北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 283-288. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.02.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

585 nm Q开关激光治疗痤疮炎症性皮损和炎症后红斑的疗效

王向熙,李臻臻,赖彦云,杨莉,史霖丽,仲少敏,吴艳()   

  1. 北京大学第一医院皮肤性病科,国家皮肤与免疫疾病临床医学研究中心,皮肤病分子诊断北京市重点实验室,国家药品监督管理局化妆品质量控制与评价重点实验室,北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-11 出版日期:2022-04-18 发布日期:2022-04-13
  • 通讯作者: 吴艳 E-mail:3437477565@qq.com

Clinical efficacy of 585 nm Q-switched laser treatment on inflammatory lesion and postinflammatory erythema of acne vulgaris

WANG Xiang-xi,LI Zhen-zhen,LAI Yan-yun,YANG Li,SHI Lin-li,ZHONG Shao-min,WU Yan()   

  1. National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Quality Control and Evaluation of Cosmetics, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2021-04-11 Online:2022-04-18 Published:2022-04-13
  • Contact: Yan WU E-mail:3437477565@qq.com

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 评价585 nm Q开关激光对于痤疮炎症性皮损和炎症后红斑的疗效和安全性。方法: 入选25例面部中度痤疮患者(Ⅱ~Ⅲ级,要求面部两侧均有一定的炎症性皮损和炎症后红斑), 其中共22例患者完成全部治疗及评价,3例患者失访。使用585 nm Q开关激光治疗随机选取的一侧面部,每次治疗间隔2周,共治疗3次。患者于每次治疗当日治疗前及末次治疗后2周、末次治疗后4周进行评价,即评价时间点分别为治疗前、第2周、第4周、第6周、第8周,共评价5次。每次评价采用研究者总体评估(investigator’s global assessment, IGA)评分及研究者红斑主观评分评价痤疮严重程度及红斑程度,使用窄谱反射分光光度计判断红斑程度。结果: 经3次治疗后,治疗侧第8周与治疗前比较的IGA评分差异有统计学意义(Z=2.64, P<0.01),对照侧第8周与治疗前比较的IGA评分差异有统计学意义(Z=2.67,P<0.01),治疗前及第8周治疗侧与对照侧比较的IGA评分差异均无统计学意义(P=0.59,P=0.26)。治疗侧第8周与治疗前比较的红斑主观评分差异有统计学意义(Z=4.24,P<0.01),对照侧前后红斑主观评分差异无统计学意义(Z=1.73,P=0.08), 第8周治疗侧研究者红斑主观评分低于对照侧(Z=3.61, P<0.01)。治疗侧5个时间点间红斑指数差异有统计学意义(P<0.01), 第8周与治疗前比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01), 对照侧5个时间点红斑指数差异无统计学意义。皮损治疗不良反应包括治疗后即刻局部出现轻度红斑、水肿,治疗中轻至中度疼痛,均于1~3 d内自行消退。9例患者评价为非常满意,7例患者评价为满意,6例患者评价为一般。结论: 585 nm Q开关激光对于改善痤疮炎症后红斑有一定效果,该治疗耐受度较高,安全性较好,对于痤疮炎症性皮损的改善治疗侧与对照侧差异无统计学意义。

关键词: 痤疮, 炎症后红斑, 585 nm Q开关激光

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 585 nm Q-switched laser in the treatment of acne inflammatory lesions and postinflammatory erythema. Methods: A total of 25 patients with moderate facial acne, symmetrical distribution of inflammatory lesions and postinflammatory erythema on both sides of the face, were enrolled. Among the 25 patients, 22 patients completed all the treatment and evaluation, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. 585 nm Q-switched laser was used on a randomly selected side of the face for three times of treatment at a 2 week interval. The evaluations were made before each treatment, 2 and 4 weeks after the last treatment, therefore the evaluation time points were before the treatment, weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8, respectively, for a total of 5 times. Acne severity was assessed using the investigator’s global assessment (IGA) score, and erythema severity was assessed using the investigator’s subjective erythema score and narrow-spectrum reflectance spectrophotometer at each follow-up. Results: After 3 times of treatment, there was statistically significant difference between the IGA score in week 8 and before treatment on both sides(Z=2.64, P<0.01; Z=2.67, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in IGA score between the treatment side and the control side before treatment and in week 8 (P=0.59, P=0.26). There was statistically significant difference between the investiga-tor’s subjective erythema score in week 8 and before treatment on the treatment side(Z=4.24, P<0.01), while no significant difference was showed on the control side(Z=1.73, P=0.08). In week 8, the investigator’s subjective erythema score of the treatment side was lower than that of the control side (Z=3.61, P<0.01). The erythema index of the treatment side was significantly decreased at 5 time points (P<0.01), and the index decreased significantly in week 8 compared with the index before treatment (P<0.01), while the erythema index of the control side was not significantly different at 5 time points. The treatment related adverse events included erythema and edema after treatment and pain during treatment, the severity was mild to moderate, which resolved spontaneously within 1 to 3 days. Nine patients were very satisfied with the treatment, 7 patients were satisfied, and 6 patients considered average. Conclusion: 585 nm Q-switched laser has some effect in the treatment of postinflammatory erythema, and it ensures good tolerance and safety. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment side and the control side on the improvement of acne inflammatory lesions.

