Email Alert | RSS

Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1037-1042. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Agreement between ultrasound-detected inflammation and clinical signs in ankles and feet joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

DENG Xue-rong,SUN Xiao-ying,ZHANG Zhuo-li()   

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2021-09-10 Online:2021-12-18 Published:2021-12-13
  • Contact: Zhuo-li ZHANG E-mail:zhuoli.zhang@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Youth Clinical Research Project of Peking University First Hospital(2018CR04)

RICH HTML

 7   

PDF (PC)

283

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the agreement between clinical signs (tenderness and/or swelling) in ankles and feet joints and ultrasound findings in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: RA patients with at least 1 tender and/or swollen joint in bilateral ankles and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints detected by physical examination were enrolled and underwent ultrasound examination by greyscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) mode. The agreement between clinical signs and ultrasound-detected inflammation (joint effusion, synovitis, or tenosynovitis) was analyzed. Results: In the study, 113 consecutive RA patients were included, with mean age of (52.5±12.6) years, median duration of 60 (13, 129) months, mean disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28 (ESR)] of 5.1±1.7,mean disease activity score in 28 joints based on C reactive protein[DAS28 (CRP)]of 4.6±1.5. The tenderness and swelling was most commonly detected in ankles (52.7% and 31.9%, respectively), while GS (+) synovitis was most frequently detectable in MTP2 (34.1%), followed by ankles (32.7%) and MTP1 (27.9%),and PD (+) synovitis was most frequently detectable in MTP1 (14.2%), followed by ankles (12.4%) and MTP2 (10.6%). The prevalence of tenosynovitis was 41.1%, which mostly located in tibialis posterior tendon (22.1% of GS positive and 17.6% of PD positive). The highest prevalence of joint effusion was detected in ankles (9.7%), while that of bone erosion in MTP5 (19%). The overall concordance rate between positive clinical signs and ultrasound-determined joint inflammation was poor in the above joints (κ<0.2, P<0.05), in which swelling had the highest κ coefficient with ultrasound-determined joint inflammation in ankles (κ=0.225, P<0.05). Moreover, swelling had the highest κ coefficient with synovitis in ankles (κ=0.231, P<0.05).The concordance between tenosynovitis and signs in ankles was also poor (κ<0.20, P<0.05). There was no significant agreement between joint effusion and clinical signs (P>0.05). Conclusion: The overall concordance between clinical signs and inflammation on ultrasound was poor in ankles and feet joints. Tenderness and swelling was more common in ankles, while more lesions were detected by ultrasound at MTP joints. Ultrasound is useful in assessing the lesions besides physical examination in patients with RA.

Key words: Arthritis, rheumatoid, Ankles and feet joints, Ultrasound

CLC Number: 

  • R593.22

Table 1

Clinical characteristic of 113 patients with rheumatoid arthritis"

Items Values
n 113
Age/year, $\overline{x}$±s 52.5 ± 12.6
Female, n (%) 93 (82.3)
Disease duration/months, M (P25,P75) 60.0 (13-129)
PGA/mm, $\overline{x}$±s 55.9±25.1
EGA/mm, $\overline{x}$±s 48.5±24.3
HAQ, M (P25,P75) 12.0 (3.5-23.5)
ESR/(mm/h), M (P25,P75) 35 (19-65)
CRP/(mg/L), M (P25,P75) 11.9 (5.5-36.4)
DAS28 (ESR), $\overline{x}$±s 5.1±1.7
DAS28 (CRP), $\overline{x}$±s 4.6±1.5
CDAI, $\overline{x}$±s 22.8±14.2
SDAI, $\overline{x}$±s 25.1±16.4

Table 2

Frequencies of clinical signs in bilateral ankles and feet joints"

Joint Tenderness Swelling
n % n %
Ankle 715 52.7 432 31.9
MTP1 244 18.1 108 8.0
MTP2 252 18.6 47 3.5
MTP3 591 21.7 40 3.1
MTP4 501 21.2 40 3.1
MTP5 538 22.6 80 6.2

Table 3

Frequencies of lesions detected by ultrasound in bilateral ankles and feet joints"

Joint GS (+)
synovitis/%		 PD (+)
synovitis/%		 Effusion/% Bone erosion/%
Ankle 32.7 12.4 9.7 11.5
MTP1 27.9 14.2 4.0 16.4
MTP2 34.1 10.6 2.7 1.3
MTP3 23.0 8.0 0.9 0.9
MTP4 14.2 5.8 0 0.9
MTP5 11.5 9.3 0 19.0

Table 4

Concordance between clinical signs and ultrasound-detected inflammation at each joint"

Joint Number of joints κ P
PE+/US+ PE+/US- PE-/US+ PE-/US-
Ankle 84 50 41 51 0.178 0.007
MTP1 14 31 58 123 -0.008 0.904
MTP2 21 22 59 124 0.125 0.041
MTP3 13 40 40 133 0.089 0.181
MTP4 13 35 20 158 0.179 0.006
MTP5 11 44 15 156 0.137 0.023

Table 5

Concordance between positive signs and ultrasound-detected inflammation at each joint"

Joint Tenderness (+) & US (+) Swelling (+) & US (+)
κ P κ P
Ankle 0.128 0.054 0.225 0.000
MTP1 -0.024 0.694 0.058 0.232
MTP2 0.111 0.066 0.028 0.579
MTP3 0.083 0.033 0.014 0.832
MTP4 0.210 0.000 0.179 0.006
MTP5 0.127 0.039 0.079 0.230

Table 6

Concordance between clinical signs and synovitis at each joint"

Joint T/S (+) & synovitis T (+) & synovitis S (+) & synovitis
κ P κ P κ P
Ankle 0.069 0.234 0.018 0.769 0.231 0.001
MTP1 -0.037 0.566 0.060 0.350 0.056 0.277
MTP2 0.118 0.056 0.104 0.091 0.032 0.333
MTP3 0.020 0.764 0.095 0.153 0.086 0.029
MTP4 0.187 0.004 0.187 0.004 0.217 0.000
MTP5 0.137 0.023 0.127 0.039 0.076 0.230

Table 7

Concordance between clinical signs and tenosynovitis at ankle"

Items κ P
T/S (+) & GS (+) tenosynovitis 0.146 0.008
T/S (+) & PD (+) tenosynovitis 0.136 0.008
T (+) & GS (+) tenosynovitis 0.126 0.034
T(+) & PD (+) tenosynovitis 0.121 0.029
S(+) & GS (+) tenosynovitis 0.083 0.212
S(+) & PD (+) tenosynovitis 0.097 0.136
[1] Inamo J, Kaneko Y, Sakata K, et al. Impact of subclinical synovitis in ankles and feet detected by ultrasonography in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Int J Rheum Dis, 2019, 22(1):62-67.
doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13399 pmid: 30338640
[2] Kapral T, Dernoschnig F, Machold KP, et al. Remission by composite scores in rheumatoid arthritis: are ankles and feet important?[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2007, 9(4):R72.
doi: 10.1186/ar2270
[3] Wechalekar MD, Lester S, Hill CL, et al. Active foot synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: unstable remission status, radiographic progression, and worse functional outcomes in patients with foot synovitis in apparent remission[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2016, 68(11):1616-1623.
doi: 10.1002/acr.22887 pmid: 26991415
[4] Sun X, Deng X, Xie W, et al. The agreement between ultrasound-determined joint inflammation and clinical signs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2019, 21(1):100.
doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1892-0
[5] Le Boedec M, Jousse-Joulin S, Ferlet JF, et al. Factors influencing concordance between clinical and ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. J Rheumatol, 2013, 40(3):244-252.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120843
[6] Padovano I, Costantino F, Breban M, et al. Prevalence of ultrasound synovial inflammatory findings in healthy subjects[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2016, 75(10):1819-1823.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208103 pmid: 26613767
[7] Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 62(9):2569-2581.
doi: 10.1002/art.27584
[8] Möller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, et al. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017, 76(12):1974-1979.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211585
[9] Terslev L, Naredo E, Aegerter P, et al. Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-Part 2: reliability and application to multiple joints of a standardised consensus-based scoring system[J]. RMD Open, 2017, 3(1):e000427.
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000427
[10] Hammer HB, Michelsen B, Sexton J, et al. Swollen, but not tender joints, are independently associated with ultrasound synovitis: results from a longitudinal observational study of patients with established rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2019, 78(9):1179-1185.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215321
[11] Hirata A, Ogura T, Hayashi N, et al. Concordance of patient-reported joint symptoms, physician-examined arthritic signs, and ultrasound-detected synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2017, 69(6):801-806.
doi: 10.1002/acr.23006 pmid: 27564121
[12] Lukas C, van der Heijde D, Fatenajad S, et al. Repair of erosions occurs almost exclusively in damaged joints without swelling[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010, 69(5):851-855.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119156
[13] Sun X, Deng X, Geng Y, et al. A simplified and validated ultrasound scoring system to evaluate synovitis of bilateral wrists and hands in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2018, 37(1):185-191.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3785-4
[14] Toyota Y, Tamura M, Kirino Y, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography delineates ankle symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Mod Rheumatol, 2017, 27(3):425-429.
doi: 10.1080/14397595.2016.1222650
[15] Ohrndorf S, