Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 77-82. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Alveolar crest and relevant analysis of labial side of anterior teeth on skeletal Angle class Ⅲ patients

Ming-xin MAO1,Li XU1,△(),Wu-di JING2,Xiao XU1,Jian-xia HOU1,Xiao-tong LI3,△(),Xiao-xia WANG4   

  1. 1. Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Periodontology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100032, China
    3. Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2019-10-10 Online:2020-02-18 Published:2020-02-20
  • Contact: Li XU,Xiao-tong LI E-mail:xulihome@263.net;xiaotonglee@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Capital Characteristic Clinical Application Research Project(Z181100001718111)

RICH HTML

 12   

PDF (PC)

255

Abstract:

Objective: To measure the distance from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC) of labial side of anterior teeth on skeletal Angle class Ⅲ patients under direct vision during periodontal bone augmentation surgery and to make relevant analysis to find the relevant factors. Methods: In the study, 46 skeletal Angle class Ⅲ patients (10 males and 36 females) received periodontal bone augmentation surgery of anterior teeth were included, with 67 jaws (27 maxillae and 40 mandibles) and 400 anterior teeth (161 maxillary anterior teeth and 239 mandibular anterior teeth). The mean age was 23.65 years. Maxillary anterior teeth consisted of 54 central incisors, 53 lateral incisors and 54 canines. Mandibular anterior teeth consisted of 79 central incisors, 80 lateral incisors and 80 canines. CEJ-AC was measured in three sites (mesial sites, central sites and distal sites) by Williams periodontal probes during periodontal bone augmentation surgery under direct vision by the same researcher. Results: The average CEJ-AC of 400 anterior teeth was (2.21±1.48) mm. The average CEJ-AC of maxillary anterior teeth was (1.72±1.13) mm, more than (2.54±1.60) mm of mandibular anterior teeth (P<0.05). The average CEJ-AC of canines was (2.42±1.78) mm, more than (2.06±1.27) mm of central incisors or (2.16±1.32) mm of lateral incisors (P<0.05). The average CEJ-AC of central sites was (3.04±2.01) mm, more than (1.79±0.86) mm of mesial sites or (1.81±0.89) mm of distal sites (P<0.05). CEJ-AC of 233 anterior teeth was more than 2 mm, accounting for 58.25%, and 117 anterior teeth with dehiscence were found, accounting for 29.25%. Multilevel and multivariate Logistic regression showed age, jaw, tooth and site were the relevant factors to the position of alveolar crest. Conclusion: The position of alveolar crest of skeletal Angle class Ⅲ patients who received periodontal bone augmentation surgery was lower than that of the general population, causing periodontal risks during decompensation orthodontics therapy before orthognathic surgery. The position of alveolar crest was lower in older patients than in younger patients, in mandibular teeth than in maxillary teeth, in canines than in central incisors or lateral incisors, and in central sites than in mesial sites or distal sites of labial side, which showed much higher risk.

Key words: Malocclusion, Angle class Ⅲ, Cemento-enamel junction, Alveolar crest

CLC Number: 

  • R781.4

Figure 1

Measuring CEJ-AC during periodontal surgery (A, mesial; B, central; C, distal)"

Table 1

Distribution of teeth of skeletal class Ⅲ patients"

Teeth Central incisors Lateral incisors Canines Total
Maxillary 54 53 54 161
Mandible 79 80 80 239
Total 133 133 134 400

Table 2

Results of CEJ-AC and comparison between maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth"

Items Maxillary/mm, x?±s Mandibular/mm, x?±s
Central incisors Lateral incisors Canines Central incisors Lateral incisors Canines
Mesial 1.33±0.64 1.51±0.59 1.60±0.72 1.94±0.91 1.95±0.91 2.08±0.96
Central 1.86±0.92 2.18±1.63 2.45±2.10 3.29±1.79 3.36±1.75 4.22±2.38
Distal 1.47±0.66 1.49±0.56 1.56±0.70 1.96±0.92 2.02±0.75 2.05±1.19
Average 1.72±1.13 2.54±1.60*

Figure 2

Comparison of CEJ-AC between different teeth CEJ-AC, the distance between cemento-enamal junction and alveolar crest. * P<0.05, vs. canines."

Figure 3

Comparison of CEJ-AC between different sites CEJ-AC, the distance between cemento-enamal junction and alveolar crest. * P<0.001, vs. central."

Table 3

Comparison of CEJ-AC of central sites between different jaws and different teeth /mm"

Items Central incisors Lateral incisors Canines Average
Maxillary 1.86±0.92 2.18±1.63 2.45±2.10 2.16±1.63
Mandibular 3.29±1.79 3.36±1.75 4.22±2.38 3.63±2.03
Average 2.71±1.66 2.89±1.79 3.51±2.42 3.04±2.01

Table 4

Distribution of teeth with CEJ-AC>2 mm and teeth with dehiscences"

Items Central incisors Lateral incisors Canines Total
CEJ-AC>2 mm Dehiscences CEJ-AC>2 mm Dehiscences CEJ-AC>2 mm Dehiscences CEJ-AC>2 mm Dehiscences
Maxillary 13 (24.07) 4 (7.41) 17 (32.08) 4 (7.55) 23 (42.59) 9 (16.67) 53 (32.92) 17 (10.56)
Mandibular 58 (73.42) 31 (39.24) 56 (70.00) 28 (35.00) 66 (82.50) 41 (51.25) 180 (75.31) 100 (41.84)
Total 71 (53.38) 35 (26.32) 73 (54.89) 32 (24.06) 89 (66.42) 50 (37.31) 233 (58.25) 117 (29.25)

Table 5

The multilevel and multivariate Logistic regression for relevant factors of position of alveolar crest"

Relevant factors Estimate OR (95%CI) P
Patient level
Gender (Female as reference) -0.143 0.867 (0.658, 1.142) 0.310
Age 0.131 1.140 (1.113, 1.168) <0.001
Body mass index(BMI) 0.030 1.030 (0.983, 1.080) 0.210
Jaw level (Mandible as reference) -1.470 0.230 (0.184, 0.287) <0.001
Tooth level (Canine as reference)
Central incisor -0.516 0.597 (0.463, 0.770) <0.001
Lateral incisor -0.282 0.754 (0.587, 0.969) 0.028
Site level (Distal site as reference)
Mesial site -0.055 0.946 (0.735, 1.219) 0.668
Central site 1.562 4.768 (0.658, 1.142) <0.001
Probing depth -0.154 0.857 (0.706, 0.961) 0.119
[1] Al-Masri MM, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY , et al. Evaluation of bone thickness and density in the lower incisors’ region in adults with different types of skeletal malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2015,16(8):630-637.
[2] Kook YA, Kim G, Kim Y . Comparison of alveolar bone loss around incisors in normal occlusion samples and surgical skeletal class Ⅲ patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012,82(4):645-652.
[3] 田玉楼, 赵震锦, 韩坤 , 等. 下颌中切牙唇倾度与牙槽骨厚度关系的锥形束CT分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015,24(2):210-214.
[4] 孙良, 王博, 房兵 . 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合前牙区牙槽骨开裂和牙槽骨开窗发生率的锥形束CT研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013,22(4):418-422.
[5] Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR , et al. Carranza’s clinical periodontology[M]. 12th ed. Amsterdam: Saunders Elsevier, 2015: 35.
[6] 解建秀, 邹兆菊 . 正常牙周组织X线表现的初步研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 1991,26(6):339-341.
[7] Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P . Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment: A retrospective study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996,110(3):239-246.
[8] Thongudomporn U, Charoemratrote C, Jearapongpakorn S . Changes of anterior maxillary alveolar bone thickness following incisor proclination and extrusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015,85(4):549-554.
[9] Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim KH . Periodontal consequences of mandibular incisor proclination during presurgical orthodontic treatment in Class Ⅲ malocclusion patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015,85(3):427-433.
[10] Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM . Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery[J]. Angle Orthod, 1976,46(1):1-25.
[11] Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE , et al. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2001,21(1):9-19.
[12] Wang B, Shen GF, Fang B , et al. Augmented corticotomy-assisted surgical orthodontics decompensates lower incisors in class Ⅲ malocclusion patients[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014,72(3):596-602.
[13] 吴佳琪, 江久汇, 徐莉 , 等. 术前正畸中改良骨皮质切开术对牙槽骨及牙根影响的锥形束CT观察[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2015,50(4):223-227.
[14] Ahn HW, Seo DH, Kim SH , et al. Morphologic evaluation of dentoalveolar structures of mandibular anterior teeth during augmented corticotomy-assisted decompensation[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016,150(4):659-669.
[15] Kim SH, Kim I, Jeong DM , et al. Corticotomy-assisted decompensation for augmentation of the mandibular anterior ridge[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011,140(5):720-731.
[16] Wu JQ, Xu L, Liang C , et al. Class Ⅲ orthognathic surgical cases facilitated by accelerated osteogenic orthodontics: A preliminary report[J]. Aust Orthod J, 2015,31(2):226-235.
[17] 徐筱, 徐莉, 江久汇 , 等. 改良骨皮质切开术对牙周组织影响的临床观察[J]. 中国口腔医学杂志, 2014,49(6):343-346.
[1] Ren-jie DU,Jian JIAO,Yan-heng ZHOU,Jie SHI. Occlusal changes before and after orthodontic treatment in patients with aggressive periodontitis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 919-924.
[2] Xiu-jing WANG,Yi-mei ZHANG,Yan-heng ZHOU. Orthodontic-orthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 86-92.
[3] XU Xiao， XU Li, JIANG Jiu-hui, WU Jia-qi, LI Xiao-tong, JING Wu-di. Accuracy analysis of alveolar dehiscence and fenestration of maxillary anterior teeth of Angle class Ⅲ by cone-beam CT [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 104-109.
[4] MA Jing, JIANG Jiu-hui. Morphological analysis of alveolar bone of anterior mandible in high-angle skeletal class Ⅱ and class Ⅲ malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 98-103.
[5] FAN Shao-qing， ZHOU Yan-heng. Evaluation of the correction of the skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion by distalization of the whole mandible dentition with micro-implant anchorage [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(3): 531-539.
[6] ZHENG Xu， HU Xing-Xue， MA Ning， CHEN Xiao-Hong. A new method to orthodontically correct dental occlusal plane canting: waveshaped arch [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(1): 176-180.
[7] ZHANG Jie, LI Xiao-tong. Study of anterior alveolar bone thickness in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion patients with orthognathic surgery [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(1): 111-115.
[8] LI Min, WANG Si-wei, ZHAO Yi-jiao, LIU Yi. A cone-beam computed tomography study on crown-root morphology of maxillary anterior teeth in Class Ⅱ, division 2 malocclusion [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(1): 105-110.
[9] HE Wei, XIE Xiao-yan, WANG Xing, WANG Xiao-xia1, FU Kai-yuan2, LI Zi-li. Effect of segmental Le FortⅠosteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the condyle position in skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion patients [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(5): 829-833.
[10] ZHOU Lin , LI Wei-Ran. Evaluation of alveolar bone defects on anterior region in patients with bimaxillary protrusion by using cone-beam CT [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(3): 514-520.
[11] PENG Ju-Xiang, JIANG Jiu-Hui, ZHAO Yi-Jiao, WANG Yong, LI Ze, WANG Ning-Ning, FENG Zhi-Min. Preliminary evaluation on 3-demension changes of facial soft tissue with structure light scanning technique before and after orthognathic surgery of Class Ⅲ deformities [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 98-103.
[12] SONG Guang-Ying, JIANG Ruo-Ping, ZHANG Xiao-Yun, LIU Si-Qi, YU Xiao-Nan, CHEN Qing, WENG Xuan-Rong, WU Wei-Zi, SU Hong, REN Chong, DAN Ru-Kai, GENG Zhi, XU Tian-Min, JIAN Li-Zhong-Guo-Zheng-Ji-Liao-Xiao-Ping-Jia-Biao-Zhun-Ke-Ti-Zu. Validation of subjective and objective evaluation methods for orthodontic treatment outcome [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 90-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 369 -373 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd