Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (2): 340-346. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.02.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of two methods of smear layer removal on the surface properties of dentin

Lingli ZHU1, Lin TANG1, Bowen LI2, Mei WANG1, Yuhua LIU1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Stomatology, Beijing Hospital; National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2021-11-08 Online:2025-04-18 Published:2025-04-12
  • Contact: Yuhua LIU E-mail:liuyuhua@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81801027)

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the effects of two methods of smear layer removal on the surface properties of dentin. Methods: Sixty extracted sound third molars were collected in this study, and were prepared as uniform dentin specimens with smear layer. All specimens were randomly divided into three groups: Control group, ultrasonic treatment (UT) group and etched treatment (ET) group. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to observe the surface micromorphology of all three groups. Then, the surface elements, mineral phases and functional groups were analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and flourier transformed infrared spectrometer (FTIR) respectively. The mechanical properties, hydrophilicity and biocompatibility were also further evaluated. Results: It was revealed that dentin tubules of UT and ET groups were exposed, but lots of dentin debris piled up on the surface of the control one which covered up dentin tubules on the surface. The EDX results should that the weaker peak value of calcium and phosphorus in ET group than control and UT groups. Characteristic peaks of hydroxyapatite could be seen by XRD in all of the three groups, but lower distinctive peaks of amide Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ bands of collagen of the dentin surface in control group than in ET and UT groups. The microhardness results showed that ET group was lower than control and UT groups, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Better hydrophilicity of ET group was investigated (P < 0.05) than control group and UT group. Cells could be observed to adhere normally to dentin surface of each group which meant that all of the three groups had good biocompatibility. Conclusion: Both UT and ET could effectively remove the smear layer on the surface of dentin and had no adverse effect of the dentin micromorphology and biocompatibility. The ultrasonic removal of the smear layer did not influence the mineral structure, hydrophilicity and mechanical properties of dentin surface. Although ET can effectively improve the hydrophilicity of dentin but decreased mechanical properties and the content of calcium and phosphorus.

Key words: Smear layer, Dentin, Ultrasonics, Etching

CLC Number: 

  • R783.3

Figure 1

General view of three groups UT, ultrasonic treatment; ET, etched treatment."

Figure 2

Scanning electron microscopy observations of three groups A, D, control group; B, E, ultrasonic treatment group; C, F, etched treatment group. Yellow arrow, peritubular dentin; Yellow asterisk, intertubular dentin."

Figure 3

Surface energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy spectra of the three groups CPS, counts per second; UT, ultrasonic treatment; ET, etched treatment."

Figure 4

X-ray diffraction spectra of three groups UT, ultrasonic treatment; ET, etched treatment; HAP, hydroxyapatite."

Figure 5

Flourier transformed infrared spectroscopy spectra of three groups UT, ultrasonic treatment; ET, etched treatment."

Figure 6

Typical images of contact angle of three groups UT, ultrasonic treatment; ET, etched treatment."

Table 1

Surface contact angles and surface microhardness of the three groups"

Groups Contact angle/(°) Microhardness/(N/m2)
Control 87.73±5.57 712.40±63.37
UT 78.83±2.94 721.82±33.94
ET 70.30±4.12* 327.26±34.24*#

Figure 7

Biocompatibility of three groups F-actin, filamentous actin; DAPI, 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylicgole; UT, ultrasonic treatment; ET, etched treatment. Red, cytoskeleton; Blue, nucleus. Magnification × 40."

