Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 840-850. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.05.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative clinical study on seldom segment with multiple segment intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors

Jian-jun SUN1,(),Jun YANG1,Jing-cheng XIE1,Qing CHANG2,Chang-cheng MA1,Mei ZHENG3,Hung-I LIAO4,Tao WANG1,Xiao-dong CHEN1,Yun-feng HAN1,Guo-zhong LIN1,Tao YU1,Jia ZHANG1,Yu SI1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Department of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    4. Department of Internal Medicine, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11237, USA
  • Received:2018-01-27 Online:2019-10-18 Published:2019-10-23
  • Contact: Jian-jun SUN E-mail:15611963113@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81200969/H0912);the Grants from Science Foundation for the Excellent Youth Scholars of Ministry of Education of China(200800011035)

Abstract:

Objective: Several clinical studies were performed on multi-segment intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors. However, no clinical study focused on the relationship between different vertebral segments intramedullary tumors involvement and neurological functions, as well as prognosis of the patients. This prospective study was performed to compare clinical analysis on neurological functions and prognosis of the patients with intramedullary spinal cord primary tumors. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed in a single medical center, Neurosurgical Department, Peking University Third Hospital. Between Jan. 1, 2010 and Dec. 30, 2015, 135 patients underwent microsurgery for intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors. The intramedullary tumor length occupying 3 or more vertebral body levels was considered as multiple segments intramedullary primary spinal cord tumor, and occupying one or two vertebral body levels considered as seldom segments. Preoperative and postoperative functions were assessed using IJOA (improved Japanese orthopaedic association) scoring system, and analyzed using the appropriate statistical tests. Results: Among the 135 patients, 52 cases had seldom segments intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors, and 83 cases had multiple segments. In the seldom group, 32 (62%) patients presented with normal urine and stool function, 8 (15%) patients with severe dysfunction, 7 (14%) with slight dysfunction, and 5 (9%) with incontinence, and 30 (58%) patients demonstrated various degrees of limbs weakness. The preoperative IJOA scores of the patients were 16.9±2.4. The postoperative IJOA scores at the end of 3 months were 16.6±2.3. The current IJOA scores until the end of the follow-up were 17.5±4.4. In the multiple group, 37 (45%) patients presented with normal urine and stool functions, 26 (31%) patients with slight dysfunction, 11 (13%) with severe dysfunction, and 9 (11%) with incontinence, and 62 (75%) patients demonstrated various degrees of limbs weakness. The preoperative IJOA scores of the patients were 15.6±3.4. The postoperative IJOA scores at the end of 3 months were 15.5±3.8. The current IJOA scores until the end of the follow-up were 16.9±5.8. The difference of presenting urine and stool dysfunction (Z=-1.35, P=0.18) was not statistically significant between the different patient groups. However, the difference of presenting limbs weakness (Z=-2.06, P=0.04) was statistically significant between the two groups. Most patients with multiple segment intramedullary tumors suffered from various limbs weakness. The difference of the preoperative IJOA score (P=0.02) and the postoperative early IJOA score (P=0.004) of the patients was statistically significant between the seldom and multiple segments groups. Preoperative and early postoperative neurological function of the patients was better with seldom segments tumor than with multiple segments tumor. Most patients with multi-segment intramedullary tumors experienced various limbs weakness. However, the difference of long-term neurological function (P=0.12) between the seldom and multiple segments groups was not statistically significant. The neurological function of the patients with multiple segments intramedullary tumor was remarkably improved after physical therapy. Conclusion: Perioperative neurological function of the patients with seldom segments primary tumor was superior to that of the patients with multiple segments primary tumor, especially for limb strength. The neurological function of the patients with multiple segments intramedullary primary tumor was remarkably improved after physical therapy during long-term follow-up.

