北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 123-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙髓根尖周病根管治疗疗效预测模型的建立

张茗茗1,郑迎东2,梁宇红1, 3△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,牙体牙髓科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081; 2. 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系, 北京100091; 3. 北京大学国际医院口腔科, 北京102206)
  • 出版日期:2018-02-18 发布日期:2018-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 梁宇红 E-mail:leungyuhong@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都临床特色应用研究项目(Z131107002231045)资助

A prognostic model for assessment of outcome of root canal treatment in teeth with pulpitis or apical periodontitis#br#

ZHANG Ming-ming1, ZHENG Ying-dong2, LIANG Yu-hong1, 3△   

  1. (1. Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China; 3. Department of Stomatology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China)
  • Online:2018-02-18 Published:2018-02-18
  • Contact: LIANG Yu-hong E-mail:leungyuhong@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Clinical Characteristics and Application Research of Capital (Z131107002231045)

摘要: 目的:初步建立牙髓根尖周病根管治疗后2年临床疗效预测模型。方法:基于根管治疗后2年疗效临床回顾性研究,以因牙髓根尖周病接受根管治疗及术后2年随访的360例患牙为研究样本,随机抽取约67%为训练样本(建立模型),其余为验证样本(模型外部验证)。以影像学评价结果为疗效标准,应用Logistic回归方法以根尖周有/无病变、根尖周病变是/否缩小为因变量分别建立临床疗效预测模型。以受试者工作特征(receiver opera-ting characteristic,ROC)曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)评价模型预测能力。结果:以根尖周有/无病变为因变量建立模型一,纳入术前根尖周有无病变、根管弯曲度、根管充填长度及密度建模,模型AUC为0.802(95%CI: 0.744~0.859),验证样本检验外部效度结果为0.688。以根尖周病变是否缩小为因变量建立模型二,根管充填长度和密度参与建模,模型AUC为0.734(95%CI: 0.612~0.856),外部验证结果为0.681。根管重度弯曲、根管治疗质量好的牙髓炎患牙接受根管治疗术后2年,通过模型一预测,根尖周无病变概率达90%,慢性根尖周炎患牙病变愈合概率为51%。应用模型二预测,慢性根尖周炎患牙根管治疗后2年,根管充填质量好的病例出现病变缩小的概率为95%,而根管充填质量不佳者病变缩小的概率仅为39%。结论:术前根尖周状态、根管弯曲情况、根管治疗质量可用于预测根管治疗后2年临床疗效。

关键词: 根管疗法, 放射摄影术, 治疗结果, 预测模型

Abstract: Objective: To present a prognostic model for evaluating the outcome of root canal treatment in teeth with pulpitis or apical periodontitis 2 years after treatment. Methods: The implementation of this study was based on a retrospective study on the 2-year outcome of root canal treatment. A cohort of 360 teeth, which received treatment and review, were chosen to build up the total sample size. In the study, 143 teeth with vital pulp and 217 teeth with apical periodontitis were included. About 67% of the samples were selected randomly to derive a training date set for modeling, and the others were used as validating date set for testing. Logistic regression models were used to produce the prognostic models. The dependent variable was defined as absence of periapical lesion or reduction of periapical lesion. The predictability of the models was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: Four predictors were included in model one (absence of apical lesion): pre-operative periapical radiolucency, canal curvature, density and apical extent of root fillings. The AUC was 0.802 (95%CI: 0.744-0.859). And the AUC of the testing date was 0.688. Only the density and apical extent of root fillings were included to present model two (reduction of apical lesion). The AUC of training dates and testing dates were 0.734 (95%CI: 0.612-0.856) and 0.681, respectively. As predicted by model one, the probability of absence of periapical lesion 2 years after endodontic treatment was 90% in pulpitis teeth with sever root-canal curvature and adequate root canal fillings, but 51% in teeth with apical periodontitis. When using prognostic model two for prediction, in teeth with apical periodontitis, the probability of detecting lesion reduction with adequate or inadequate root fillings was 95% and 39% 2 years after treatment. Conclusion: The preoperative periapical status, canal curvature and quality of root canal treatment could be used to predict the 2year outcome of root canal treatment.

Key words: Root canal therapy, Radiography, Treatment outcome, Prognostic model

中图分类号: 

  • R781.3
[1] 王楠楠, 袁大晋, 朱昱冰, 丁磊. 结直肠癌根治术后肝转移风险多中心列线图预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 290-300.
[2] 李伟浩, 张学民, 李伟, 张韬, 张小明. 胸主动脉腔内修复术左肱动脉穿刺点使用血管缝合器处理的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 388-392.
[3] FarinEbrahimi, 冯志强, FarazEbrahimi, 韩玮华, 于子杨, 贾宽宽, 安金刚. 上颌药物相关性颌骨坏死的不同分期手术治疗效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 107-114.
[4] 潘莲菲, 李文静, 王瑞洋, 焦剑, 曹战强, 高丽, 释栋. 口服抗生素辅助牙周机械治疗对重度牙周炎的短期疗效及影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 30-36.
[5] 康一帆, 葛严军, 吕晓鸣, 谢尚, 单小峰, 蔡志刚. 即刻种植体支持式义齿修复的血管化髂骨瓣重建下颌骨缺损[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 78-84.
[6] 何海龙,李清,徐涛,张晓威. 构建显微精索手术治疗精索疼痛的术后疼痛缓解预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 646-655.
[7] 李文菁,张保宙,李恒,赖良鹏,杜辉,孙宁,龚晓峰,李莹,王岩,武勇. 胫距跟融合治疗终末期踝和后足病变的中短期临床结果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 299-306.
[8] 苏俊琪,王晓颖,孙志强. 舌鳞状细胞癌根治性切除术后患者预后预测列线图的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 120-130.
[9] 邹雪,白小娟,张丽卿. 艾拉莫德联合托法替布治疗难治性中重度类风湿关节炎的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[10] 薛蔚,董樑,钱宏阳,费笑晨. 前列腺癌新辅助治疗与辅助治疗的现状及进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 775-780.
[11] 邱敏,宗有龙,王滨帅,杨斌,徐楚潇,孙争辉,陆敏,赵磊,卢剑,刘承,田晓军,马潞林. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中高复杂程度肾肿瘤的效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[12] 张云静,乔丽颖,祁萌,严颖,亢伟伟,刘国臻,王明远,席云峰,王胜锋. 乳腺癌患者新发心血管疾病预测模型的建立与验证:基于内蒙古区域医疗数据[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 471-479.
[13] 王磊,韩天栋,江卫星,李钧,张道新,田野. 主动迁移技术与原位碎石技术在输尿管软镜治疗1~2 cm输尿管上段结石中的安全性和有效性比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 553-557.
[14] 田靖,秦满,陈洁,夏斌. 失活剂烧伤致乳磨牙早失及恒牙胚丧失2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 381-385.
[15] 李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!