北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 123-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙髓根尖周病根管治疗疗效预测模型的建立

张茗茗1,郑迎东2,梁宇红1, 3△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,牙体牙髓科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081; 2. 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系, 北京100091; 3. 北京大学国际医院口腔科, 北京102206)
  • 出版日期:2018-02-18 发布日期:2018-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 梁宇红 E-mail:leungyuhong@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都临床特色应用研究项目(Z131107002231045)资助

A prognostic model for assessment of outcome of root canal treatment in teeth with pulpitis or apical periodontitis#br#

ZHANG Ming-ming1, ZHENG Ying-dong2, LIANG Yu-hong1, 3△   

  1. (1. Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China; 3. Department of Stomatology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China)
  • Online:2018-02-18 Published:2018-02-18
  • Contact: LIANG Yu-hong E-mail:leungyuhong@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Clinical Characteristics and Application Research of Capital (Z131107002231045)

摘要: 目的:初步建立牙髓根尖周病根管治疗后2年临床疗效预测模型。方法:基于根管治疗后2年疗效临床回顾性研究,以因牙髓根尖周病接受根管治疗及术后2年随访的360例患牙为研究样本,随机抽取约67%为训练样本(建立模型),其余为验证样本(模型外部验证)。以影像学评价结果为疗效标准,应用Logistic回归方法以根尖周有/无病变、根尖周病变是/否缩小为因变量分别建立临床疗效预测模型。以受试者工作特征(receiver opera-ting characteristic,ROC)曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)评价模型预测能力。结果:以根尖周有/无病变为因变量建立模型一,纳入术前根尖周有无病变、根管弯曲度、根管充填长度及密度建模,模型AUC为0.802(95%CI: 0.744~0.859),验证样本检验外部效度结果为0.688。以根尖周病变是否缩小为因变量建立模型二,根管充填长度和密度参与建模,模型AUC为0.734(95%CI: 0.612~0.856),外部验证结果为0.681。根管重度弯曲、根管治疗质量好的牙髓炎患牙接受根管治疗术后2年,通过模型一预测,根尖周无病变概率达90%,慢性根尖周炎患牙病变愈合概率为51%。应用模型二预测,慢性根尖周炎患牙根管治疗后2年,根管充填质量好的病例出现病变缩小的概率为95%,而根管充填质量不佳者病变缩小的概率仅为39%。结论:术前根尖周状态、根管弯曲情况、根管治疗质量可用于预测根管治疗后2年临床疗效。

关键词: 根管疗法, 放射摄影术, 治疗结果, 预测模型

Abstract: Objective: To present a prognostic model for evaluating the outcome of root canal treatment in teeth with pulpitis or apical periodontitis 2 years after treatment. Methods: The implementation of this study was based on a retrospective study on the 2-year outcome of root canal treatment. A cohort of 360 teeth, which received treatment and review, were chosen to build up the total sample size. In the study, 143 teeth with vital pulp and 217 teeth with apical periodontitis were included. About 67% of the samples were selected randomly to derive a training date set for modeling, and the others were used as validating date set for testing. Logistic regression models were used to produce the prognostic models. The dependent variable was defined as absence of periapical lesion or reduction of periapical lesion. The predictability of the models was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: Four predictors were included in model one (absence of apical lesion): pre-operative periapical radiolucency, canal curvature, density and apical extent of root fillings. The AUC was 0.802 (95%CI: 0.744-0.859). And the AUC of the testing date was 0.688. Only the density and apical extent of root fillings were included to present model two (reduction of apical lesion). The AUC of training dates and testing dates were 0.734 (95%CI: 0.612-0.856) and 0.681, respectively. As predicted by model one, the probability of absence of periapical lesion 2 years after endodontic treatment was 90% in pulpitis teeth with sever root-canal curvature and adequate root canal fillings, but 51% in teeth with apical periodontitis. When using prognostic model two for prediction, in teeth with apical periodontitis, the probability of detecting lesion reduction with adequate or inadequate root fillings was 95% and 39% 2 years after treatment. Conclusion: The preoperative periapical status, canal curvature and quality of root canal treatment could be used to predict the 2year outcome of root canal treatment.

Key words: Root canal therapy, Radiography, Treatment outcome, Prognostic model

中图分类号: 

  • R781.3
[1] 李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[2] 朱正达,高岩,何汶秀,方鑫,刘洋,魏攀,闫志敏,华红. 红色诺卡氏菌细胞壁骨架治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[3] 李潇,苏家增,张严妍,张丽琪,张亚琼,柳登高,俞光岩. 131I相关唾液腺炎的炎症分级及内镜治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 586-590.
[4] 朱学华,杨明钰,夏海缀,何为,张智荧,刘余庆,肖春雷,马潞林,卢剑. 机器学习模型在预测肾结石输尿管软镜碎石术后早期结石清除率中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 653-659.
[5] 詹颖,杜祎甜,仰浈臻,张春丽,齐宪荣. 紫杉醇微球-原位凝胶的制备及其局部注射的抗肿瘤药效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 477-486.
[6] 杨泽川,刘朝旭,林阳,胡伟华,陈文坚,李锋,曾恒. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术全钛板与交替钛板、缝线固定治疗颈椎病的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
[7] 游文喆,窦桂丽,夏斌. 乳牙间接牙髓治疗两年疗效观察及影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 65-69.
[8] 李欣艺,赵金霞,刘湘源. 抗磷脂抗体相关性复发性流产的诊治:附75例抗磷脂综合征患者妊娠期用药和结局分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 956-961.
[9] 李旭, 李奉龙, 鲁谊, 朱以明, 郭斯翊, 李屹钧, 姜春岩. 锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性复杂肱骨近端骨折的中期临床及影像学随访研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.
[10] 张维宇,张晓鹏,胡浩,陈京文,刘献辉,许克新. 无张力尿道中段悬吊术治疗女性混合性尿失禁的疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 638-642.
[11] 樊华,李汉忠,徐维锋,纪志刚,张玉石. 异位促肾上腺皮质激素综合征的外科治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 652-656.
[12] 张永进,李甲,綦珂,薛晨晨,徐卫东. 全髋关节置换术中直接前方入路与后外侧入路的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 201-205.
[13] 吕明, 张金庆, 王兴山, 黄野, 李为, 张春雨. 直接前入路髋关节置换术及其早期临床疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 206-213.
[14] 崔云鹏,米川,施学东,王冰,潘元星,林云飞. 培养阴性化脓性脊柱炎患者的临床特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 226-230.
[15] 张树,张继源,杨杜明,杨明,张培训. 矢状位不稳定转子间骨折的形态特征和复位技术[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 236-241.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .