论著

复合手术治疗无残端的症状性长段颈内动脉慢性闭塞

  • 贾子昌 ,
  • 李选 ,
  • 郑梅 ,
  • 栾景源 ,
  • 王昌明 ,
  • 韩金涛
展开
  • 1. 北京大学第三医院 介入血管外科, 北京 100191
    2. 北京大学第三医院 神经内科,北京 100191

收稿日期: 2019-02-20

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(81200969)

Hybrid treatment for symptomatic long-segment chronic internal carotid artery occlusion without stump

  • Zi-chang JIA ,
  • Xuan LI ,
  • Mei ZHENG ,
  • Jing-yuan LUAN ,
  • Chang-ming WANG ,
  • Jin-tao HAN
Expand
  • 1. Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China

Received date: 2019-02-20

  Online published: 2020-02-20

Supported by

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81200969)

摘要

目的:总结采用复合手术方法治疗无残端症状性长段颈内动脉慢性闭塞(chronic internal carotid artery occlusion,CICAO)病变的初步经验。方法:回顾性总结分析2015年7月至2017年12月北京大学第三医院介入血管外科采取复合手术的方法进行治疗的12例无残端的症状性长段CICAO患者资料,初步分析手术的安全性及有效性。结果:11例患者获得技术成功,技术成功率91.7%(11/12),仅1例发生主要并发症,该患者术中出现颈内动脉海绵窦瘘,结扎颈内动脉近端后好转。全部12例患者无缺血性及出血性卒中,无死亡病例。10例患者获得随访,随访10~32个月,平均随访时间(19±9)个月,其中1例出现症状性支架内再狭窄,予再次手术治疗后好转。结论:对于经严格筛选的无残端的症状性长段CICAO患者,复合开通手术在技术上可行,有较高的手术安全性及技术成功率。

本文引用格式

贾子昌 , 李选 , 郑梅 , 栾景源 , 王昌明 , 韩金涛 . 复合手术治疗无残端的症状性长段颈内动脉慢性闭塞[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020 , 52(1) : 177 -180 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.028

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the preliminary experience of hybrid operation for the treatment of symptomatic long-segment chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) without stump. Methods: Clinical data of 12 patients of symptomatic long-segment CICAO without stump undergoing hybrid operation treatment from July 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The safety and efficacy of hybrid operation for the treatment of symptomatic long-segment CICAO without stump were preliminarily assessed. CICAO was defined as occlusion time being more than 4 weeks. The primary outcome was defined as any stroke (including ischemic or hemorrhagic) or deaths from any cause after hybrid operation within 30 days. The secondary outcome was defined as successful revascularization and occurrence of >50% in-stent restenosis during the follow-up period. Results: In this group, the symptomatic long-segment CICAO of 11 patients were successfully recanalized. Technical success rate was 91.7% (11/12). The main complication rate was 8.3% (1/12). This patient encountered iatrogenic internal carotid artery cavernous sinus fistula caused by micro-guide wire in the midway of the hybrid operation, the pro-ximal segment of this internal carotid artery was ligated and the iatrogenic internal carotid artery cavernous sinus fistula disappeared in the following digital subtraction angiography image. No patient encountered hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke. No death complications occurred. In this group 10 patients of them were followed up. The follow-up period ranged from 10 to 32 months [mean, (19±9) months]. During the follow-up period, 1 patients developed in-stent restenosis and improved after reoperation of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty by the right size balloon without stenting treatment. Conclusion: Hybrid operation for the treatment of highly screened patients with symptomatic long-segment CICAO without stump is safe and effective, could reduce the incidence of complications and improve procedural success rate.

参考文献

[1] Iwata T, Mori T, Tajiri H , et al. Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome following stenting by flow reversal technique for chronic occlusions older than 3 months of the cervical carotid or vertebral artery[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012,70(1):82-90.
[2] Sundaram S, Kannoth S, Thomas B , et al. Collateral assessment by CT angiography as a predictor of outcome in symptomatic cervical internal carotid artery occlusion[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017,38(1):52-57.
[3] Zirak P, Delgado-mederos R, Dinia L , et al. Microvascular versus macrovascular cerebral vasomotor reactivity in patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion[J]. Acad Radiol, 2014,21(2):168-174.
[4] Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Liapis CD . Internal carotid artery occlusion: association with atherosclerotic disease in other arterial beds and vascular risk factors[J]. Angiology, 2007,58(3):329-335.
[5] Alexander JJ, Moawad J, Super D . Outcome analysis of carotid artery occlusion[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2007,41(5):409-416.
[6] Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RL Jr . Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 2011,306(18):1983-1992.
[7] Jiao L, Song G, Hua Y , et al. Recanalization of extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion: A 12-year retrospective study[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2013,8(23):2204-2206.
[8] Lee CW, Lin YH, Liu HM , et al. Predicting procedure successful rate and 1-year patency after endovascular recanalization for chro-nic carotid artery occlusion by CT angiography[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2016,221(15):772-776.
[9] Chen YH, Leong WS, Lin MS , et al. Predictors for successful endovascular intervention in chronic carotid artery total occlusion[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016,9(17):1825-1832.
[10] Park S, Park ES, Kwak JH , et al. Endovascular management of long segmental petrocavernous internal carotid artery (Carotid S) occlusion[J]. Stroke, 2015,17(3):336-343.
[11] 中国医师协会介入医师分会神经介入专业委员会, 中华医学会放射学分会介入放射学组, 中国卒中学会复合介入神经外科分会, 国家脑卒中防治工程委员会缺血性卒中专业委员会. 慢性颈内动脉闭塞再通治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019,7(1):1-6.
[12] Namba K, Shojima M, Nemoto S . Wire-probing technique to revascularize subacute or chronic internal carotid artery occlusion[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2012,18(3):288-296.
文章导航

/