北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 90-94.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

患者参与的数字化设计在前牙美学修复中的应用

刘云松1,3*,叶红强1,3*,谷明1,吕珑薇1,孙玉春2,3,赵一娇2,3,周永胜1,3△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,北京100081;2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔医学计算机应用中心,国家卫生和计划生育 委员会口腔医学计算机应用工程技术研究中心,北京100081;3. 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2014-02-18 发布日期:2014-02-18

Application of patient-participated digital design in esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth

LIU Yun-song1,3*, YE Hong-qiang1,3*, GU Ming1, LV Long-wei1, SUN Yu-chun2,3, ZHAO Yi-jiao2,3, ZHOU Yong-sheng1,3△   

  1. (1. Department of Prosthodonties, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Center of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology; Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Digital Dentistry, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Beijing 100081, China; 3. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2014-02-18 Published:2014-02-18

摘要: 目的:探索一种患者能够参与的前牙美学修复的数字化设计、预测和制作方法,为前牙美学修复提供新思路。方法:选取需要进行前 牙美学修复的患者32人,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各16人。实验组通过口内扫描和面部三维扫描获取牙列和面部图像并进行配准,在计 算机辅助设计(computer-aided design, CAD)软件中设计修复体,得到三维数字化修复效果图,根据患者意见调整修复体形态后,用牙科计 算机辅助制作(computer-aided manufacturing, CAM)设备根据设计好的修复体形态制作前牙修复体。对照组采用常规方法制作修复。记录 两组患者初戴修复体时每单位修复体所用时间,请未参与实验的医师对修复体质量进行盲评,并请患者对修复体以及修复后面部整体外观进行 满意度评价。结果:成功建立了患者参与的前牙美学修复数字化设计和效果预测流程,并用数字化技术制作出患者满意的前牙修复体。实验组 患者对于数字化修复方式的接受率为100%。实验组与对照组的修复体经过未参与实验的医师盲评,在外形准确性、边缘密合性以及表面光滑性 上差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组患者对修复体及修复后面部整体外观的满意度明显高于对照组(P<0.05),且实验组修复体初戴时 每单位修复体调改时间较对照组明显缩短(P<0.01)。结论:患者参与的前牙美学修复的数字化设计、预测和制作方法可行,此方法有助于缩 短修复体初戴时间并能够提高患者对修复效果的满意度。

关键词: 成像, 三维, 美学, 牙科, 计算机辅助设计, 病人参与

Abstract: Objective: To explore a new method of patient-involved digital design, esthetic outcome prediction and fabrication for the esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth, and to provide an alternative choice for the restoration of anterior teeth. Methods: In this study, 32 patients with esthetic problems in their anterior teeth were included and divided into two groups randomly: the experimental group (16 patients) and control group (16 patients). In the experimental group, the dentition and facial images were obtained by intra-oral scanning and three-dimensional (3D) facial scanning and then calibrated. The design of the rehabilitation and the esthetic outcome prediction were created by computeraided design (CAD) software. After morphologic modification according to the patients’ opinions, prostheses were fabricated according to the final design by computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) equipment. As for the control group, the regular design method was applied to restore their anterior teeth. The time consuming in the first insertion of each restoration in both groups was recorded. The quality of the prostheses was assessed by another prosthedontist. The satisfaction to prostheses and the facial appearance were evaluated by the patients. Results: The process of the patient-involved digital design and outcome anticipation was successfully established. The patients were satisfied with the esthetic effects of the anterior restoration made by the digital technique. The acceptance rate of the patients on the digital rehabilitation in the experimental group was 100%. There was no significant difference of the quality of the prostheses between the two groups. The satisfaction rate of the patients on prostheses and facial appearance was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). In addition, the time consuming in the first insertion of the experimental group was much shorter than that in the control group (P<0.01). Conclusion: The new method of the patient-involved digital design, esthetic outcome prediction and fabrication for the esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth is a practical technique. This method is useful in shortening the time consuming of the restoration of anterior teeth and improving the patient satisfaction with the esthetic outcome.

Key words: Imaging, three-dimensional, Esthetics, dental, Computer-aided design, Patient participation

[1] 邢念增,王明帅,杨飞亚,尹路,韩苏军. 前列腺免活检创新理念的临床实践及其应用前景[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 565-566.
[2] 田宇轩,阮明健,刘毅,李德润,吴静云,沈棋,范宇,金杰. 双参数MRI改良PI-RADS评分4分和5分病灶的最大径对临床有意义前列腺癌的预测效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 567-574.
[3] 唐祖南,胡耒豪,陈震,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 增强现实技术在口腔颌面颈部解剖识别中的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 541-545.
[4] 吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[5] 毛渤淳,田雅婧,王雪东,李晶,周彦恒. 骨性Ⅱ类高角患者拔牙矫治前后的面部软硬组织变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 111-119.
[6] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[7] 徐心雨,吴灵,宋凤岐,李自力,张益,刘筱菁. 基于下颌运动轨迹的正颌外科术中下颌骨髁突定位方法及初步精度验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 57-65.
[8] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[9] 刘毅,袁昌巍,吴静云,沈棋,肖江喜,赵峥,王霄英,李学松,何志嵩,周利群. 靶向穿刺+6针系统穿刺对PI-RADS 5分患者的前列腺癌诊断效能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 812-817.
[10] 袁昌巍,李德润,李志华,刘毅,山刚志,李学松,周利群. 多参数磁共振成像中动态对比增强状态在诊断PI-RADS 4分前列腺癌中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 838-842.
[11] 刘颖,霍然,徐慧敏,王筝,王涛,袁慧书. 磁共振血管壁成像评估颈动脉中重度狭窄患者斑块特征与脑血流灌注的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 646-651.
[12] 傅强,高冠英,徐雁,林卓华,孙由静,崔立刚. 无症状髋关节前上盂唇撕裂超声与磁共振检查的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 665-669.
[13] 刘想,谢辉辉,许玉峰,张晓东,陶晓峰,柳林,王霄英. 人工智能对提高放射科住院医生诊断胸部肋骨骨折一致性的价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 670-675.
[14] 黄莹,吴志远,周行红,蔡志刚,张杰. 股前外侧皮瓣修复上颌骨缺损术后面部软组织对称性感观分级[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 708-715.
[15] 张雯,刘筱菁,李自力,张益. 基于解剖标志的鼻翼基底缩窄缝合术对正颌患者术后鼻唇部形态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 736-742.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!