北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 456-461. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京市老年人认知功能的影响因素

林郁婷1,王华丽2,田宇3,巩俐彤4,常春1,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学公共卫生学院社会医学与健康教育系,北京 100191
    2. 北京大学第六医院记忆障碍诊疗与研究中心/国家精神心理疾病临床医学研究中心,北京 100191
    3. 北京市新街口社区卫生服务中心,北京 100035
    4. 北京市大兴区疾病预防控制中心,北京 102699
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-18 出版日期:2024-06-18 发布日期:2024-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 常春 E-mail:changchun@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国社区卫生协会社区卫生科研基金(20212041)

Factors influencing cognitive function among the older adults in Beijing

Yuting LIN1,Huali WANG2,Yu TIAN3,Litong GONG4,Chun CHANG1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Peking University Sixth Hospital Dementia Care and Research Center/National Clinical Research Center for Psychiatric Diseases, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Beijing Xinjiekou Community Health Service Center, Beijing 100035, China
    4. Beijing Daxing District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102699, China
  • Received:2024-02-18 Online:2024-06-18 Published:2024-06-12
  • Contact: Chun CHANG E-mail:changchun@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    China Community Health Association Community Health Research Fund(20212041)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 探讨老年人认知功能现况,基于生命历程理论分析老年人认知功能的影响因素。方法: 采用横断面研究,于2023年对北京市西城区、大兴区部分老年人进行问卷调查,使用香港简短认知功能检测(Hong Kong brief cognitive test,HKBC)量表评估老年人的认知功能,采用SPSS 27.0软件对老年人认识功能的影响因素进行描述性分析和多元线性回归分析。结果: 纳入349名老年人,年龄在60~69岁的调查对象占比最高(41.3%),58.7%为女性,文化程度初中及以上者占比88.0%,退休前每周工作时长多集中在35~48 h(68.8%),14.0%的老年人有痴呆家族史。在控制年龄、性別等变量后,线性回归分析结果显示,婚姻状况为已婚(β=0.501,95%CI:0.144~0.859)和每周运动3~4次是老年人认知功能的保护因素(β=0.617,95%CI:0.087~1.148),抑郁症状是其危险因素(β=-0.723,95%CI:-1.198~-0.247)。结论: 从生命全周期的视角看待认知功能影响因素,缺乏体育锻炼与抑郁症状均是认知功能的危险因素,加强体育锻炼,改善老年人心理健康,将预防性干预关口前移,有助于预防和减缓老年人认知功能衰退。

关键词: 认知障碍, 危险因素, 老年人, 生命历程理论

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the current status of cognitive function of the older adults in Beijing, and to analyze the factors affecting their cognitive function. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study. A questionnaire survy was conducted in 2023 among the older adults in Beijing. The cognitive function of the older adults was assessed with the Hong Kong brief cognitive test (HKBC) scale, a simple cognitive assessment tool. Using SPSS 27.0 to perform the descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression analysis of factors, which affect cognitive function among the older adults. Results: Totally 349 older adults were recruited, with the highest percentage of respondents aged 60-69 years (41.3%), of whom 58.7% were female, 88.0% of the respondents had a junior high school or above education level. Most of the older adults (68.8%) worked 35-48 h/week before they retired, and 14.0% of the older adults had a family history of dementia. After controlling age and gender, the linear regression analysis showed that marital status married (β=0.501, 95%CI: 0.144-0.859) and 3-4 times physical activity per week (β=0.617, 95%CI: 0.087-1.148) were protective factors of cognitive function in the older adults, and depressive symptoms were a risk factor (β= -0.723, 95%CI: -1.198 to -0.247) of cognitive function for the older adults. Conclusion: In this study, the factors influencing cognitive function among the older adults was analyzed based on a life-cycle perspective. Lack of physical activity and depressive symptoms were risk factors for cognitive function among the older adults. It was suggested that strengthening physical activity, improving mental health of the older adults, as well as conducting preventive intervention in early stages of the life-cycle will be benefit for preventing and slowing cognitive decline in the older adults.

Key words: Cognition disorders, Risk factors, Aged, Life course theory

中图分类号: 

  • R395.6

表1

研究对象的社会人口学特征(n=349)"

Items n(%)
Gender
  Male 144 (41.3)
  Female 205 (58.7)
Age/years
  60- 144 (41.3)
  70- 101 (28.9)
  ≥80 104 (29.8)
Marital status
  Single/Divorced/Widowed 186 (53.3)
  Married 163 (46.7)
Education level
  Primary school or less 42 (12.0)
  Middle school 178 (51.0)
  High school or higher 129 (37.0)
Family history of dementia
  Yes 49 (14.0)
  No 300 (86.0)
Weekly working hours before retirement
  <35 56 (16.0)
  35- 122 (35.0)
  41- 118 (33.8)
  ≥49 53 (15.2)

表2

认知功能得分的单因素分析"

Variable Cognitive function score ($\bar x \pm s$) t/F P
Early life course factors
  Education level 3.872 0.022
    Primary school or below 23.76±1.61
    Middle school 24.25±1.65
    High school or above 24.51±1.34
  Family history of dementia 0.751 0.455
    No 24.31±1.57
    Yes 24.14±1.46
Midlife course factors
  Weekly working hours before retirement 1.998 0.114
    <35 23.89±1.85
    35- 24.32±1.42
    41- 24.49±1.57
    ≥49 24.19±1.40
  Marital status -3.331 0.001
    Single/Divorced/Widowed 24.04±1.66
    Married 24.58±1.36
Late life course factors
  Times of physical activity per week 6.872 0.001
    0-2 23.97±1.81
    3-4 24.76±0.88
    ≥5 24.49±1.34
  Smoking 0.105 0.917
    Never 24.29±1.58
    Everyday/Quit 24.27±1.34
  Drinking -0.997 0.321
    No 24.26±1.61
    Yes 24.44±1.11
  Social participation -1.037 0.300
    Low level 24.21±1.69
    High level 24.38±1.36
  3H 1.038 0.304
    No 24.31±1.59
    Yes 24.09±1.38
  Depression 3.759 <0.001
    No 24.42±1.32
    Yes 23.59±2.33
  Insomnia 2.486 0.013
    No 24.46±1.36
    Yes 24.04±1.77
  Social support 0.503 0.615
    Low level 24.33±1.50
    High level 24.24±1.61

表3

认知功能相关因素的多元回归分析"

VariablesModel 1 Model 2 Model 3
β(95%CI) t P β(95%CI) t P β(95%CI) t P
Sociodemographic factors
  Gender (Female) 0.119(-0.211, 0.450) 0.710 0.478 0.077(-0.254, 0.407) 0.457 0.648 0.015(-0.316, 0.345) 0.088 0.930
Early life course factors
  Education level
    Middle school 0.469(-0.054, 0.992) 1.762 0.079 0.344(-0.191, 0.879) 1.265 0.207 0.309(-0.264, 0.881) 1.061 0.289
    High school or above 0.756(0.205, 1.308) 2.699 0.007 0.479(-0.089, 1.048) 1.658 0.098 0.325(-0.286, 0.935) 1.045 0.297
  Family history of dementia (Yes) -0.133(-0.606, 0.341) -0.550 0.582 -0.131(-0.605, 0.343) -0.542 0.588 -0.107(-0.579, 0.365) -0.446 0.656
Midlife course factors
  Weekly working hours before retirement
    35-40 0.353(-0.137, 0.842) 1.418 0.157 0.270(-0.216, 0.756) 1.094 0.275
    41-48 0.526(0.034, 1.018) 2.105 0.036 0.341(-0.153, 0.836) 1.359 0.175
    ≥49 0.344(-0.263, 0.950) 1.115 0.266 0.126(-0.482, 0.734) 0.407 0.684
  Marital status (Married) 0.539(-0.183, 0.896) 2.978 0.003 0.501(0.144, 0.859) 2.759 0.006
Late life course factors
  Times of physical activity per week
    3-4 0.617(0.087, 1.148) 2.291 0.023
    ≥5 0.270(-0.109, 0.649) 1.402 0.162
  Smoking (Everyday/Quit) -0.119(-0.629, 0.391) -0.458 0.647
  Drinking (Yes) -0.002(-0.472, 0.467) -0.009 0.993
  Social participation (High level) 0.228(-0.131, 0.588) 1.250 0.212
  3H (Yes) -0.205(-0.754, 0.344) -0.735 0.463
  Depression (Yes) -0.723(-1.198, -0.247) -2.991 0.003
  Insomnia (Yes) -0.129(-0.475, 0.217) -0.736 0.462
  Social support (High level) -0.222(-0.574, 0.129) -1.245 0.214
1 Scheltens P , Strooper B , Kivipelto M , et al.Alzheimer's disease[J].Lancet,2021,397(10284):1577-1590.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32205-4
2 王丹, 刘跃华, 朱学敏, 等.WHO和25个国家(地区)应对失智症行动计划及其对我国的启示[J].中国全科医学,2022,25(25):3075-3082.
3 Rtersen RC .Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity[J].Intern Med,2004,25(6):183-194.
4 Jia L , Du Y , Chu L , et al.Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: A cross-sectional study[J].Lancet Public health,2020,5(12):e661-e671.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30185-7
5 World Health Organization. Global status report on the public health response to dementia[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
6 Ben-Shlomo Y , Kuh D .A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives[J].Int J Epidemiol,2022,31(2):285-293.
7 Livingston G , Huntley J , Sommerlad A , et al.Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission[J].Lancet,2020,396(10248):413-446.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6
8 World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
9 付志强, 齐伟, 翁华, 等.关于社会处方管理模式对社区老年人认知状况的干预效果及其社会支持影响因素的探索性研究[J].老龄科学研究,2022,10(12):24-33.
10 Zhou L , Ma X , Wang W .Relationship between cognitive perfor-mance and depressive symptoms in Chinese older adults: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)[J].J Affect Disord,2021,281,454-458.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.059
11 肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,(2):98-100.
12 Chiu HF , Zhong BL , Leung T , et al.Development and validation of a new cognitive screening test: The Hong Kong Brief Cognitive Test (HKBC)[J].Int J Geriatr Psychiatry,2018,33(7):994-999.
doi: 10.1002/gps.4883
13 Andresen EM , Malmgren JA , Carter WB , et al.Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale)[J].Am J Prev Med,1994,10(2):77-78.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6
14 张宝山, 李娟.简版流调中心抑郁量表在全国成年人群中的信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2011,25(7):506-511.
15 Chung KF , Kan KKK , Yeung WF .Assessing insomnia in adolescents: Comparison of insomnia severity index, Athens insomnia scale and sleep quality index[J].Sleep Med,2011,12(5):463-470.
16 于恩彦.中国老年期痴呆防治指南(2021)[M].北京: 人民卫生出版社,2021.
17 Baumgart M , Snyder HM , Carrillo MC , et al.Summary of the evidence on modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and demen-tia: A population-based perspective[J].Alzheimers Dement,2015,11(6):718-726.
18 Sanders LM , Hortobagyi T , Gemert SB , et al.Dose-response relationship between exercise and cognitive function in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].PLoS One,2019,14(1):e0210036.
19 Erickson KI , Hillman C , Stillman CM , et al.Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: A review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines[J].Med Sci Sports Exerc,2019,51(6):1242-1251.
20 Wit LD , O'Shea D , Chandler M , et al.Physical exercise and cognitive engagement outcomes for mild neurocognitive disorder: A group-randomized pilot trial[J].Trials,2018,19(1):1-11.
21 James SN , Chiou YJ , Fatih N , et al.Timing of physical activity across adulthood on later-life cognition: 30 years follow-up in the 1946 British birth cohort[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2023,94(5):349-356.
22 Prince M, Albanese E, Guerchet M. World Alzheimer Report 2014: Dementia and risk reduction. An analysis of protective and modifiable risk factors[R]. London: Alzheimer Disease International, 2014.
23 Chen H , Zhou YG , Huang LY , et al.Multimorbidity burden and developmental trajectory in relation to later-life dementia: A prospective study[J].Alzheimers Dement,2023,19(5):2024-2033.
[1] 魏慧, 张警丰, 姚中强, 赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎合并慢性病贫血患者的临床特征及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 307-312.
[2] 赵杰, 付春, 赵秀娟, 薛海岩, 李纾, 王振洲, 朱凤雪. 胸部创伤患者在重症监护病房内发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 351-358.
[3] 郭芷均, 俎明, 马超, 张贺军, 张静, 丁士刚. 同时性多发早期胃癌漏诊病灶的临床病理特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 410-415.
[4] 魏粤晖, 简伟研. 中国老年人社会经济地位与视力障碍的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1136-1144.
[5] 曹沛, 栾庆先. 牙周炎与全身系统性疾病的思考与探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 852-858.
[6] 李博闻, 张强, 孙益鑫. 儿童及青年漏斗胸患者Nuss术后发生脊柱侧弯的风险预测模型建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 941-946.
[7] 杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[8] 刘伟, 郭稳, 过哲, 李春艳, 李云龙, 刘思奇, 张亮, 宋慧. 痛风患者放射学阴性骨侵蚀的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 735-739.
[9] 陆梦溪, 刘秋萍, 周恬静, 刘晓非, 孙烨祥, 沈鹏, 林鸿波, 唐迅, 高培. 基于社区人群队列的甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管病发病和死亡的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 430-435.
[10] 杨龙傲, 金旭, 黄文初, 何丽华, 陈娟. 视屏作业人员视疲劳及干眼的流行病学调查[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 554-561.
[11] 郭华秋, 王哲, 杨雪, 白洁. 口腔急诊出血患者的临床特征与危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 142-147.
[12] 邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[13] 李钰锴, 王红彦, 罗靓, 李云, 李春. 抗磷脂抗体在白塞病合并血栓中的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1036-1040.
[14] 田杨, 韩永正, 李娇, 王明亚, 曲音音, 房景超, 金辉, 李民, 王军, 徐懋, 王圣林, 郭向阳. 颈椎前路手术后硬膜外血肿的发生率和危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1058-1064.
[15] 王明瑞, 赖金惠, 姬家祥, 唐鑫伟, 胡浩浦, 王起, 许克新, 徐涛, 胡浩. 使用中文版威斯康星结石生活质量问卷预测肾结石患者生活质量降低的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1069-1074.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!