北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 177-181. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.028

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较

李伟浩,李伟(),张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明   

  1. 北京大学人民医院血管外科,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2022-02-18 发布日期:2022-02-21
  • 通讯作者: 李伟 E-mail:mailtowei@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    北大医学交叉研究种子基金(BMU2018MX015);中央高校基本科研业务费,北京大学临床医学+X青年专项(PKU2019LCXQ009);中央高校基本科研业务费,北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RDH2018-02)

Comparison of the outcomes between open and hybrid approaches in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms repair

LI Wei-hao,LI Wei(),ZHANG Xue-min,LI Qing-le,JIAO Yang,ZHANG Tao,JIANG Jing-jun,ZHANG Xiao-ming   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2020-06-16 Online:2022-02-18 Published:2022-02-21
  • Contact: Wei LI E-mail:mailtowei@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Medicine Seed Fund for Interdisciplinary Research(BMU2018MX015);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities: Peking University Clinical Medicine Plus X-Young Scholars Project(PKU2019LCXQ009);Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Funds(RDH2018-02)

摘要:

目的: 总结和对比去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的近远期结果。方法: 回顾性分析2008年1月至2019年12月采用传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的18例患者和采用杂交手术治疗的11例患者的临床资料。杂交手术组中,夹层动脉瘤、术前合并肾功能不全以及美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)评分≥3分的患者比例明显高于传统手术组。结果: 去分支杂交手术患者的手术时间为(445±85) min,术中出血量为(955±599) mL,术后30 d发生并发症2例,没有截瘫,死亡1例,术后30 d并发症发生率为18.2%,死亡率为9.1%。传统手术患者的手术时间为(560±245) min,术中出血量为(6 100±4 536) mL,术后30 d发生并发症12例,其中截瘫1例,死亡4例,术后30 d并发症发生率为66.7%,死亡率为22.2%。去分支杂交手术的术中出血量明显低于传统手术(P<0.001),30 d内并发症发生率显著降低(P=0.011)。随访期内,杂交手术组二次手术4例,死亡3例,1年、5年和10年的全因生存率分别为72%、54%和29%;传统手术组二次手术1例,死亡5例,1年、5年和10年的全因生存率分别为81%、71%和35%。杂交手术和传统手术在全因生存率和动脉瘤生存率上差异没有统计学意义。结论: 去分支杂交手术是一种治疗高危胸腹主动脉瘤患者安全、有效的手术方式,术后早期并发症发生率明显低于传统手术,但中远期疗效仍需要进一步提高。

关键词: 胸腹主动脉瘤, 血管内操作, 手术后并发症, 治疗结果

Abstract:

Objective: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm is one of the most challenging aortic diseases. Open surgical repair remains constrained with considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The emergence of a hybrid approach utilizing visceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm repair has brought an alternative for high-risk patients. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between hybrid and open repairs in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods: In this retrospectively observational study, patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treated in a single center between January 2008 and December 2019 were reviewed, of whom 11 patients with hybrid repair, and 18 patients with open repair were identified. Demographic characteristic, operative data, perioperative morbidity and mortality, freedom from reintervention, and long-term survival were compared between the two groups. Results: In the hybrid repair group, the patients with dissection aneurysm, preoperative combined renal insufficiency, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 or more were significantly overwhelming than in the open repair group. The operation time of debranching hybrid repair was (445±85) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (955±599) mL. There were 2 cases of complications in the early 30 days after surgery, without paraplegia, and 1 case died. The 30-day complication rate was 18.2%, and the 30-day mortality was 9.1%. The operation time of the patients with open repair was (560±245) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (6 100±4 536) mL. Twelve patients had complications in the early 30 days after surgery, including 1 paraplegia and 4 deaths within 30 days. The 30-day complication rate was 66.7%, and the 30-day mortality was 22.2%. The bleeding volume in hybrid repair was significantly reduced compared with open repair (P<0.001). Besides, the incidence of 30-day complications in hybrid surgery was significantly reduced (P=0.011). During the follow-up period, there were 4 reinterventions and 3 deaths in hybrid repair group. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause survival rates were 72%, 54%, and 29%, respectively. In open repair group, reintervention was performed in 1 case and 5 cases died, and the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause survival rates were 81%, 71%, and 35%, respectively. There was no significant difference between hybrid repair and open repair in all-cause survival and aneurysm-specific survival. Conclusion: Hybrid approach utilizing visceral debranching with endovascular aneurysm repair is a safe and effective surgical method for high-risk patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The incidence of early postoperative complications and mortality is significantly reduced compared with traditional surgery, but the efficacy in the medium and long term still needs to be improved.

