Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3): 513-519. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2026.03.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A population-based survey of myopia on primary school students in an administrative district, 2019 to 2024

Mingjia YANG1,2, Jiangxue WU3,*(), Jing WANG3, Yang LIU1,2, Zhongmin LI3, Jingjing LI3, Hongtian LI1,2,4, Yubo ZHOU1,2,4, Jianmeng LIU1,2,4,*()   

  1. 1. Institute of Reproductive and Child Health, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Department of Ophthalmology, Fuyang Women and Children's Hospital, Fuyang 236001, Anhui, China
    4. State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2026-02-25 Online:2026-06-18 Published:2026-04-10
  • Contact: Jiangxue WU, Jianmeng LIU
  • Supported by:
    the Peking University Medicine & Fuyang Women and Children's Hospital Joint Laboratory Program on Clinical Translational Research

RICH HTML

  

Abstract:

Objective: To describe the myopia prevalence and spherical equivalent among primary school students in a district of Anhui Province in 2019, to analyze their changes in 2020 and 2024, to obtain baseline data, and to explore the potential impact of changes in screen time on vision, providing scientific evidence for myopia prevention and control strategies. Methods: This cross-sectional study included all the primary school students who underwent vision screening in 2019 (baseline period), 2020 (period of increased screen time), and 2024 (period of slightly resumed screen time). Data on grade, gender, uncorrected distance visual acuity, and refraction were extracted from the screening database. Noncycloplegic refraction was assessed using an FKR-710 autorefractor to measure sphere and cylinder, and uncorrected distance visual acuity was assessed using an K238-AZ LCD visual acuity chart. The spherical equivalent was calculated as sphere + 0.5 × cylinder. Myopia was defined as uncorrected distance visual acuity < 5.0 in either eye with a corresponding spherical equivalent ≤ -0.50 D. Myopia prevalence and spherical equivalent were described using percentage and mean with 95%confidence interval (CI). The Chi-square test and One-way analysis of variance were used to compare myopia prevalence and spherical equivalent across different years, followed by stratified analysis by grade. Results: A total of 183 204 students were screened: 45 294 in 2019, 52 922 in 2020, and 84 988 in 2024. In 2019, the myopia prevalence was 30.8%(95%CI: 30.4%, 31.2%), higher in girls (33.7%) than in boys (28.4%) and increased with grade (P < 0.001), rising from 11.0%in Grade 1 to 35.7%in Grades 2-6. Compared with 2019, the myopia prevalence in 2020 increased by 4.3 (3.7, 4.9) percentage points to 35.1%(P < 0.001). By 2024, it further increased by 6.7 (6.2, 7.2) percentage points from the 2020 level to 41.8%(P < 0.001). In grade-stratified analyses, compared with 2019, Grade 1 students showed the largest increase in 2020; compared with 2020, Grade 1 students showed the smallest subsequent increase in 2024. Quantitative analysis of spherical equivalent showed that the mean spherical equivalent in 2020 was -0.72 D, representing a myopia shift of -0.21 D (-0.23 D, -0.19 D) compared with the 2019 level (P < 0.001); by 2024, the mean spherical equivalent was -0.68 D, indicating a hyperopic shift of 0.04 D (0.02 D, 0.06 D) compared with the 2020 level (P < 0.001). Further grade-stratified analyses indicated that the mean spherical equivalent for Grade 1 students in 2024 (0.08 D) had nearly returned to the 2019 level (0.09 D). Conclusion: The myopia prevalence among primary school students in the study area was 30.8%in 2019, higher than the global level and approximately twice that of the United States and four times that of Germany, indicating that myopia prevention and control among primary school students remains challenging. The myopia prevalence in 2020 and 2024 was higher than in 2019, suggesting that lifestyle changes, such as increased screen time, affect the short-term visual status. Younger students experienced the greatest increase in myopia prevalence in 2020 and the mildest subsequent increased in 2024, and their spherical equivalent in 2024 had almost recovered to the 2019 level, but not for older students. These findings indicate greater ocular plasticity in younger students, i.e. more sensitive to negative exposures and easier to recover after removing such exposures, warranting further investigation on the underlying mechanisms. Additionally, patterns of higher myopia prevalence in girls than in boys and a gradual increase with grade support previous studies, also enhancing the reliability of the relevant results in our study.

Key words: Vision screening, Myopia, Spherical equivalent, School, Students

CLC Number: 

  • R778.11

Table 1

Myopia prevalence among primary school students by grade and gender, 2019-2024"

Items 2019 2020 2024
n nmyopia Prevalence/% n nmyopia Prevalence/% Prevalence changea/% n nmyopia Prevalence/% Prevalence changeb/%
Grade 1
  Boy 5 081 556 10.9 (10.1, 11.8) 5 625 1 006 17.9 (16.9, 18.9) 7 027 1 442 20.5 (19.6, 21.5)
  Girl 3 929 435 11.1 (10.1, 12.1) 4 694 897 19.1 (18.0, 20.2) 6 444 1 133 17.6 (16.7, 18.5)
  Subtotal 9 010 991 11.0 (10.4, 11.6) 10 319 1 903 18.4 (17.7, 19.2) 7.4 (6.4, 8.4) 13 471 2 575 19.1 (18.5, 19.8) 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Grade 2
  Boy 4 743 733 15.5 (14.4, 16.5) 5 429 1 163 21.4 (20.3, 22.5) 7 810 2 049 26.2 (25.3, 27.2)
  Girl 4 027 676 16.8 (15.6, 17.9) 4 394 1 007 22.9 (21.7, 24.2) 7 106 1 892 26.6 (25.6, 27.7)
  Subtotal 8 770 1 409 16.1 (15.3, 16.8) 9 823 2 170 22.1 (21.3, 22.9) 6.0 (4.9, 7.2) 14 916 3 941 26.4 (25.7, 27.1) 4.3 (3.2, 5.4)
Grade 3
  Boy 4 281 1 127 26.3 (25.0, 27.6) 5 238 1 526 29.1 (27.9, 30.4) 7 701 2 830 36.7 (35.7, 37.8)
  Girl 3 668 1 087 29.6 (28.2, 31.1) 4 443 1 497 33.7 (32.3, 35.1) 6 953 2 783 40.0 (38.9, 41.2)
  Subtotal 7 949 2 214 27.9 (26.9, 28.8) 9 681 3 023 31.2 (30.3, 32.1) 3.4 (2.0, 4.7) 14 654 5 613 38.3 (37.5, 39.1) 7.1 (5.9, 8.3)
Grade 4
  Boy 3 911 1 413 36.1 (34.6, 37.6) 4 680 1 743 37.2 (35.9, 38.6) 7 896 3 445 43.6 (42.5, 44.7)
  Girl 3 242 1 369 42.2 (40.5, 43.9) 4 009 1 833 45.7 (44.2, 47.3) 6 660 3 389 50.9 (49.7, 52.1)
  Subtotal 7 153 2 782 38.9 (37.8, 40.0) 8 689 3 576 41.2 (40.1, 42.2) 2.3 (0.7, 3.8) 14 556 6 834 46.9 (46.1, 47.8) 5.8 (4.5, 7.1)
Grade 5
  Boy 3 357 1 396 41.6 (39.9, 43.3) 4 231 1 954 46.2 (44.7, 47.7) 7 608 4 006 52.7 (51.5, 53.8)
  Girl 2 795 1 479 52.9 (51.1, 54.8) 3 486 2 004 57.5 (55.8, 59.1) 6 661 4 150 62.3 (61.1, 63.5)
  Subtotal 6 152 2 875 46.7 (45.5, 48.0) 7 717 3 958 51.3 (50.2, 52.4) 4.6 (2.9, 6.2) 14 269 8 156 57.2 (56.3, 58.0) 5.9 (4.5, 7.3)
Grade 6
  Boy 3 420 1 813 53.0 (51.3, 54.7) 3 624 1 911 52.7 (51.1, 54.4) 7 140 4 231 59.3 (58.1, 60.4)
  Girl 2 840 1 856 65.4 (63.6, 67.1) 3 069 2 035 66.3 (64.6, 68.0) 5 982 4 169 69.7 (68.5, 70.9)
  Subtotal 6 260 3 669 58.6 (57.4, 59.8) 6 693 3 946 59.0 (57.8, 60.1) 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1) 13 122 8 400 64.0 (63.2, 64.8) 5.1 (3.6, 6.5)
Grade 1-6
  Boy 24 793 7 038 28.4 (27.8, 28.9) 28 827 9 303 32.3 (31.7, 32.8) 45 182 18 003 39.8 (39.4, 40.3)
  Girl 20 501 6 902 33.7 (33.0, 34.3) 24 095 9 273 38.5 (37.9, 39.1) 39 806 17 516 44.0 (43.5, 44.5)
  Total 45 294 13 940 30.8 (30.4, 31.2) 52 922 18 576 35.1 (34.7, 35.5) 4.3 (3.7, 4.9) 84 988 35 519 41.8 (41.5, 42.1) 6.7 (6.2, 7.2)