Key words: Intramedullary primary tumor, Seldom segments, Multiple segments, Pathology, Neurological functions, Prognosis

CLC Number: 

  • R739.42

"

Items Different groups All patients t value P value
Seldom Multiple
Age/years 40±15 40±14 40±14 0.31 0.76
Occupied numbers 1.8±0.4 4.2±1.8 3.3±1.8 34.3 <0.001
Hospitalization time/d 16.4±2.5 17.9±6.2 16.5±4.8 -1.22 0.23
Duration of symptoms/months 22±29 47±77 37±64 11.9 0.001
Preoperative IJOA scores 16.9±2.4 15.6±3.5 16.1±3.2 6.13 0.02
Three months postoperative IJOA scores 16.6±2.4 15.5±3.8 15.9±3.4 8.53 0.004
Current IJOA scores 17.5±4.5 16.9±5.9 17.1±5.3 2.38 0.12
Longer meter of tumors/cm 2.8±1.6 8.3±5.07 6.2±4.9 11.1 0.001
Follow-up period/months 42±17 40±21 43±19
Case numbers 52 83 135

"

Items Different groups All patients Z value P value
Seldom Multiple
Gender -0.15 0.88
Male 27 (52%) 42 (51%) 69 (51%)
Female 25 (48%) 41 (49%) 66 (49%)
Presenting symptoms -1.04 0.30
Pain 18 (35%) 35 (42%) 53 (39%)
Numbness 12 (23%) 18 (22%) 30 (22%)
Limbs weakness 10 (19%) 13 (16%) 23 (17%)
Neck or limbs discomfort 7 (13%) 3 (4%) 10 (8%)
Urine and/or stool dysfunction 3 (6%) 4 (5%) 7 (5.2%)
Numbness and weakness 2 (4%) 7 (8%) 9 (6.7%)
Dyspnea 0 1 (1%) 1 (0.7%)
Dizziness 0 1 (1%) 1 (0.7%)
Limbs malformation 0 1 (1%) 1 (0.7%)
Preoperative bowel/bladder -1.35 0.18
Normal 32 (62%) 37 (45%) 69 (51%)
Slight dysfunction 7 (14%) 26 (31%) 33 (25%)
Severe dysfunction 8 (15%) 11 (13%) 19 (14%)
Incontinent 5 (9%) 9 (11%) 14 (10%)
Preoperative motor weakness -2.06 0.04
Normal 22 (42%) 21 (25%) 43 (32%)
Weakness 30 (58%) 62 (75%) 92 (68%)
Location -1.57 0.12
Cervical 15 (29%) 30 (36%) 45 (33%)
Thoracic 17 (33%) 19 (23%) 36 (27%)
Cervicothoracic 2 (4%) 11 (13%) 13 (10%)
Thoracolumbar 6 (11%) 12 (15%) 18 (13%)
Lumbar 11 (21%) 9 (11%) 20 (15%)
Medulla-cervical 1 (2%) 2 (2%) 3 (2%)
Removal extent -1.72 0.09
Class Ⅰ 39 (75%) 52 (63%) 91 (67.4%)
Class Ⅱ 8 (15%) 14 (17%) 22 (16.3%)
Class Ⅲ 5 (10%) 11 (13%) 16 (11.9%)
Class Ⅳ 0 6 (7%) 6 (4.4%)
Histological pathology -3.12 <0.01
Vascular tumors 16 (31%) 0 16 (12%)
Ependymoma 14 (27%) 40 (48%) 54 (40%)
Teratoma 6 (11%) 15 (18%) 21 (16%)
Lipoma 0 7 (8%) 7 (5%)
Diffuse astrocytoma 5 (9%) 7 (8%) 12 (9%)
High-grade gliomas 4 (8%) 5 (6%) 9 (7%)
Cyst 4 (8%) 4 (5%) 8 (6%)
Low-grade gliomas 3 (6%) 3 (4%) 6 (4%)
Schwannoma 0 2 (3%) 2 (1%)

"

Items Different groups F value P value
Survival Dead
Age/years 40.8±13.6 38.0±23.7 8.7 0.004
Hospitalization/d 15.9±3.1 23.6±14.1 35.0 <0.001
Preoperative IJOA scores 16.5±2.8 13.3±4.3 -3.1 0.003
Three months postoperative IJOA scores 16.5±3.0 12.9±5.1 9.0 0.003
Current IJOA scores 18.3±2.7 0 6.1 0.020
Case number 110 8

"

Items Different groups All patients Z value P value
Survived Dead
Recurrence of tumors -5.37 <0.001
Yes 7 (6%) 6 (75%) 13 (11%)
No 103 (94%) 2 (25%) 105 (89%)
Removal extent -5.16 <0.001
Class Ⅰ 82 (75%) 1 (12.5%) 83 (70%)
Class Ⅱ 17 (15%) 1 (12.5%) 18 (15%)
Class Ⅲ 11 (10%) 4 (50%) 15 (13%)
Class Ⅳ 0 2 (25%) 2 (2%)
Histological pathology -4.63 <0.001
Ependymoma 50 (45%) 0 50 (42%)
Teratoma 20 (18%) 0 20 (17%)
Vascular tumor 13 (12%) 1 (12.5%) 14 (13%)
Diffuse astrocytoma 8 (7%) 2 (25%) 9 (8%)
High-grade gliomas 2 (2%) 4 (50%) 6 (5%)
Low-grade glioma 4 (4%) 1 (12.5%) 5 (4%)
Lipoma 6 (5.5%) 0 6 (5%)
Neuronoma 2 (2%) 0 2 (2%)
Cyst 5 (4.5%) 0 5 (4%)

"

Items Different groups t value P value
Recurrence or regrowth Locally controlled
Age/years 33.1±19.8 45.3±12.6 -2.68 0.009
Duration of symptoms /months 6.3±6.5 39.0±65.9 5.8 0.020
Hospitalization/ d 21.4±11.4 15.8±3.1 19.3 <0.001
Current IJOA scores 7.0±7.8 18.4±3.3 33.4 <0.001
Three months postoperative IJOA scores 12.7±4.9 16.7±2.8 19.4 <0.001
Case number 105 13

"

Items Different groups All patients Z value P value
Recurrence or regrowth Local control
Removal extent -5.64 <0.001
Class Ⅰ 1 (7%) 82 (78%) 83 (70%)
Class Ⅱ 4 (31%) 14 (13%) 18 (15%)
Class Ⅲ 6 (47%) 9 (9%) 15 (13%)
Class Ⅳ 2 (15%) 0 2 (2%)
Histological pathology -2.35 0.02
Ependymoma 2 (15%) 48 (45%) 50 (42%)
Teranoma 2 (15%) 18 (17%) 20 (17%)
Diffuse astrocytoma 3 (24%) 6 (6%) 9 (8%)
High-grade glioma 5 (39%) 2 (2%) 7 (6%)
Low-grade glioma 1 (7%) 4 (4%) 5 (4%)
Lipoma 0 6 (6%) 6 (5%)
Vascular tumors 0 14 (13%) 14 (12%)
Neuronoma 0 2 (2%) 2 (2%)
Cyst 0 5 (5%) 5 (4%)
[1] Tobin MK, Geraghty JR, Engelhard HH , et al. Intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a review of current and future treatment strategies[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2015,39(2):E14.
[2] Acerbi F, Cavallo C, Schebesch KM , et al. Fluorescein-guided resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: results from a preliminary, multicentric, retrospective study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017,108(10):603-609.
[3] Montano N, Papacci F, Trevisi G , et al. Factors affecting functional outcome in patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors: results from a literature analysis[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2017,117(1):277-282.
[4] Sun JJ, Wang ZY, Li ZD , et al. Microsurgical treatment and functional outcomes of multi-segment intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2009,16(5):666-671.
[5] Samuel N, Tetreault L, Santaguida C , et al. Clinical and pathological outcomes after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a single-institution case series[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2016,41(2):E8.
[6] Sun JJ, Sun ZY, Li ZD , et al. Clinical analysis of the adolescent patients with multi-segments intramedullary spinal cord tumors[J]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2012,44(4):599-601.
[7] Wang ZY, Sun JJ, Xie JC , et al. Comparative analysis on the diagnosis and treatments of multi-segment intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors between the different age groups[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2012,35(1):85-93.
[8] Ebner FH, Roser F, Falk M , et al. Management of intramedullary spinal cord lesions: interdependence of the longitudinal extension of the lesion and the functional outcome[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010,19(4):665-669.
[9] Ardeshiri A . Intramedullary spinal cord astrocytomas: the influence of localization and tumor extension on resectability and functional outcome[J]. Acta Neurochir, 2013,155(7):1203-1207.
[10] Sharma NC, Chandra T, Sharma A , et al. Long-segment intramedullary spinal dermoid[J]. India J Radiol Imaging, 2009,19(2):148-150.
[11] Bansal S, Ailawadhi P, Suri A , et al. Ten years’ experience in the management of spinal intramedullary tumors in a single institution[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2013,20(2):292-298.
[12] Raco A, Esposito V, Lenzi J , et al. Long-term follow-up of intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors: a series of 202 cases[J]. Neurosurgery, 2005,56(5):972-981.
[13] Kutluk T, Varan A, Kafali C , et al. Pediatric intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors: a single center experience[J]. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2015,19(1):41-47.
[14] Chang UK, Choe WJ, Chung SK , et al. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of spinal intramedullary ependymomas in adults[J]. J Neurooncol, 2002,57(2):133-139.
[15] Gavin QD, Farooqi N, Pigott TJ , et al. Outcome predictors in the management of spinal cord ependymoma[J]. Eur Spine J, 2007,16(3), 399-404.
[16] Moquin RR . Cystic intramedullary neoplasms of the spinal cord[J]. Semin Spine Surg, 2006,18(3):168-174.
[17] Xiao R . Molecular and clinical prognostic factors for favorable outcome following surgical resection of adult intramedullary spinal cord astrocytomas[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2016,144(10):82-87.
[18] Sun JJ, Teo M, Wang ZY , et al. Characteristic and surgical results of multisegment intramedullary cervical spinal cord tumors[J]. Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery, 2017,7:29-43.
[19] Lee SM, Cho YE, Kwon YM . Neurological outcome after surgical treatment of intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors[J]. Korean J Spine, 2014,11(3):121-126.
[20] Fakhreddine MH, Mahajan A, Penas-Prado M , et al. Treatment, prognostic factors, and outcomes in spinal cord astrocytomas[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2013,15(4):406-412.
[21] Kim MS, Chung CK, Choe GY , et al. Intramedullary spinal cord astrocytoma in adults: postoperative outcome[J]. J Neuro Oncol, 2001,52(1):85-94.
[22] Huddart R, Traish D, Ashley S , et al. Management of spinal astrocytoma with conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Br J Neurosurg, 1993,7(5):473-481.
[23] Yang S, Yang X, Hong G . Surgical treatment of one hundred seventy-four intramedullary primary spinal cord tumors[J]. Spine, 2009,34(24), 2705-2710.
[24] Abdullah KG, Lubelski D, Miller J , et al. Progression free survival and functional outcome after surgical resection of intramedullary ependymomas[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2015,22(12):1933-1937.
[25] Behmanesh B, Setzer M, Konczalla J , et al. Management of patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord glioblastoma[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017,98(10):198-202.
[26] Jallo GI, Danish S, Velasquez L , et al. Intramedullary low-gradeastrocytomas: long-term outcome following radical surgery[J]. J Neurooncol, 2001,53(1):61-66.
[27] Abd-El-Barr MM, Huang KT, Chi JH . Infiltrating spinal cord astrocytomas: Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatments and future directions[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2016,29(7):15-20.
[28] Venes J . Spinal cord astrocytoma: results of therapy[J]. Neurosurgery, 1992,30(4):490-493.
[29] Schebesch KM, Mueller S, Wendl C , et al. Recurrence rates and functional outcome after resection of intrinsic intramedullary tumors[J]. Clin Neurol and Neurosurg, 2015,134(4):60-66.
[30] Klekamp J . Treatment of intramedullary tumors: analysis of surgical morbidity and long-term results[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013,19(1):12-26.
[31] Sandler HM, Papadopoulos SM, Thornton AF , et al. Spinal cord astrocytomas: results of therapy[J]. Neurosurgery, 1992,30(4):490-493.
[1] XUE Jiang,ZHANG Jian-yun,SHI Rui-rui,XIE Xiao-yan,BAI Jia-ying,LI Tie-jun. Clinicopathological analysis of 105 patients with fibrous dysplasia of cranio-maxillofacial region [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 54-61.
[2] Fei WANG,Xiang ZHU,Bei HE,Hong ZHU,Ning SHEN. Spontaneous remission of follicular bronchiolitis with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: A case report and literature review [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1196-1200.
[3] Mei-ge LIU,Pu FANG,Yan WANG,Lu CONG,Yang-yi FAN,Yuan YUAN,Yan XU,Jun ZHANG,Dao-jun HONG. Clinical, pathological and genetic characteristics of 8 patients with distal hereditary motor neuropathy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 957-963.
[4] Wei-bo GAO,Mao-jing SHI,Hai-yan ZHANG,Chun-bo WU,Ji-hong ZHU. Relationship between marked hyperferritinemia and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 921-927.
[5] Mei-xiang ZHANG,Wen-zhi SHI,Jian-xin LIU,Chun-jian WANG,Yan LI,Wei WANG,Bin JIANG. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of MLL-AF6 positive patients with acute myeloid leukemia [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 915-920.
[6] Yan-fang JIANG,Jian WANG,Yong-jian WANG,Jia LIU,Yin PEI,Xiao-peng LIU,Ying-fang AO,Yong MA. Mid-to-long term clinical outcomes and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament revision [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 857-863.
[7] XIAO Ruo-tao,LIU Cheng,XU Chu-xiao,HE Wei,MA Lu-lin. Prognostic value of preoperative platelet parameters in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 647-652.
[8] YU Yan-fei,HE Shi-ming,WU Yu-cai,XIONG Sheng-wei,SHEN Qi,LI Yan-yan,YANG Feng,HE Qun,LI Xue-song. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of fumarate hydratase deficient renal cell carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 640-646.
[9] ZHAO Xun,YAN Ye,HUANG Xiao-juan,DONG Jing-han,LIU Zhuo,ZHANG Hong-xian,LIU Cheng,MA Lu-lin. Influence of deep invasive tumor thrombus on the surgical treatment and prognosis of patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma complicated with venous tumor thrombus [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 665-670.
[10] CHEN Huai-an,LIU Shuo,LI Xiu-jun,WANG Zhe,ZHANG Chao,LI Feng-qi,MIAO Wen-long. Clinical value of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting prognosis of patients with ureteral urothelial carcinoma [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 302-307.
[11] Shi-bo LIU,Hui GAO,Yuan-chun FENG,Jing LI,Tong ZHANG,Li WAN,Yan-ying LIU,Sheng-guang LI,Cheng-hua LUO,Xue-wu ZHANG. Clinical features of hydronephrosis induced by retroperitoneal fibrosis: 17 cases reports [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(6): 1069-1074.
[12] Wei-qian CHEN,Xiao-na DAI,Ye YU,Qin WANG,Jun-yu LIANG,Yi-ni KE,Cai-hong YI,Jin LIN. Analysis of clinical features and prognosis in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome and autoimmune liver disease [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 886-891.
[13] Yi LIU,Zhi-jian LIU,Qi SHEN,Jing-yun WU,Yu FAN,De-run LI,Wei YU,Zhi-song HE. A clinical analysis of 14 cases of prostatic stromal tumor of uncertain malignant potential [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 621-624.
[14] Yi-chang HAO,Ye YAN,Fan ZHANG,Min QIU,Lang ZHOU,Ke LIU,Jian LU,Chun-lei XIAO,Yi HUANG,Cheng LIU,Lu-lin MA. Surgical strategy selection and experience summary of prostate cancer with positive single needle biopsy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 625-631.
[15] Ru MA,Xin-bao LI,Feng-cai YAN,Yu-lin LIN,Yan LI. Clinical evaluation of tumor-stroma ratio in pseudomyxoma peritonei from the appendix [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 240-246.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 505 -515 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 599 -601 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(5): 516 -520 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 304 -309 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 310 -314 .