Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 145-150. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.01.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Expression of hUTP14a in non-small cell lung cancer

Chun-feng ZHANG1,Yun LIU2,Min LU3,Xiao-juan DU4,()   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Genetics, Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Peking University Centre of Medical and Health Analysis, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Department of Pathology, Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China
    4. Department of Cell Biology, Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2018-09-27 Online:2019-02-18 Published:2019-02-26
  • Contact: Xiao-juan DU E-mail:duxiaojuan100@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81874143)

Abstract:

Objective: Human U three protein 14a (hUTP14a) facilitates tumorigenesis through promoting p53 and Rb degradation as well as enhancing c-Myc oncogenic activity. Moreover, hUTP14a expression is up-regulated in human hepatocellular cancer and colorectal cancer tissues. In this study, the expression of hUTP14a in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues was evaluated by immunohistochemistry staining (IHC). The relationship between hUTP14a expression levels and the clinical characteristics of the NSCLC patients were analyzed. Methods: Lung cancer tissues and the adjacent non-cancerous tissues were collected from 123 cases of NSCLC patients including 53 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 70 cases of adenocarcinoma (ADC), who had accepted surgical resection at Peking University Third Hospital from May 2003 to April 2006. The expression level of hUTP14a was determined by IHC in human NSCLC tissues and the adjacent non-cancerous tissues. The associations between hUTP14a expression and the clinical pathological variables including gender, age, tumor size, histological type, differentiation degree and clinical pathological stage were analyzed using the Pearson’s χ 2 test. Results: The expression rate of hUTP14a in NSCLC tissues was significantly higher than that in the non-cancerous tissues (37.4% vs. 0, P<0.001). The expressions of hUTP14a in lung ADC and SCC were 48.6% and 20.6%, respectively. The expression rate of hUTP14a in both lung ADC and SCC was significantly higher than that in the adjacent non-cancerous tissues (P<0.001). In addition, the expression rate of hUTP14a in lung ADC was significantly higher than that in SCC (χ 2=8.66, P=0.003). Furthermore, the expression rate of hUTP14a in the late pTNM stage of SCC was significantly higher than that in the early pTNM stage of SCC while hUTP14a expression level was not associated with pTNM stage of ADC. No correlation was found between hUTP14a expression and the other clinical pathologic features of the patients. Conclusion: Expression of hUTP14a was up-regulated in NSCLC tissues and was correlated with pTNM stage of SCC, suggesting that hUTP14a might possess a potential as a candidate marker for the early diagnosis screening of NSCLC.

Key words: hUTP14a, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, Immunohistochemistry, Squamous cell carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma

CLC Number: 

  • R734.2

Figure 1

Immunohistochemistry staining of hUTP14a in lung cancer tissues (×400) A, hUTP14a in adenocarcinoma tissue; B, hUTP14a in squamous carcinoma tissue."

Table 1

Clinical features and positive expression rate of hUTP14a in 123 patients with lung cancer*"

Clinicopathologic variables hUTP14a positive rate, n (%)
Total (n=123) SCC (n=53) Adenocarcinoma (n=70)
Gender (n=123)
Male (n=74) 25 (33.8) 10 (18.9) 15 (21.4)
Female (n=49) 21 (42.9) 2 (3.8) 19 (27.1)
Age/years (n=123)
≤60 (n=55) 20 (36.4) 8 (15.1) 12 (17.1)
>60 (n=68) 26 (38.2) 4 (7.5) 22 (31.4)
Tumor size/cm (n=123)
≤3 (n=81) 32 (39.5) 7 (13.2) 25 (35.7)
>3 (n=42) 14 (33.3) 5 (9.4) 9 (12.9)
Differentiationgrade (n=112)
Poorly differentiated (n=22) 8 (36.3) 2 (3.8) 6 (8.6)
Moderately differentiated (n=78) 30 (38.5) 6 (11.3) 24 (34.3)
Highly differentiated (n=12) 4 (33.3) 2 (3.8) 2 (2.9)
pTNM stage (n=101)
Ⅰ+Ⅱ (n=64) 16 (25.0) 3 (5.7) 13 (18.6)
Ⅲ+Ⅳ (n=37) 13 (35.1) 9 (16.9) 4 (5.7)

Table 2

The relationship between hUTP14a expression and clinicopathologic features in 123 patients with lung cancer*"

Clinicopathologic variables Total (n=123), n(%) χ2 P value
hUTP14a (-) hUTP14a (+)
Gender (n=123)
Male (n=74) 49 (66.2) 25 (33.8)
Female (n=49) 28 (57.1) 21 (42.9) 1.037 0.309
Age/years (n=123)
≤60 (n=55) 35 (63.6) 20 (36.4)
>60 (n=68) 42(61.8) 26 (38.2) 0.045 0.831
Histopathology (n=123)
SCC (n=53) 41 (77.4) 12 (22.6)
Adenocarcinoma (n=70) 36 (51.4) 34 (48.6) 8.662 0.003
Tumor size/cm (n=123)
≤3 (n=81) 49 (60.5) 32 (39.5)
>3 (n=42) 28 (66.7) 14 (33.3) 0.450 0.502
Differentiation grade (n=112)
Poorly differentiated (n=22) 14 (63.6) 8 (36.4)
Moderately differentiated (n=78) 48 (61.5) 30 (38.5)
Highly differentiated (n=12) 8 (66.7) 4 (33.3) 0.132 0.936
pTNM stage (n=101)
Ⅰ+Ⅱ (n=64) 48 (75.0) 16 (25.0)
Ⅲ+Ⅳ(n=37) 24 (64.9) 13 (35.1) 1.177 0.278

Table 3

The relationship between hUTP14a expression and clinicopathologic features in 53 lung SCC patients*"

Clinicopathologic variables SCC (n=53), n(%) χ2 P value
hUTP14a (-) hUTP14a (+)
Gender (n=53)
Male (n=44) 34 (77.3) 10 (22.7)
Female (n=9) 7 (77.8) 2 (22.2) 0.001 0.974
Age/years (n=53)
≤60 (n=24) 16 (66.7) 8 (33.3)
>60 (n=29) 25 (86.2) 4 (13.8) 2.863 0.091
Tumor size/cm (n=53)
≤3 (n=27) 20 (74.1) 7 (25.9)
>3 (n=26) 21 (80.8) 5 (19.2) 0.339 0.560
Differentiation grade (n=42)
Poorly differentiated (n=10) 8 (80.0) 2 (20.0)
Moderately differentiated (n=26) 20 (76.9) 6 (23.1)
Highly differentiated (n=6) 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 0.388 0.824
pTNM stage (n=54)
Ⅰ+Ⅱ (n=29) 26 (89.6) 3 (10.3)
Ⅲ+Ⅳ(n=25) 17 (68.0) 8 (32.0) 3.959 0.047

Table 4

The relationship between hUTP14a expression and clinicopathologic features in 70 lung adenocarcinoma patients*"

Clinicopathologic variables Adenocarcinoma (n=70), n(%) χ2 P value
hUTP14a (-) hUTP14a (+)
Gender (n=70)
Male (n=30) 15 (50.0) 15 (50.0)
Female (n=40) 21 (52.5) 19 (47.5) 0.043 0.836
Age/years (n=70)
≤60 (n=31) 19 (61.3) 12 (38.7)
>60 (n=39) 17 (43.6) 22 (56.4) 2.166 0.141
Tumor size/cm (n=70)
≤3 (n=54) 29 (53.7) 25 (46.3)
>3 (n=16) 7 (43.7) 9 (56.3) 0.490 0.484
Differentiation grade (n=70)
Poorly differentiated (n=12) 6 (50.0) 6 (50.0)
Moderately differentiated (n=52) 28(53.8) 24 (46.2)
Highly differentiated (n=6) 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 0.463 0.793
pTNM stage (n=47)
Ⅰ+Ⅱ (n=35) 22 (62.9) 13 (37.1)
Ⅲ+Ⅳ(n=12) 7 (58.3) 5 (12.9) 0.077 0.781
[1] Zhang L, Li M, Wu N , et al. Time trends in epidemiologic cha-racteristics and imaging features of lung adenocarcinoma: a population study of 21,113 cases in China[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(8):e0136727.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136727 pmid: 4552856
[2] 王媛媛, 毕玉, 王在翔 , 等. 山东省肺癌患者生存分析[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018,35(1):111-116.
[3] 黄文彦, 刘凯珊 . 以新视角观察p53家族在肺癌发生及治疗中的独特作用[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2013,16(8):422-425.
doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2013.08.06
[4] 李相国, 齐景宪, 易明福 . P16、Rb和PCNA在非小细胞肺癌的表达及临床意义[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2008,13(8):1002-1004.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2008.08.023
[5] Scheffner M, Huibregtse JM, Vierstra RD , et al. The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase in the ubiquitination of p53[J]. Cell, 1993,75(3):495-505.
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90384-3 pmid: 8221889
[6] Uchida C, Miwa S, Kitagawa K , et al. Enhanced Mdm2 activity inhibits pRB function via ubiquitin-dependent degradation[J]. EMBO J, 2005,24(1):160-169.
doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600486 pmid: 15577944
[7] Sdek P, Ying H, Chang DL , et al. MDM2 promotes proteasome-dependent ubiquitin-independent degradation of retinoblastoma protein[J]. Mol Cell, 2005,20(5):699-708.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.017 pmid: 16337594
[8] Hu LL, Wang JN, Liu Y , et al. A small ribosomal subunit (SSU) processome component, the human U3 protein 14A (hUTP14A) binds p53 and promotes p53 degradation[J]. J Biol Chem, 2011,286(4):3119-3128.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.157842 pmid: 21078665
[9] Liu HJ, Wang JN, Liu Y , et al. Human U3 protein14a is a novel type ubiquitin ligase that binds RB and promotes RB degradation depending on a leucine-rich region[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res, 2018,1865(11 Pt A):1611-1620.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.08.016
[10] Zhang JY, Ren PW, Xu D , et al. Human UTP14a promotes colorectal cancer progression by forming a positive regulation loop with c-Myc [J]. Cancer Letters, 2018, 440- 441:106-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.010
[11] Zhang JY, Xu D, Liu ZZ , et al. Human U three protein 14a expression is increased in hepatocellular carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2017,130(4):470-476.
doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.199839 pmid: 5324385
[12] Ma T, Lu CX, Guo YF , et al. Human U3 protein 14a plays an anti-apoptotic role in cancer cells[J]. Bio Chem, 2017,398(11):1247-1257.
[13] Groome PA, Bolejack V, Crowley JJ , et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2007,2(8):694-705.
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31812d05d5 pmid: 17762335
[14] Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Yarbrough WG . ARF promotes MDM2 degradation and stabilizes p53: ARF-INK4a locus deletion impairs both the Rb and p53 tumor suppression pathways[J]. Cell, 1998,92(6):725-734.
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81401-4
[15] Leduc C, Claverie P, Eymin B , et al. p14ARF promotes RB accumulation through inhibition of its Tip60-dependent acetylation[J]. Oncogene, 2006,25(30):4147-4154.
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209446 pmid: 16501607
[16] Bozcuk H, Gumus A, Ozbilim G , et al. Cluster analysis of p-glycoprotein, c-erb-B2 and P53 in relation to tumor histology strongly indicates prognosis in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2005,11(6):11-20.
doi: 10.1051/medsci/2005216-7669 pmid: 15917726
[17] 张丽华, 侯振江 . p53在肺癌研究中的进展[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2006,11(1):59-60.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2006.01.030
[1] ZHOU Chuan-xiang,ZHOU Zheng,ZHANG Ye,LIU Xiao-xiao,GAO Yan. Clinicopathological study in 28 cases of oral basaloid squamous cell carcinomas [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 62-67.
[2] SU Jun-qi,SONG Yang,XIE Shang. Analysis of etiological characteristics and establishment of prediction model of postoperative infections in patients undergoing oral squamous cell carcinoma surgery with free flap reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 68-76.
[3] YU Yan-fei,HE Shi-ming,WU Yu-cai,XIONG Sheng-wei,SHEN Qi,LI Yan-yan,YANG Feng,HE Qun,LI Xue-song. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of fumarate hydratase deficient renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 640-646.
[4] LIAO Xu-he,WANG Rong-fu,LIU Meng,CHEN Xue-qi,XIONG Yan,NONG Lin,YIN Lei,ZHANG Bing-ye,DU Yu-jing. Semiquantitative parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT, gene mutation states of epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase in prognosis evaluation of patients with lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 246-254.
[5] WANG Ying-chun,HUANG Yong-hui,CHANG Hong,YAO Wei,YAN Xiu-e,LI Ke,ZHANG Yao-peng,ZHENG Wei. Characteristics of benign and malignant lesions of ampullary polyps and the accuracy of forceps biopsy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 204-209.
[6] CHI Yan-ting,ZHANG Yan-ping,ZHANG Qiu-lu,LIU Cui-ling,LI bin-bin. Clinicopathological analysis of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma secondary to Sjögren’s syndrome in salivary gland [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 40-45.
[7] Lei-zhen SU,Jie CHEN,Xian LI,Ping JI. Effects of salinomycin on proliferation and apoptosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 902-906.
[8] Ru MA,Xin-bao LI,Feng-cai YAN,Yu-lin LIN,Yan LI. Clinical evaluation of tumor-stroma ratio in pseudomyxoma peritonei from the appendix [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 240-246.
[9] Xiao-peng ZHANG,Wei-yu ZHANG,Fei HUO,Hao HU,Qi WANG,Ke-xin XU. Outcome of surgical management and pathogenesis of female primary bladder neck obstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1052-1055.
[10] Chuan-si-bo TAO,Fan DONG,Dian-can WANG,Chuan-bin GUO. Diagnostic test for detection of cervical lymph node metastasis from oral squamous cell carcinoma via infrared thermal imaging [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 959-963.
[11] Yang LIU,Yan GAO,Xue-jie CHEN,Hong HUA. DNA cytometry of exfoliated cells in the diagnosis of oral potential malignant disorders [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 16-20.
[12] Lei LIU,Li-hua WANG,Yu-bo REN,Xiao-song RAO,Shao-min YANG. Clinicopathological analysis of aggressive angiomyxoma of soft tissue in abdomino-pelvic cavity [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1098-1101.
[13] QIN Zi-jian, BI Hai, MA Lu-lin, HUANG Yi, ZHANG Fan. A primary intestinal-derived adenocarcinoma in intestine bladder substitutes:a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 737-739.
[14] ZHANG Xiao-dong, LIU De-ruo. Correlation between the new lung adenocarcinoma classification and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 640-644.
[15] ZHAO Yi-guo, YANG Xiao-dong, ZHANG Yan-kai, NING Ning, XING Zhao-dong, YE Ying-jiang. #br# Adenocarcinoma in a Meckel’s diverticulum with multiple liver metastases and gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a case report [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1095-1097.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 505 -515 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .