类风湿关节炎患者趋化因子CXCL9和CXCL10在骨侵蚀中的作用

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的:检测趋化因子CXCL9和CXCL10在类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis, RA)患者外周血中的水平,分析其对RA发生骨侵蚀的作用,探讨CXCL9和CXCL10在RA中的临床意义。方法:采用酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA)检测105例RA患者、90例骨关节炎(osteoarthritis, OA)患者和25例健康对照者(healthy control, HC)血清CXCL9、CXCL10水平并比较各组间差异,分析其与RA临床特征、实验室指标、疾病活动性及骨侵蚀的相关性,采用Logistic回归分析血清CXCL9和CXCL10水平与RA患者骨侵蚀的相关性。结果:RA组患者血清CXCL9、CXCL10水平显著高于OA组和HC组(P<0.01、P<0.01),RA患者血清CXCL9水平与肿胀关节数(swollen joints, SJC)、类风湿因子(rheumatoid factor, RF)呈正相关(P<0.05),血清CXCL10水平与压痛关节数(tender joints, TJC)、SJC、C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein, CRP)、免疫球蛋白(immunoglobulin, Ig)A、IgM、RF及抗环瓜氨酸多肽抗体(anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody,ACPA)呈正相关(P<0.05)。此外,血清CXCL9、CXCL10水平均与RA疾病活动度评分(disease activity score 28, DAS28)呈正相关(P=0.013、P=0.006),且高疾病活动度组(DAS28≥5.1)的血清CXCL9、CXCL10水平显著高于中低疾病活动度组(DAS28<5.1,P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析提示,病程长、高疾病活动度及血清CXCL9水平升高与RA患者发生骨侵蚀相关(P<0.05)。结论:RA患者血清趋化因子CXCL9和CXCL10的表达水平升高,与RA疾病活动性及骨侵蚀具有相关性,可能参与了RA的发病及骨破坏过程。

关键词: 类风湿关节炎, 骨侵蚀, 趋化因子CXCL9, 趋化因子CXCL10

Abstract:

Objective: To detect the serum level of soluble chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to analyze their correlation with bone erosion, as well as the clinical significance in RA. Methods: In the study, 105 cases of RA patients, 90 osteoarthritis (OA) patients and 25 healthy controls in Peking University People’s Hospital were included. All the clinical information of the patients was collected, and the serum CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels of both patients and healthy controls were measured by enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA). CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels among different groups were compared. The correlation between serum levels with clinical/laboratory parameters and the occurrence of bone erosion in RA were analyzed. Independent sample t test, Chi square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman’s rank correlation and Logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results: The levels of CXCL9 and CXCL10 were significantly higher in the RA patients [250.02 (126.98, 484.29) ng/L, 108.43 (55.16, 197.17) ng/L] than in the OA patients [165.05 (75.89, 266.37) ng/L, 69.00 (33.25, 104.74) ng/L] and the health controls [79.47 (38.22, 140.63) ng/L, 55.44 (18.76, 95.86) ng/L] (all P<0.01). Spearman’s correlation analysis showed that the level of serum CXCL9 was positively correlated with swollen joints (SJC), rheumatoid factor (RF) and disease activity score 28 (DAS28) (r=0.302, 0.285, 0.289; P=0.009, 0.015, 0.013). The level of serum CXCL10 was positively correlated with tender joints (TJC), SJC, C-reactive protein (CRP), immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgM, RF, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA), and DAS28 (r=0.339, 0.402, 0.269, 0.266, 0.345, 0.570, 0.540, 0.364; P=0.010, 0.002, 0.043, 0.045, 0.009, <0.001, <0.001, 0.006). Serum CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels in the RA patients with bone erosion were extremely higher than those without bone erosion [306.84 (234.02, 460.55) ng/L vs. 149.90 (75.88, 257.72) ng/L, 153.74 (89.50, 209.59) ng/L vs. 54.53 (26.30, 83.69) ng/L, respectively] (all P<0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that disease duration, DAS28 and serum level of CXCL9 were correlated with bone erosion in the RA patients (P<0.05). Conclusion: Serum levels of CXCL9 and CXCL10 were remarkably elevated in patients with RA, and correlated with disease activities and occurrence of bone erosion. Chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 might be involved in the pathogenesis and bone destruction in RA.

Key words: Rheumatoid arthritis, Bone erosion, Chemokine CXCL9, Chemokine CXCL10

中图分类号:

R593.22

钟华,徐丽玲,白明欣,苏茵. 类风湿关节炎患者趋化因子CXCL9和CXCL10在骨侵蚀中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1026-1031.

ZHONG Hua,XU Li-ling,BAI Ming-xin,SU Yin. Effect of chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 on bone erosion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1026-1031.

图/表 5

图1

表1

图2

表2

表3

参考文献 23

[1]	Sparks JA. Rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2019, 170(1): ITC1-ITC16. doi: 10.7326/AITC201901010
[2]	Zhu H, Li R, Da Z, et al. Remission assessment of rheumatoid arthritis in daily practice in China: A cross-sectional observational study[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2018, 37(3):597-605. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3850-z
[3]	Zhou Y, Wang X, An Y, et al. Disability and health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Rheum Dis, 2018, 21(9):1709-1715. doi: 10.1111/apl.2018.21.issue-9
[4]	Poeta VM, Massara M, Capucetti A, et al. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new targets for cancer immunotherapy[J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10:379. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00379
[5]	Susek KH, Karvouni M, Alici E, et al. The role of CXC chemokine receptors 1-4 on immune cells in the tumor microenvironment[J]. Front Immunol, 2018, 9:2159. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02159
[6]	Tokunaga R, Zhang W, Naseem M, et al. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11/CXCR3 axis for immune activation: A target for novel cancer therapy[J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2018, 63:40-47. doi: S0305-7372(17)30199-8 pmid: 29207310
[7]	McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 365(23):2205-2219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965
[8]	Muntyanu A, Abji F, Liang K, et al. Differential gene and protein expression of chemokines and cytokines in synovial fluid of patients with arthritis[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2016, 18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1196-6
[9]	Antonelli A, Ferrari SM, Giuggioli D, et al. Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand CXCL10 in autoimmune diseases[J]. Autoimmun Rev, 2014, 13(3):272-280. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.10.010
[10]	Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 62(9):2569-2581. doi: 10.1002/art.27584
[11]	Zhang W, Doherty M, Peat G, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010, 69(3):483-489. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.113100 pmid: 19762361
[12]	Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, et al. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1995, 38(1):44-48. doi: 10.1002/art.v38:1
[13]	Fransen J, van Riel PL. The disease activity score and the EULAR response criteria [J]. Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2009, 35(4): 745-757, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.001
[14]	Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1988, 31(3):315-324. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1529-0131
[15]	Ostergaard M, Peterfy C, Conaghan P, et al. OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system[J]. J Rheumatol, 2003, 30(6):1385-1386.
[16]	Bruyn GA, Hanova P, Iagnocco A, et al. Ultrasound definition of tendon damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a OMERACT consensus-based ultrasound score focusing on the diagnostic reliability[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2014, 73(11):1929-1934. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203596
[17]	Zeidler H. The need to better classify and diagnose early and very early rheumatoid arthritis[J]. J Rheumatol, 2012, 39(2):212-217. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110967
[18]	Griffith JW, Sokol CL, Luster AD. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: Positioning cells for host defense and immunity[J]. Annu Rev Immunol, 2014, 32:659-702. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145 pmid: 24655300
[19]	Korniejewska A, McKnight AJ, Johnson Z, et al. Expression and agonist responsiveness of CXCR3 variants in human T lymphocytes[J]. Immunology, 2011, 132(4):503-515. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03384.x pmid: 21255008
[20]	Schoenborn JR, Wilson CB. Regulation of interferon-gamma during innate and adaptive immune responses[J]. Adv Immunol, 2007, 96:41-101. pmid: 17981204
[21]	Farber JM. Mig and IP-10: CXC chemokines that target lymphocytes[J]. J Leukoc Biol, 1997, 61(3):246-257. doi: 10.1002/jlb.1997.61.issue-3
[22]	Kwak HB, Ha H, Kim HN, et al. Reciprocal cross-talk between RANKL and interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 is responsible for bone-erosive experimental arthritis[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2008, 58(5):1332-1342. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1529-0131
[23]	Kraan MC, Patel DD, Haringman JJ, et al. The development of clinical signs of rheumatoid synovial inflammation is associated with increased synjournal of the chemokine CXCL8 (interleukin-8)[J]. Arthritis Res, 2001, 3(1):65-71. pmid: 11178128

相关文章 15

[1]	刘东武, 陈杰, 高明利, 于静. 类风湿关节炎伴发淋巴结Castleman样病理改变1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 928-931.
[2]	黄会娜,赵静,赵祥格,白自然,李霞,王冠. 乳酸对类风湿关节炎患者外周血CD4⁺T细胞亚群的调控作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 519-525.
[3]	汤晓菲,李永红,丁秋玲,孙卓,张阳,王育梅,田美伊,刘坚. 类风湿关节炎患者下肢深静脉血栓发病率及危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 279-283.
[4]	邹雪,白小娟,张丽卿. 艾拉莫德联合托法替布治疗难治性中重度类风湿关节炎的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[5]	吴琦,蔡月明,何娟,黄文蒂,王庆文. 血脂异常与类风湿关节炎肺间质病变的相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 982-992.
[6]	张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 体重指数与类风湿关节炎临床特征的相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 993-999.
[7]	金银姬,孙琳,赵金霞,刘湘源. 血清IgA型抗鼠科肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B1抗体在类风湿关节炎中的意义[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 631-635.
[8]	蔡文心,李仕成,刘一鸣,梁如玉,李静,郭建萍,胡凡磊,孙晓麟,李春,刘栩,叶华,邓立宗,李茹,栗占国. 类风湿关节炎临床分层及其特征的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1068-1073.
[9]	程昉,杨邵英,房星星,王璇,赵福涛. CCL28-CCR10通路在类风湿关节炎单核细胞迁移中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1074-1078.
[10]	刘蕊,赵金霞,闫良. 类风湿关节炎合并下肢静脉血栓患者的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1079-1085.
[11]	张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎患者生活质量与疾病活动度的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1086-1093.
[12]	高超,陈立红,王莉,姚鸿,黄晓玮,贾语博,刘田. 类风湿关节炎合并纤维肌痛简易分类标准的临床验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(2): 278-282.
[13]	娄雪,廖莉,李兴珺,王楠,刘爽,崔若玫,徐健. 类风湿关节炎患者外周血TWEAK基因启动子区甲基化状态及其表达[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1020-1025.
[14]	罗靓,霍文岗,张钦,李春. 类风湿关节炎合并角膜溃疡的临床特点和相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1032-1036.
[15]	张璐,胡小红,陈澄,蔡月明,王庆文,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎初治患者颈椎失稳情况及临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1049-1054.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Items	All subjects	Without bone erosion	With bone erosion	P value
Patients, n	52	17	35
Gender, n
Female	38	12	26	0.778
Male	14	5	9
Age/years	56 (52, 66)	55 (51, 66)	57 (52, 70)	0.667
Disease duration/month	60 (21, 204)	36 (8, 66)	84 (24, 240)	0.010
SJC, n	4 (1, 8)	2 (0, 8)	5 (2, 8)	0.234
TJC, n	4 (1, 8)	5 (2, 8)	2 (1, 7)	0.169
ESR/(mm/h)	52 (24, 100)	33 (13, 88)	61 (36, 102)	0.077
CRP/(mg/L)	21.30 (6.42, 53.25)	11.40 (3.07, 48.95)	30.90 (9.10, 53.80)	0.084
IgA/(g/L)	2.43 (1.75, 3.59)	2.01 (1.69, 2.86)	2.59 (1.80, 3.81)	0.172
IgG/(g/L)	11.95 (10.43, 13.30)	10.70 (9.77, 12.80)	12.40 (10.70, 14.30)	0.141
IgM/(g/L)	1.29 (0.82, 1.78)	1.22 (0.73, 1.51)	1.34 (0.92, 1.93)	0.310
RF/(IU/mL)	136.50 (31.28, 340.25)	133.00 (34.15, 404.50)	138.00 (28.00, 353.00)	0.984
ACPA/(U/mL)	144.57 (23.91, 200.00)	118.02 (63.96, 200.00)	155.81 (8.36, 200.00)	0.579
DAS28	4.74±1.26	4.52±1.35	4.85±1.22	0.385
CXCL9/(ng/L)	280.27 (150.50, 439.83)	149.90 (75.88, 257.72)	306.84 (234.02, 460.55)	<0.001
CXCL10/(ng/L)	107.10 (52.62, 200.33)	54.43 (26.30, 83.69)	153.74 (89.50, 209.59)	0.001

Items	β	Wald	OR	95%CI	P value
Disease duration	0.015	6.550	1.015	1.003-1.026	0.010
ACPA	-0.005	0.834	0.995	0.985-1.006	0.361
DAS28	1.063	4.539	2.896	1.089-7.701	0.033
CXCL9	0.011	8.339	1.012	1.004-1.019	0.004
CXCL10	-0.004	3.204	0.996	0.992-1.000	0.073