北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 994-1000. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.06.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

甲氨蝶呤在类风湿关节炎患者中的应用现状

韩艺钧, 陈小莉, 李常虹, 赵金霞*()   

  1. 北京大学第三医院风湿免疫科,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-08 出版日期:2024-12-18 发布日期:2024-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 赵金霞 E-mail:zhao-jinxia@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学第三医院临床队列建设项目(BYSYDL2022017)

Application status of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Yijun HAN, Xiaoli CHEN, Changhong LI, Jinxia ZHAO*()   

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-08-08 Online:2024-12-18 Published:2024-12-18
  • Contact: Jinxia ZHAO E-mail:zhao-jinxia@163.com
  • Supported by:
    the Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital(BYSYDL2022017)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 分析甲氨蝶呤(methotrexate, MTX)在类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis, RA)患者中的应用现状。方法: 纳入2022年1月1日至2023年11月31日于北京大学第三医院风湿免疫科诊治的RA患者,调查MTX的应用情况,包括起始剂量、最大剂量、目前用药情况、停药原因等,收集患者的临床信息和实验室数据,分析MTX应用与疾病控制情况之间的相关性。采用t检验、Mann-Whitney秩和检验、卡方检验和Fisher确切概率法和多因素回归分析进行统计学分析。结果: 共纳入RA患者239例,其中女性201例,男性38例,平均年龄(54.5±14.3)岁。239例患者中,治疗达标(临床缓解或低疾病活动度)患者101例(42.2%),符合欧洲抗风湿病联盟(European League Against Rheumatism,EULAR)定义的难治性RA患者26例(10.9%),曾应用MTX的比例为84.1%(201/239例),而目前仍规律应用者仅为39.7%(95/239例),且应用MTX的剂量普遍偏低,起始剂量为每周(9.5±3.0) mg,最大剂量中位数为每周15.0(10.0, 15.0) mg,目前剂量为每周(12.4±2.7) mg。最常见的停药或减量原因为不良反应,主要包括肝功能异常、胃肠道不适及白细胞减少。目前规律应用MTX者与未用药者相比,治疗达标率更高(52.6% vs. 35.4%,P>0.05)、疾病活动度更低[28个关节计数的疾病活动评分(28-joint disease activity score,DAS28)-红细胞沉降率(erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ESR)评分(3.6±1.8)分vs. (4.2±1.8)分, P<0.05]、疼痛关节数更少[(4.8±8.3)个vs. (8.6±10.4)个,P<0.05];而肿胀关节数、患者疼痛评分及总体评分、C反应蛋白、ESR等指标两组差异无统计学意义。与治疗未达标者相比,治疗达标者规律应用MTX的比例较高(48.5% vs. 33.3%,P<0.05),既往应用MTX的比例相当(84.2% vs. 84.1%,P>0.05);治疗达标者应用MTX的最大剂量较大(中位数每周15.0 mg vs. 13.7 mg,P>0.05),目前剂量也较大[每周(12.9±2.5) mg vs. (11.8±2.8) mg,P>0.05],而起始剂量两组相当[每周(9.6±2.8) mg vs. (9.5±3.1) mg,P>0.05]。难治性RA患者虽然既往应用MTX的比例较高(96.2% vs. 82.6%,P<0.05),但应用的最大剂量(中位数每周12.5 mg vs. 15.0 mg,P>0.05)和目前剂量均较小[每周(11.6±3.2) mg vs. (12.5±2.6) mg,P>0.05]。结论: RA患者中规律应用MTX的比例偏低,且药物剂量偏小;规律应用MTX的RA患者治疗达标率更高,疾病活动度更低;治疗达标者较未达标者目前应用MTX的比例高,最大剂量及目前剂量较大;难治性RA的患者应用MTX的最大剂量及维持剂量均偏低。RA患者中MTX的应用还有很大提升空间,通过提高RA患者MTX的使用率及用药剂量可能有助于改善RA患者的治疗达标率。

关键词: 类风湿关节炎, 甲氨蝶呤, 剂量效应关系, 药物, 达标治疗

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the current status of methotrexate (MTX) application in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods: The clinical and laboratory data of RA patients who attended in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2022 to November 31, 2023 were collected retrospectively. In order to figure out the relationship between MTX use and RA disease control, we recorded information including the starting dose, maximum dose, current dose, reasons of discontinuation of MTX, etc. The t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test, Fisher' s exact probability and multivariable Logistic regression were used for analysis. Results: A total of 239 RA patients were enrolled, including 201 females and 38 males with a mean age of (54.5±14.3) years. Among them, 101 patients reached the therapeutic target [clinical remission or low disease activity assessed by 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)], accounting for 42.2% of the RA patients. Twenty-six patients met the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) definition of difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA, accounting for 10.9% of RA patients. The proportion of the RA patients who had ever used MTX was 84. 1%, and those who were currently on it accounted for only 39.7%. The MTX dose was generally low, with a starting dose of (9.5±3.0) mg/week, the maximum dose of 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) mg/week, and the current dose being (12.4±2.7) mg/week. The most common reasons for MTX dose reduction or discontinuation were adverse reactions, mainly including abnormalities of hepatic function, gastrointestinal discomfort, leucopenia, etc. Those who were currently on MTX had a higher rate of treatment to target (52.6% vs. 35.4%, P>0.05), lower disease activity score (DAS28-ESR, 3.6±1.8 vs. 4.2±1.8, P < 0.05), and fewer tender joint counts (4.8±8.3 vs. 8.6±10.4, P < 0.05) as compared with those who were not taking the drug, while swollen joint count, pain visual analog score and patient' s global score, C-reactive protein (CRP) level and ESR level were not significantly different between the two groups. Compared with those who did not reach the target of treatment, those who did had a higher rate of current MTX application (48.5% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.05), but the history of MTX did not differ between the two groups (84.2% vs. 84.1%, P>0.05). The maximum dose of MTX (median 15.0 mg/week vs. 13.7 mg/week, P>0.05) and the current dose [(12.9±2.5) mg/week vs. (11.8±2.8) mg/week, P>0.05] was higher in those who achieved the target, while the starting dose [(9.6±2.8) mg/week vs. (9.5±3.1) mg/week, P>0.05] and the rate of prior MTX (84.2% vs. 83.3%, P>0.05) was comparable between the two groups. The D2T RA patients had a higher rate of previous MTX use (96.2% vs. 82.6%, P < 0.05) and a higher starting dose [(11.6±4.3) mg/week vs. (9.8±2.7) mg/week, P>0.05], while the maximum dose (median 12.5 mg/week vs. 15.0 mg/week, P>0.05) and the current dose were both lower [(11.6±3.2) mg/week vs. (12.5±2.6) mg/week, P>0.05] than the non-D2T RA patients. Conclusion: The proportion of regular use of MTX among RA patients was low and the dose was generally small. The RA patients with regular use of MTX had a higher rate of achieving treatment target and lower disease activity. Those who achieved the target had a higher rate of current MTX use, higher maximum and current doses than those who did not. The D2T RA patients had lower maximum and current doses of MTX than the non-D2T RA patients. Therefore, increasing the usage and dosage of MTX in RA patients may help to improve the rate of achieving treatment targets.

Key words: Rheumatoid arthritis, Methotrexate, Dose-response relationship, drug, Treat-to-target

中图分类号: 

  • R593.22

表1

RA患者的临床特征"

Items Data (n=239)
Female 201 (84.1)
Age/years 54.5±14.3
Disease duration/year 11.0±9.2
RF positivity 170 (71.1)
Anti-CCP antibody positivity 210 (87.9)
Swollen joint count 4.6±7.3
Tender joint count 6.2±9.0
Pain visual analog score (0-100) 35.9±28.7
Patient global score (0-100) 45.4±27.8
CRP/(mg/L) 1.6±2.9
ESR/(mm/h) 21.3±17.1
DAS28-ESR 3.9±1.8
History of MTX 201 (84.1)
Current use of MTX 95 (39.7)

表2

目前使用和不使用MTX的RA患者临床特征比较"

Items RA (n=239) Current MTX use (n=95) Not use MTX (n=144) P
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 9.5±3.0 (n=201) 10.0±2.9 8.6±2.8 (n=106) 0.009
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) (n=201) 15.0 (11.2, 18.8) 10.0 (7.5, 12.5) (n=106) <0.010
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 (n=95) 12.4±2.7 0
Swollen joint count 4.6±7.3 3.5±6.3 5.1±7.7 0.088
Tender joint count 6.2±9.0 4.8±8.3 8.6±10.4 0.021
Pain visual analog score (0-100) 35.9±28.7 34.6±30.0 36.6±27.7 0.381
Patient global score 45.4±27.8 43.3±29.3 50.9±25.7 0.078
CRP/(mg/L) 1.6±2.9 1.8±3.4 1.5±1.9 0.263
ESR/(mm/h) 21.3±17.1 21.8±17.5 20.7±17.1 0.648
DAS28-ESR 3.9±1.8 3.6±1.8 4.2±1.8 0.025
Low disease activity or remission 101 (42.2) 50 (52.6) 51 (35.4) 0.068

表3

达到低疾病活动度或缓解的RA患者与未达到的患者使用MTX和合并用药的比较"

Items RA (n=239) Low disease activity/remission (n=101) Moderate/severe disease activity (n=138) P
History of MTX 201 (84.1) 85 (84.2) 116 (84.1) 0.983
Current use of MTX 95 (39.7) 49 (48.5) 46 (33.3) 0.018
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 9.5±3.0 (n=201) 9.6±2.8 (n=85) 9.5±3.1 (n=116) 0.828
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) (n=201) 15.0 (12.5, 15.0) (n=85) 13.7 (10.0, 15.0) (n=116) 0.074
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 (n=95) 12.9±2.5 (n=50) 11.8±2.8 (n=45) 0.071
MTX monotherapy 18 (7.5) 15 (14.8) 3 (2.2) 0.059
Current use of other csDMARDs
  IGU 44 (18.4) 18 (17.8) 26 (18.8) 0.700
  HCQ 92 (38.5) 42 (41.6) 50 (36.2) 0.598
  SASP 21 (8.8) 9 (8.9) 12 (8.7) 0.949
  LEF 38 (15.9) 14 (13.8) 24 (17.4) 0.366
  TG 31 (13.0) 10 (9.9) 21 (15.2) 0.175
Current use of b/tsDMARDs 102 (42.7) 31 (30.7) 71 (51.4) <0.001
  ETN 10 (4.2) 2 (1.9) 8 (5.8) 0.125
  ADA 15 (6.3) 3 (2.9) 12 (8.7) 0.058
  TOC 22 (9.2) 2 (1.9) 20 (14.5) 0.001
  TOF 25 (10.5) 8 (7.9) 17 (12.3) 0.220
  BARI 31 (13.0) 16 (15.8) 15 (10.8) 0.330

表4

MTX单药治疗与联合治疗RA患者的临床特征比较"

Items RA with current use of MTX (n=95) MTX monotherapy (n=18) Combination therapy (n=77) P
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 10.0±2.9 12.1±2.2 9.8±3.0 0.176
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (11.2, 18.8) 15.0 (15.0, 15.0) 12.5 (10.0, 15.0) 0.117
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 14.3±1.9 12.1±2.7 0.036
Swollen joint count 3.5±6.3 1.1±3.3 3.8±6.5 0.170
Tender joint count 4.8±8.3 3.1±8.3 5.0±8.4 0.269
Pain visual analog score (0-100) 34.6±30.0 24.3±33.6 35.1±30.0 0.540
Patient global score 43.3±29.3 27.1±31.9 45.1±28.7 0.069
CRP/(mg/L) 1.8±3.4 0.7±1.3 1.9±3.6 0.502
ESR/(mm/h) 21.8±17.5 17.6±8.9 21.8±16.2 0.996
DAS28-ESR 3.6±1.8 2.7±1.8 3.8±1.8 0.074
Low disease activity or remission 50 (52.6) 15 (81.8) 35 (45.5) 0.033

表5

难治性RA和非难治性RA患者使用MTX的比较"

Items RA (n=239) D2T-RA (n=26) Non-D2T-RA (n=213) P
History of MTX 201 (84.1) 25 (96.2) 176 (82.6) 0.041
Current use of MTX 95 (39.7) 14 (53.8) 81 (38.0) 0.844
MTX starting dose/(mg/week) 9.5±3.0 (n=201) 10.5±4.1 (n=25) 9.4±2.7 (n=176) 0.450
MTX maximum dose/(mg/week) 15.0 (10.0, 15.0) (n=201) 12.5 (7.5, 17.5) (n=25) 15.0 (11.9, 18.1) (n=176) 0.761
MTX current dose/(mg/week) 12.4±2.7 (n=95) 11.6±3.2 (n=14) 12.5±2.6 (n=81) 0.482
1 Smolen JS , Landewé RBM , Bergstra SA , et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2023, 82 (1): 3- 18.
doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223356
2 耿研, 谢希, 王昱, 等. 类风湿关节炎诊疗规范[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2022, 61 (1): 51- 59.
3 Yu C , Li M , Duan X , et al. Chinese registry of rheumatoid arthritis (CREDIT): Ⅰ. Introduction and prevalence of remission in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2018, 36 (5): 836- 840.
4 Sun X , Li R , Cai Y , et al. Clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis in a multicenter real-world study in Asia-Pacific region[J]. Lancet Reg Health West Pac, 2021, 15, 100240.
5 Sokka T , Kautiainen H , Toloza S , et al. QUEST-RA: Quantitative clinical assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen in standard rheumatology care in 15 countries[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2007, 66 (11): 1491- 1496.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.069252
6 田新平, 李梦涛, 曾小峰. 我国类风湿关节炎诊治现状与挑战: 来自中国类风湿关节炎2019年年度报告[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2021, 60 (7): 593- 598.
7 Aletaha D , Neogi T , Silman AJ , et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010, 69 (9): 1580- 1588.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138461
8 Nagy G , Roodenrijs NMT , Welsing PM , et al. EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2021, 80 (1): 31- 35.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217344
9 Kearsley-Fleet L , Davies R , de Cock D , et al. Biologic refractory disease in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77 (10): 1405- 1412.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213378
10 Roodenrijs NMT , van der Goes MC , Welsing PMJ , et al. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: Contributing factors and burden of disease[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2021, 60 (8): 3778- 3788.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa860
11 Valerio V , Kwok M , Loewen H , et al. Systematic review of recommendations on the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2021, 40 (4): 1259- 1271.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05363-2
12 代丽怡, 赵金霞. 甲氨蝶呤单药治疗类风湿关节炎的再认识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2022, 102 (37): 2909- 2913.
13 Wang W , Zhou H , Liu L . Side effects of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review[J]. Eur J Med Chem, 2018, 158, 502- 516.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.027
14 Friedman B , Cronstein B . Methotrexate mechanism in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2019, 86 (3): 301- 307.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.07.004
15 Smolen JS , Aletaha D , McInnes IB . Rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388 (10055): 2023- 2038.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8
16 Brown PM , Pratt AG , Isaacs JD . Mechanism of action of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, and the search for biomarkers[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2016, 12 (12): 731- 742.
doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.175
17 Ling S , Bluett J , Barton A . Prediction of response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 2018, 14 (5): 419- 429.
doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1465409
18 Gehringer CK , Martin GP , Hyrich K , et al. Developing and externally validating multinomial prediction models for methotrexate treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from an international collaboration[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2024, 166, 111239.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111239
19 Saevarsdottir S , Wedren S , Seddighzadeh M , et al. Patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who smoke are less likely to respond to treatment with methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: Observations from the Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Swedish Rheumatology Register cohorts[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2011, 63 (1): 26- 36.
doi: 10.1002/art.27758
20 Sysojev AÖ , Saevarsdottir S , Diaz-Gallo LM , et al. Genome-wide investigation of persistence with methotrexate treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2024, 63 (5): 1221- 1229.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead301
21 Palmowski A , Strehl C , Pfeiffenberger M , et al. Identification of gene expression biomarkers to predict clinical response to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2024, 43 (1): 511- 519.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06814-2
22 Jenko B , Tomsic M , Jekic B , et al. Clinical pharmacogenetic models of treatment response to methotrexate monotherapy in slovenian and serbian rheumatoid arthritis patients: Differences in patient ' s management may preclude generalization of the models[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2018, 9, 20.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00020
23 Ally MM , Hodkinson B , Meyer PW , et al. Circulating anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies, cytokines and genotype as biomarkers of response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16, 130.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0587-1
[1] 贾霈雯, 杨迎, 邹耀威, 欧阳志明, 林建子, 马剑达, 杨葵敏, 戴冽. 类风湿关节炎患者低肌肉量综合征的临床特征及其对躯体功能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1009-1016.
[2] 马豆豆, 卢哲敏, 郭倩, 朱莎, 古今, 丁艳, 石连杰. 小剂量利妥昔单抗成功治疗类风湿关节炎合并重症肌无力1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1110-1114.
[3] 闫蕊, 柯丹, 张妍, 李丽, 苏焕然, 陈伟, 孙明霞, 刘晓敏, 罗靓. 血清趋化因子CXCL-10和涎液化糖链抗原6水平在类风湿关节炎合并肺间质病变患者中的诊断和病情评估价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 956-962.
[4] 赵亮, 史成龙, 马柯, 赵静, 王潇, 邢晓燕, 莫万星, 练益瑞, 高超, 李玉慧. 抗合成酶综合征重叠类风湿关节炎患者的免疫学特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 972-979.
[5] 刘东武, 陈杰, 高明利, 于静. 类风湿关节炎伴发淋巴结Castleman样病理改变1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 928-931.
[6] 黄会娜,赵静,赵祥格,白自然,李霞,王冠. 乳酸对类风湿关节炎患者外周血CD4+T细胞亚群的调控作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 519-525.
[7] 汤晓菲,李永红,丁秋玲,孙卓,张阳,王育梅,田美伊,刘坚. 类风湿关节炎患者下肢深静脉血栓发病率及危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 279-283.
[8] 邹雪,白小娟,张丽卿. 艾拉莫德联合托法替布治疗难治性中重度类风湿关节炎的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[9] 吴琦,蔡月明,何娟,黄文蒂,王庆文. 血脂异常与类风湿关节炎肺间质病变的相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 982-992.
[10] 张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 体重指数与类风湿关节炎临床特征的相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 993-999.
[11] 金银姬,孙琳,赵金霞,刘湘源. 血清IgA型抗鼠科肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B1抗体在类风湿关节炎中的意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 631-635.
[12] 蔡文心,李仕成,刘一鸣,梁如玉,李静,郭建萍,胡凡磊,孙晓麟,李春,刘栩,叶华,邓立宗,李茹,栗占国. 类风湿关节炎临床分层及其特征的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1068-1073.
[13] 程昉,杨邵英,房星星,王璇,赵福涛. CCL28-CCR10通路在类风湿关节炎单核细胞迁移中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1074-1078.
[14] 刘蕊,赵金霞,闫良. 类风湿关节炎合并下肢静脉血栓患者的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1079-1085.
[15] 张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎患者生活质量与疾病活动度的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1086-1093.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!