北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 686-691. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.04.002

• 专家笔谈 • 上一篇    下一篇

前列腺癌筛查研究现状

刘明*(), 陈惠铃, 吕政通, 侯惠民, 孙嘉敏   

  1. 北京医院(国家老年医学中心)泌尿外科,老年疾病国家临床医学研究中心,国家卫生健康委老年医学重点实验室,中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,北京 100005
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-23 出版日期:2026-08-18 发布日期:2026-05-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘明

Current status of prostate cancer screening research

Ming LIU*(), Huiling CHEN, Zhengtong LYU, Huimin HOU, Jiamin SUN   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center for Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
  • Received:2026-04-23 Online:2026-08-18 Published:2026-05-27
  • Contact: Ming LIU

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

前列腺癌是全球男性发病率第二位的恶性肿瘤,其早期诊断依赖筛查。如何提高临床有意义前列腺癌的检出率,避免低危肿瘤的过度诊断与过度治疗,同时兼顾经济效益比,已成为前列腺癌筛查领域的核心问题。当前国际前列腺癌筛查策略正从单一的前列腺特异性抗原(prostate specific antigen, PSA)筛查走向个体化风险分层,并探索整合磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging, MRI)、新型生物标志物及风险预测模型等多种分层工具的作用,但尚无公认的统一路径。近年来,我国前列腺癌发病率虽快速上升,但早期诊断率仍较低,这与我国前列腺癌筛查普及率不足直接相关,而且我国还面临老年高危人群的合理筛查模式缺乏、公众认知不足、精细化筛查路径缺失等问题。未来需要基于中国人群数据,构建适合中国国情的分层筛查策略,以推动筛查从机会性向系统性转变。

关键词: 前列腺肿瘤, 癌症早期检测, 社区卫生服务, 多参数磁共振成像

Abstract:

Prostate cancer is the second most common malignant tumor among men worldwide. Its early diagnosis relies on screening. How to increase the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer, avoid overdiagnosis and over-treatment of low-risk tumors, while also considering economic benefits, has become a core issue in the field of screening. Currently, international prostate cancer screening strategies are moving from a single prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening to individualized risk stratification, and exploring the roles of various stratification tools, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), new biomarkers, and risk prediction models. However, there is no universally recognized unified approach. In recent years, although the incidence of prostate cancer in China has increased rapidly, the early diagnosis rate is still low. This is directly related to the insufficient prevalence of prostate cancer screening in China. Moreover, China also faces problems such as the lack of a reasonable screening model for elderly high-risk populations, insufficient public awareness, and the absence of a refined screening path. Future work involves building stratified screening strategies suitable for the Chinese population based on Chinese data, promoting the transition of screening from opportunistic to systematic, and is a task that needs to be carried out.

Key words: Prostate tumor, Early cancer detection, Community health service, Multiparametric nuclear magnetic resonance

中图分类号: 

  • R737.25
1
Bray F , Laversanne M , Sung H , et al. Global cancer statistics 2022:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74 (3): 229- 263.
2
郑荣寿, 陈茹, 韩冰峰, 等. 2022年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2024, 46 (3): 221- 231.
3
Gan Y , Zhou H , Feng P , et al. Global trends and regional variations in PCa burden: A focus on China's rapid growth[J]. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig, 2025, 43 (9): 526.e17- 526.e31.
4
Zeng H , Zheng R , Sun K , et al. Cancer survival statistics in China 2019-2021:A multicenter, population-based study[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2024, 4 (3): 203- 213.
5
李绪, 李荣欣, 关心, 等. 兰州地区目标人群前列腺癌筛查及异常PSA值影响因素分析[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2022, 36 (3): 3- 13.
6
郑利伟, 宋灵敏, 王钢, 等. 基层医院基于医共体模式下前列腺癌筛查模式的初步探索[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 45 (6): 416- 419.
7
Andriole GL , Crawford ED , Grubb RL Ⅲ , et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360 (13): 1310- 1319.

doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696
8
Hugosson J , Roobol MJ , Månsson M , et al. A 16-yr follow-up of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2019, 76 (1): 43- 51.

doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.009
9
Leenen RCA , Venderbos LDF , Helleman J , et al. Prostate cancer early detection in the European Union and UK[J]. Eur Urol, 2025, 87 (3): 326- 339.

doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.07.019
10
Dushimova Z , Iztleuov Y , Chingayeva G , et al. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in prostate cancer[J]. Diseases, 2025, 13 (6): 167.

doi: 10.3390/diseases13060167
11
Sharpley CF , Bitsika V , Christie DRH . "The worst thing was…": Prostate cancer patients' evaluations of their diagnosis and treatment experiences[J]. Am J Mens Health, 2018, 12 (5): 1503- 1509.

doi: 10.1177/1557988318772752
12
Nielsen SB , Spalletta O , Toft Kristensen MA , et al. Psychosocial consequences of potential overdiagnosis in prostate cancer a qualitative interview study[J]. Scand J Prim Health Care, 2020, 38 (4): 439- 446.

doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1843826
13
Millan B , Hoogenes J , Uy M , et al. Long-term impact of posterior reconstruction urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy: A secondary analysis of a randomized cohort[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2025, 19 (8): 269- 274.
14
Gómez Rivas J , Gómez Dávila P , Tarrazo Antelo AM , et al. The future of prostate cancer screening in the European Union: PRAISE-U project[J]. Actas Urológicas Españolas Engl Ed, 2026, 50 (3): 501919.
15
Van Poppel H , Roobol MJ , Chandran A . Early detection of prostate cancer in the European Union: Combining forces with PRAISE-U[J]. Eur Urol, 2023, 84 (6): 519- 522.

doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.002
16
Singh D , Carvalho AL , Mosquera I , et al. Monitoring of prostate cancer screening in the European Union: Development of key performance indicators through the PRAISE-U project[J]. eClinicalMedicine, 2025, 80, 103022.

doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103022
17
Cornford P, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer-uroweb[EB/OL]. (2026-04-02)[2026-04-03]. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer.
18
Sweis J , Ofori B , Murphy AB . Concerns regarding prostate cancer screening guidelines in minority populations[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2024, 27 (4): 591- 593.

doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00765-0
19
Möller F , Månsson M , Wallström J , et al. Prostate cancers in the prostate-specific antigen interval of 1.8-3 ng/ml: Results from the göteborg-2 prostate cancer screening trial[J]. Eur Urol, 2024, 86 (2): 95- 100.

doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.017
20
Lophatananon A , Light A , Burns-Cox N , et al. Re-evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of PSA as a referral test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in contemporary MRI-based image-guided biopsy pathways[J]. J Clin Urol, 2023, 16 (4): 264- 273.

doi: 10.1177/20514158211059057
21
Crocetto F , Musone M , Chianese S , et al. Blood and urine-based biomarkers in prostate cancer: Current advances, clinical applications, and future directions[J]. J Liq Biopsy, 2025, 9, 100305.

doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100305
22
Auvinen A , Tammela TLJ , Mirtti T , et al. Prostate cancer screening with PSA, kallikrein panel, and MRI: The ProScreen randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 2024, 331 (17): 1452.

doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.3841
23
McHugh JK , Bancroft EK , Saunders E , et al. Assessment of a polygenic risk score in screening for prostate cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2025, 392 (14): 1406- 1417.

doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2407934
24
Robinson HS , Lee SS , Barocas DA , et al. Evaluation of blood and urine based biomarkers for detection of clinically-significant prostate cancer[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2025, 28 (1): 45- 55.

doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00840-0
25
Kawada T , Shim SR , Quhal F , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of liquid biomarkers for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of multiple thresholds[J]. Eur Urol Oncol, 2024, 7 (4): 649- 662.

doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.029
26
Tosoian JJ , Sessine MS , Trock BJ , et al. MyProstateScore in men considering repeat biopsy: Validation of a simple testing approach[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2023, 26 (3): 563- 567.

doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00633-3
27
Franco A , Autorino R . ExoDx test for prostate cancer: The future is liquid[J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2023, 26 (3): 443- 444.

doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00707-w
28
Vigneswaran HT , Eklund M , Discacciati A , et al. Stockholm3 in a multiethnic cohort for prostate cancer detection (SEPTA): A prospective multicentered trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2024, 42 (32): 3806- 3816.

doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00152
29
McLeod OD , Palsdottir T , Walz J , et al. Cost analysis of prostate cancer care using a biomarker-enhanced diagnostic strategy with Stockholm3[J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2024, 66, 26- 32.

doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.010
30
Tilki D , Rejek N , Nohe F , et al. External validation of Stockholm3 in a retrospective German clinical cohort[J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2025, 11 (1): 82- 87.

doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.07.009
31
Ahmed HU , El-Shater Bosaily A , Brown LC , et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): A paired validating confirmatory study[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389 (10071): 815- 822.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1
32
Bratt O , Godtman RA , Jiborn T , et al. Population-based organised prostate cancer testing: Results from the first invitation of 50-year-old men[J]. Eur Urol, 2024, 85 (3): 207- 214.

doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.013
33
Messina E , Borrelli A , Sciarra A , et al. Primary noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer screening: A randomized clinical trial (PROSA)[J]. Eur Urol, 2026, 89 (3): 246- 257.

doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.024
34
Hugosson J , Carlsson S , Aus G , et al. Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11 (8): 725- 732.

doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70146-7
35
Al-Monajjed R, Boschheidgen M, Lakes J, et al. Value of additional systematic cores during magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsy in prostate cancer screening for young men: Results from the PROBASE trial[J/OL]. Eur Urol Oncol, 2025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588931125002883?via%3Dihub. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.10.014.
36
陈惠铃, 吕政通, 侯惠民, 等. 社区体检前列腺癌筛查的效果和卫生经济学价值: 一项北京市东城区真实世界研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2025, 46 (12): 930- 936.
[1] 刘艳华, 陆敏, 赵旭阳, 张宽根, 武睿, 梅放, 戴志豪, 由江峰, 裴斐. 肿瘤转移抑制基因LASS2去磷酸化对液泡型ATP酶活性及前列腺癌侵袭性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1113-1123.
[2] 杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[3] 宁家昕, 王浩然, 罗书航, 敬吉波, 王建业, 侯惠民, 刘明. 氧化应激相关基因与前列腺癌关系的多组学分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 633-643.
[4] 王泽远, 于栓宝, 郑浩轲, 陶金, 范雅峰, 张雪培. 基于临床特征和多参数MRI的前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的术前预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 684-691.
[5] 李志存, 吴天俣, 梁磊, 范宇, 孟一森, 张骞. 穿刺活检单针阳性前列腺癌术后病理升级的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[6] 邢念增,王明帅,杨飞亚,尹路,韩苏军. 前列腺免活检创新理念的临床实践及其应用前景[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 565-566.
[7] 田宇轩,阮明健,刘毅,李德润,吴静云,沈棋,范宇,金杰. 双参数MRI改良PI-RADS评分4分和5分病灶的最大径对临床有意义前列腺癌的预测效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 567-574.
[8] 姚凯烽,阮明健,李德润,田宇轩,陈宇珂,范宇,刘毅. 靶向穿刺联合区域系统穿刺对PI-RADS 4~5分患者的前列腺癌诊断效能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 575-581.
[9] 欧俊永,倪坤明,马潞林,王国良,颜野,杨斌,李庚午,宋昊东,陆敏,叶剑飞,张树栋. 肌层浸润性膀胱癌合并中高危前列腺癌患者的预后因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 582-588.
[10] 薛蔚,董樑,钱宏阳,费笑晨. 前列腺癌新辅助治疗与辅助治疗的现状及进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 775-780.
[11] 刘毅,袁昌巍,吴静云,沈棋,肖江喜,赵峥,王霄英,李学松,何志嵩,周利群. 靶向穿刺+6针系统穿刺对PI-RADS 5分患者的前列腺癌诊断效能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 812-817.
[12] 毛海,张帆,张展奕,颜野,郝一昌,黄毅,马潞林,褚红玲,张树栋. 基于MRI前列腺腺体相关参数构建腹腔镜前列腺癌术后尿失禁的预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 818-824.
[13] 袁昌巍,李德润,李志华,刘毅,山刚志,李学松,周利群. 多参数磁共振成像中动态对比增强状态在诊断PI-RADS 4分前列腺癌中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 838-842.
[14] 徐菱忆,惠淼,朱树宏,杨照,李梦蕊,杨宏宇,郑茜子,吕继成,杨莉. 社区慢性肾脏病的筛查与管理现状[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1056-封三.
[15] 刘毅,刘志坚,沈棋,吴静云,范宇,李德润,虞巍,何志嵩. 14例恶性潜能未定的前列腺间质肿瘤病例分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 621-624.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!