjacent teeth were independent risk factors for spontaneous re-eruption of traumatically intruded permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents during advised observation, while intrusion of < 3 mm and post-osteoclastic eruption of adjacent teeth were served as independent protective factors.

Key words: Tooth avulsion, Permanent dentition, Tooth eruption, Risk factors, Child, Adolescent

中图分类号:

R788.4

邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 148-153.

Minting DENG, Nan WANG, Bin XIA, Yuming ZHAO, Junxia ZHU. Factors associated with spontaneous re-eruption of traumatically intruded permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(1): 148-153.

图/表 3

图1

表1

表2

参考文献 21

1	Andreasen JO , Bakland LK , Matras RC , et al. Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 1. An epidemiological study of 216 intruded permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2006, 22 (2): 83- 89. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00421.x
2	Costa LA , Ribeiro CC , Cantanhede LM , et al. Treatments for intrusive luxation in permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 46 (2): 214- 229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.021
3	Andreasen JO , Bakland LK , Andreasen FM . Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 2. A clinical study of the effect of pre-injury and injury factors, such as sex, age, stage of root development, tooth location, and extent of injury including number of intruded teeth on 140 intruded permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2006, 22 (2): 90- 98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00422.x
4	Singhal R , Negi S , Namdev R , et al. Effect of root immaturity and depth of intrusion on spontaneous re-eruption and healing complications: A retrospective analysis[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2024, 40 (3): 243- 250. doi: 10.1111/edt.12921
5	Andreasen JO , Bakland LK , Andreasen FM . Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 3. A clinical study of the effect of treatment variables such as treatment delay, method of repositioning, type of splint, length of splinting and antibiotics on 140 teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2006, 22 (2): 99- 111. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00423.x
6	Faria G , Silva RA , Fiori-Júnior M , et al. Re-eruption of traumatically intruded mature permanent incisor: case report[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2004, 20 (4): 229- 232. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2004.00237.x
7	Alkhalifa JD , Alazemi AA . Intrusive luxation of permanent teeth: A systematic review of factors important for treatment decision-making[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2014, 30 (3): 169- 175. doi: 10.1111/edt.12104
8	Humphrey JM , Kenny DJ , Barrett EJ . Clinical outcomes for permanent incisor luxations in a pediatric population. Ⅰ. Intrusions[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2003, 19 (5): 266- 273. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2003.00207.x
9	Bourguignon C , Cohenca N , Lauridsen E , et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2020, 36 (4): 314- 330. doi: 10.1111/edt.12578
10	Diangelis AJ , Andreasen JO , Ebeleseder KA , et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2012, 28 (1): 2- 12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01103.x
11	Cvek M . Prognosis of luxated non-vital maxillary incisors treated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta-percha. A retrospective clinical study[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1992, 8 (2): 45- 55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1992.tb00228.x
12	Wigen TI , Agnalt R , Jacobsen I . Intrusive luxation of permanent incisors in Norwegians aged 6-17 years: A retrospective study of treatment and outcome[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2008, 24 (6): 612- 618. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00686.x
13	Wang N , Chen J , Zhao Y . Clinical outcomes of 79 traumatically intruded permanent teeth in Chinese children and adolescents: A retrospective study[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2020, 36 (2): 174- 184. doi: 10.1111/edt.12521
14	Tsilingaridis G , Malmgren B , Andreasen JO , et al. Intrusive luxation of 60 permanent incisors: A retrospective study of treatment and outcome[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2012, 28 (6): 416- 422. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01088.x
15	Bassetti MA , Mischler DC , Kuttenberger JJ , et al. Spontaneous reeruption after intrusive luxation of the permanent incisors by incomplete root formation. Two case reports (in German)[J]. Swiss Dent J, 2019, 129 (9): 709- 717. doi: 10.61872/sdj-2019-09-02
16	Ebeleseder KA , Santler G , Glockner K , et al. An analysis of 58 traumatically intruded and surgically extruded permanent teeth[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 2000, 16 (1): 34- 39. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016001034.x
17	Al-Badri S , Kinirons M , Cole B , et al. Factors affecting resorption in traumatically intruded permanent incisors in children[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2002, 18 (2): 73- 76. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.180205.x
18	Xavier TA , Madalena IR , Da Silva RAB , et al. Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for delayed tooth eruption associated with persistent primary tooth[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2021, 79 (8): 600- 605. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1918762
19	Campbell KM , Casas MJ , Kenny DJ . Ankylosis of traumatized permanent incisors: Pathogenesis and current approaches to diagnosis and management[J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 2005, 71 (10): 763- 768.
20	Ideno H , Komatsu K , Nakashima K , et al. Tooth transplantation and replantation: Biological insights towards therapeutic improvements[J]. Genesis, 2022, 60 (8/9): e23496.
21	Lauridsen E , Blanche P , Amaloo C , et al. The risk of healing complications in primary teeth with concussion or subluxation injury: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2017, 33 (5): 337- 344. doi: 10.1111/edt.12342

相关文章 15

[1]	郭华秋, 王哲, 杨雪, 白洁. 口腔急诊出血患者的临床特征与危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 142-147.
[2]	程雅雯, 李德利, 赵彦, 夏斌, 刘云松. 青少年恒牙牙体缺损的修复难点及过渡修复的方式选择[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 208-213.
[3]	李钰锴, 王红彦, 罗靓, 李云, 李春. 抗磷脂抗体在白塞病合并血栓中的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1036-1040.
[4]	田杨, 韩永正, 李娇, 王明亚, 曲音音, 房景超, 金辉, 李民, 王军, 徐懋, 王圣林, 郭向阳. 颈椎前路手术后硬膜外血肿的发生率和危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1058-1064.
[5]	王明瑞, 赖金惠, 姬家祥, 唐鑫伟, 胡浩浦, 王起, 许克新, 徐涛, 胡浩. 使用中文版威斯康星结石生活质量问卷预测肾结石患者生活质量降低的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1069-1074.
[6]	杨颖婷, 李若竹, 窦桂丽, 雷玥, 夏斌. iRoot BP Plus用于年轻恒牙外伤部分牙髓切断治疗的临床随机对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1083-1088.
[7]	王敏, 李倩. 青少年抑郁症患者心理弹性影响因素的路径分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 809-814.
[8]	赵双云, 邹思雨, 李雪莹, 沈丽娟, 周虹. 中文版口腔健康素养量表简版(HeLD-14)在学龄前儿童家长中应用的信度和效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 828-832.
[9]	陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[10]	李志存, 吴天俣, 梁磊, 范宇, 孟一森, 张骞. 穿刺活检单针阳性前列腺癌术后病理升级的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[11]	颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[12]	陈延,李况蒙,洪锴,张树栋,程建星,郑仲杰,唐文豪,赵连明,张海涛,姜辉,林浩成. 阴茎海绵体注射试验对阴茎血管功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 680-686.
[13]	庞博,郭桐君,陈曦,郭华棋,石嘉章,陈娟,王欣梅,李耀妍,单安琪,余恒意,黄婧,汤乃军,王艳,郭新彪,李国星,吴少伟. 天津与上海35岁以上人群氮氧化物个体暴露水平及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 700-707.
[14]	和静,房中则,杨颖,刘静,马文瑶,霍勇,高炜,武阳丰,谢高强. 血浆中脂质代谢分子与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块、传统心血管危险因素及膳食因素的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 722-728.
[15]	岳芷涵,韩娜,鲍筝,吕瑾莨,周天一,计岳龙,王辉,刘珏,王海俊. 儿童早期体重指数轨迹与超重风险关联的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 390-396.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Variables	Spontaneous re-eruption			P
Variables	Total (n=170)	No (n=58)	Yes (n=112)	P
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s	9.20±2.15	9.98±2.48	8.80±1.84	0.002
Degree of intrusion, n(%)				< 0.001
< 3 mm	45 (26.47)	3 (5.17)	42 (37.50)
3-7 mm	102 (60.00)	37(63.79)	65(58.04)
>7 mm	23(13.53)	18 (31.03)	5(4.46)
Direction of intrusion, n(%)				< 0.001
Straight	117 (68.82)	24(41.38)	93 (83.04)
Buccal-lingual	36 (21.18)	20(34.48)	16 (14.29)
Mesial-distal	17 (10.00)	14 (24.14)	3 (2.68)
Post-osteoclastic eruption of the adjacent teeth, n(%)				< 0.001
No	99(58.24)	49(84.48)	50(44.64)
Yes	71(41.76)	9(15.52)	62(55.36)
Laceration of gingival, n(%)				< 0.001
No	125 (73.53)	32 (55.17)	93 (83.04)
Yes	45 (26.47)	26 (44.83)	19 (16.96)
Luxation of adjacent teeth, n(%)				< 0.001
No	75 (44.12)	12 (20.69)	63 (56.25)
Yes	95 (55.88)	46 (79.31)	49(43.75)
Cvek’s classification, n(%)				0.009
Stage 1	9 (5.29)	1 (1.72)	8 (7.14)
Stage 2	27 (15.88)	7 (12.07)	20 (17.86)
Stage 3	48 (28.24)	12 (20.69)	36 (32.14)
Stage 4	31 (18.24)	9 (15.52)	22 (19.64)
Stage 5	55 (32.35)	29 (50.00)	26 (23.21)
Complex crown fracture, n(%)				0.895
No	156 (91.76)	53 (91.38)	103 (91.96)
Yes	14 (8.24)	5 (8.62)	9 (8.04)

Variables	β	SE	Wald χ²	P	OR (95%CI)
Age	0.074	0.176	0.178	0.673	1.077 (0.763-1.521)
Degree of intrusion
3-7 mm					1.00 (Reference)
>7 mm	-2.727	0.776	12.354	< 0.001	0.065 (0.014-0.299)
< 3 mm	2.288	0.715	10.255	0.001	9.860 (2.430-40.009)
Direction of intrusion
Straight					1.00 (Reference)
Buccal-lingual	-0.980	0.519	3.566	0.059	0.374 (0.136-1.038)
Mesial-distal	-1.793	0.863	4.313	0.038	0.167 (0.031-0.904)
Cvek’s classification	-0.493	0.205	5.748	0.017	0.611 (0.408-0.914)
Laceration of gingival
No					1.00 (Reference)
Yes	-0.145	0.557	0.068	0.794	0.865 (0.290-2.578)
Luxation of adjacent teeth
No					1.00 (Reference)
Yes	-0.997	0.479	4.331	0.037	0.369 (0.144-0.944)
Post-osteoclastic eruption of the adjacent teeth
No					1.00 (Reference)
Yes	1.550	0.575	7.277	0.007	4.712 (1.528-14.531)