北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 782-789.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国城镇居民5种慢性疾病的经济负担和经济风险

刘明1,2,孙利华1△,刘国恩2   

  1. (1.沈阳药科大学工商管理学院,沈阳110016;2.北京大学中国卫生经济研究中心,北京100871)
  • 出版日期:2014-10-18 发布日期:2014-10-18

Economic burden and economic risk of five major chronic diseases among Chinese urban residents

LIU Ming1,2,SUN Li-hua1△, LIU Gordon2   

  1. (1. School of Business Administration, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China; 2. China Center for Health Economics Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Online:2014-10-18 Published:2014-10-18

摘要: 目的:为中国相关医疗保险及卫生政策的制定提供合理的参考依据。方法:使用2007年11月至2011年11月的城镇居民基本医疗保险试点评估入户调查数据,运用二步模型法和人力资本法估算中国城镇居民5种主要慢性疾病的经济负担,进一步根据慢病患者的疾病经济负担计算相对经济风险度(relative risk,RR)和校正RR值,比较不同慢病患者相对慢性病全人群的疾病经济风险大小,5种主要慢性病包括高血压、心血管疾病、糖尿病、性肺部疾病、关节炎或风湿病。结果:5种主要慢性病患者中50%以上都为65岁以上的离退休人员。除慢性肺部疾病患者的医疗保险覆盖率不足90%以外,其他几种慢性病都在90%以上。这5类慢性病的门诊及药店购药的次均自付费用比例都在60%以上,次均住院自付费用比例都在50%左右。城镇居民主要慢性病中年人均疾病经济负担最高的是心血管疾病患者,为8 954.29元,其次是糖尿病患者,为8 914.36元。心血管疾病和糖尿病患者的校正RR值要大于1,分别为1.36和1.15。结论:城镇居民主要慢病患者中退休老年人所占的比例最大,西北部地区这5类慢病的患病情况最严重。经济负担主要来自门诊和药店,报销用药的可及性需要进一步提高。主要慢病中疾病经济负担和经济风险较大的都为心血管疾病和糖尿病患者。

关键词: 慢性病, 经济学, 患病代价, 城镇人口, 经济风险

Abstract: Objective: To provide scientific evidence for medical insurance and health policies allocating the limited health resources in China. Methods: Based on the data of the national household survey by the State Council Pilot Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance Evaluation from Nov.2007 to Nov.2011, a twostep model and the human capital method were used to estimate the economic burden of five major chronic diseases among urban residents in China. According to the economic burden, the relative economic risk (relative risk, RR) and adjusted RR were calculated. The five chronic diseases were hypertension, cardiovascular, diabetes, arthritis or rheumatism and chronic lung diseases. Results: More than 50% of the residents with these five chronic diseases were the over 65-year-old and retired. 90% of the residents with these five chronic diseases had medical insurance except the residents with chronic lung diseases. Average co-pay from the outpatient department and the pharmacy was more than 60%, and about 50% from the inpatient department. Annual total cost per capita was the highest 8 954.29 Yuan among the residents with cardiovascular disease and the second highest 8 914.36 Yuan among the residents with diabetes. The adjusted RR of the residents with cardiovascular and diabetes were greater than 1, respectively 1.36 and 1.15. Conclusion: The retired take up the largest percentage of population with chronic diseases, and the influence of the major five chronic diseases is more serious in north-west China. The main expenditure is from the outpatient department and the pharmacy, in which the availability of drugs reimbursed needs to be improved. The patients with cardiovascular and diabetes experience both higher economic burden and economic risk.

Key words: Chronic disease, Economics, Cost of illness, Urban population, Economic risk

[1] 祝春素,连至炜,崔一民. 中国中老年人抑郁和慢性病的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 606-611.
[2] 刘光奇,庞元捷,吴疆,吕敏,于孟轲,李雨橦,黄旸木. 2013—2019年流感季北京市住院老年人流感疫苗接种趋势分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 505-510.
[3] 周吴平,穆楠,简伟研,王化虹. 克罗恩病患者疾病经济负担现状与相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 555-559.
[4] 吴士艳,张旭熙,孙凯歌,胡康,刘思佳,孙昕霙. 慢性病高危人群和健康人群休闲类身体活动健康信念模式的多组结构方程模型分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 711-716.
[5] 刘国峰,孙美平,王智勇,简伟研. 城镇化水平与慢性病及健康相关行为的关联分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(3): 478-482.
[6] 张磊, 朱磊, 李志恒, 李金洲, 潘宏伟, 张少峰, 秦文华, 何丽华. 煤工尘肺住院患者疾病负担及其影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(2): 226-231.
[7] 庞明樊, 冯星淋. 城市中老年慢性病防治就诊倾向分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(2): 220-225.
[8] 汤淑女, 简伟研. 中国就业人群慢性病的社会决定因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(03): 443-447.
[9] 王友发, LIM Hyunjung, 吴杨. 全球慢性非传染病负担急剧增长及中国的现状[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(5): 688-693.
[10] 高文静, 李立明, 曹卫华, 詹思延, 吕筠, 逄增昌, 陈卫健, 汪韶洁, 陈荣富, 胡永华. 共同抚养和分开抚养的双生子血压、肥胖及吸烟、饮酒行为比较分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2011, 43(3): 329-332.
[11] 李丹*, 丁洁. 蛋白尿加速慢性肾脏病进展的分子机制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(5): 608-611.
[12] 潘靖, 李若瑜. 慢性砷中毒1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2004, 36(5): 554-555.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!