技术方法

机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复手术:单一术者108例经验总结

  • 程嗣达 ,
  • 李新飞 ,
  • 熊盛炜 ,
  • 樊书菠 ,
  • 王杰 ,
  • 朱伟杰 ,
  • 李子奡 ,
  • 丁光璞 ,
  • 俞婷 ,
  • 李万强 ,
  • 孙永明 ,
  • 杨昆霖 ,
  • 张雷 ,
  • 郝瀚 ,
  • 李学松 ,
  • 周利群
展开
  • 1.北京大学第一医院泌尿外科,北京大学泌尿外科研究所,国家泌尿、男性生殖系肿瘤研究中心,北京 100034
    2.三明市第二医院泌尿外科,福建三明 366000
    3.三峡大学第一临床医学院/宜昌市中心人民医院泌尿外科,湖北宜昌 443003
    4.南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁市人民医院泌尿外科,江苏宿迁 223800

收稿日期: 2020-04-20

  网络出版日期: 2020-08-06

Robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery: A review of 108 cases by a single surgeon

  • Si-da CHENG ,
  • Xin-fei LI ,
  • Sheng-wei XIONG ,
  • Shu-bo FAN ,
  • Jie WANG ,
  • Wei-jie ZHU ,
  • Zi-ao LI ,
  • Guang-pu DING ,
  • Ting YU ,
  • Wan-qiang LI ,
  • Yong-ming SUN ,
  • Kun-lin YANG ,
  • Lei ZHANG ,
  • Han HAO ,
  • Xue-song LI ,
  • Li-qun ZHOU
Expand
  • 1. Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Sanming, Sanming 366000, Fujian, China
    3. Department of Urology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang 443003, Hubei, China
    4. Department of Urology, Suqian People’s Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group, Suqian 223800, Jiangsu, China

Received date: 2020-04-20

  Online published: 2020-08-06

摘要

目的: 总结分析单一术者机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复手术的技术经验及治疗效果。方法: 回顾性分析2018年11月至2020年1月由单一术者完成的108例机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复手术的临床资料,包括改良后离断肾盂成形术53例、肾盂瓣成形术11例、输尿管狭窄段切除再吻合术11例、输尿管狭窄切开自体舌黏膜修补术5例、输尿管狭窄切开阑尾补片修复术4例、输尿管膀胱再植术11例、术中精确测量法膀胱悬吊翻瓣术6例和改良回肠代输尿管术7例。手术成功定义为主观症状缓解且泌尿系超声提示肾积水缓解。结果: 108例手术均成功完成,无中转普通腹腔镜及开放手术。改良后离断肾盂成形术,中位手术时间141 min(74~368 min),中位出血量20 mL(10~350 mL),中位术后住院时间4 d(3~19 d),手术成功率为94.3%。肾盂瓣成形术,中位手术时间159 min(110~222 min),中位出血量50 mL(20~150 mL),中位术后住院时间5 d(3~8 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管狭窄段切除再吻合术,中位手术时间126 min(76~160 min),中位术中出血量20 mL(10~50 mL),中位术后住院时间5 d(4~9 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管狭窄切开自体舌黏膜补片修补术,中位手术时间204 min(154~250 min),中位出血量30 mL(10~100 mL),中位术后住院时间6 d(4~7 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管狭窄切开阑尾补片修复术,中位手术时间164 min(135~211 min),中位手术出血量75 mL(50~200 mL),中位术后住院日8.5 d(6~12 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管膀胱再植术,中位手术时间149 min(100~218 min),中位术中出血量20 mL(10~50 mL),中位术后住院日7 d(5~10 d),手术成功率为90.9%。术中精确测量法膀胱悬吊翻瓣术,中位手术时间166 min(137~205 min),中位手术出血45 mL(20~100 mL),中位术后住院时间5 d(4~41 d),手术成功率为83.3%。改良回肠代输尿管手术,中位手术时间270 min(227~335 min),中位术中出血量100 mL(10~100 mL),中位术后住院时间7 d(5~26 d),手术成功率为85.7%。结论: 本研究中单一术者应用机器人辅助腹腔镜开展并改良了多种复杂上尿路修复手术术式,对进一步形成标准化、程序化上尿路修复手术方式提供了参考。

本文引用格式

程嗣达 , 李新飞 , 熊盛炜 , 樊书菠 , 王杰 , 朱伟杰 , 李子奡 , 丁光璞 , 俞婷 , 李万强 , 孙永明 , 杨昆霖 , 张雷 , 郝瀚 , 李学松 , 周利群 . 机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复手术:单一术者108例经验总结[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020 , 52(4) : 771 -779 . DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.032

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the experiences and outcomes of 108 robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgeries conducted by a single surgeon. Methods: We consecutively and retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgeries by a single surgeon from November 2018 to January 2020. The patient demographics, perioperative variables, postoperative complications and follow-up data were recorded. Fifty-three modified dismembered pyeloplasties (MDP), 11 spiral flap pyeloplasties (SFP), 11 ure-teroureterostomies (UUT), 4 lingual mucosal onlay graft ureteroplasties (LMU), 5 appendiceal onlay flap ureteroplasties (AU), 11 ureteral reimplantations (UR), 6 Boari flap-Psoas hitch surgeries (BPS) and 7 ileal ureter replacements (IUR) were enrolled finally. The success was defined as the improvement in subjective pain levels, and the improvement in the degree of hydronephrosis at ultrasound. Results: All the surgeries were successfully completed without open or laparoscopic conversion. The median operative time was 141 min (range: 74-368 min), median blood loss was 20 mL (range: 10-350 mL) and median hospital stay was 4 d (range: 3-19 d) in MDP group, with the success rate of 94.3%. The median operative time was 159 min (range: 110-222 min), median blood loss was 50 mL (range: 20-150 mL) and median hospital stay was 5 d (range: 3-8 d) in SFP group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 126 min (range: 76-160 d), median blood loss was 20 mL (range: 10-50 mL) and median hospital stay was 5 d (range: 4-9 d) in UUT group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 204 min (range: 154-250 min), median blood loss was 30 mL (range: 10-100 mL) and median hospital stay was 6 d (range: 4-7 d) in LMU group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 164 min (range: 135-211 min), median blood loss was 75 mL (range: 50-200 mL) and median hospital stay was 8.5 d (range: 6-12 d) in AU group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 149 min (range: 100-218 min), median blood loss was 20 mL (range: 10-50 mL) and median hospital stay was 7 d (range: 5-10 d) in UR group, with the success rate of 90.9%. The median operative time was 166 min (range: 137-205 min), median blood loss was 45 mL (range: 20-100 mL) and median hospital stay was 5 d (range: 4-41 d) in BPS group, with the success rate of 83.3%. The median operative time was 270 min (range: 227-335 min), median blood loss was 100 mL (range: 10-100 mL) and median hospital stay was 7 d (range: 5-26 d) in IUR group, with the success rate of 85.7%. Conclusion: The surgeon performed and modified numerous complicated upper urinary tract reconstruction surgeries by the robotic platform, which facilitated the development of the standardized upper urinary tract reconstruction surgical technique.

参考文献

[1] Stief CG, Jonas U, Petry KU, et al. Ureteric reconstruction[J]. BJU Int, 2003,91(2):138-142.
[2] Mufarrij PW, Shah OD, Berger AD, et al. Robotic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract[J]. J Urol, 2007,178(5):2002-2005.
[3] 赵海岳, 叶雄俊, 陈伟男, 等. 腹腔镜肾盂成型术中异位血管的处理方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019,51(4):660-664.
[4] Wang J, Xiong SW, Fan SB, et al. Appendiceal onlay flap ure-teroplasty for the treatment of complex ureteral strictures: Initial experience of nine patients [J/OL]. J Endourol, (2020-04-23)[2020-05-07]. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0176.
[5] Yang K, Yao L, Li X, et al. A modified suture technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty of pelviureteric junction obstruction[J]. Urology, 2015,85(1):263-267.
[6] Hong P, Cai Y, Li Z, et al. Modified laparoscopic partial urete-rectomy for adult ureteral fibroepithelial polyp: Technique and initial experience[J]. Urol Int, 2019,102(1):13-19.
[7] Zhong W, Hong P, Ding G, et al. Technical considerations and outcomes for ileal ureter replacement: a retrospective study in China[J]. BMC Surg, 2019,19(1):9.
[8] 丁光璞, 程嗣达, 方冬, 等. 上尿路微创手术的技术改良[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019,51(4):610-614.
[9] Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a syste-matic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol, 2014,65(2):430-452.
[10] Hong P, Li Z, Zhu D, et al. A simple modification for the usage of flexible cystoscope in modified laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ure-teropelvic junction obstruction with renal calculi: A flexible guiding tube[J]. Urol Int, 2019,102(3):262-268.
[11] 丁光璞, 彭意吉, 杨昆霖, 等. 改良经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术联合孙氏镜治疗UPJO合并肾结石的初步经验[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019,40(9):680-684.
[12] 许小林, 徐月敏, 朱开常, 等. 采用旋转带蒂肾盂瓣输尿管扩大成形术治疗上段输尿管超长段狭窄[J]. 中华临床医师杂志: 电子版, 2011,5(24):7417-7418.
[13] 熊盛炜, 杨昆霖, 丁光璞, 等. 输尿管损伤外科修复治疗的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019,51(4):783-788.
[14] Sun G, Yan L, Ouyang W, et al. Management for ureteral stenosis: A comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy and conventional laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019,29(9):1111-1115.
[15] Lee Z, Simhan J, Parker DC, et al. Novel use of indocyanine green for intraoperative, real-time localization of ureteral stenosis during robot-assisted ureteroureterostomy[J]. Urology, 2013,82(3):729-733.
[16] Tang ZY, Chen Z, He Y, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site ureteroureterostomy with intraoperative retrograde ureteroscopy-assisted technique for benign proximal and middle ureteral strictures: A single-center experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014,24(7):493-496.
[17] Eisenberg ML, Lee KL, Zumrutbas AE, et al. Long-term outcomes and late complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy with renal autotransplantation[J]. J Urol, 2008,179(1):240-243.
[18] Kocot A, Kalogirou C, Vergho D, et al. Long-term results of ileal ureteric replacement: A 25-year single-centre experience[J]. BJU Int, 2017,120(2):273-279.
[19] Zhao LC, Weinberg AC, Lee Z, et al. Robotic ureteral reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts: A multi-institutional expe-rience[J]. Eur Urol, 2018,73(3):419-426.
[20] Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty[J]. BJU Int, 2004,94(6):867-869.
[21] Li B, Xu Y, Hai B, et al. Laparoscopic onlay lingual mucosal graft ureteroplasty for proximal ureteral stricture: initial experience and 9-month follow-up[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2016,48(8):1275-1279.
[22] Duty BD, Kreshover JE, Richstone L, et al. Review of appendiceal onlay flap in the management of complex ureteric strictures in six patients[J]. BJU Int, 2015,115(2):282-287.
[23] 王亮, 张国玺, 邹晓峰. 腹腔镜输尿管膀胱再植术的研究进展[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2019,39(2):195-199.
[24] Stein R, Rubenwolf P, Ziesel C, et al. Psoas hitch and Boari flap ureteroneocystostomy[J]. BJU Int, 2013,112(1):137-155.
[25] Zhong W, Du Y, Yang K, et al. Ileal ureter replacement combined with Boari flap-Psoas hitch to treat full-length ureteral defects: Technique and initial experience[J]. Urology, 2017(108):201-206.
[26] Stein RJ, Turna B, Patel NS, et al. Laparoscopic assisted ileal ureter: technique, outcomes and comparison to the open procedure[J]. J Urol, 2009,182(3):1032-1039.
[27] Ubrig B, Janusonis J, Paulics L, et al. Functional outcome of completely intracorporeal robotic ileal ureteric replacement[J]. Urology, 2018(114):193-197.
文章导航

/