北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (2): 332-336. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.02.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

女性睾酮检测中假阳性问题及质谱法的确诊价值

吴曼1,2,*, 罗樱樱1,3,*, 纪立农1,3,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学人民医院内分泌与代谢科, 北京 100044
    2. 厦门市第三医院内分泌科, 福建厦门 361100
    3. 北京大学糖尿病中心, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-28 出版日期:2026-04-18 发布日期:2025-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 纪立农
  • 作者简介:

    * These authors contributed equally to this work

  • 基金资助:
    2024年中央财政支持国家临床重点专科项目

False positives in female testosterone testing and the diagnostic value of mass spectrometry

Man WU1,2, Yingying LUO1,3, Linong JI1,3,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
    2. Department of Endocrinology, The Third Hospital of Xiamen, Xiamen 361100, Fujian, China
    3. Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2024-11-28 Online:2026-04-18 Published:2025-12-29
  • Contact: Linong JI
  • Supported by:
    the 2024 National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Program of China

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 分析化学发光免疫分析法(chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA)测定女性睾酮水平假性升高的比例,并评估液相色谱-串联质谱法(liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,LC-MS/MS)在提高女性睾酮检测准确性中的应用价值。方法: 回顾性收集2020年1月1日至2024年5月1日就诊于北京大学人民医院,采用了CLIA检测睾酮水平升高并再次采集血样进行LC-MS/MS检测的女性患者。根据LC-MS/MS检测结果,将患者分为假性升高组和真性升高组,比较两组睾酮水平的差异,计算CLIA的假阳性率,并分析假性升高组进一步的检查情况。结果: 共纳入287例CLIA检测睾酮水平升高的女性患者,根据LC-MS/MS的结果,178例(62.0%)被归类为假性升高组,109例(38.0%)被归类为真性升高组,两组睾酮水平(CLIA检测结果)的均值分别为(3.63±1.60) nmol/L和(4.13±2.20) nmol/L,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。CLIA检测女性睾酮水平的假阳性率为62.0%,受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)为0.601(95%CI:0.534~0.668),提示其诊断准确性较低。假性升高组中,40.45%的患者接受了多次CLIA复测,部分患者接受了不必要的临床评估,包括影像学和激素检查,增加了患者负担。结论: CLIA在女性睾酮检测中的假阳性率较高,假阳性结果可能导致误诊、重复检测和不必要的其他相关检查,增加了患者负担和医疗资源浪费;LC-MS/MS可显著提高女性睾酮水平评估的准确性,建议在CLIA检测睾酮水平升高的女性患者中优先采用LC-MS/MS进行确诊。

关键词: 雄激素增多症, 睾酮, 化学发光免疫分析法, 液相色谱-串联质谱法, 假阳性

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the proportion of pseudo-elevated testosterone levels detected by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in female patients and to evaluate the application value of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in improving the accuracy of testosterone detection in this population. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data collected from female patients who presented at Peking University People' s Hospital from January 1, 2020 to May 1, 2024. These patients were initially identified with elevated testosterone levels through CLIA and subsequently underwent additional blood sampling for confirmatory testing using LC-MS/MS. Based on LC-MS/MS results, the patients were categorized into the pseudo-elevated group and the true-elevated group. Dif-ferences in the testosterone levels between the two groups were compared, the false-positive rate of CLIA was calcula-ted, and further evaluations conducted in the pseudo-elevated group were analyzed. Results: A total of 287 female patients with elevated testosterone levels detected by CLIA were included in the study. According to the LC-MS/MS results, 178 cases (62.0%) were classified into the pseudo-elevated group, while 109 cases (38.0%) were classified into the true-elevated group. The mean testosterone levels measured by CLIA were (3.63±1.60) nmol/L in the pseudo-elevated group and (4.13±2.20) nmol/L in the true-elevated group, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The false-positive rate of CLIA in detecting testosterone levels in women was 62.0%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for CLIA was 0.601 (95%CI: 0.534-0.668) indicating low diagnostic accuracy. Among the pseudo-elevated group, 40.45% of patients underwent multiple CLIA retests, and some patients were subjected to unnecessary clinical evaluations, including imaging and hormonal testing, which significantly increased patient burden. Conclusion: This study highlights the high false-positive rate of CLIA in detecting testosterone levels in female patients, which can result in misdiagnosis, repeated testing, and unnecessary clinical evaluations, thereby increasing patient burden and resulting in inefficient use of medical resources.LC-MS/MS significantly enhances the accuracy of testosterone detection in women and is strongly recommended as the confirmatory test for female patients with elevated testosterone levels initially detected by CLIA.

Key words: Hyperandrogenism, Testosterone, Chemiluminescent immunoassay, Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, False positive

中图分类号: 

  • R588

图1

CLIA测定女性睾酮水平的ROC曲线"

表1

假性睾酮升高组(n=178)患者的进一步检查情况"

Evaluation items Cases, n (%) Results or special conditions
Testosterone retesting (CLIA) 72 (40.45) Up to 9 retests
Diagnosed with PCOS 61 (34.27) 28 cases (45.90%) with polycystic ovaries on ultrasound, 33 cases (54.10%) without
BG 149 (83.71) 128 normal cases (85.91%), 21 cases (14.09%) diagnosed with diabetes or elevated blood sugar
Insulin 121 (67.98) 115 normal cases (95.04%), 3 elevated cases (2.48%), 3 decreased cases (2.48%)
Cortisol 178 (100.00) 18 elevated cases (10.11%), retests normal; 42 decreased cases (23.60%), retests normal
ACTH 63 (35.39) 7 elevated cases (11.11%), retests normal
IGF-1 19 (10.67) 3 elevated cases (15.79%), 2 retests normal
GH 10 (5.62) 9 normal cases (90.00%), 1 elevated (10.00%)
Thyroid function 142 (79.78) 22 cases (15.79%) with abnormal thyroid function
Gynecological ultrasound 132 (74.16) 28 cases (21.21%) with polycystic changes, 30 cases (22.73%) with uterine fibroids
Adrenal ultrasound 18 (10.11) No significant abnormalities in all cases (100.00%)
Adrenal CT 18 (10.11) 10 cases (55.56%) with no significant abnormalities, 8 cases (44.44%) with adrenal nodules or thickening
Thyroid ultrasound 30 (16.85) 19 cases (63.33%) with thyroid nodules, 9 cases (30.00%) with diffuse changes, 6 cases (20.00%) with heterogeneous echogenicity, 4 cases (13.33%) with no abnormalities
1
Joham AE , Norman RJ , Stener-Victorin E , et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2022, 10 (9): 668- 680.

doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00163-2
2
Sasako T , Ilboudo Y , Liang KYH , et al. The influence of trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor gene on androgen-related traits and diseases[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2024, 109 (12): 3234- 3244.

doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae302
3
Carmina E , Koyama T , Chang L , et al. Does ethnicity influence the prevalence of adrenal hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome?[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 167 (6): 1807- 1812.

doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91779-A
4
Handelsman DJ . Mass spectrometry, immunoassay and valid steroid measurements in reproductive medicine and science[J]. Hum Reprod, 2017, 32 (6): 1147- 1150.

doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex078
5
Gambineri A , Pelusi C . Sex hormones, obesity and type 2 diabetes: Is there a link?[J]. Endocr Connect, 2019, 8 (1): R1- R9.

doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0450
6
Zeng X , Xie YJ , Liu YT , et al. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: Correlation between hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance and obesity[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2020, 502, 214- 221.

doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.003
7
Sanchez-Garrido MA , Tena-Sempere M . Metabolic dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome: Pathogenic role of androgen excess and potential therapeutic strategies[J]. Mol Metab, 2020, 35, 100937.

doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.01.001
8
Huang-Doran I , Kinzer AB , Jimenez-Linan M , et al. Ovarian hyperandrogenism and response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues in primary severe insulin resistance[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2021, 106 (8): 2367- 2383.

doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab275
9
Rojas J , Chávez M , Olivar L , et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome, insulin resistance, and obesity: Navigating the pathophysiologic labyrinth[J]. Int J Reprod Med, 2014, 2014, 719050.
10
Azziz R , Carmina E , Dewailly D , et al. The Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: The complete task force report[J]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 91 (2): 456- 488.

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035
11
Cheng I , Norian JM , Jacobson JD . Falsely elevated testosterone due to heterophile antibodies[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 120 (2 Pt 2): 455- 458.
12
Martínez-Escribano A , Maroto-García J , Ruiz-Galdón M , et al. Measurement of serum testosterone in nondiabetic young obese men: Comparison of direct immunoassay to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Biomolecules, 2020, 10 (12): 1697.

doi: 10.3390/biom10121697
13
Rosner W , Auchus RJ , Azziz R , et al. Position statement: Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: An Endocrine Society position statement[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007, 92 (2): 405- 413.

doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1864
14
Demers LM . Androgen deficiency in women; role of accurate testosterone measurements[J]. Maturitas, 2010, 67 (1): 39- 45.

doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.04.019
15
Huhtaniemi IT , Tajar A , Lee DM , et al. Comparison of serum testosterone and estradiol measurements in 3174 European men using platform immunoassay and mass spectrometry; relevance for the diagnostics in aging men[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2012, 166 (6): 983- 991.

doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-1051
16
Moal V , Mathieu E , Reynier P , et al. Low serum testosterone assayed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Comparison with five immunoassay techniques[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2007, 386 (1/2): 12- 19.
17
Naamneh Elzenaty R , du Toit T , Flück CE . Basics of androgen synthesis and action[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2022, 36 (4): 101665.

doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2022.101665
18
Rodriguez Paris V , Bertoldo MJ . The mechanism of androgen actions in PCOS etiology[J]. Med Sci, 2019, 7 (9): 89.
19
Abdelazim IA , Alanwar A , AbuFaza M , et al. Elevated and diagnostic androgens of polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Prz Menopauzalny, 2020, 19 (1): 1- 5.
20
Tosi F , Fiers T , Kaufman JM , et al. Implications of androgen assay accuracy in the phenotyping of women with polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2016, 101 (2): 610- 618.

doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2807
21
McCartney CR , Burt Solorzano CM , Patrie JT , et al. Estimating testosterone concentrations in adolescent girls: Comparison of two direct immunoassays to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Steroids, 2018, 140, 62- 69.

doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2018.09.001
22
尹逸丛, 卢琳, 朱惠娟, 等. 女性睾酮水平假性升高病例的临床特点和检验验证[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2021, 30 (7): 852- 857.
23
中华医学会妇产科学分会内分泌学组及指南专家组. 多囊卵巢综合征中国诊疗指南[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2018, 53 (1): 2- 6.
24
Teede HJ , Tay CT , Laven JJE , et al. Recommendations from the 2023 international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2023, 108 (10): 2447- 2469.

doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463
25
曹正, 阮祥燕, 翟燕红, 等. 多囊卵巢综合征雄激素质谱检测专家共识[J]. 检验医学, 2023, 38 (3): 203- 208.
26
Kanakis GA , Tsametis CP , Goulis DG . Measuring testosterone in women and men[J]. Maturitas, 2019, 125, 41- 44.

doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.04.203
[1] 花克涵,杨磊,张晓威,白文俊,李清,徐涛. 完全性雄激素不敏感综合征合并膀胱瘘1例报道及文献回顾[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 724-729.
[2] 伏海燕, 靖俊, 伊男, 余时超, 恽时峰, 梁元姣, 姚兵. StarD7与Wnt/β-catenin信号通路对Annexin 5刺激大鼠Leydig细胞睾酮分泌的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(4): 518-523.
[3] 陈亮, 徐阳 , 左文莉 , 杨慧霞, 廖秦平, 辛钟成, 郭应禄. Ras分子信号蛋白调控睾丸间质细胞Cox7a2蛋白表达及共定位影响研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(4): 507-510.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!