Key words: Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, Endovascular procedures, Postoperative complications, Treatment outcome

中图分类号: 

  • R654.3

表1

杂交手术和传统手术治疗的胸腹主动脉瘤患者的基线资料"

Items Hybrid repair (n=11) Open repair (n=18) P value
Age/years 53±12 46±13 0.207
Male 8 (73%) 11 (61%) 0.694
BMI/(kg/m2) 23.0±3.4 23.2±4.4 0.911
Hyperlipemia 4 (36%) 3 (17%) 0.375
Hypertension 10 (91%) 13 (72%) 0.362
Stroke 1 (9%) 1 (6%) >0.999
COPD 1 (9%) 2 (11%) >0.999
Renal insufficiency 6 (55%) 3 (17%) 0.048
History of smoking 5 (46%) 6 (33%) 0.696
Prior aortic surgery 1 (9%) 5 (28%) 0.362
LVEF/% 64±6 67±6 0.362
Baseline creatinine/(mmol/L) 152±123 77±55 0.033
Previous aortic dissection 8 (73%) 5 (28%) 0.027
Connective tissue disease 0 (0) 5 (28%) 0.126
Ruptured 3 (27%) 2 (11%) 0.339
ASA score ≥3 8 (73%) 4 (22%) 0.018

图1

去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的长期效果比较"

[1] 张小明, 张永保, 李清乐, 等. 胸腹主动脉瘤的治疗[J]. 中国血管外科杂志: 电子版, 2014, 6(3):137-142.
[2] 来志超, 孙晓宁, 古丽丹娜·沙艳, 等. 胸腹主动脉瘤的手术方式与外科治疗选择[J]. 中国血管外科杂志: 电子版, 2018, 10(4):233-236.
[3] 赵纪春, 陈熹阳. 胸腹主动脉瘤: 杂交手术现状[J]. 中华血管外科杂志, 2016, 1(2):78-81.
[4] Di Marco L, Murana G, Leone A, et al. Hybrid repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm: An alternative strategy for preventing major complications in high risk patients[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2018, 271:31-35.
doi: S0167-5273(18)31046-5 pmid: 30223362
[5] Jain A, Flohr TF, Johnston WF, et al. Staged hybrid repair of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms secondary to chronic aortic dissection[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2016, 63(1):62-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.060
[6] Coselli JS, Amarasekara HS, Zhang Q, et al. The impact of preoperative chronic kidney disease on outcomes after Crawford extent Ⅱ thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 156(6): 2053-2064. e1.
[7] Girardi LN, Ohmes LB, Lau C, et al. Open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with preoperative renal failure[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2017, 51(5):971-977.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx007
[8] Cina CS, Clase CM. Coagulation disorders and blood product use in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. Transfus Med Rev, 2005, 19(2):143-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2004.11.003
[9] 闫兵, 张雷, 黄骏咏, 等. 去分支技术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(7):536-538.
[10] Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Avgerinos ED, et al. Hybrid open endovascular technique for aortic thoracoabdominal pathologies[J]. Circulation, 2011, 124(24):2670-2680.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.041582
[11] 张宏鹏, 郭伟, 刘小平, 等. 杂交技术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2009, 47(9):657-660.
[1] 朱正达,高岩,何汶秀,方鑫,刘洋,魏攀,闫志敏,华红. 红色诺卡氏菌细胞壁骨架治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[2] 董文敏,王明瑞,胡浩,王起,许克新,徐涛. Allium覆膜金属输尿管支架长期留置治疗输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄的初期临床经验及随访结果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 637-641.
[3] 高健,胡立宝,陈尘,郅新,徐涛. 经皮肾镜去石术后出血的介入治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 667-671.
[4] 李潇,苏家增,张严妍,张丽琪,张亚琼,柳登高,俞光岩. 131I相关唾液腺炎的炎症分级及内镜治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 586-590.
[5] 马凯,曲星珂,许清泉,熊六林,叶雄俊,安立哲,陈伟男,黄晓波. 肾移植术后移植肾输尿管膀胱吻合口狭窄的腔内治疗:13例报道[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1155-1158.
[6] 詹颖,杜祎甜,仰浈臻,张春丽,齐宪荣. 紫杉醇微球-原位凝胶的制备及其局部注射的抗肿瘤药效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 477-486.
[7] 杨泽川,刘朝旭,林阳,胡伟华,陈文坚,李锋,曾恒. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术全钛板与交替钛板、缝线固定治疗颈椎病的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
[8] 游文喆,窦桂丽,夏斌. 乳牙间接牙髓治疗两年疗效观察及影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 65-69.
[9] 李欣艺,赵金霞,刘湘源. 抗磷脂抗体相关性复发性流产的诊治:附75例抗磷脂综合征患者妊娠期用药和结局分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 956-961.
[10] 徐稼轩,王宏志,董军,陈小杰,杨勇,陈仁雄,王国栋. 食管癌术后急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 1057-1062.
[11] 张茗茗,郑迎东,梁宇红. 牙髓根尖周病根管治疗疗效预测模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 123-130.
[12] 李旭, 李奉龙, 鲁谊, 朱以明, 郭斯翊, 李屹钧, 姜春岩. 锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性复杂肱骨近端骨折的中期临床及影像学随访研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.
[13] 张维宇,张晓鹏,胡浩,陈京文,刘献辉,许克新. 无张力尿道中段悬吊术治疗女性混合性尿失禁的疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 638-642.
[14] 樊华,李汉忠,徐维锋,纪志刚,张玉石. 异位促肾上腺皮质激素综合征的外科治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 652-656.
[15] 张永进,李甲,綦珂,薛晨晨,徐卫东. 全髋关节置换术中直接前方入路与后外侧入路的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 201-205.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘广芝, 冯捷, 叶雪, 付天云, 成夜霞. 人卵巢上皮癌细胞原代培养及细胞系BUPH:OVSC-1的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(3): 271 -275 .
[2] 孙宇, 刘忠军, 党耕町. 颈椎病外科治疗的回顾[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(5): 627 -629 .
[3] 杨坚, 杨亚东, 冯海兰. 固位型设计对粘结桥固位的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(1): 80 -82 .
[4] 关明, 刘瑞昌, 杨旭东, 董稳, 刘克英 . 婴儿唇腭裂修复术中输注不同浓度含糖液的效果分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 74 -77 .
[5] 石祥恩, 张永力, 吴斌. 颅咽管瘤179例手术治疗经验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2003, 35(5): 515 -520 .
[6] 王昱, 郭晓蕙. 胰升糖素样多肽-1对OLETF大鼠胰腺的保护作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2006, 38(4): 375 -380 .
[7] 杜淑旭, 张春雨, 金红芳, 杜军保, 唐朝枢. 二氧化硫衍生物舒张大鼠离体主动脉血管环的效应及其机制研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2006, 38(6): 581 -585 .
[8] 高凌, 李晓红, 赵建晴, 陆继红, 赵家刚, 朱佳石, . 冬虫夏草的成熟伴随着冬虫夏草子座中多个基因突变型冬虫夏草菌表达的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(3): 454 -463 .
[9] 欧阳翔英, 阳雯. 转化医学及其在牙周干细胞研究中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(1): 152 -155 .
[10] 赵耀, 李淳德, 刘宪义, 邑晓东, 刘宏, 卢海霖, 李宏, 于峥嵘, 孙浩林, 王诗军. 老年脊柱术后胸腰段近端交界性后凸的矢状位参数分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(5): 732 -737 .