北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 148-153. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.01.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素

邓敏婷1, 王楠2, 夏斌1, 赵玉鸣1, 朱俊霞1,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院儿童口腔科,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,口腔生物材料和数字诊疗装备国家工程研究中心,北京 100081
    2. 北京大学第三医院口腔科,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-09 出版日期:2025-02-18 发布日期:2025-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 朱俊霞 E-mail:pkusszhujunxia@163.com

Factors associated with spontaneous re-eruption of traumatically intruded permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents

Minting DENG1, Nan WANG2, Bin XIA1, Yuming ZHAO1, Junxia ZHU1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Dentistry, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2024-10-09 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-01-25
  • Contact: Junxia ZHU E-mail:pkusszhujunxia@163.com

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 探究影响儿童及青少年外伤挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的影响因素。方法: 回顾性分析2015年6月至2024年8月就诊于北京大学口腔医院儿童口腔科5~17岁发生恒前牙挫入患者的临床资料,记录外伤年龄、性别、牙根发育程度、挫入程度、挫入方向、是否伴有冠折露髓、是否伴有牙龈撕裂伤、邻牙是否发生移位性损伤、邻牙是否处于破骨后萌出期,以外伤挫入牙在建议观察时间内是否有自行再萌出作为结局变量,采用单因素分析及多因素二元Logistic回归模型进行影响因素分析。结果: 共纳入139例患者170颗患牙,包括男性84例,女性55例;年龄范围为5.3~16.3岁,平均年龄(9.0±2.1)岁。根据判断标准,在建议观察期间出现自行再萌出的患牙有112颗,无自行再萌出的患牙有58颗。挫入程度在3 mm以下患牙45颗(26.47%),3~7 mm患牙102颗(60.00%),>7 mm患牙23颗(13.53%);根向挫入的患牙117颗(68.82%),近远中向挫入的患牙17颗(10.00%),颊舌向挫入的患牙36颗(21.18%)。二元Logistic回归分析显示,近远中向挫入(OR=0.167,95%CI: 0.031~0.9048,P=0.038)、挫入>7 mm(OR=0.065,95%CI: 0.014~0.299,P < 0.001)、邻牙发生移位性损伤(OR=0.369,95%CI: 0.144~0.944,P=0.037)是挫入牙自行再萌出的独立危险因素。挫入 < 3 mm(OR=9.860,95%CI: 2.430~40.009,P=0.001)和邻牙处于破骨后萌出期(OR=4.712,95%CI: 1.528~14.531,P=0.007)是外伤挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的独立保护性因素,Cvek牙根发育分期每增加一个分期单位(OR=0.611,95%CI: 0.408~0.914,P=0.017),挫入牙自行再萌出可能性降低61.1%。年龄(OR=1.077,95%CI: 0.763~1.521,P=0.673)、牙龈撕裂伤(OR=0.865,95%CI: 0.290~2.578,P=0.794)并不会对挫入恒前牙自行再萌出产生影响。结论: 近远中向挫入、挫入程度>7 mm、邻牙发生移位性损伤是儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的独立危险因素,挫入程度 < 3 mm、相邻恒牙处于破骨后萌出期是挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的独立保护性因素。

关键词: 牙撕脱, 恒牙列, 牙萌出, 危险因素, 儿童, 青少年

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the factors related to spontaneous re-eruption after intruded injury in permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents. Methods: Clinical data from 5- to 17-year-old patients who sustained intrusive luxation of permanent anterior teeth and treated in the Department of Pedia-tric Dentistry of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from June 2015 to August 2024 were reviewed. Information of age, gender, degree of intrusion, direction of intrusion, tooth development, concomitant injuries, luxation and post-osteoclastic eruption of the adjacent teeth were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they showed spontaneous re-eruption during advised observation after intrusion. Univariate and multifactor analysis were performed using Logistic regression. Results: Data from 170 teeth in 139 patients whose age ranging from 5.3-16.3 years [mean age (9.0± 2.1) years] were examined. A gender disparity was observed among the patients, with 84 being male and 55 being female. Among the 170 teeth, 112 were categorized as successfully spontaneous re-eruption during advised observation after intrusion, while 58 were not. In terms of the degree of intrusion, 45 teeth (26.47%) had intrusion less than 3 mm, 102 teeth (60.00%) experienced intrusion between 3-7 mm, and 23 teeth (13.53%) were faced with intrusion exceeding 7 mm. As for the direction of intrusion, 117 teeth (68.82%) were straight intrusion while mesial-distal and buccal-lingual intrusion respectively accounting for 17 (10.00%) and 23 (13.53%). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that mesial-distal intrusion (OR=0.167, 95%CI: 0.031-0.9048, P=0.038), intrusion of >7 mm (OR=0.065, 95%CI: 0.014-0.299, P < 0.001) and luxation of adjacent teeth (OR=0.369, 95%CI: 0.144-0.944, P=0.037) were independent risk factors for spontaneous re-eruption of traumatically intruded permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents during advised observation after intrusion, while intrusion of < 3 mm (OR=9.860, 95%CI: 2.430-40.009, P=0.001) and post-osteoclastic eruption of adjacent teeth (OR=4.712, 95%CI: 1.528-14.531, P=0.007) were independent protective factors. The possibility of spontaneous re-eruption in permanent anterior teeth during advised observation after intrusion was decreased by 61.1% with the increase of root development using Cvek' s classification (OR=0.611, 95%CI: 0.408-0.914, P=0.017). Age (OR=1.077, 95%CI: 0.763-1.521, P=0.673) and laceration of gingival (OR=0.865, 95%CI: 0.290-2.578, P=0.794) didn't significantly affect the spontaneous re-eruption during advised observation after intrusion. Conclusion: In this study, mesial-distal intrusion, intrusion of >7 mm and luxation of adjacent teeth were independent risk factors for spontaneous re-eruption of traumatically intruded permanent anterior teeth in children and adolescents during advised observation, while intrusion of < 3 mm and post-osteoclastic eruption of adjacent teeth were served as independent protective factors.

Key words: Tooth avulsion, Permanent dentition, Tooth eruption, Risk factors, Child, Adolescent

中图分类号: 

  • R788.4

图1

外伤挫入恒前牙口内照及X线片表现"

表1

外伤挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的单因素分析"

Variables Spontaneous re-eruption P
Total (n=170) No (n=58) Yes (n=112)
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s 9.20±2.15 9.98±2.48 8.80±1.84 0.002
Degree of intrusion, n(%) < 0.001
   < 3 mm 45 (26.47) 3 (5.17) 42 (37.50)
  3-7 mm 102 (60.00) 37(63.79) 65(58.04)
  >7 mm 23(13.53) 18 (31.03) 5(4.46)
Direction of intrusion, n(%) < 0.001
  Straight 117 (68.82) 24(41.38) 93 (83.04)
  Buccal-lingual 36 (21.18) 20(34.48) 16 (14.29)
  Mesial-distal 17 (10.00) 14 (24.14) 3 (2.68)
Post-osteoclastic eruption of the adjacent teeth, n(%) < 0.001
  No 99(58.24) 49(84.48) 50(44.64)
  Yes 71(41.76) 9(15.52) 62(55.36)
Laceration of gingival, n(%) < 0.001
  No 125 (73.53) 32 (55.17) 93 (83.04)
  Yes 45 (26.47) 26 (44.83) 19 (16.96)
Luxation of adjacent teeth, n(%) < 0.001
  No 75 (44.12) 12 (20.69) 63 (56.25)
  Yes 95 (55.88) 46 (79.31) 49(43.75)
Cvek’s classification, n(%) 0.009
  Stage 1 9 (5.29) 1 (1.72) 8 (7.14)
  Stage 2 27 (15.88) 7 (12.07) 20 (17.86)
  Stage 3 48 (28.24) 12 (20.69) 36 (32.14)
  Stage 4 31 (18.24) 9 (15.52) 22 (19.64)
  Stage 5 55 (32.35) 29 (50.00) 26 (23.21)
Complex crown fracture, n(%) 0.895
  No 156 (91.76) 53 (91.38) 103 (91.96)
  Yes 14 (8.24) 5 (8.62) 9 (8.04)

表2

外伤挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的多因素Logistics回归分析"

Variables β SE Wald χ2 P OR (95%CI)
Age 0.074 0.176 0.178 0.673 1.077 (0.763-1.521)
Degree of intrusion
  3-7 mm 1.00 (Reference)
  >7 mm -2.727 0.776 12.354 < 0.001 0.065 (0.014-0.299)
   < 3 mm 2.288 0.715 10.255 0.001 9.860 (2.430-40.009)
Direction of intrusion
  Straight 1.00 (Reference)
  Buccal-lingual -0.980 0.519 3.566 0.059 0.374 (0.136-1.038)
  Mesial-distal -1.793 0.863 4.313 0.038 0.167 (0.031-0.904)
Cvek’s classification -0.493 0.205 5.748 0.017 0.611 (0.408-0.914)
Laceration of gingival
  No 1.00 (Reference)
  Yes -0.145 0.557 0.068 0.794 0.865 (0.290-2.578)
Luxation of adjacent teeth
  No 1.00 (Reference)
  Yes -0.997 0.479 4.331 0.037 0.369 (0.144-0.944)
Post-osteoclastic eruption of the adjacent teeth
  No 1.00 (Reference)
  Yes 1.550 0.575 7.277 0.007 4.712 (1.528-14.531)
1 Andreasen JO , Bakland LK , Matras RC , et al. Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 1. An epidemiological study of 216 intruded permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2006, 22 (2): 83- 89.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00421.x
2 Costa LA , Ribeiro CC , Cantanhede LM , et al. Treatments for intrusive luxation in permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 46 (2): 214- 229.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.021
3 Andreasen JO , Bakland LK , Andreasen FM . Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 2. A clinical study of the effect of pre-injury and injury factors, such as sex, age, stage of root development, tooth location, and extent of injury including number of intruded teeth on 140 intruded permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2006, 22 (2): 90- 98.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00422.x
4 Singhal R , Negi S , Namdev R , et al. Effect of root immaturity and depth of intrusion on spontaneous re-eruption and healing complications: A retrospective analysis[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2024, 40 (3): 243- 250.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12921
5 Andreasen JO , Bakland LK , Andreasen FM . Traumatic intrusion of permanent teeth. Part 3. A clinical study of the effect of treatment variables such as treatment delay, method of repositioning, type of splint, length of splinting and antibiotics on 140 teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2006, 22 (2): 99- 111.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00423.x
6 Faria G , Silva RA , Fiori-Júnior M , et al. Re-eruption of traumatically intruded mature permanent incisor: case report[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2004, 20 (4): 229- 232.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2004.00237.x
7 Alkhalifa JD , Alazemi AA . Intrusive luxation of permanent teeth: A systematic review of factors important for treatment decision-making[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2014, 30 (3): 169- 175.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12104
8 Humphrey JM , Kenny DJ , Barrett EJ . Clinical outcomes for permanent incisor luxations in a pediatric population. Ⅰ. Intrusions[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2003, 19 (5): 266- 273.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2003.00207.x
9 Bourguignon C , Cohenca N , Lauridsen E , et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2020, 36 (4): 314- 330.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12578
10 Diangelis AJ , Andreasen JO , Ebeleseder KA , et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2012, 28 (1): 2- 12.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01103.x
11 Cvek M . Prognosis of luxated non-vital maxillary incisors treated with calcium hydroxide and filled with gutta-percha. A retrospective clinical study[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1992, 8 (2): 45- 55.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1992.tb00228.x
12 Wigen TI , Agnalt R , Jacobsen I . Intrusive luxation of permanent incisors in Norwegians aged 6-17 years: A retrospective study of treatment and outcome[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2008, 24 (6): 612- 618.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00686.x
13 Wang N , Chen J , Zhao Y . Clinical outcomes of 79 traumatically intruded permanent teeth in Chinese children and adolescents: A retrospective study[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2020, 36 (2): 174- 184.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12521
14 Tsilingaridis G , Malmgren B , Andreasen JO , et al. Intrusive luxation of 60 permanent incisors: A retrospective study of treatment and outcome[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2012, 28 (6): 416- 422.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01088.x
15 Bassetti MA , Mischler DC , Kuttenberger JJ , et al. Spontaneous reeruption after intrusive luxation of the permanent incisors by incomplete root formation. Two case reports (in German)[J]. Swiss Dent J, 2019, 129 (9): 709- 717.
doi: 10.61872/sdj-2019-09-02
16 Ebeleseder KA , Santler G , Glockner K , et al. An analysis of 58 traumatically intruded and surgically extruded permanent teeth[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 2000, 16 (1): 34- 39.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016001034.x
17 Al-Badri S , Kinirons M , Cole B , et al. Factors affecting resorption in traumatically intruded permanent incisors in children[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2002, 18 (2): 73- 76.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.180205.x
18 Xavier TA , Madalena IR , Da Silva RAB , et al. Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for delayed tooth eruption associated with persistent primary tooth[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2021, 79 (8): 600- 605.
doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1918762
19 Campbell KM , Casas MJ , Kenny DJ . Ankylosis of traumatized permanent incisors: Pathogenesis and current approaches to diagnosis and management[J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 2005, 71 (10): 763- 768.
20 Ideno H , Komatsu K , Nakashima K , et al. Tooth transplantation and replantation: Biological insights towards therapeutic improvements[J]. Genesis, 2022, 60 (8/9): e23496.
21 Lauridsen E , Blanche P , Amaloo C , et al. The risk of healing complications in primary teeth with concussion or subluxation injury: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2017, 33 (5): 337- 344.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12342
[1] 魏慧, 张警丰, 姚中强, 赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎合并慢性病贫血患者的临床特征及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 307-312.
[2] 赵杰, 付春, 赵秀娟, 薛海岩, 李纾, 王振洲, 朱凤雪. 胸部创伤患者在重症监护病房内发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 351-358.
[3] 郭芷均, 俎明, 马超, 张贺军, 张静, 丁士刚. 同时性多发早期胃癌漏诊病灶的临床病理特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 410-415.
[4] 李博闻, 张强, 孙益鑫. 儿童及青年漏斗胸患者Nuss术后发生脊柱侧弯的风险预测模型建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 941-946.
[5] 杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[6] 李宗瀚, 黄洋阅, 李宁, 李明磊, 宋宏程, 张潍平, 刘超. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在儿童肾盂成形术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 662-665.
[7] 刘伟, 郭稳, 过哲, 李春艳, 李云龙, 刘思奇, 张亮, 宋慧. 痛风患者放射学阴性骨侵蚀的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 735-739.
[8] 赵兆, 张维宇, 杨文博, 张勇杰, 张晓鹏, 赵慧颖, 周刚, 王强. 低龄、低体重儿童肾移植2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 803-807.
[9] 陆梦溪, 刘秋萍, 周恬静, 刘晓非, 孙烨祥, 沈鹏, 林鸿波, 唐迅, 高培. 基于社区人群队列的甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管病发病和死亡的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 430-435.
[10] 张依航, 蔡珊, 陈子玥, 刘云飞, 党佳佳, 师嫡, 李佳欣, 黄天彧, 宋逸. 基于RE-AIM框架儿童青少年近视与肥胖共病综合干预实施性研究结局指标的构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 436-441.
[11] 唐孟利, 刘扬, 秦冉, 郭欣, 李宏田. 我国10省幼儿园5~6岁儿童近视和近视前期流行特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 442-447.
[12] 杨龙傲, 金旭, 黄文初, 何丽华, 陈娟. 视屏作业人员视疲劳及干眼的流行病学调查[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 554-561.
[13] 刘光旭, 张良, 赵厚宇, 邓思危, 杨君婷, 李宁, 马瑞, 何艳, 许国章, 刘志科, 詹思延. 2015—2021年宁波市6岁以下儿童热性惊厥的流行病学特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 584-591.
[14] 李琳, 廖津津. 应用ROC曲线评估久坐行为对儿童青少年视力不良的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 614-619.
[15] 王紫薇, 李闵, 高慧, 邓芳. 链球菌感染与过敏性紫癜肾炎患儿肾损害的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 284-290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!