Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 843-849. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measurement and evaluation of the quadriceps muscle mass in young men based on magnetic resonance imaging

WU Yi-fan,ZHANG Xiao-yuan,REN Shuang,YU Ying-xiang,CHANG Cui-qing()   

  1. Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Institute of Sports Medicine of Peking University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2021-06-04 Online:2021-10-18 Published:2021-10-11
  • Contact: Cui-qing CHANG E-mail:changcuiqing@126.com

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the correlation between the quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) and quadriceps muscle volume (QMV) at different horizontal levels from the upper edge of the patella, and to determine the best observation position. Methods: Thigh magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of 22 Chinese young men [age: (29±6) years] with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture were examined. The CSA was measured at 18, 15, and 12 cm above the upper edge of the pate-lla (denoted by CSA-18, CSA-15 and CSA-12 respectively), and the QMV and CSA were determined by semiautomatic segmentation. A curve model was established to estimate QMV. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine the confidence limits of the volumes. Results: On the unaffected side, the mean QMV was (1 944.45±323.77) cm3. The quadriceps CSA at the upper edge of the patella at 18, 15, and 12 cm was (80.80±12.16) cm2, (77.53±12.03) cm2, and (72.68±10.51) cm2, respectively. The coefficients of determination (R2), ascertained using curve estimation models, for the 3 positions were 0.819, 0.755, and 0.684 (P<0.001), and the standard deviations of the volume estimated value (SEE) were 7.4%, 8.7%, and 9.8%. The fitting equations of the three horizontal positions were all good, but the fitting degree of CSA-18 was the highest. The Bland-Altman scatter plot showed that the arithmetic means of the QMV at 18, 15 and 12 cm from the upper edge of the patella 0.8 cm3, -1.1 cm3, and 0.9 cm3 and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were (-268.8, 270.5), (-315.2, 313.1), and (-355.7, 357.5), respectively. The estimated QMV was in good agreement with the measured value. The difference between the estimated CSA-18 and measured values was the smallest. The results on the affected side were consistent. Conclusion: The correlation between QMV and CSA in the young men with the upper edge of patella as baseline was reliable and consistent. Among them, CSA-18 had the highest correlation with the QMV. However, different observation sites could be selected for different injuries of the quadriceps.

Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging, Quadriceps muscle, Cross-sectional area, Measurement

CLC Number: 

  • R873

Figure 1

The MRI images of the participants in the image analysis software A, the establishment of the quadriceps mask (the threshold is 60); B, the area encircled in color shows the quadriceps CSA in both sides; C, the regions with red line show the rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), vastus internus (VI), vastus lateralis (VL), respectively."

Table 1

CSA of quadriceps (n=22, x ?±s)"

Items CSA of quadriceps/cm2 F value P value
CSA-18 CSA-15 CSA-12
Unaffected side
Quadriceps 80.80±12.16 77.53±12.03 72.68±10.51 92.876 <0.001
RF 9.53±2.36 7.01±1.67 3.66±1.28 209.987 <0.001
VM 14.97±3.46 20.09±4.51 23.04±4.90 336.556 <0.001
VL 28.71±4.93 25.84±4.71 22.06±3.85 121.180 <0.001
VI 27.59±4.58 24.60±4.11 21.19±3.95 132.113 <0.001
Affected side
Quadriceps 73.79±15.83 71.16±15.25 66.41±14.02 58.739 <0.001
RF 9.49±2.34 7.05±1.86 4.24±1.19 226.089 <0.001
VM 13.43±3.89 17.78±4.37 22.29±5.46 239.172 <0.001
VL 26.07±6.73 23.63±5.90 20.23±5.35 58.258 <0.001
VI 24.80±5.10 22.70±5.08 19.64±4.48 101.731 <0.001

Table 2

Correction analysis between CSA and QMV, height and weight"

Items Unaffected side Affected side
r R2 P value r R2 P value
QMV
CSA-18 0.891 0.793 <0.001 0.953 0.909 <0.001
CSA-15 0.843 0.711 <0.001 0.926 0.857 <0.001
CSA-12 0.808 0.652 <0.001 0.904 0.818 <0.001
Height 0.404 0.163 0.062 0.447 0.199 0.037
Weight 0.705 0.497 <0.001 0.658 0.433 0.001
Height
CSA-18 0.135 0.018 0.548 0.247 0.061 0.268
CSA-15 0.058 0.003 0.796 0.197 0.039 0.378
CSA-12 -0.025 0.001 0.912 0.196 0.038 0.383
Weight
CSA-18 0.657 0.432 0.001 0.571 0.326 0.005
CSA-15 0.597 0.357 0.003 0.567 0.322 0.006
CSA-12 0.509 0.259 0.016 0.508 0.258 0.016

Table 3

Fitting equation of the QMV"

R2 SEE F value P value Constant b1 b2
Unaffected side
CSA-18 0.819 144.64 43.111 <0.001 -2 221.800 79.618 -0.340
CSA-15 0.755 168.51 29.265 <0.001 -2 506.692 92.559 -0.443
CSA-12 0.684 191.29 20.580 <0.001 -2 311.765 93.240 -0.468
Affected side
CSA-18 0.923 123.05 114.104 <0.001 -1 423.204 62.000 -0.247
CSA-15 0.883 151.52 72.009 <0.001 -1 766.642 75.312 -0.349
CSA-12 0.871 159.67 63.904 <0.001 -1 992.903 87.521 -0.451

Table 4

The estimated value and the measured value of QMV (n=22, x ?±s)"

QMV Unaffected side Affected side
Measured value/cm3 1 944.45±323.77 1 747.36±422.18
Estimated value of CSA-18/cm3 1 943.62±292.85 1 747.76±405.79
Estimated value of CSA-15/cm3 1 945.52±281.62 1 747.83±396.99
Estimated value of CSA-12/cm3 1 943.54±267.56 1 745.81±393.31

Figure 2

Establishment of the curve model of QMV (A-C, unaffected side; D-F, affected side) Abbreviations as in Table 2."

Figure 3

The Bland-Altman scatter plots indicate the difference between estimated value of CSA-18, CSA-15, and CSA-12 and the measured value of QMV in bilateral quadriceps (A-C, unaffected side; D-F, affected side) Abbreviations as in Table 2. Mean values of QMV = (estimated value + measured value)/2; Difference of QMV = measured value-estimated value."

[1] Francis P, Lyons M, Piasecki M, et al. Measurement of muscle health in aging [J]. Biogerontology, 2017, 18(6):901-911.
doi: 10.1007/s10522-017-9697-5 pmid: 28378095
[2] Leenders M, Verdijk LB, van der Hoeven L, et al. Prolonged leucine supplementation does not augment muscle mass or affect glycemic control in elderly type 2 diabetic men [J]. J Nutr, 2011, 141(6):1070-1076.
doi: 10.3945/jn.111.138495 pmid: 21525248
[3] Wang SY, Shamliyan TA, Talley KM, et al. Not just specific diseases: Systematic review of the association of geriatric syndromes with hospitalization or nursing home admission [J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2013, 57(1):16-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.007
[4] Cai W, Gao L, Li L, et al. Epidemiology of physical activity-related injuries in Chinese university students [J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2019, 29(9):1331-1339.
doi: 10.1111/sms.v29.9
[5] Gao Y, Cai W, Gao L, et al. Physical activity-related injuries among university students: A multicentre cross-sectional study in China [J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(9):e021845.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021845
[6] Birchmeier T, Lisee C, Kane K, et al. Quadriceps muscle size following ACL injury and reconstruction: A systematic review [J]. J Orthop Res, 2020, 38(3):598-608.
doi: 10.1002/jor.24489 pmid: 31608490
[7] Lindstrom M, Strandberg S, Wredmark T, et al. Functional and muscle morphometric effects of ACL reconstruction. A prospective CT study with 1 year follow-up [J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2013, 23(4):431-442.
doi: 10.1111/sms.2013.23.issue-4
[8] Williams GN, Snyder-Mackler L, Barrance PJ, et al. Quadriceps femoris muscle morphology and function after ACL injury: A diffe-rential response in copers versus non-copers [J]. J Biomech, 2005, 38(4):685-693.
pmid: 15713288
[9] Young A, Stokes M, Crowe M. The size and strength of the qua-driceps muscles of old and young men [J]. Clin Physiol, 1985, 5(2):145-154.
pmid: 3888498
[10] Thomas AC, Wojtys EM, Brandon C, et al. Muscle atrophy contributes to quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2016, 19(1):7-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.12.009 pmid: 25683732
[11] Pons C, Borotikar B, Garetier M, et al. Quantifying skeletal muscle volume and shape in humans using MRI: A systematic review of validity and reliability [J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(11):e0207847.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207847
[12] Barnouin Y, Butler-Browne G, Voit T, et al. Manual segmentation of individual muscles of the quadriceps femoris using MRI: A reappraisal [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 40(1):239-247.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.24370 pmid: 24615897
[13] Holzbaur KR, Murray WM, Gold GE, et al. Upper limb muscle volumes in adult subjects [J]. J Biomech, 2007, 40(4):742-749.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.11.011
[14] Mersmann F, Bohm S, Schroll A, et al. Muscle shape consistency and muscle volume prediction of thigh muscles [J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2015, 25(2):e208-e213.
doi: 10.1111/sms.2015.25.issue-2
[15] Strandberg S, Wretling ML, Wredmark T, et al. Reliability of computed tomography measurements in assessment of thigh muscle cross-sectional area and attenuation [J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2010(10):18.
[16] 甄希成, 陈新, 白巍. 传统按摩结合持续被动运动训练对脑卒中患者股四头肌横截面积的影响研究 [J]. 中国全科医学, 2012, 15(29):3366-3368.
[17] Morse CI, Degens H, Jones DA. The validity of estimating quadriceps volume from single MRI cross-sections in young men [J]. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2007, 100(3):267-274.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0429-4
[18] Zhang X, Huang H, Yu Y, et al. Impact of whey protein isolate and eccentric training on quadriceps mass and strength in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A randomized controlled trial [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2020, 52(3):jrm00035.
[19] Marcon M, Ciritsis B, Laux C, et al. Cross-sectional area mea-surements versus volumetric assessment of the quadriceps femoris muscle in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions [J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(2):290-298.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3424-2 pmid: 25358592
[20] Strandberg S, Lindstrom M, Wretling ML, et al. Muscle morphometric effect of anterior cruciate ligament injury measured by computed tomography: Aspects on using non-injured leg as control [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2013(14):150.
[21] Yang YX, Chong MS, Lim WS, et al. Validity of estimating muscle and fat volume from a single MRI section in older adults with sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity [J]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(5):427.e9-427.e14.
[22] Yamauchi K, Yoshiko A, Suzuki S, et al. Estimation of indivi-dual thigh muscle volumes from a single-slice muscle cross-sectional area and muscle thickness using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with knee osteoarthritis [J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2017, 25(3):2309499017743101.
[23] Yamauchi K, Suzuki S, Kato C, et al. Atrophy of individual thigh muscles measured by MRI in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study [J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2020, 63(1):38-45.
doi: S1877-0657(19)30110-1 pmid: 31386911
[24] 师东良, 王宁华, 谢斌. 膝骨关节炎患者与正常人股内侧肌、股直肌和股外侧肌收缩特征的对照研究 [J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2009, 15(6):508-513.
[25] Macleod TD, Snyder-Mackler L, Buchanan TS. Differences in neuromuscular control and quadriceps morphology between potential copers and noncopers following anterior cruciate ligament injury [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2014, 44(2):76-84.
doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4876 pmid: 24261930
[26] Henninger HB, Christensen GV, Taylor CE, et al. The muscle cross-sectional area on MRI of the shoulder can predict muscle volume: An MRI study in Cadavers [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2020, 478(4):871-883.
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001044
[27] Tomlinson OW, Barker AR, Fulford J, et al. Quantification of thigh muscle volume in children and adolescents using magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Eur J Sport Sci, 2020, 20(9):1215-1224.
doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1707292
[28] Nakatani M, Takai Y, Akagi R, et al. Validity of muscle thickness-based prediction equation for quadriceps femoris volume in middle-aged and older men and women [J]. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2016, 116(11/12):2125-2133.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3464-1
[1] Yuxuan TIAN,Mingjian RUAN,Yi LIU,Derun LI,Jingyun WU,Qi SHEN,Yu FAN,Jie JIN. Predictive effect of the dual-parametric MRI modified maximum diameter of the lesions with PI-RADS 4 and 5 on the clinically significant prostate cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 567-574.
[2] Yue WEI,Lan YAO,Xi LU,Jun WANG,Li LIN,Kun-peng LIU. Evaluation of gastric emptying after drinking carbohydrates before cesarean section by gastric ultrasonography [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1082-1087.
[3] Yi LIU,Chang-wei YUAN,Jing-yun WU,Qi SHEN,Jiang-xi XIAO,Zheng ZHAO,Xiao-ying WANG,Xue-song LI,Zhi-song HE,Li-qun ZHOU. Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 812-817.
[4] Chang-wei YUAN,De-run LI,Zhi-hua LI,Yi LIU,Gang-zhi SHAN,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of dynamic contrast enhanced status in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer with PI-RADS 4 lesion [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 838-842.
[5] Ying LIU,Ran HUO,Hui-min XU,Zheng WANG,Tao WANG,Hui-shu YUAN. Correlations between plaque characteristics and cerebral blood flow in patients with moderate to severe carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 646-651.
[6] Qiang FU,Guan-ying GAO,Yan XU,Zhuo-hua LIN,You-jing SUN,Li-gang CUI. Comparative study of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of asymptomatic anterosuperior acetabular labrum tears [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 665-669.
[7] Shan YE,Ping-ping JIN,Nan ZHANG,Hai-bo WU,Lin SHI,Qiang ZHAO,Kun YANG,Hui-shu YUAN,Dong-sheng FAN. Cortical thickness and cognitive impairment in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(6): 1158-1162.
[8] Ying CAI,Qiao-qin WAN,Xian-jie CAI,Ya-juan GAO,Hong-bin HAN. Epidural photobiomodulation accelerates the drainage of brain interstitial fluid and its mechanism [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(5): 1000-1005.
[9] WANG Shu-lei,GAO Yang-xu,ZHANG Hong-wu,YANG Hai-bo,LI Hui,LI Yu,SHEN Li-xue,YAO Hong-xin. Clinical analysis of 30 cases of basal ganglia germinoma in children [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 222-226.
[10] ZHANG Fan,CHEN Qu,HAO Yi-chang,YAN Ye,LIU Cheng,HUANG Yi,MA Lu-lin. Relationship between recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and preoperative/postoperative membranous urethral length [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 299-303.
[11] Jing-xian ZHU,Sheng-nan LU,Yan-fang JIANG,Ling JIANG,Jian-quan WANG. Influencing factors of preoperative pulmonary function in elderly patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 902-906.
[12] Hui SHENG,Lei LIANG,Tong-liang ZHOU,Yan-xing JIA,Tong WANG,Lan YUAN,Hong-bin HAN. Improved synthesis process of optical-magnetic bimodal probe of Gd-[4,7-Bis-carboxymethyl-10-(2-fluoresceinthioureaethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraaza-cyclododec-1-yl]-acetic acid complexes [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 959-963.
[13] Shi-ming ZHAO,Tie-jun YANG,Chun-miao XU,Xiao-feng GUO,Yong-kang MA,Xue-jun CHEN,Xiang LI,Chao-hong HE. Bladder cancer local staging about muscle invasion: 3.0T MRI performance following transurethral resection [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 701-704.
[14] Yu SONG,Hong-bin HAN,Jun YANG,Ai-bo WANG,Qing-yuan HE,Yuan-yuan LI,Guo-mei ZHAO,Ya-juan GAO,Rui WANG,Yi-xing HAN,Ai-lian LIU,Qing-wei SONG. Effect of convection enhanced delivery on the microstructure of brain extracellular space in aged rats [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 362-367.
[15] Wen-qiang SUN,Zhou ZHAO,Qing GAO,Zeng-qiang HAN,Wei YANG,Bo LIAN,Gang LIU,Sheng-long CHEN,Yu CHEN. Effects of intraoperative graft flow measurements on the early mid-term outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 851-855.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!