北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 1012-1018. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.06.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

切口妊娠介入治疗的临床应用及预后分析

鲁景元1,2,顾建平1△,徐文健2,楼文胜1,施万印1,汪涛1,邵泽锋1   

  1. (1. 南京医科大学附属南京医院介入科, 南京 210006;2. 南京医科大学附属南京妇幼保健院介入科, 南京 210004)
  • 出版日期:2016-12-18 发布日期:2016-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 顾建平 E-mail:gujianping@vip.163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(81541061)、江苏省科技发展基金临床医学专项(BL2014013)、南京市卫生科技发展基金重点项目(ZKX10004)、南京市科技发展项目(201402049)资助

Clinical application and prognostic analysis of interventional treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy

LU Jing-yuan1,2, GU Jian-ping1△, XU Wen-jian2, LOU Wen-sheng1, SHI Wan-yin1, WANG Tao1, SHAO Ze-feng1   

  1. (1. Department of Interventional Radiology,Affiliated Nanjing Hospital,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210006,China;2. Department of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Hospital,Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210004,China)
  • Online:2016-12-18 Published:2016-12-18
  • Contact: GU Jian-ping E-mail:gujianping@vip.163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81541061), Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Development Fund Clinical Medicine Special(BL2014013), the Key Project of Nanjing Health Science and Technology Development Fund(ZKX10004), and Nanjing Science and Technology Development Project(201402049)

摘要:

目的:分析子宫动脉栓塞(uterine artery embolization,UAE)治疗切口妊娠(cesarean scar pregnancy, CSP)的临床价值及预后。方法: 选取2011年1月至2014年12月收治于南京医科大学附属南京妇幼保健院的确诊CSP患者492例,其中高危组283例、低危组209例。根据是否行UAE治疗,将高危组分为高危UAE组(UAE+腹腔镜组)167例,高危非UAE组(化疗+腹腔镜组)116例;将低危组分为低危UAE组(UAE+清宫组)113例,低危非UAE组(化疗+清宫组) 96例。分别比较术中出血、住院时间、血人绒毛膜促性腺激素(beta human chorionic gonadotropin,β-HCG)降至正常时间、月经复潮时间及住院费用的差异,并通过多因素回归分析预测CSP再发风险。结果: 高危UAE组在术中出血[(36.5±14.8) mL vs. (76.5±39.7) mL)]、住院时间[(5.9±0.9) d vs.(9.6±1.3) d]、血β-HCG降至正常时间[(17.9±8.7) d vs. (28.7±10.1) d)]以及月经复潮时间[(18.1±1.6) d vs.(24.3±1.8) d]的比较中优于高危非UAE组,而低危UAE组在术中出血[(93.2±43.3) mL vs. (284.8±110.5) mL]、住院时间[(10.2±1.4) d vs.( 30.7±9.6) d]、血βHCG降至正常时间[(50.1±17.6) d vs. (67.5±22.9) d)]以及月经复潮时间[(56.3±6.7) d vs.(65.9±9.3) d)]的比较中优于低危非UAE组,均P<0.05;高危UAE组住院费用[(20 140±1 520)元 vs.(13 510±1 013)元)]高于高危非UAE组,而低危UAE组住院费用[(10 095±962)元 vs. (3 890±457)元)]高于低危非UAE组,P<0.01;多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,治疗方法是CSP再发风险的独立预测因素(OR 2.407, 95%CI 1.176~5.092,P<0.05),采用包含UAE在内的综合治疗方法可降低CSP再发风险。结论: UAE治疗CSP疗效迅速可靠、并发症少、恢复快、再发风险低,在有条件的医院,特别是针对有再次生育要求的CSP患者,应将含UAE治疗手段的综合治疗方案列为首选。

关键词: 妊娠, 异位, 子宫动脉栓塞术, 明胶海绵, 吸收性, 甲氨喋呤

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the clinical value and prognosis of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treated by uterine artery embolization (UAE). Methods: In the study, 492 cases of patients in Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University diagnosed as CSP between January 2011 and December 2014 were chosen, of which 283 were of high-risk group and 209 of low-risk group. According to whether to take UAE, the high-risk group was subdivided into high-risk UAE group(UAE+laparoscopic group), 167 cases, and high-risk non UAE group (chemotherapy+laparoscopic group), 116 cases, while the low-risk group was subdivided into low-risk UAE group (UAE+curettage group), 113 cases, and low-risk non UAE group(chemotherapy+curettage group), 96 cases. The differences of the intraoperative bleeding, length of stay, blood beta human chorionic go-nadotropin (βHCG) dropped to normal time, menstruation recovery time and the hospitalization expenses were compared. And multivariate regression analysis was used to predict the recurrence risk of CSP. Results: The high-risk UAE group was better than the high-risk non UAE group in comparison of intraoperative bleeding [(36.5±14.8) mL vs.(76.5±39.7) mL], length of stay [(5.9±0.9) d vs.(9.6±1.3) d], blood β-HCG dropped to normal time [(17.9±8.7) d vs.(28.7±10.1) d] and menstruation recovery time [(18.1±1.6) d vs.(24.3±1.8) d],while the low-risk UAE group was better than the low-risk non UAE group in comparison of intraoperative bleeding [(93.2±43.3) mL vs.(284.8±110.5) mL], length of stay [(10.2±1.4) d vs. (30.7±9.6) d], blood β-HCG dropped to normal time [(50.1±17.6)d vs.(67.5±22.9)d] and menstruation recovery time[(56.3±6.7)d vs.(65.9±9.3) d], all P<0.05. The highrisk UAE group was higher than the high-risk non UAE group in comparison of hospitalization expenses [(20 140±1 520 )Yuan vs.(13 510±1 013) Yuan], and the low-risk group UAE was also higher than the low-risk non UAE group in comparison of hospitalization expenses [(10 095±962 )Yuan vs.(3 890±457) Yuan], all P<0.01. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the treatment method was independent predictor of CSP recurrence risk (OR 2.407, 95%CI 1.176-5.092, P<0.05), and using the comprehensive treatment including UAE could reduce the risk of recurrent CSP. Conclusion: As the efficacy of interventional therapy for CSP was rapid and reliable, fewer complications, faster recovery and lower recurrence, hospitalization with good conditions, and particularly for those patients with CSP who want to fertility again, the comprehensive treatment including UAE treatment should be the first choice.

Key words: Pregnancy, ectopic, Uterine artery embolization, Gelatin sponge, absorbable, Methotre-xate

中图分类号: 

  • R714.22
[1] 马会超,李军,王永清. 妊娠合并炎症性肠病的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 260-266.
[2] 李洋洋,侯林,马紫君,黄山雅美,刘捷,曾超美,秦炯. 孕期因素与婴儿牛奶蛋白过敏的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 144-149.
[3] 游芳凝,罗靓,刘香君,张学武,李春. 未分化结缔组织病患者的妊娠结局、疾病演变及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1045-1052.
[4] 李宇菲,闫亚妮,靳家扬,李春,裴秋艳. 合并胎儿心脏病变的抗SSA抗体阳性孕妇的临床及实验室特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1053-1057.
[5] 吴洁,张雯,梁舒,秦艺璐,范文强. 妊娠期原发性干燥综合征合并视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病危重症1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1118-1124.
[6] 徐金辉,韩娜,苏涛,林力孜,计岳龙,周双,包鹤龄,刘峥,罗树生,徐相蓉,王海俊. 孕早期单纯甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体阳性与胎儿生长的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 886-892.
[7] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[8] 孙希雅,陈艺璐,曾琳,闫丽盈,乔杰,李蓉,智旭. 不孕女性维生素D水平与抗苗勒氏管激素的相关性及对妊娠结局的预测[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 167-173.
[9] 森本智惠子,王益勤,周蓉,王建六. 子宫内膜非典型增生及子宫内膜癌患者保留生育功能治疗的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 936-942.
[10] 张红霞,杨蕊,杨硕,潘宁宁,王琳琳,李蓉. 经腹胎儿颅内与胸腔内注射氯化钾减胎的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 943-947.
[11] 陈阳阳,周玉博,杨静,花语蒙,原鹏波,刘爱萍,魏瑗. 双胎妊娠孕期体质量对血清高敏C反应蛋白与妊娠期糖尿病关联的影响:一项队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 427-433.
[12] 于博,赵扬玉,张喆,王永清. 妊娠合并感染性心内膜炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 578-580.
[13] 郭洪萍,赵艾,薛勇,马良坤,张玉梅,王培玉. 孕期营养素摄入与妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖控制效果的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 467-472.
[14] 宋沁峰,李宏田,杨静,原鹏波,程志浩,刘建蒙,赵扬玉. 双胎妊娠孕早期甲状腺功能及其与早产的关联性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 473-478.
[15] 孟文颖,黄琬桐,张杰,焦明远,金蕾,靳蕾. 孕早期血清维生素E水平与妊娠期高血压疾病发病风险的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 470-478.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!