北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 78-81. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.01.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

调拌纸板厚度对玻璃离子水门汀抗压强度的影响

周倩妹1,丁瑞宇2,李莉1,白伟3,胡菁颖1,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院综合二科,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,国家卫生健康委员会口腔医学计算机应用工程技术研究中心,国家药品监督管理局口腔生物材料重点实验室,北京 100081
    2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院特诊科,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,国家卫生健康委员会口腔医学计算机应用工程技术研究中心,国家药品监督管理局口腔生物材料重点实验室,北京 100081
    3. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔材料研究室,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,国家卫生健康委员会口腔医学计算机应用工程技术研究中心,国家药品监督管理局口腔生物材料重点实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-10 出版日期:2023-02-18 发布日期:2023-01-31
  • 通讯作者: 胡菁颖 E-mail:hjingying@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学口腔医院青年科研基金(PKUSS20160203)

Influence of paper mixing pads thickness on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement

Qian-mei ZHOU1,Rui-yu DING2,Li LI1,Wei BAI3,Jing-ying HU1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of General Dentistry Ⅱ, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China
    3. Department of Dental Materials, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-10-10 Online:2023-02-18 Published:2023-01-31
  • Contact: Jing-ying HU E-mail:hjingying@sina.com
  • Supported by:
    Youth Research Fund of Peaking University Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSS20160203)

RICH HTML

5   

摘要:

目的: 探讨调拌纸板厚度变化对玻璃离子水门汀抗压强度的影响。方法: 在相同的实验条件下,分别采用60、40、20、1张纸的纸板(P60、P40、P20、P1)对3种不同的玻璃离子水门汀进行调拌,在其凝固后进行抗压强度检测,并用扫描电镜观察不同组别材料断面气泡形成情况。结果: (1) 抗压强度:①ChemFil Superior玻璃离子材料(CF):P1组平均抗压强度最高,与P40、P60组相比差异有统计学意义(P=0.041、0.032);②而至富士IX GP玻璃离子材料(IX):P1组平均抗压强度最高,与P40、P60组相比差异有统计学意义(P=0.042、0.038);③Glaslonomer FX-Ⅱ玻璃离子材料(FX):P1组平均抗压强度最高,与P20、P40、P60组相比差异有统计学意义(P=0.031、0.040、0.041),其余各组间差异无统计学意义,三种材料均显示出随着调拌纸板厚度的下降,玻璃离子抗压强度逐渐升高,纸板厚度与玻璃离子抗压强度成高度线性负相关,CF、IX、FX相关系数分别为-0.927、-0.989、-0.892。(2)扫描电镜下观察:三种材料均显示P1组气泡最少。结论: 采用1张纸的纸板调拌玻璃离子水门汀的气泡最少,并可以获得更高的抗压强度。

关键词: 玻璃离子, 纸板, 抗压强度, 气泡

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the influence of the thickness of mixed cardboard on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement and the associated factors. Methods: Three different types of glass ionomer cements were mixed on the top of 60, 40, 20 and 1 pieces of paper (P60, P40, P20 and P1), respectively. The compressive strength of the materials was tested after solidification, and the bubble rate was calculated with the assistance of scanning electron microscope. Results: (1) Compressive strength: ① ChemFil Superior glass ionomer (CF): The average compressive strength of P1 group was the highest, which was significantly different from that of P40 and P60 groups (P values were 0.041 and 0.032 respectively); ② To Fuji IX GP glass ionomer (IX): The average compressive strength of P1 group was the highest, which was statistically different from that of P40 and P60 groups (P values were 0.042 and 0.038 respectively); ③ Glaslonomer FX-Ⅱ glass ionomer cement (FX): The average compressive strength of P1 group was the highest, which was statistically different from that of P20, P40 and P60 groups (P values were 0.031, 0.040 and 0.041 respectively), but there was no statistical difference among the other groups. All the three materials showed that the compressive strength of glass ions gradually increased with the decrease of the thickness of the blended paperboard, and the two materials had a highly linear negative correlation, the correlation coefficients of which were CF-0.927, IX-0.989, FX-0.892, respectively. (2) Scanning electron microscope: P1 group had the least bubbles among the three materials. Conclusion: It indicates that the thickness of mixed cardboard has a negative correlation with the compressive strength of glass ions. The thicker the mixed cardboard is, the greater the elasticity is. Excessive elasticity will accelerate the mixing speed when the grinding glass ions. Studies have shown that the faster the speed of artificial mixing is, the more bubbles is produced.The thicker ther mixed cardboard is, the more bubblesn are generated by glass ionomer cement, and the higher the compressive strength is. Using one piece of paper board to mix glass ionomer cement has the least bubbles and can obtain higher compressive strength.

Key words: Glass ionomer cement, Mixing board, Compressive strength, Porosity

中图分类号: 

  • R783.1

表1

不同纸板厚度组的抗压强度"

Group Sample size Type of cement/MPa, ˉx±s
CF IX FX Total
P1 5 202.9±24.2 205.0±32.3 206.0±31.2 204.3±22.4
P20 5 192.6±23.1 200.1±26.9 193.5±24.6 189.0±27.5
P40 5 185.1±22.9 197.9±26.3 184.1±18.8 191.4±27.3
P60 5 185.2±22.9 195.4±25.3 186.3±18.7 194.7±23.6

图1

材料CF扫描电镜观察"

图2

材料FX扫描电镜观察"

图3

材料IX扫描电镜观察"

1 Nicholson JW . Adhesive dental materials and their durability[J]. INT J Adhes, 2000, 20 (1): 11- 16.
2 Bayrak S , Tunc ES , Aksoy A , et al. Fluoride release and recharge from different materials used as fissure sealants[J]. Eur J Dent, 2010, 4 (3): 245- 250.
3 Fleming GCP , Farooq AA , Barralet JE . Influence of powder/liquid mixing ratio on the performance of a restorative glass-ionomer dental cement[J]. Biomaterials, 2003, 24 (23): 4173- 4179.
4 Sulaiman T , Abdulmajeed A , Altitinchi A , et al. Effect of resinmodified glass ionomer cement dispensing/mixing methods on mechanical properties[J]. J Oper Dent, 2018, 43 (4): 158- 165.
5 Singer L , Bierbaum G , Kehl K , et al. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and compressive strength of a dental cement modified using plant extract mixture[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2020, 31 (12): 116.
6 International Organization of Standardization. ISO 9917-1: 2007-dental-water-based cements. Part 1: Powder/liquid acid-base cements[S]. Geneva: ISO, 2016.
7 D'Alpino PH , Lopes LG , Pereira JC . Mechanical properties of dental restorative material: Relative contribution of laboratory test[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2003, 11 (3): 162- 167.
8 Dowling AH , Fleming GJP . Are encapsulated anterior glass-ionomer restoratives better than their hand-mixed equivalents[J]. J Dent, 2009, 37 (2): 133- 140.
9 Nomoto R , Komoriyama M , McCabe JF , et al. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement[J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20 (10): 972- 978.
10 Schulze KA , Zaman AA , Söderholm KJM , et al. Effect of filler fraction on strength, viscosity and porosity of experimental compomer materials[J]. J Dent, 2003, 31 (6): 373- 382.
11 Nomoto R , McCabe JF . Effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements[J]. J Dent, 2001, 29 (3): 205- 210.
12 Kaushik M , Sharma R , Reddy P , et al. Comparative evaluation of voids present in conwentional and capsulated glass ionomer cements using two different conditions: An in vitro study[J]. Int J Biomater, 2014, 12 (3): 191- 195.
[1] 胡菁颖,李莉,周倩妹,丁瑞宇,尚冉,白伟. 不同调拌板对玻璃离子水门汀物理性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 964-967.
[2] 陈小贤, 刘星纲. 玻璃离子窝沟封闭剂2年临床防龋效果观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(1): 157-157.
[3] 胡炜, 王晓灵, 王勤, 傅民魁. 正畸粘接用树脂改良型玻璃离子粘固剂的氟离子释放[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2002, 34(2): 144-147.
Viewed
Full text
112
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 5 0 0 107

  From Others local
  Times 13 99
  Rate 12% 88%

Abstract
494
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 494
  From Others local
  Times 473 21
  Rate 96% 4%

Cited

Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!