不同部位口腔鳞癌的延迟诊断分析

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.04.027

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的:通过科学设计的调查表,对口腔鳞状细胞癌(简称鳞癌)患者的延迟诊断情况进行临床调查,从而辨别影响口腔鳞癌患者患源性延迟的影响因素以及延迟特点。方法:共收集2014年1月至2016年4月就诊于北京大学口腔医院的原发口腔鳞癌患者514例,包括334例男性和180例女性,男女构成比例为1.85 :1,年龄21~89岁,中位年龄57.6岁。发病部位按国际疾病分类(International Classification of Diseases,ICD)-10分为唇、颊、牙龈、磨牙后区、腭、口底、舌及口咽部共8个部位,年龄分组以10年为分隔,教育程度分为未受教育、初级教育水平(高中以下学历)和高级教育水平(高中及以上学历),体重指数(body mass index,BMI)以18 kg/m ²和25 kg/m ²为界分为3个等级,使用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue score,VAS)评估患者术前的疼痛情况。对患者进行详细的问卷调查以了解其延迟诊断的可能因素和特点,并运用SPSS 18.0软件,采用方差分析和卡方检验来进行组间比较。结果:口腔鳞癌发生的部位按延迟时间长短排序依次为唇部(6.1个月)、颊部(4.1个月)、口底(3.9个月)、舌部(3.6个月)、口咽部(2.9个月)、磨牙后区(2.7个月)、腭部(2.4个月)、牙龈(2.4个月),不同部位间延迟诊断差异有统计学意义(P=0.048);不同性别、教育程度、疼痛、吸烟、饮酒、疼痛程度间延迟诊断差异无统计学意义。结论:肿瘤所在部位与延迟诊断具有相关性,唇部是最容易发生延迟诊断的口腔部位,对于唇明显变大的肿物,应建议患者及时就诊,同时接诊医师尽早采取合适的诊断方法。

关键词: 肿瘤, 鳞状细胞, 延迟诊断, 口腔肿瘤

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic delay of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma by self-designed questionnaire to find out the significant influencing factors, so as to identify the influencing factors of the patient’s delay and the risk of oral cancer.Methods: A total of 514 patients with primary oral squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January 2014 to April 2016, including 334 men and 180 women, with a male to female ratio of 1.85 :1. The youngest participant was 21 years old, with a maximum of 89 years and a median age of 57.6 years. The position of the disease according to International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) was divided into lip, buccal, gingival, retromolar, palate, floor of the mouth, tongue, and oropharynx. The age group is divided into 10 years. The level of education was divided into illiteracy, primary education level and advanced education level. Body mass index (BMI) was divided into three levels by 18 kg/m ² and 25 kg/m ². Visual analog scale (VAS) method was to evaluate the patient’s preoperative pain. At the same time, the patients were examined by detailed questionnaire to understand the delay factors and delay characteristics, and use SPSS 18.0 software, analysis of variance and chi-square test to explore correlation.Results: Among all patients, the proportion of patients developed in the tongue was the highest (43.3%). Delay was defined by a span of three months or longer from the onset of symptoms until treatment. The delays to diagnosis according to location were as follows (in months and in descending order): lip (6.1 months), buccal (4.1 months), floor of the mouth (3.9 months), tongue (3.6 months), oropharyngeal (2.9 months), retromolar (2.7 months), palatine (2.4 months), and gingival (2.4 months). Different sites and delayed diagnosis were statistically significant (P=0.048). There were no statistically significant differences in gender, education, pain, smoking, drinking and VAS score.Conclusion: The study has found that tumor positions and delay have a significant correlation. The position of the tumor is an obvious factor associated with the findings. The lip is the most likely to delay the diagnosis of oral positions. For the lip of the lesion, more than three months’ obvious mass is recommended for timely treatment, while at admission, physicians should take the appropriate diagnostic method as soon as possible.

Key words: Neoplasms, squamous cell, Delayed diagnosis, Mouth neoplasms

中图分类号:

R739.8

徐韬,王佃灿,单小峰,蔡志刚. 不同部位口腔鳞癌的延迟诊断分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(4): 748-752.

Tao XU,Dian-can WANG,Xiao-feng SHAN,Zhi-gang CAI. Delayed diagnosis of oral squamous cell neoplasms at different sites[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(4): 748-752.

图/表 2

表1

表2

参考文献 18

[1]	Gillison ML . Current topics in the epidemiology of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers[J]. Head Neck, 2007,29(8):779-792.
[2]	Rogers SN, Brown JS, Woolgar JA , Survival following primary surgery for oral cancer[J]. Oral Oncol, 2009,45(3):201-211.
[3]	Allison P, Franco E, Feine J . Predictors of professional diagnostic delays for upper aerodigestive tract carcinoma[J]. Oral Oncol, 1998,34(2):127-132.
[4]	Cooke BE, Tapper-Jones L . Recognition of oral cancer. Causes of delay[J]. Br Dent J, 1977,142(3):96-98.
[5]	Austoker J, Bankhead C, Forbes LJ , et al. Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review[J]. Br J Cancer, 2009,101(Suppl. 2):S31-S39.
[6]	Peacock ZS, Pogrel MA, Schmidt BL . Exploring the reasons for delay in treatment of oral cancer[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2008,139(10):1346-1352.
[7]	Jensen AR, Nellemann HM, Overgaard J . Tumor progression in waiting time for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2007,84(1):5-10.
[8]	Carvalho AL, Pintos J, Schlecht NF , et al. Predictive factors for diagnosis of advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002,128(3):313-318.
[9]	Seoane J, Varela-Centelles PI, Walsh TF , et al. Gingival squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic delay or rapid invasion?[J]. J Periodontol, 2006,77(7):1229-1233.
[10]	Goy J, Hall SF, Feldman-Stewart D , et al. Diagnostic delay and disease stage in head and neck cancer: a systematic review[J]. Laryngoscope, 2009,119(5):889-898.
[11]	Thompson L . World Health Organization classification oftumours: pathology and genetics of head and neck tumors[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2006,85(2):74.
[12]	高巍, 郭传瑸 . 口腔鳞状细胞癌患者诊断延迟现象的研究现状[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2008,22(4):419-423.
[13]	Tong XJ, Shan ZF, Tang ZG , et al. Theimpact of clinical prognostic factors on the survival of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014,72(12):2497.
[14]	Johnson NW, Jayasekara P, Amarasinghe AA . Squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions of the oral cavity: epidemiology and etiology[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2011,57(1):19-37.
[15]	Johnson NJ, Backlund E, Sorlie PD , et al. Marital status and mortality: the national longitudinal mortality study[J]. Ann Epide-miol, 2000,10(4):224-238.
[16]	Rogers SN, Glen P, Robinson A , et al. A survey of general dental practitioners in merseyside regarding urgent appointments and suspected cancer referrals[J]. Prim Dent Care, 2008,15(1):25-30.
[17]	Rogers RS . Common lesions of the oral mucosa. A guide to diseases of the lips, cheeks, tongue, and gingivae[J]. Postgrad Med, 1992,91(6):141-148.
[18]	Koivunen P, Rantala N, Hyrynkangas K , et al. The impact of patient and professional diagnostic delays on survival in pharyngeal cancer[J]. Cancer, 2001,92(11):2885-2891.

相关文章 15

[1]	季加孚, 韦静涛, 季科, 步召德. 胃癌诊疗的瓶颈与破局：迈向精准化与智能化融合的新纪元[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 231-238.
[2]	高加勒, 张忠涛. 局部进展期直肠癌精准治疗现状与展望[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 247-250.
[3]	王海, 江一舟. 靶向血管治疗在乳腺癌精准治疗中的分子机制与临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 251-256.
[4]	罗必显, 刘洪铭, 谢伟勋, 龚渭华. 产甲胎蛋白胃癌的新临床特征和前沿科学问题[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 257-265.
[5]	付浩, 申潞艳, 黄冰洋, 马少华. 免疫治疗背景下食管鳞状细胞癌围手术期治疗的临床思考[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 266-271.
[6]	杜文, 章文博, 于尧, 刘硕, 苏惠裕, 胡耒豪, 唐祖南, 吴彬彰, 陈震, 李家琦, 王昊, 彭歆. 口腔颌面部肿瘤"数智化外科"诊疗流程探索与临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 278-284.
[7]	王楠楠, 袁大晋, 朱昱冰, 丁磊. 结直肠癌根治术后肝转移风险多中心列线图预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 290-300.
[8]	刘友东, 吕亚军, 陈杰, 臧明德, 潘宏达, 刘晓文, 陆俊, 刘凤林. 全腹腔镜保留贲门胃底胃次全切除术治疗中上部胃癌的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 301-306.
[9]	李嘉临, 陈力侨, 唐家天, 吴艳, 王安强. 胃肝样腺癌转化治疗1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 399-404.
[10]	李斌, 梁寒. 机器人胃癌根治术：研究进展与实践挑战[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 416-422.
[11]	董海峰, 陈恒星, 张常华. 恶性肿瘤中蛋白质乳酸化修饰的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 423-430.
[12]	李宏杨, 黄涛, 王琳琳. 脂肪肌肉比率与卵巢良性肿瘤风险的关联性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 169-174.
[13]	高若凡, 马天宇, 王润楷, 殷雨辰, 李芮迪, 王丹丹, 夏斌. 细胞膜囊泡递送靶向肿瘤坏死因子-α的小干扰RNA对牙髓干细胞的抗炎作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(1): 22-29.
[14]	刘艳华, 陆敏, 赵旭阳, 张宽根, 武睿, 梅放, 戴志豪, 由江峰, 裴斐. 肿瘤转移抑制基因LASS2去磷酸化对液泡型ATP酶活性及前列腺癌侵袭性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(6): 1113-1123.
[15]	杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 956-960.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Items	n (%)	Delayed diagnosis			P
Items	n (%)	No(<3 months)	Yes(≥3 months)		P
Gender					0.759
Male	334 (65.0%)	241 (72.2%)		93 (27.8%)
Female	180 (35.0%)	127 (70.6%)		53 (29.4%)
Age					0.698
<40 years	52 (10.1%)	35(67.3%)		17(32.7%)
40-49 years	70 (13.6%)	50(71.4%)		20(28.6%)
50-59 years	147 (28.6%)	108(73.5%)		39(26.5%)
60-69 years	161 (31.3%)	110(68.3%)		51(31.7%)
70-79 years	79 (15.4%)	61(77.2%)		18(22.8%)
>79 years	5 (1.0%)	4(80.0%)		1(20.0%)
Education					0.267
Illiteracy	27 (5.3%)	23(85.2%)		4(14.8%)
Primary	309 (60.1%)	220(71.1%)		89(28.9%)
Advanced	178 (34.6%)	125(70.2%)		53(29.8%)
Smoking					0.762
Yes	273 (53.1%)	197(72.2%)		76(27.8%)
No	241 (46.9%)	171(70.9%)		70(29.1%)
Drinking					0.989
Yes	215 (41.8%)	154(71.6%)		61(28.4%)
No	299 (58.2%)	214(71.6%)		85(28.4%)
BMI					0.553
<18 kg/m²	28 (5.4%)	22(78.6%)		6(21.4%)
18-25 kg/m²	322 (62.6%)	226(70.2%)		96(29.8%)
>25 kg/m²	164 (31.9%)	120(73.2%)		44(26.8%)
VAS					0.971
0	43(8.4%)	31(72.1%)		12(27.9%)
1-3	239 (46.5%)	169(70.7%)		70(29.3%)
4-7	186 (36.2%)	134(72.1%)		52(27.9%)
7-10	46 (8.9%)	34(73.9%)		12(26.1%)
T stage					0.959
T1	98 (19.1%)	71(72.4%)		27(27.6%)
T2	192 (37.4%)	138(71.9%)		54(28.1%)
T3-4	224 (43.6%)	159(70.9%)		65(29.1%)
Position					0.048
Lip	21(4.1%)	14(66.7%)		7(33.3%)
Buccal	49(9.5%)	31(63.3%)		18(36.7%)
Gingival	111(21.6%)	92(82.9%)		19(17.1%)
Retromolar	14(2.7%)	11(78.6%)		3(21.4%)
Palatine	20(3.9%)	17(85.0%)		3(15.0%)
Floor of mouth	52(10.1%)	37(71.2%)		15(28.8%)
Tongue	223(43.4%)	150(67.3%)		73(32.7%)
Oropharyngeal	24(4.7%)	16(66.7%)		8(33.3%)

Position	n	Number of delay diagnosis	Time of medical history/months	Time of delay diagnosis/months	P
Lip	21	7(33.3%)	10.7±10.8	6.1±5.2	0.003
Buccal	49	18(36.7%)	7.1±6.5	4.1±4.6
Gingival	111	19(17.1%)	4.7±5.5	2.3±3.6
Retromolar	14	3(21.4%)	4.5±3.9	2.7±4.0
Palatine	20	3(15.0%)	3.7±3.2	2.4±3.3
Floor of mouth	52	15(28.8%)	6.2±6.5	3.9±5.9
Tongue	223	73(23.7%)	6.5±6.4	3.6±4.7
Oropharyngeal	24	8(33.3%)	5.3±5.0	2.9±3.2