Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 582-588. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.04.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prognostic factors of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer with intermediate-to-high risk prostate cancer

Junyong OU1,Kunming NI2,Lulin MA1,Guoliang WANG1,Ye YAN1,Bin YANG1,Gengwu LI1,Haodong SONG1,Min LU2,Jianfei YE1,*(),Shudong ZHANG1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-03-18 Online:2024-08-18 Published:2024-07-23
  • Contact: Jianfei YE,Shudong ZHANG E-mail:jamesyeh@126.com;zhangshudong@bjmu.edu.cn

RICH HTML

   

PDF (PC)

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the prognostic factors for all-cause mortality in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with intermediate-to-high-risk primary prostate cancer. Methods: From January 2012 to October 2023, the clinical data of the patients with MIBC with intermediate-to-high-risk primary prostate cancer in Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were monitored and the occurrence of all-cause death was documented as the outcome event in the prognostic study. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional risk regression analysis models were implemented to search for independent influences on the prognosis of patients. For significant influencing factors (pathological T stage, M stage and perineural invasion of bladder cancer), survival curves were plotted before and after multifactorial Cox regression adjusting for confounding factors. Results: A total of 32 patients were included in this study. The mean age was (72.5±6.6) years; the median preoperative total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) was 6.68 (2.47, 6.84) μg/L; the mean preoperative creatinine was (95±36) μmol/L, and the median survival time was 65 months. The majority of the patients (87.5%) had high-grade bladder cancer, 53.1% had lymphatic invasion, and 31.3% had perineural invasion. Prostate involvement was observed in 25.0% of the cases, and the positive rate of soft-tissue surgical margin was 37.5%. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that preoperative creatinine level (HR=1.02, 95%CI: 1.01-1.04), pathological stage of bladder cancer T3 (HR=11.58, 95%CI: 1.38-97.36) and T4 (HR=19.53, 95%CI: 4.26-89.52) metastasis of bladder cancer (HR=9.44, 95%CI: 1.26-70.49) and perineural invasion of bladder cancer (HR=6.26, 95%CI: 1.39-28.27) were independent prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Survival curves with Log-rank test after adjusting for confounding factors demonstrated that bladder cancer pathology T3, T4, M1, and perineural invasion were unfavorable factors affecting the patients' survival prognosis (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with MIBC with intermediate-to-high risk primary prostate cancer generally portends a poor prognosis. High preoperative serum creatinine, T3 or T4 pathological stage of bladder cancer, metastasis of bladder cancer and bladder cancer perineural invasion are poor prognostic factors for patients with MIBC with intermediate-to-high risk primary prostate cancer.

Key words: Urinary bladder neoplasms, Neoplasm invasiveness, Prostatic neoplasms, Neoplasms, multiple primary, Prognosis

CLC Number: 

  • R737.1

Table 1

Clinicopathologic features of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer with intermediate-to-high risk primary prostate cancer"

Characteristic Data Characteristic Data
Age/years 72.5±6.6 Metastasis (BCa)
tPSA/(μg/L) 6.68 (2.47, 6.84)   No 27 (84.4)
BMI/(kg/m2) 23.8±3.2   Yes 5 (15.6)
Preoperative hemoglobin/(g/L) 130±22 LVI (BCa)
Preoperative creatinine/(μmol/L) 95±36   LVI- 15 (46.9)
Comorbiditya   LVI+ 17 (53.1)
  0 12 (37.5) PNI (BCa)
  1 11 (34.4)   PNI- 22 (68.8)
  2 5 (15.6)   PNI+ 10 (31.3)
  ≥3 4 (12.5) STSM (BCa)
History of smoking   Margin- 20 (62.5)
  No 23 (71.9)   Margin+ 12 (37.5)
  Yes 9 (28.1) BCa involved prostate
History of alcohol consumption   Involve- 24 (75.0)
  No 25 (78.1)   Involve+ 8 (25.0)
  Yes 7 (21.9) Gleason score (PCa)
Preoperative TURP   3+4 18 (56.3)
  No 19 (59.4)   4+3 8 (25.0)
  Yes 13 (40.6)   ≥8 6 (18.8)
Neoadjuvant treatment pT (PCa)
  No 15 (46.9)   ≤ pT2 28 (87.5)
  Yes 17 (53.1)   ≥ pT3 4 (12.5)
Histology PNI (PCa)
  Urothelial carcinoma 30 (93.8)   PNI- 28 (87.5)
  Small cell carcinoma 1 (3.1)   PNI+ 4 (12.5)
  Adenocarcinoma 1 (3.1) Margin (PCa)
Grade (BCa)   Margin- 7 (21.9)
  Low grade 4 (12.5)   Margin+ 25 (78.1)
  High grade 28 (87.5) Procedure for radical cystectomy
pT (BCa)   Laparoscopy 24 (75.0)
  pT2 20 (62.5)   Robot-assisted laparoscopy 8 (25.0)
  pT3 3 (9.4) Urinary flow diversion pattern
  pT4 9 (28.1)   Bricker bladder 12 (37.5)
pN (BCa)   Studur bladder 3 (9.4)
  pN- 26 (81.3)   Cutaneous terminal ureterostomy 17 (53.1)
  pN+ 6 (18.8)

Table 2

Univariate analysis of influencing factor for 32 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer with intermediate-to-high risk primary prostate cancer"

Characteristic HR 95%CI P
Age 1.04 0.96-1.13 0.310
tPSA 1.00 0.96-1.04 0.934
BMI 0.96 0.80-1.16 0.694
Preoperative hemoglobin 0.97 0.95-1.00 0.043
Preoperative creatinine 1.02 1.01-1.04 0.004
Grade (BCa)
  Low grade
  High grade NA NA NA
pT (BCa)
  pT2
  pT3 3.15 0.32-31.13 0.326
  pT4 10.23 2.34-44.70 0.002
pN (BCa)
  pN-
  pN+ 2.33 0.59-9.20 0.226
Metastasis (BCa)
  No
  Yes 1.26 0.26-6.01 0.771
LVI (BCa)
  LVI-
  LVI+ 4.24 0.90-20.04 0.068
PNI (BCa)
  PNI-
  PNI+ 4.45 1.25-15.92 0.022
STSM (BCa)
  Margin-
  Margin+ 7.43 1.79-30.87 0.006
BCa involved prostate
  Involve-
  Involve+ 3.33 0.92-12.03 0.067
Gleason score (PCa)
  3+4
  4+3 0.91 0.22-3.74 0.893
  ≥8 0.25 0.03-2.44 0.234
pT (PCa)
  ≤pT2
  ≥pT3 0.60 0.08-4.76 0.630
PNI (PCa)
  PNI-
  PNI+ NA NA NA
Margin (PCa)
  Margin-
  Margin+ 0.40 0.10-1.62 0.198

Table 3

Multivariate analysis of influencing factors for 32 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer with intermediate-to-high risk primary prostate cancer (Cox regression)"

Characteristic HR 95%CI P
Preoperative hemoglobin 1.00 0.97-1.03 0.928
Preoperative creatinine 1.02 1.01-1.04 0.006
pT (BCa)
  pT2
  pT3 11.58 1.38-97.36 0.024
  pT4 19.53 4.26-89.52 < 0.001
pN (BCa)
  pN-
  pN+ 0.86 0.16-4.78 0.867
Metastasis (BCa)
  No
  Yes 9.44 1.26-70.49 0.029
LVI (BCa)
  LVI-
  LVI+ 0.32 0.06-1.78 0.194
PNI (BCa)
  PNI-
  PNI+ 6.26 1.39-28.27 0.017
STSM (BCa)
  Margin-
  Margin+ 1.00 0.19-5.26 >0.999

Figure 1

Survival curve of 32 muscle invasive patients with bladder cancer with intermediate-to-high risk primary prostate cancer A and B show survival curves of bladder cancer pathological T stage before and after adjusting for confounding factors, respectively; C and D show survival curves of bladder cancer pathological M stage before and after adjusting for confounding factors, respectively; E and F show survival curves of bladder cancer with perineural invasion before and after adjusting for confounding factors, respectively. Mets, metastasis; LVI, lymphovascular invasion."

1 Alfred Witjes J , Max Bruins H , Carrión A , et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: Summary of the 2023 guidelines[J]. Eur Urol, 2024, 85 (1): 17- 31.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.016
2 Siegel RL , Giaquinto AN , Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2024[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74 (1): 12- 49.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21820
3 Dyrskjøt L , Hansel DE , Efstathiou JA , et al. Bladder cancer[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2023, 9 (1): 58.
doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00468-9
4 Compérat E , Amin MB , Cathomas R , et al. Current best practice for bladder cancer: A narrative review of diagnostics and treatments[J]. Lancet, 2022, 400 (10364): 1712- 1721.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01188-6
5 Lopez-Beltran A , Cheng L , Montorsi F , et al. Concomitant bladder cancer and prostate cancer: Challenges and controversies[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2017, 14 (10): 620- 629.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.124
6 Jing Y , Zhang R , Ma P , et al. Prevalence and clonality of synchronous primary carcinomas in the bladder and prostate[J]. J Pathol, 2018, 244 (1): 5- 10.
doi: 10.1002/path.4997
7 Aljabery F , Liedberg F , Häggström C , et al. Treatment and prognosis of patients with urinary bladder cancer with other primary cancers: A nationwide population-based study in the bladder can-cer data base Sweden (BladderBaSe)[J]. BJU Int, 2020, 126 (5): 625- 632.
doi: 10.1111/bju.15198
8 Claps F , Pavan N , Umari P , et al. Incidence, predictive factors and survival outcomes of incidental prostate cancer in patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer[J]. Minerva Urol Nephrol, 2021, 73 (3): 349- 356.
9 Malte R , Kluth LA , Kaushik D , et al. Frequency and prognostic significance of incidental prostate cancer at radical cystectomy: Results from an international retrospective study[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2017, 43 (11): 2193- 2199.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.08.013
10 Fahmy O , Khairul-Asri MG , Schubert T , et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic value of incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in radical cystoprostatectomy specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 140 patients[J]. J Urol, 2017, 197 (2): 385- 390.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.088
11 Kaelberer JB , O'donnell MA , Mitchell DL , et al. Incidental prostate cancer diagnosed at radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer: Disease-specific outcomes and survival[J]. Prostate Int, 2016, 4 (3): 107- 112.
doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2016.06.002
12 Wu S , Lin SX , Lu M , et al. Assessment of 5-year overall survival in bladder cancer patients with incidental prostate cancer identified at radical cystoprostatectomy[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2019, 51 (9): 1527- 1535.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02181-7
13 Mazzucchelli R , Barbisan F , Scarpelli M , et al. Is incidentally detected prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy clinically significant?[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2009, 131 (2): 279- 283.
doi: 10.1309/AJCP4OCYZBAN9TJU
14 Moschini M , Shariat SF , Freschi M , et al. Impact of prostate involvement on outcomes in patients treated with radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer[J]. Urol Int, 2017, 98 (3): 290- 297.
doi: 10.1159/000454736
[1] Zhicun LI, Tianyu WU, Lei LIANG, Yu FAN, Yisen MENG, Qian ZHANG. Risk factors analysis and nomogram model construction of postoperative pathological upgrade of prostate cancer patients with single core positive biopsy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[2] Yuxuan TIAN,Mingjian RUAN,Yi LIU,Derun LI,Jingyun WU,Qi SHEN,Yu FAN,Jie JIN. Predictive effect of the dual-parametric MRI modified maximum diameter of the lesions with PI-RADS 4 and 5 on the clinically significant prostate cancer [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 567-574.
[3] Kaifeng YAO,Mingjian RUAN,Derun LI,Yuxuan TIAN,Yuke CHEN,Yu FAN,Yi LIU. Diagnostic efficacy of targeted biopsy combined with regional systematic biopsy in prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4-5 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 575-581.
[4] Shuai LIU,Lei LIU,Zhuo LIU,Fan ZHANG,Lulin MA,Xiaojun TIAN,Xiaofei HOU,Guoliang WANG,Lei ZHAO,Shudong ZHANG. Clinical treatment and prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 624-630.
[5] Le YU,Shaohui DENG,Fan ZHANG,Ye YAN,Jianfei YE,Shudong ZHANG. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 661-666.
[6] Zezhen ZHOU,Shaohui DENG,Ye YAN,Fan ZHANG,Yichang HAO,Liyuan GE,Hongxian ZHANG,Guoliang WANG,Shudong ZHANG. Predicting the 3-year tumor-specific survival in patients with T3a non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 673-679.
[7] Yangyi FANG,Qiang LI,Zhigao HUANG,Min LU,Kai HONG,Shudong ZHANG. Well-differentiated papillary mesothelial tumour of the tunica vaginalis: A case report [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(4): 741-744.
[8] Yuanyuan ZENG,Yun XIE,Daonan CHEN,Ruilan WANG. Related factors of euthyroid sick syndrome in patients with sepsis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 526-532.
[9] Jian-bin LI,Meng-na LYU,Qiang CHI,Yi-lin PENG,Peng-cheng LIU,Rui WU. Early prediction of severe COVID-19 in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1007-1012.
[10] Huan-rui LIU,Xiang PENG,Sen-lin LI,Xin GOU. Risk modeling based on HER-2 related genes for bladder cancer survival prognosis assessment [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 793-801.
[11] Zi-xuan XUE,Shi-ying TANG,Min QIU,Cheng LIU,Xiao-jun TIAN,Min LU,Jing-han DONG,Lu-lin MA,Shu-dong ZHANG. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of young renal tumors with tumor thrombus [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 802-811.
[12] Yi LIU,Chang-wei YUAN,Jing-yun WU,Qi SHEN,Jiang-xi XIAO,Zheng ZHAO,Xiao-ying WANG,Xue-song LI,Zhi-song HE,Li-qun ZHOU. Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 812-817.
[13] Chang-wei YUAN,De-run LI,Zhi-hua LI,Yi LIU,Gang-zhi SHAN,Xue-song LI,Li-qun ZHOU. Application of dynamic contrast enhanced status in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer with PI-RADS 4 lesion [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(5): 838-842.
[14] Han LU,Jian-yun ZHANG,Rong YANG,Le XU,Qing-xiang LI,Yu-xing GUO,Chuan-bin GUO. Clinical factors affecting the prognosis of lower gingival squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 702-707.
[15] Yun-fei SHI,Hao-jie WANG,Wei-ping LIU,Lan MI,Meng-ping LONG,Yan-fei LIU,Yu-mei LAI,Li-xin ZHOU,Xin-ting DIAO,Xiang-hong LI. Analysis of clinicopathological and molecular abnormalities of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(3): 521-529.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd