北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 334-339. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.02.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

部分下颌下腺切除术治疗下颌下腺良性肿瘤的临床效果

杨源源1,2, 张珊珊2, 俞光岩3, 杨辉俊2,*(), 杨宏宇2,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院综合二科,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081
    2. 北京大学深圳医院口腔医学中心口腔颌面外科,广东省高水平临床重点专科,广东省口腔疾病诊疗技术工程技术研究中心,广东深圳 518036
    3. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔颌面外科,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-27 出版日期:2025-04-18 发布日期:2025-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨辉俊,杨宏宇 E-mail:yanghj8801019@163.com;hyyang192@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市医疗卫生三名工程(SZSM202111012);广东省高水平临床重点专科(SZGSP008);深圳市卫生计生系统科研项目(SZXJ2018078)

Clinical outcomes of partial sialoadenectomy for the treatment of benign tumors in the submandibular gland

Yuanyuan YANG1,2, Shanshan ZHANG2, Guangyan YU3, Huijun YANG2,*(), Hongyu YANG2,*()   

  1. 1. Department of General Dentistry Ⅱ, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Center, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital & Guangdong Province High-level Clinical Key Specialty & Guangdong Province Engineering Research Center of Oral Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China
    3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-06-27 Online:2025-04-18 Published:2025-04-12
  • Contact: Huijun YANG, Hongyu YANG E-mail:yanghj8801019@163.com;hyyang192@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen(SZSM202111012);Shenzhen Fund for Guangdong Provincial High-level Clinical Key Specialties(SZGSP008);Shenzhen Health and Family Planning System Research Project(SZXJ2018078)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 分析部分下颌下腺切除术对于下颌下腺良性肿瘤治疗的临床效果,探讨部分下颌下腺切除术的应用价值。方法: 纳入2017年10月至2021年2月于北京大学深圳医院口腔颌面外科行手术治疗的下颌下腺多形性腺瘤患者并对其进行随访评估,其中15例行部分下颌下腺切除术(部分切除组),18例行常规下颌下腺切除术(全切除组),比较两组术后唾液分泌、口干程度、面颈部容貌、神经损伤、肿瘤复发情况,并分析部分切除组健侧和患侧腺体体积、唾液流率及两者之间的相关性。结果: 两组患者在随访期内均未见肿瘤复发。部分切除组及全切除组术后静息全唾液流率分别为(2.15±1.10) g/5 min及(1.35±0.97) g/5 min,差异有统计学意义(t=2.208,P=0.035),口干症状部分切除组较全切除组轻(Z=-2.244,P=0.025);在部分切除组中,同一患者健侧和患侧下颌下腺静息唾液流率分别为(1.18±0.40) g/5 min及(0.92±0.40) g/5 min,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.821,P=0.014),而当患侧腺体剩余80%以上时,健侧和患侧静息唾液流率差异无统计学意义(t=-0.027,P=0.980),单位体积腺体唾液流率健侧和患侧差异无统计学意义(t=-0.015,P=0.989),剩余腺体的体积与唾液流率呈正相关(r=0.750,P=0.012)。部分切除组术后容貌满意度略高于全切除组,但差异无统计学意义;两组术后均未出现神经损伤症状。结论: 部分下颌下腺切除术在根治良性肿瘤的同时保留腺体分泌功能,并发症更少,可以提高患者生活质量。

关键词: 下颌下腺良性肿瘤, 部分腺体切除术, 功能性唾液腺外科, 治疗效果

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and explore the application of partial sialoadenectomy for the treatment of benign tumors in the submandibular gland (SMG). Methods: Patients with pleomorphic adenoma of the SMG who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, from October 2017 to February 2021, were enrolled and assessed in the follow-up. Fifteen patients underwent partial sialoadenectomy (PS group), and 18 patients underwent total sialoadenectomy (TS group). Postoperative salivary secretion, degree of dry mouth, appearance changes of the face and neck, nerve damage, and tumor recurrence were compared between the groups. The volume of the glands on the operated and contralateral sides of the patients in the PS group, the saliva flow rate, and their correlations, were also analyzed. Results: There was no recurrence during the follow-up period. The whole saliva flow rate at rest in the PS group was higher than that in the TS group [(2.15±1.10) g/5 min vs. (1.35±0.97) g/5 min, t=2.208, P=0.035)], while the stimulated saliva flow rate was not significantly different. The objective feeling of dry mouth, evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, was more obvious in the TS group than in the PS group (Z=-2.244, P=0.025). In the PS group, the resting saliva flow rate of the SMG on the operated side was lower than that on the contralateral side of the same patient [(0.92±0.40) g/5 min vs. (1.18±0.40) g/5 min, t=-2.821, P=0.014], however, in the cases whose remaining SMG was more than 80% of the contralateral side, the saliva flow rate of both sides was not significantly different (t=-0.027, P=0.980). There was no significant difference in the saliva flow rate per unit volume of the gland on either side (t=-0.015, P=0.989), and the saliva flow rate of the operated SMG was positively correlated with the volume of the remaining gland (r=0.750, P=0.012). The VAS scores for neck deformity were not significantly different between the two groups (t=-0.997, P=0.319). No symptoms of nerve injury occurred in either group. Conclusion: Partial sialoadenectomy in the SMG can safely remove benign tumors while preserving glandular secretory function, with fewer complications and improved quality of life.

Key words: Benign tumor of submandibular gland, Partial sialoadenectomy, Gland-preserving surge-ry, Treatment outcome

中图分类号: 

  • R782.7

图1

部分下颌下腺切除的主要手术步骤"

图2

部分下颌下腺切除术后健侧和患侧腺体重建图像"

表1

两组术后下颌下腺功能及并发症发生情况"

Items Partial sialoadenectomy (n=15) Total sialoadenectomy (n=18) Statistics P value
Flow rate of whole saliva/(g/5 min)
  Rest 2.15±1.10 1.35±0.97 t=2.208 0.035
  Stimulated 10.63±5.67 8.12±3.96 t=1.493 0.146
VAS score
  Dry mouth 0 (0-1) 1 (0-2) Z=-2.244 0.025
  Neck deformity 2 (1-3) 2 (1-3) Z=-0.997 0.319
Nerve damage/% 0 0

表2

部分下颌下腺切除术后健侧和患侧腺体体积及唾液流率"

Items n Operated SMG Contralateral SMG t P value
Volume of gland/cm3 10 3.60±2.31 4.67±2.29 -3.996 0.003
Saliva flow rate/(g/5 min) 15 0.92±0.40 1.18±0.40 -2.821 0.014
Saliva flow rate of per unit volume/[g/(cm3·5 min)] 10 0.32±0.18 0.32±0.18 -0.015 0.989

图3

部分下颌下腺切除术后腺体体积与患侧唾液流率相关性"

1 Roblegg E , Coughran A , Sirjani D . Saliva: An all-rounder of our body[J]. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2019, 142, 133- 141.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.06.016
2 Carpenter GH . The secretion, components, and properties of saliva[J]. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol, 2013, 4, 267- 276.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030212-182700
3 de Brito Neves CP , Lira RB , Chulam TC , et al. Retroauricular endoscope-assisted versus conventional submandibular gland excision for benign and malignant tumors[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34 (1): 39- 46.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07173-3
4 Cammaroto G , Vicini C , Montevecchi F , et al. Submandibular gland excision: From external surgery to robotic intraoral and extraoral approaches[J]. Oral Dis, 2020, 26 (5): 853- 857.
doi: 10.1111/odi.13340
5 Dhiwakar M , Ronen O , Malone J , et al. Feasibility of submandi-bular gland preservation in neck dissection: A prospective anatomic-pathologic study[J]. Head Neck, 2011, 33 (5): 603- 609.
doi: 10.1002/hed.21499
6 Proctor GB , Shaalan AM . Disease-induced changes in salivary gland function and the composition of saliva[J]. J Dent Res, 2021, 100 (11): 1201- 1209.
doi: 10.1177/00220345211004842
7 Yu GY , Ma DQ , Liu XB , et al. Local excision of the parotid gland in the treatment of Warthin' s tumour[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1998, 36 (3): 186- 189.
doi: 10.1016/S0266-4356(98)90495-8
8 Roh JL , Park CI . Gland-preserving surgery for pleomorphic adenoma in the submandibular gland[J]. Br J Surg, 2008, 95 (10): 1252- 1256.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.6306
9 Xu H , Mao C , Liu JM , et al. Microanatomic study of the vascular and duct system of the submandibular gland[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69 (4): 1103- 1107.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.006
10 Min R , Zun Z , Siyi L , et al. Gland-preserving surgery can effectively preserve gland function without increased recurrence in treatment of benign submandibular gland tumour[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2013, 51 (7): 615- 619.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.009
11 Yang TL , Ko JY , Lou PJ , et al. Gland-preserving robotic surgery for benign submandibular gland tumours: A comparison between robotic and open techniques[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 52 (5): 420- 424.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.02.015
12 Ge N , Peng X , Zhang L , et al. Partial sialoadenectomy for the treatment of benign tumours in the submandibular gland[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 45 (6): 750- 755.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.12.013
13 李巍, 孙志鹏, 刘筱菁, 等. 腮腺和颌下腺体积的测量[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46 (2): 288- 293.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2014.02.022
14 Huang L , Wang Z , Shan Z , et al. Nasal asymmetry changes during growth and development in 6- to 12-year-old children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: A 3D computed tomography analysis[J]. J Anat, 2022, 240 (1): 155- 165.
doi: 10.1111/joa.13538
15 俞光岩. 要重视下颌下腺功能器官的保护[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2017, 52 (4): 204- 205.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.04.002
16 Ethunandan M , Davies B , Pratt CA , et al. Primary epithelial submandibular salivary gland tumours: Review of management in a district general hospital setting[J]. Oral Oncol, 2009, 45 (2): 173- 176.
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.04.011
17 Li LJ , Li Y , Wen YM , et al. Clinical analysis of salivary gland tumor cases in West China in past 50 years[J]. Oral Oncol, 2008, 44 (2): 187- 192.
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.01.016
18 Tian Z , Li L , Wang L , et al. Salivary gland neoplasms in oral and maxillofacial regions: A 23-year retrospective study of 6 982 cases in an eastern Chinese population[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 39 (3): 235- 242.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.10.016
19 Gao M , Hao Y , Huang MX , et al. Salivary gland tumours in a northern Chinese population: A 50-year retrospective study of 7 190 cases[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 46 (3): 343- 349.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.09.021
20 Hu Y , Zheng C , Cao R , et al. Resection of benign tumours of the submandibular gland with harmonic scalpel-assisted minimally extracapsular dissection[J]. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48 (1): 300060519892783.
doi: 10.1177/0300060519892783
21 Li L , Gao XL , Song YZ , et al. Anatomy of arteries and veins of submandibular glands[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2007, 120 (13): 1179- 1182.
doi: 10.1097/00029330-200707010-00013
22 Garcia-Serrano G , Moñux A , Maranillo E , et al. Vascular clinical anatomy of the submandibular gland[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2020, 48 (6): 582- 589.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.04.004
23 王张嵩, 谢舒乐, 张汉卿, 等. 2 456例唾液腺肿瘤临床病理分析[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020, 28 (5): 298- 302.
24 Andreasen S , Therkildsen MH , Bjørndal K , et al. Pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland 1985-2010: A Danish nationwide study of incidence, recurrence rate, and malignant transformation[J]. Head Neck, 2016, 38 (Suppl 1): E1364- E1369.
25 Dai L , Lou W , Fang Q , et al. Recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland: Experience of 128 patients with first recurrence[J]. J Oncol, 2020, 2020, 6645340.
26 Valstar MH , de Ridder M , van den Broek EC , et al. Salivary gland pleomorphic adenoma in the Netherlands: A nationwide observational study of primary tumor incidence, malignant transformation, recurrence, and risk factors for recurrence[J]. Oral Oncol, 2017, 66, 93- 99.
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.01.004
27 Roldan-Valadez E , Garcia-Ulloa AC , Gonzalez-Gutierrez O , et al. 3D volumetry comparison using 3T magnetic resonance imaging between normal and adenoma-containing pituitary glands[J]. Neurol India, 2011, 59 (5): 696- 699.
doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.86543
28 王怡平, 蔡志刚, 彭歆, 等. 下颌下腺质量和体积的实体体外检测[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53 (1): 126- 132.
doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.019
29 Hong X , Zhang YY , Li W , et al. Treatment of immunoglobulin G4-related sialadenitis: Outcomes of glucocorticoid therapy combined with steroid-sparing agents[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2018, 20 (1): 12.
doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1507-6
[1] 任军,杨朵. 提高过继性T细胞免疫治疗临床疗效的新思考----肠道菌群与肿瘤免疫[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 204-206.
[2] 弓煦,赵颖,李巍然,高雪梅. 不同疗程戴用口腔矫治器治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的疗效对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 115-119.
[3] 梁宇红, 陈智滨, 王嘉德. 超声波与声波根管冲洗的清理效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(6): 970-972.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!