Table 2

Spherical equivalent among primary school students by grade and gender, 2019-2024"

Items 2019 2020 2024
n Spherical equivalent/D n Spherical equivalent/D n Spherical equivalent/D
Grade 1
  Boy 5 081 0.09 (0.06, 0.11) 5 625 -0.16 (-0.19, -0.13) 7 027 0.06 (0.03, 0.08)
  Girl 3 929 0.10 (0.07, 0.13) 4 694 -0.13 (-0.16, -0.10) 6 444 0.11 (0.08, 0.14)
  Subtotal 9 010 0.09 (0.07, 0.11) 10 319 -0.15 (-0.17, -0.12) 13 471 0.08 (0.06, 0.10)
Grade 2
  Boy 4 743 -0.10 (-0.13, -0.08) 5 429 -0.32 (-0.35, -0.28) 7 810 -0.18 (-0.21, -0.16)
  Girl 4 027 -0.14 (-0.17, -0.11) 4 394 -0.34 (-0.37, -0.30) 7 106 -0.18 (-0.21, -0.15)
  Subtotal 8 770 -0.12 (-0.14, -0.10) 9 823 -0.32 (-0.35, -0.30) 14 916 -0.18 (-0.20, -0.16)
Grade 3
  Boy 4 281 -0.38 (-0.42, -0.35) 5 238 -0.56 (-0.59, -0.52) 7 701 -0.49 (-0.51, -0.46)
  Girl 3 668 -0.43 (-0.47, -0.39) 4 443 -0.65 (-0.69, -0.61) 6 953 -0.55 (-0.58, -0.51)
  Subtotal 7 949 -0.40 (-0.43, -0.38) 9 681 -0.60 (-0.63, -0.58) 14 654 -0.51 (-0.54, -0.49)
Grade 4
  Boy 3 911 -0.66 (-0.70, -0.62) 4 680 -0.84 (-0.88, -0.79) 7 896 -0.75 (-0.78, -0.72)
  Girl 3 242 -0.79 (-0.84, -0.74) 4 009 -1.00 (-1.04, -0.95) 6 660 -0.91 (-0.94, -0.87)
  Subtotal 7 153 -0.72 (-0.75, -0.69) 8 689 -0.91 (-0.94, -0.88) 14 556 -0.82 (-0.85, -0.80)
Grade 5
  Boy 3 357 -0.86 (-0.91, -0.81) 4 231 -1.10 (-1.15, -1.05) 7 608 -1.06 (-1.10, -1.03)
  Girl 2 795 -1.08 (-1.14, -1.03) 3 486 -1.38 (-1.43, -1.32) 6 661 -1.29 (-1.33, -1.24)
  Subtotal 6 152 -0.96 (-1.00, -0.92) 7 717 -1.23 (-1.26, -1.19) 14 269 -1.17 (-1.20, -1.14)
Grade 6
  Boy 3 420 -1.25 (-1.30, -1.19) 3 624 -1.34 (-1.40, -1.28) 7 140 -1.36 (-1.41, -1.32)
  Girl 2 840 -1.49 (-1.55, -1.42) 3 069 -1.68 (-1.74, -1.62) 5 982 -1.68 (-1.73, -1.63)
  Subtotal 6 260 -1.36 (-1.40, -1.32) 6 693 -1.50 (-1.54, -1.45) 13 122 -1.51 (-1.54, -1.48)
Grade 1-6
  Boy 24 793 -0.46 (-0.48, -0.44) 28 827 -0.66 (-0.67, -0.64) 45 182 -0.63 (-0.64, -0.62)
  Girl 20 501 -0.56 (-0.58, -0.54) 24 095 -0.79 (-0.80, -0.77) 39 806 -0.73 (-0.74, -0.71)
  Total 45 294 -0.51 (-0.52, -0.49) 52 922 -0.72 (-0.73, -0.70) 84 988 -0.68 (-0.69, -0.67)
1
Liang J , Pu Y , Chen J , et al. Global prevalence, trend and projection of myopia in children and adolescents from 1990 to 2050: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2025, 109 (3): 362- 371.

doi: 10.1136/bjo-2024-325427
2
国家疾控局. 国家疾控局积极推进儿童青少年近视防控近视率呈下降趋势[EB/OL]. (2024-03-13)[2025-05-13]. https://www.ndcpa.gov.cn/jbkzzx/c100008/common/content/content_1764617954927783936.html.
3
Haarman AEG , Enthoven CA , Tideman JWL , et al. The complications of myopia: A review and meta-analysis[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2020, 61 (4): 49.

doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.4.49
4
Ha A , Lee YJ , Lee M , et al. Digital screen time and myopia: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2025, 8 (2): e2460026.

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60026
5
Xiong S , Sankaridurg P , Naduvilath T , et al. Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: A meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95 (6): 551- 566.

doi: 10.1111/aos.13403
6
Xiang M , Zhang Z , Kuwahara K . Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents' lifestyle behavior larger than expected[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2020, 63 (4): 531- 532.

doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.013
7
Ma M , Xiong S , Zhao S , et al. COVID-19 home quarantine accelerated the progression of myopia in children aged 7 to 12 years in China[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2021, 62 (10): 37.

doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.10.37
8
Kägi-Braun N , Hedin L , Cassel S , et al. Physical activity and screen time trends in Swedish youth: The generation pep study 2018-2023[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2025, 114 (10): 2589- 2602.

doi: 10.1111/apa.70146
9
Orgilés M , Amorós-Reche V , Francisco R , et al. Beyond the pandemic: Tracing the evolution of activity, screen time, and sleep in European children over 3 years[J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2025, 184 (10): 629.

doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06458-1
10
国家卫生健康委员会. 《儿童青少年近视防控适宜技术指南(更新版)》及解读[EB/OL]. (2021-10-13)[2026-01-16]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-10/13/content_5642345.htm.
11
王红星, 徐文武, 王金玲. 阜阳市颍泉区2022—2024年中小学生筛查性近视情况及影响因素分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2025, 31 (4): 339- 344.
12
国家卫生健康委员会. 去年全国儿童青少年近视率53.6%[EB/OL]. (2019-04-29)[2026-01-08]. https://jiankang.cctv.com/2019/04/29/ARTI9HBa9IQ2vBCreF4OCYvI190429.shtml.
13
徐李莎, 黄烨, 吴汶灿, 等. 河南省中小学生2019—2020年近视队列研究结果[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44 (12): 1814-1818, 1823.
14
梁艺, 王早霞, 胡池, 等. 2019—2022年宜昌市中小学生常见病监测结果分析[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2025, 36 (4): 98- 101.
15
Yotsukura E , Torii H , Inokuchi M , et al. Current prevalence of myopia and association of myopia with environmental factors among schoolchildren in Japan[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2019, 137 (11): 1233- 1239.

doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3103
16
Lim DH , Han J , Chung TY , et al. The high prevalence of myopia in Korean children with influence of parental refractive errors: The 2008-2012 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13 (11): e0207690.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207690
17
Santiago HC , Ortiz K , Rivera A , et al. Prevalence of refractive errors in children of Puerto Rico[J]. Int J Ophthalmol, 2023, 16 (3): 434- 441.

doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.03.15
18
Hönekopp A , Tommes LM , Doebler P , et al. Myopia prevalence, refractive status and uncorrected myopia among primary and secondary school students in Germany[J]. Front Med, 2024, 11, 1483069.

doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1483069
19
Pärssinen O , Franssila ML , Nordhausen K , et al. The prevalence of myopia in Finnish conscripts has not increased in recent decades and is lower than in many east and Southeast Asian countries[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2025, 66 (12): 10.

doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.12.10
20
Morgan IG , Ohno-Matsui K , Saw SM . Myopia[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379 (9827): 1739- 1748.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4
21
Morgan IG , Rose KA . Myopia and international educational performance[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2013, 33 (3): 329- 338.

doi: 10.1111/opo.12040
22
Meguro A , Yamane T , Takeuchi M , et al. Genome-wide association study in Asians identifies novel loci for high myopia and highlights a nervous system role in its pathogenesis[J]. Ophthalmology, 2020, 127 (12): 1612- 1624.

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.014
23
Fan Q , Verhoeven VJM , Wojciechowski R , et al. Meta-analysis of gene-environment-wide association scans accounting for education level identifies additional loci for refractive error[J]. Nature Commun, 2016, 7, 11008.

doi: 10.1038/ncomms11008
24
韩霄, 汪静, 陈辉, 等. 2019—2021年北京市东城区小学生筛查性近视及屈光状态分析[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2023, 24 (4): 388- 392.
25
Chang P , Zhang B , Lin L , et al. Comparison of myopic progression before, during, and after COVID-19 lockdown[J]. Ophthalmology, 2021, 128 (11): 1655- 1657.

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.029
26
Zhang XJ , Zhang Y , Kam KW , et al. Prevalence of myopia in children before, during, and after COVID-19 restrictions in Hong Kong[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2023, 6 (3): e234080.

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4080
27
Alvarez-Peregrina C , Martinez-Perez C , Villa-Collar C , et al. Impact of COVID-19 home confinement in children's refractive errors[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18 (10): 5347.
28
Darko-Takyi C , Mills TW , Boadi-Kusi SB , et al. Association between near visual display device usage and the eye's accommodation and vergence parameters: A cross-sectional study of high school children in Cape Coast, Ghana[J]. BMJ Public Health, 2025, 3 (2): e003041.

doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-003041
29
Wang J , Li Y , Musch D , et al. Progression of myopia in school-aged children after COVID-19 home confinement[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2021, 139 (3): 293- 300.

doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.6239
30
Zhang J , Li Z , Ren J , et al. Prevalence of myopia: A large-scale population-based study among children and adolescents in Weifang, China[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10, 924566.

doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924566
31
Gao J , Meng L , Lv X , et al. Analysis of refractive development characteristics in school-age children based on biometric measurements: A cross-sectional study involving 12 025 primary school students from Xingtai City[J]. Front Public Health, 2025, 13, 1660018.
32
Guo L , Yang J , Mai J , et al. Prevalence and associated factors of myopia among primary and middle school-aged students: A school-based study in Guangzhou[J]. Eye, 2016, 30 (6): 796- 804.
33
Tian L , Zhu M , Song Y , et al. The prevalence of myopia and eye health behaviors among 3 to 18 years: A cross-sectional survey study[J]. BMC Public Health, 2025, 25 (1): 1688.
34
Zhang X , Wang J , Weng Y , et al. Myopia prevalence among primary school students across different districts in Guangzhou: Insights from a large-scale school-based screening[J]. BMC Public Health, 2025, 25 (1): 3615.
35
Sankaridurg P , He X , Naduvilath T , et al. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95 (7): e633- e640.
36
徐梓航, 胡媛媛, 温莹, 等. 3种方法界定儿童青少年近视检出率及其一致性评价[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2023, 44 (5): 747-750, 755.
[1] Lili LU, Jiaxing LI, Tianyu HUANG, Ruolan YANG, Yunfei LIU, Jiajia DANG, Shan CAI, Ziyue SUN, Meizhu LIU, Yang YANG, Kaiheng ZHU, Yi SONG. Analysis of the prevalence and influencing factors of myopia among primary and secondary school students in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2022 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(3): 520-527.
[2] Hongjuan BAI, Yang CHEN, Kun WANG, Xuebing XU. Relationship between family trauma, school bullying and suicidal behavior in adolescents: Regulatory effect of DRD2 gene polymorphism [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2026, 58(3): 606-615.
[3] Yihang ZHANG, Shan CAI, Ziyue CHEN, Yunfei LIU, Jiajia DANG, Di SHI, Jiaxin LI, Tianyu HUANG, Yi SONG. Establishment of outcome indicators for the implementation of comprehensive intervention for multimorbidity of myopia and obesity among children and adolescents based on the RE-AIM framework [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(3): 436-441.
[4] Mengli TANG, Yang LIU, Ran QIN, Xin GUO, Hongtian LI. Epidemiological characteristics of myopia and pre-myopia among preschool children aged 5-6 years in ten provinces of China [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2025, 57(3): 442-447.
[5] Chengyue LI, Hao WANG, ALIMUJIANG·Yimiti·tarken. Secular trend in growth of Uygur primary and middle school students aged 7-18 years in Xinjiang from 1985 to 2019 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 802-808.
[6] Shuangyun ZHAO, Siyu ZOU, Xueying LI, Lijuan SHEN, Hong ZHOU. Evaluation of reliability and validity of Chinese version of a short-form of Health Literacy Dental scale (HeLD-14) in the application among parents of preschool children [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(5): 828-832.
[7] Shan CAI,Yihang ZHANG,Ziyue CHEN,Yunfe LIU,Jiajia DANG,Di SHI,Jiaxin LI,Tianyu HUANG,Jun MA,Yi SONG. Status and pathways of factors influencing physical activity time among elementary and junior high school students in Beijing [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 403-410.
[8] Weimin LI,Zufeiya TUERDI. Comparative research on the relationship between body mass index and physical fitness index among the Uygur, Kazakh and Han ethnic college students [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 411-417.
[9] Zuhong ZHANG,Tianjiao CHEN,Jun MA. Associations between puberty timing and cardiovascular metabolic risk factors among primary and secondary students [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(3): 418-423.
[10] Xiao-jin YAN,Yun-fei LIU,Ning MA,Jia-jia DANG,Jing-shu ZHANG,Pan-liang ZHONG,Pei-jin HU,Yi SONG,Jun MA. Assessment of prevalence of malnutrition among Chinese primary and secondary school students and analysis of policy effect during the period of the Program for the Development of Chinese Children 2011-2020 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(4): 593-599.
[11] Xiao-yi MI,Shan-shan HOU,Zi-yuan FU,Mo ZHOU,Xin-xuan LI,Zhao-xue MENG,Hua-fang JIANG,Hong Zhou. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of adverse childhood experiences international questionnaire in parents of preschool children [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(3): 408-414.
[12] FENG Sha-wei,GUO Hui,WANG Yong,ZHAO Yi-jiao,LIU He. Initial establishment of digital reference standardized crown models of the primary teeth [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 327-334.
[13] DONG Yan-hui,CHEN Man-man,WANG Li-ping,XING Yi,SONG Yi,ZOU Zhi-yong,DONG Bin,LI Zhong-jie,MA Jun. Epidemiological characteristics of infectious diseases of group A, B and C among Chinese students’ population [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(3): 498-505.
[14] LI Yuan-cheng, CUI Wen-xin, GUO Xue-er, ZHU Fan, LIU Si-chen, JIA Bi-bo, WANG Pei, MA Ying-hua. Comparison of acquired immure deficiency syndrome-related knowledge and behavior between persons with and without human immunodeficiency virus-infection among young male students who have sex with men [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(3): 511-517.
[15] Shuang-jia WANG,Ting-ting WANG,Jun-bo WANG. Nutritional knowledge, attitudes and dietary behaviors of teachers and students in a medical college in Beijing and their influencing factors [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 881-885.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!