1 Gu XH , Mao CY , Kern M . Effect of different irrigation on smear layer removal after post space preparation[J]. J Endodont, 2009, 35 (4): 583- 586.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.006
2 刘清, 杨玉琼, 聂蓉蓉, 等. 牙本质玷污层特性对自粘接树脂水门汀粘接强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2018, 36 (6): 619- 622.
3 Tribst JPM , Dos-Santos AFC , da Cruz-Santos G , et al. Effect of cement layer thickness on the immediate and long-term bond strength and residual stress between lithium disilicate glass-ceramic and human dentin[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14 (18): 5153.
doi: 10.3390/ma14185153
4 李秋菊, 宫玮玉, 董艳梅. 生物活性玻璃预处理对牙本质粘接界面耐久性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52 (5): 931- 937.
doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.023
5 张健, 葛久禹. 微波对化学法根管预备中的玷污层的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2008, 24 (2): 173- 176.
6 Ghasemi N , Torabi ZS . The effect of photodynamic therapy on the smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study[J]. J Dent (Shiraz), 2021, 22 (3): 162- 168.
7 Akter RS , Ahmed Z , Yamauti M , et al. Effects of remaining dentin thickness, smear layer and aging on the bond strengths of selfetch adhesives to dentin[J]. Dent Mater J, 2021, 40 (2): 538- 546.
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-436
8 李秋容, 韦小浪, 谢方方. 改性PAMAM促进脱矿牙本质再矿化的体外研究[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2014, 24 (3): 151- 154.
9 Saikaew P , Matsumoto M , Sattabanasuk V , et al. Ultra-morphological characteristics of dentin surfaces after different preparations and treatments[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2020, 128 (3): 246- 254.
doi: 10.1111/eos.12698
10 Dai LL , Mei ML , Chu CH , et al. Remineralizing effect of a new strontium-doped bioactive glass and fluoride on demineralized enamel and dentine[J]. J Dent, 2021, 108, 103633.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103633
11 Feitosa VP , Ogliari FA , van Meerbeek B , et al. Can the hydrophilicity of functional monomers affect chemical interaction?[J]. J Dent Res, 2014, 93 (2): 201- 206.
doi: 10.1177/0022034513514587
12 Karade P , Sharma D , Hoshing UA , et al. Efficiency of different endodontic irrigation and activation systems, self-adjusting file instrumentation/irrigation system, and XP-Endo finisher in removal of the intracanal smear layer: An ex vivo scanning electron microscope study[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2021, 13 (Suppl 1): 402- 407.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_775_20
13 Gungormus M , Tulumbaci F . Peptide-assisted pre-bonding remineralization of dentin to improve bonding[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2021, 113, 104119.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104119
14 Dai LL , Mei ML , Chu CH , et al. Effect of strontium-doped bioactive glass on preventing formation of demineralized lesion[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14 (16): 4645.
doi: 10.3390/ma14164645
15 Jang JH , Lee MG , Ferracane JL , et al. Effect of bioactive glass-containing resin composite on dentin remineralization[J]. J Dent, 2018, 75, 58- 64.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.017
16 Anastasiadis K , Verdelis K , Eliades G . The effect of universal adhesives on dentine collagen[J]. Dent Mater, 2021, 37 (8): 1316- 1324.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.05.004
17 Zhou Z , Ge X , Bian M , et al. Remineralization of dentin slices using casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate combined with sodium tripolyphosphate[J]. Biomed Eng Online, 2020, 19 (1): 18.
doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-0756-9
18 Sereda G , van Laecken A , Turner JA . Monitoring demineralization and remineralization of human dentin by characterization of its structure with resonance-enhanced AFM-IR chemical mapping, nanoindentation, and SEM[J]. Dent Mater, 2019, 35 (4): 617- 626.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.007
19 Ayad MF , Johnston WM , Rosenstiel SF . Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2009, 102 (2): 81- 88.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60114-1
20 Jing X , Xie B , Li X , et al. Peptide decorated demineralized dentin matrix with enhanced bioactivity, osteogenic differentiation via carboxymethyl chitosan[J]. Dent Mater, 2021, 37 (1): 19- 29.
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.019
[1] Ruo-qing ZHONG,Meng-qian ZHU,Ying-long LI,Jie PAN. Antibacterial effect of low-temperature plasma on Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules in vitro [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 38-43.
[2] Ruo-lan GUO,Gui-bin HUANG,Yun-zi LONG,Yan-mei DONG. Effects of novel bioactive glasses on promoting remineralization of artificial dentin caries [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 82-87.
[3] Wei YONG,Kun QIAN,Wen-hao ZHU,Xiao-yi ZHAO,Chang LIU,Jie PAN. X-ray evaluation of pulp calcification in adult permanent teeth after pulpotomy [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(1): 88-93.
[4] MA Xin-rong,ZHU Xiao-ming,LI Jing,LI De-li,LI He-ping,TAN Jian-guo. Effect of a novel radio-frequency atmospheric-pressure glow discharge plasma jet treatment on crosslinking of dentin collagen [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 83-88.
[5] LUO Chi-yi,PENG Chu-fang,YANG Yuan,QIN Man,WANG Yuan-yuan. Effects of three self-etch adhesives and mild salivary contamination on the bonding durability of deciduous teeth [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 46-53.
[6] Qiu-ju LI,Wei-yu GONG,Yan-mei DONG. Effect of bioactive glass pretreatment on the durability of dentin bonding interface [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 931-937.
[7] Yi-xiang PAN,Xiu-hua LI,Fu-cong TIAN,Xiao-yan WANG. Effect of intrapulpal pressure on the bonding strength of resin cement to dentin [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 321-326.
[8] Xiao-ming ZHU,Xuan QI,De-li LI,Yu-wei ZHANG,He-ping LI,Jian-guo TAN. Effect of a novel cold atmospheric plasma jet treatment with different temperatures on resin-dentin bonding [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(1): 43-48.
[9] LI Fang, LIU Yang, LIU Hao-chen, FENG Hai-lan . Genetic variants analysis and histological observation of teeth in a patient with hereditary opalescent dentin [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(4): 666-671.
[10] LI Shuang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of smear layer on apical sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Plus through the sucrose penetration mode [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(3): 560-563.
[11] ZANG Hai-ling, WANG Yue, LIANG Yu-hong. Cleaning efficacy of different solvents on sealer-contaminated dentin surface [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 63-68.
[12] JIAO Yang, WANG Ji-de, DENG Jiu-peng. Effect of different surface treatments on the crystal structure and properties of zirconia [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(1): 49-52.
[13] TANG Lin, ZHANG Yi, LI Hao, LIU Yu-hua, ZHOU Yong-sheng, LI Bo-wen, WU Wei-yi, WANG Si-wen. Influence of EDC ethanol solution on dentin shear bond strength with a self-etch adhesive system [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(6): 1055-1059.
[14] LI Hao, LIU Yu-hua, LUO Zhi-qiang. Effects of bioactive glass on reducing the hypersensitivity after full crown preparation [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(4): 709-713.
[15] XIN Yi, WANG Sai-nan, CUI Cai-yun, DONG Yan-mei. Effects of bioactive glass and extracted dentin proteins on human dental pulp cells [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2017, 49(2): 331-336.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!