北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 298-301. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.02.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

多学科协作诊疗模式在严重创伤患者救治中的应用

杜哲,黄伟,王志伟,周靖,熊建,李明,张鹏,刘中砥,朱凤雪,王传林,姜保国,王天兵()   

  1. 北京大学人民医院创伤救治中心,国家创伤医学中心, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-14 出版日期:2020-04-18 发布日期:2020-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 王天兵 E-mail:wangtianbing@pkuph.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    科技冬奥项目课题(2018YFF0301103);北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RD2019-02)

Application of multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the treatment of severe trauma

Zhe DU,Wei HUANG,Zhi-wei WANG,Jing ZHOU,Jian XIONG,Ming LI,Peng ZHANG,Zhong-di LIU,Feng-xue ZHU,Chuan-lin WANG,Bao-guo JIANG,Tian-bing WANG()   

  1. Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2019-08-14 Online:2020-04-18 Published:2020-04-18
  • Contact: Tian-bing WANG E-mail:wangtianbing@pkuph.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Subproject of 2022 Science and Technology Winter Olympic Project(2018YFF0301103);Peking University People’s Hospital Scientific Research Development Funds(RD2019-02)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的 探讨综合医院多学科协作诊疗(multidisciplinary team, MDT)模式对重症创伤患者的救治效果.方法: 选择2017年3月至2019年4月,北京大学人民医院创伤救治中心启动MDT流程收治的严重创伤患者的病例资料进行回顾性分析,讨论MDT组成和严重创伤者启动MDT的指标,并分析MDT救治模式与患者预后的相关性.结果: 共收集启动MDT团队进行创伤救治的病例112例,患者入院GCS(Glasgow coma scale)评分13.0±2.9,TI(trauma index)评分13.0±2.8,ISS(injury severity score)评分21.5±11.9.启动MDT团队呼叫用时(3.7±0.8) min,MDT人员抵达急诊抢救区时间(6.1±0.9) min,完成快速CT时间(23.8±3.0) min,开始损伤控制手术时间(92.6±15.4) min.所有入院患者均得以有效救治,ICU住院时间(12.6±6.7) d,治愈出院患者55例,死亡病例5例,转康复医院患者52例.结论: 综合医院创伤救治中心以MDT模式进行严重创伤患者的救治,能够明显提高严重创伤患者救治能力和水平,弥补了大型综合医院分科过细对严重创伤及多发伤患者治疗的欠缺,提高了严重创伤患者的救治效果,为大型综合医院救治严重创伤及多发伤患者以及创伤救治中心建设提供了一种可参考模式.

关键词: 创伤救治中心, MDT, 模式, 严重创伤, 救治

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the effect of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) in general hospitals on severe trauma patients.Methods: This study reviewed the treatment of patients with severe trauma in trauma center of Peking University People's Hospital from March 2017 to April 2019. The baseline information: the patients' gender, age, injury mechanism, etc.; the start indicators: the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), trauma index (TI), injury severity score (ISS); the start related indicators: time for activation, time for MDT to arrive, time for CT scan, time for damage control surgery; patient treatment and prognosis: ICU (intensive care unit) length of stay, number of cured and discharged patients, number of dead cases, number of patients transferred to rehabilitation hospital, were all analyzed. It discussed the composition of MDT, the initiation scheme, the indicators of initiation of MDT for severe trauma, and analyzed the correlation between the application of MDT and the prognosis of patients.Results: From March 2017 to April 2019, 112 trauma patients were treated by MDT in Peking University People's Hospital. There were 69 males and 43 females. The minimum age was 15 years, the maximum age was 89 years, most of them were 36-55 years old. The main injury mechanism was traffic accident injury. The GCS, TI, ISS were 13.0±2.9, 13.0±2.8, and 21.5±11.9, respectively. It took 3.7±0.8 minutes to start the call, 6.1±0.9 minutes for MDT personnel to arrive at the emergency rescue area, 23.8±3.0 minutes for fast CT and 92.6±15.4 minutes for injury control operation. All the hospitalized patients were treated effectively. ICU (Intensive care unit) hospitalization time was 12.6±6.7 days. 55 discharged patients were cured, 5 died (1 died of hemorrhagic shock, 4 died of severe brain injury) and 52 transferred to rehabilitation hospital.Conclusion: The treatment of severe trauma patients by MDT in trauma center of general hospitals can greatly improve the ability and level of treatment of severe trauma patients, make up for the lack of treatment of severe trauma especially multiple trauma patients in large general hospitals, and improve the treatment effect of severe trauma patients. It provides a reference model for large general hospitals to treat patients with severe trauma and multiple trauma and for the construction of trauma centers.

Key words: Trauma center, Multidisciplinary team (MDT), Model, Severe trauma, Application

中图分类号: 

  • R649.9

表1

MDT启动下收治重症创伤患者基本情况"

Items Number
Gender
Male 69
Female 43
Age
15-35 12
36-55 48
56-75 39
>75 13
Mechanics of injury
Traffic accidents 52
Fall 29
Explosion, crush injury 19
Others 12

表2

MDT启动后相关指标评价"

Indicators Data
Activation indicators
GCS 13.0±2.9
TI 13.0±3.8
ISS 21.5±11.9
Activation related indicators/min
Time for activation 3.7±0.8
Time for MDT to arrive 6.1±0.9
Time for CT scan 23.8±3.0
Time for damage control surgery 92.6±15.4
[1] 王天兵, 李明, 杜哲 , 等. 创伤救治中心建设中的医疗质量控制[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019,35(3):212-215.
[2] Mercer SJ, Kingston EV, Jones CPL . The trauma call[J]. BMJ, 2018,361:k2272.
[3] 唐华民 . 创伤救治"黄金 1h": 美国创伤系统介绍[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2017,19(8):638-640.
[4] 胡培阳, 张连阳 . 综合性医院创伤救治多学科团队的建设和维护[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2018,20(9):719-720.
[5] 都定元, 王建柏 . 中国创伤外科发展现状与展望[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2018,20(3):161-165.
[6] 邓进, 张连阳 . 我国创伤救治中心建设的困境与对策[J]. 中华灾害救援医学, 2017,5(8):464-466.
[7] 邓鹏, 陈建红, 周祥军 , 等. 县市级创伤救治中心 MDT 模式对提高重症创伤患者生存率的研究[J]. 现代医学与健康研究, 2018,2(16):163-165.
[8] Long AM, Lefebvre CM, Masneri DA , et al. The golden opportunity: multidisciplinary simulation training improves trauma team efficiency[J]. J Surg Educ, 2019,76(4):1116-1121.
[9] 寇玉辉, 殷晓峰, 王天兵 , 等. 严重创伤救治规范的研究与推广[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015,47(2):207-210.
[1] 冯琦琛,盖铄,王昌明,李选. 经同侧大隐静脉入路髂静脉成型及支架植入术在日间治疗模式中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 322-325.
[2] 安思兰,郑群怡,王锴,高姗. 全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的特点及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[3] 陈逸凡,刘中砥,张鹏,黄伟. 严重创伤患者损伤严重度评分的一致性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 157-160.
[4] 崔孟杰,马奇,陈曼曼,马涛,王鑫鑫,刘婕妤,张奕,陈力,蒋家诺,袁雯,郭桐君,董彦会,马军,星一. 不同生长模式与7~17岁儿童青少年代谢综合征的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 415-420.
[5] 郭辅政,赵秀娟,邓玖旭,杜哲,王天兵,朱凤雪. 严重创伤患者早期外周血淋巴细胞变化与预后之间的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 552-556.
[6] 高阳旭,孙青,李辉,谢瑶,姚红新,赵卫红. 儿童肝母细胞瘤多学科协作模式下的治疗效果及临床成本[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 200-203.
[7] 吴士艳,张旭熙,孙凯歌,胡康,刘思佳,孙昕霙. 慢性病高危人群和健康人群休闲类身体活动健康信念模式的多组结构方程模型分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 711-716.
[8] 吴士艳,张旭熙,杨帅帅,孙凯歌,贾卫兰,邵春欣,吴芹,宣小伟,刘永昌,刘思佳,孙昕霙. 北京市某近郊区居民身体活动情况及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(3): 483-490.
[9] 陈娟, 廖逸星, 李卓婷, 田野, 杨帅帅, 吐达洪, 何朝, 孙昕霙. 应用健康信念模式分析北京城乡居民限盐行为的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(2): 242-246.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!