北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 90-94.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

患者参与的数字化设计在前牙美学修复中的应用

刘云松1,3*,叶红强1,3*,谷明1,吕珑薇1,孙玉春2,3,赵一娇2,3,周永胜1,3△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,北京100081;2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔医学计算机应用中心,国家卫生和计划生育 委员会口腔医学计算机应用工程技术研究中心,北京100081;3. 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2014-02-18 发布日期:2014-02-18

Application of patient-participated digital design in esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth

LIU Yun-song1,3*, YE Hong-qiang1,3*, GU Ming1, LV Long-wei1, SUN Yu-chun2,3, ZHAO Yi-jiao2,3, ZHOU Yong-sheng1,3△   

  1. (1. Department of Prosthodonties, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Center of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology; Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Beijing 100081, China; 3. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2014-02-18 Published:2014-02-18

摘要: 目的:探索一种患者能够参与的前牙美学修复的数字化设计、预测和制作方法,为前牙美学修复提供新思路。方法:选取需要进行前 牙美学修复的患者32人,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各16人。实验组通过口内扫描和面部三维扫描获取牙列和面部图像并进行配准,在计 算机辅助设计(computer-aided design, CAD)软件中设计修复体,得到三维数字化修复效果图,根据患者意见调整修复体形态后,用牙科计 算机辅助制作(computer-aided manufacturing, CAM)设备根据设计好的修复体形态制作前牙修复体。对照组采用常规方法制作修复。记录 两组患者初戴修复体时每单位修复体所用时间,请未参与实验的医师对修复体质量进行盲评,并请患者对修复体以及修复后面部整体外观进行 满意度评价。结果:成功建立了患者参与的前牙美学修复数字化设计和效果预测流程,并用数字化技术制作出患者满意的前牙修复体。实验组 患者对于数字化修复方式的接受率为100%。实验组与对照组的修复体经过未参与实验的医师盲评,在外形准确性、边缘密合性以及表面光滑性 上差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组患者对修复体及修复后面部整体外观的满意度明显高于对照组(P<0.05),且实验组修复体初戴时 每单位修复体调改时间较对照组明显缩短(P<0.01)。结论:患者参与的前牙美学修复的数字化设计、预测和制作方法可行,此方法有助于缩 短修复体初戴时间并能够提高患者对修复效果的满意度。

关键词: 成像, 三维, 美学, 牙科, 计算机辅助设计, 病人参与

Abstract: Objective: To explore a new method of patient-involved digital design, esthetic outcome prediction and fabrication for the esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth, and to provide an alternative choice for the restoration of anterior teeth. Methods: In this study, 32 patients with esthetic problems in their anterior teeth were included and divided into two groups randomly: the experimental group (16 patients) and control group (16 patients). In the experimental group, the dentition and facial images were obtained by intra-oral scanning and three-dimensional (3D) facial scanning and then calibrated. The design of the rehabilitation and the esthetic outcome prediction were created by computeraided design (CAD) software. After morphologic modification according to the patients’ opinions, prostheses were fabricated according to the final design by computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) equipment. As for the control group, the regular design method was applied to restore their anterior teeth. The time consuming in the first insertion of each restoration in both groups was recorded. The quality of the prostheses was assessed by another prosthedontist. The satisfaction to prostheses and the facial appearance were evaluated by the patients. Results: The process of the patient-involved digital design and outcome anticipation was successfully established. The patients were satisfied with the esthetic effects of the anterior restoration made by the digital technique. The acceptance rate of the patients on the digital rehabilitation in the experimental group was 100%. There was no significant difference of the quality of the prostheses between the two groups. The satisfaction rate of the patients on prostheses and facial appearance was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). In addition, the time consuming in the first insertion of the experimental group was much shorter than that in the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion: The new method of the patient-involved digital design, esthetic outcome prediction and fabrication for the esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth is a practical technique. This method is useful in shortening the time consuming of the restoration of anterior teeth and improving the patient satisfaction with the esthetic outcome.

Key words: Imaging, three-dimensional, Esthetics, dental, Computer-aided design, Patient participation

[1] 温奥楠, 张晓会, 杨咏涛, 高梓翔, 李文博, 单珅瑶, 商相宜, 田淯文, 郭殊玮, 王艺蓁, 王勇, 赵一姣. 基于非刚性配准构建三维颜面微笑仿真序列数据的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 139-144.
[2] 于录, 吴灵, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 基于数据库相似性检索的正颌外科手术规划技术流程可行性研究: 随机对照试验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 145-152.
[3] 孙菲, 王翠, 李思琪, 危伊萍, 余日月, 胡文杰. 赤藓糖醇喷砂与超声治疗对种植体周黏膜炎疗效的随机对照临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 37-42.
[4] 邵梁, 马雯洁, 陈莹, 丁茜, 张磊. 上颌切牙前伸和正中咬合接触解剖特征的数字化测量与分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 99-106.
[5] 王翠萍, 陈哲, 程永静. 超微血流成像评估与膝骨关节炎临床症状的关联研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1096-1100.
[6] 宋凤岐, 徐心雨, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 上颌骨前部和整体顺时针旋转改善骨性Ⅲ类牙颌面畸形患者鼻旁凹陷的对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 980-988.
[7] 肖宇嘉, 毛渤淳, 周彦恒. 姿势性微笑的三维形态学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 989-995.
[8] 王泽远, 于栓宝, 郑浩轲, 陶金, 范雅峰, 张雪培. 基于临床特征和多参数MRI的前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的术前预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 684-691.
[9] 宁圆, 张晓盈, 李雪, 李原, 何菁, 金月波. 干燥综合征并发乳腺淋巴瘤1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 808-811.
[10] 钱锟, 刘亦洪. 基于直接法和间接法数字印模制作的高嵌体适合性评价的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 604-609.
[11] 孙建军, 马千权, 尹晓亮, 杨辰龙, 张嘉, 陈素华, 吴超, 谢京城, 韩芸峰, 林国中, 司雨, 杨军, 邬海博, 赵强. 任意维度重建磁共振对骶管囊肿进行精准分型对于指导微创手术和康复的意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 303-308.
[12] 仇师禹, 练洋, 康一帆, 张雷, 蔡义望, 单小峰, 蔡志刚. 基于下颌骨数据库和全连接神经网络的三维检索模型辅助下的下颌骨个性化重建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 360-368.
[13] 马丽娟, 腾雍辉, 王勇, 赵一姣, 张馨月, 秦庆钊, 尹东. 乳牙缺失数字化丝圈间隙保持器的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 376-383.
[14] 朱玉佳, 沈华, 温奥楠, 高梓翔, 秦庆钊, 单珅瑶, 李文博, 傅湘玲, 赵一姣, 王勇. 三维颌面对称参考平面智能构建的深度学习算法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 113-120.
[15] 徐昕恺, 赵建江, 田素坤, 刘中宁, 赵晓一, 赵晓波, 江腾飞, 陈晓军, 马超, 孙玉春. 集成压缩气流系统扫描头辅助获取液体干扰表面三维数据精度评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 121-127.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!