北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 257-262. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.02.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

终末期骨关节炎患者全膝关节置换术前的躯体功能客观测定

李志昌1,姜龙1,张舒2,秦雪英3,Daniel K. White PT  4,侯云飞1,周之伟1,林剑浩1△   

  1. (1.北京大学人民医院关节病诊疗研究中心, 北京 100044; 2. 北京市东城区第一人民医院, 北京 100075; 3.北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系, 北京 100191; 4.Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)
  • 出版日期:2016-04-18 发布日期:2016-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 林剑浩 E-mail:linjianhao @pkuph.edu.cn

Evaluation of physical function for the end-stage osteoarthritis patient waiting for the total knee replacement

LI Zhi-chang1, JIANG Long1, ZHANG Shu2, QIN Xue-ying3, Daniel K. White PT  4, HOU Yun-fei1, ZHOU Zhi-wei1, LIN Jian-hao1△   

  1. (1. Arthritis Clinic and Research Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; 2. The First People’s Hospital of Dongcheng District of Beijing, Beijing 100075, China; 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China; 4. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)
  • Online:2016-04-18 Published:2016-04-18
  • Contact: LIN Jian-hao E-mail:linjianhao @pkuph.edu.cn

摘要:

目的:采集终末期骨关节炎患者接受全膝关节置换术前的功能全面评价指标,并与轻度骨关节炎患者进行比较,评价疼痛、患者自我报告量表、基于表现的躯体功能以及实际日常活动水平之间的相关性。方法: 前瞻性研究设计,获取87例因终末期骨关节炎而接受单侧全膝关节置换术患者术前的全面躯体功能参数,并招募年龄接近的60例轻度骨关节炎患者[Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L)分级0~2级]采集相同的躯体功能参数。所采集的数据包括患者的年龄、身高、体重、30秒座椅站立测试(30 s chair stand test, 30-CST)、40米快速步行测试(40 m fast-paced walk test,40-FPWT)、12级爬楼梯测试(12 steps stair climb test,12-SCT)、3米起立行走测试(timed up & go test,TUG)、6分钟步行测试(6 minute walk test,6-MWT)、美国西部Ontario和McMaster大学骨关节炎指数评分(The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index,WOMAC)、美国膝关节协会评分(knee society score,KSS)、可视化疼痛评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)以及连续7 d的每日步数。使用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计学分析,首先对各项数据的观察值进行描述性报告,使用KolmogorvSmirnov检验每一变量是否符合正态分布,结果两组的每一变量均不符合正态分布,因而采用非参数MannWhitney检验两组间差异,应用Spearman相关分析评估各项参数之间的相关性。结果: 轻度骨关节炎组患者的VAS评分、WOMAC评分、KSS评分、日均步数以及各项基于表现的躯体功能测试结果均优于终末期骨关节炎组患者,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。轻度骨关节炎组内,各项躯体功能测试均与各项自我报告量表无显著相关性或有较弱相关性;终末期骨关节炎组内,各项躯体功能测试与各项自我报告量表之间有着不同强度的相关性。结论: 描述了多项躯体功能参数在中国轻度骨关节炎与终末期骨关节炎患者中的应用,基于表现的躯体功能、实际日常活动水平、患者自我报告量表以及疼痛评分之间并不一定有较好的相关性,需要对骨关节炎患者进行更全面地评估并制定相应的全膝关节置换术手术决策标准。

关键词: 骨关节炎, 关节成形术, 置换, 膝, 躯体功能测试, 自我评定

Abstract:

Objective:To collect comprehensive data of the physical function of the end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) patients, and compare it with patients with mild OA. To evaluate the correlations among pain, self-reported questionnaire, performance based physical function and actual daily life activity level. Methods: In this prospective study, the comprehensive physical function parameters of 87 end stage OA patients waiting for total knee replacement, and that of 60 patients with mild OA [Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 0-2] were collected. The comprehensive physical function parameters including: age, height, body weight, 30 s chair stand test (30-CST), 40 m fast-paced walk test (40-FPWT), 12 steps stair climb test (12-SCT), timed up & go test (TUG), 6 minutes walk test (6-MWT), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee society score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scale, and everyday steps counts for continuous 7 days. The data were analyzed with the soft ware SPSS 22.0. The descriptive report of all the parameters was made. Because the Kolmogorv-Smirnov test results for all the parameters were negative for normal distribution, nonparative Mann-Whitney test was used to analysis the differences between the two groups, as well as the Spearman test for the correlations.  Results: All the parameters of the mild OA group were better than those of the end stage group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). In the mild OA group, there were no correlations or weak correlations between all the physical function test and questionnaire, however, in the end stage group, the correlations were weak, moderate, or strong. Conclusion: The usage of lots of different physical parameters from Chinese OA patients were reported in this study. The results showed that there are no good correlations among performance based physical function test, actual daily activity level, self reported questionnaires, and the pain scales. More comprehensive evaluation for the OA patients needs to be made, in order to make better decision for arthroplasty.

Key words: Osteoarthritis, Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Physical function test, Self report

中图分类号: 

  • R684.3
[1] 李红光,韩玮华,吴训,冯继玲,李刚,孟娟红. 关节腔冲洗联合液态浓缩生长因子注射治疗单侧颞下颌关节骨关节炎的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 338-344.
[2] 安思兰,郑群怡,王锴,高姗. 全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的特点及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[3] 赵然,刘延青,田华. 应用累积和控制图分析全膝关节置换术中电子压力垫片指导软组织平衡的学习曲线[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 658-664.
[4] 叶一林,刘恒,潘利平,柴卫兵. 全膝关节置换术后假体周围痛风发作误诊1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 362-365.
[5] 王梓,张军军,左力,王悦,李文歌,程虹,蔡广研,裴华颖,王利华,周绪杰,师素芳,刘立军,吕继成,张宏. 血浆置换治疗新月体型IgA肾病的有效性分析: 多中心队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1038-1046.
[6] 栗占国,任立敏. 侵蚀性骨关节炎:一种值得关注的疾病[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 829-831.
[7] 贾金凤,梁菲,黄建伟,王昊,韩璞青. 双重血浆分子吸附系统模式人工肝治疗对血小板的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 548-551.
[8] 李志昌,侯云飞,周之伟,姜龙,张舒,林剑浩. 影响全膝关节置换术患者术前预期的患者因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 170-176.
[9] 苗欣,黄红拾,胡晓青,时会娟,任爽,敖英芳. 膝关节前交叉韧带断裂后单腿位置觉测试时脑电功率谱的变化特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 871-876.
[10] 吴浩,潘利平,刘恒,塔拉提百克·买买提居马,王洪彬,宁太国,曹永平. 胫骨假体的不同后倾角度对内侧间室单髁置换术后膝关节功能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 877-882.
[11] 印钰,梅宇,王泽刚,宋首一,刘鹏飞,何鹏峰,武文杰,谢兴. 固定袢和可调节袢在粗骨道中的长度对股骨骨道增宽及膝关节功能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 883-890.
[12] 王鑫光,耿霄,李杨,吴天晨,李子剑,田华. 便携式导航与计算机导航辅助在全膝关节置换力线对准和手术时间的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 728-733.
[13] 吴俊慧,陈泓伯,武轶群,吴瑶,王紫荆,吴涛,王梦莹,王斯悦,王小文,王伽婷,于欢,胡永华. 2015—2017年北京市2型糖尿病患者骨关节炎患病的相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 518-522.
[14] 及松洁,黄野,王兴山,柳剑,窦勇,姜旭,周一新. Oxford膝关节单间室置换术后内翻多因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 293-297.
[15] 柯岩,张蔷,马云青,李儒军,陶可,桂先革,李克鹏,张洪,林剑浩. 全髋关节置换术治疗脊柱骨骺发育不良患者Tönnis 3级髋关节骨关节炎的早期疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 175-182.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!