Key words: Acne, Postinflammatory erythema, 585 nm Q-switched laser

中图分类号: 

  • R758.4

表1

585 nm Q开关激光治疗双侧治疗前后IGA评分比较(n=22)"

Groups Treatment side IGA score Control side IGA score Z2 P2
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
Prior treatment, n 0 1 15 5 1 0 2 15 4 1 0.54 0.59
Week 8 of treatment, n 0 5 16 1 0 0 8 13 1 0 1.13 0.26
Z1 2.64 2.67
P1 <0.01 <0.01

表2

585 nm Q开关激光治疗双侧治疗前后研究者红斑主观评分比较(n=22)"

Groups Treatment side Control side Z2 P2
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
Prior treatment,n 0 5 14 3 0 6 14 2 1.41 0.16
Week 8 of treatment,n 1 18 3 0 0 8 13 1 3.61 <0.01
Z1 4.24 1.73
P1 <0.01 0.08

图1

患者治疗前后痤疮炎症性皮损和炎症后红斑变化"

表3

585 nm Q开关激光治疗双侧红斑指数情况 [M(Min, Max)]"

Groups Prior treatment Week 2 Week 4 Week 6 Week 8
Treatment side 364.0(246.0, 564.0) 356.5(250.0, 477.0) 337.5(247.0, 503.0) 339.5(224.0, 471.0) 327.5(215.0, 464.0)
Control side 344.5(251.0, 549.0) 355.5(244.0, 488.0) 348.5(234.0, 501.0) 342.5(219.0, 497.0) 336.0(233.0, 489.0)
[1] Panchaprateep R, Munavalli G. Low-fluence 585 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser: a novel laser treatment for post-acne erythema[J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2015, 47(2):148-155.
doi: 10.1002/lsm.22321 pmid: 25645645
[2] Samuels DV, Rosenthal R, Lin R, et al. Acne vulgaris and risk of depression and anxiety: a meta-analytic review[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2020, 83(2):532-541.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.040
[3] 鞠强. 中国痤疮治疗指南(2019修订版)[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志, 2019, 48(9):583-588.
[4] Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry acne vulgaris: developing drugs for treatment[EB/OL].(2016-10-16) [2021-02-26]. www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM071292.pdf.
[5] Yoon HJ, Lee DH, Kim SO, et al. Acne erythema improvement by long-pulsed 595 nm pulsed-dye laser treatment: a pilot study[J]. J Dermatolog Treat, 2008, 19(1):38-44.
doi: 10.1080/09546630701646164
[6] Afra TP, Razmi TM, De D. Topical timolol for postacne erythema[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2020, 84(6):e255-e256.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.144 pmid: 32376427
[7] Min S, Park SY, Yoon JY, et al. Fractional microneedling radiofrequency treatment for acne-related post-inflammatory erythema[J]. Acta Derm Venereol, 2016, 96(1):87-91.
doi: 10.2340/00015555-2164
[8] Chaowattanapanit S, Silpa-Archa N, Kohli I, et al. Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: a comprehensive overview: treatment options and prevention[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017, 77(4):607-621.
doi: S0190-9622(17)30129-9 pmid: 28917452
[9] Mathew ML, Karthik R, Mallikarjun M, et al. Intense pulsed light therapy for acne-induced post-inflammatory erythema[J]. Indian Dermatol Online J, 2018, 9(3):159-164.
doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_306_17 pmid: 29854634
[10] Park KY, Ko EJ, Seo SJ, et al. Comparison of fractional, nonablative, 1 550 nm laser and 595 nm pulsed dye laser for the treatment of facial erythema resulting from acne: a split-face, evaluator-blinded, randomized pilot study[J]. J Cosmet Laser Ther, 2014, 16(3):120-123.
doi: 10.3109/14764172.2013.854626
[11] Li D, Chen B, Wu W J, et al. Experimental study on the vascular thermal response to visible laser pulses[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2015, 30(1):135-145.
doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1631-3
[12] Erceg A, de Jong EM, van de Kerkhof PC, et al. The efficacy of pulsed dye laser treatment for inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2013, 69(4):609-615.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.03.029
[13] Forbat E, Al-Niaimi F. Nonvascular uses of pulsed dye laser in clinical dermatology[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2019, 18(5):1186-1201.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.v18.5
[14] Seaton ED, Charakida A, Mouser PE, et al. Pulsed-dye laser treatment for inflammatory acne vulgaris: randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9393):1347-1352.
pmid: 14585635
[15] Lekwuttikarn R, Tempark T, Chatproedprai S, et al. Rando-mized, controlled trial split-faced study of 595 nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of acne vulgaris and acne erythema in adolescents and early adulthood[J]. Int J Dermatol, 2017, 56(8):884-888.
doi: 10.1111/ijd.13631 pmid: 28447362
[16] Chalermsuwiwattanakan N, Rojhirunsakool S, Kamanamool N, et al. The comparative study of efficacy between 1 064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser and 595 nm pulsed dye laser for the treatment of acne vulgaris[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2020, 20(7):2108-2115.
doi: 10.1111/jocd.v20.7
[17] Choi YS, Suh HS, Yoon MY, et al. Intense pulsed light vs. pulsed-dye laser in the treatment of facial acne: a randomized split-face trial[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2010, 24(7):773-780.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03525.x pmid: 20002654
[1] 刘蕊, 刘湘源. 滑膜炎-痤疮-脓疱疹-骨肥厚-骨炎综合征一例及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2008, 40(6): 652-653.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!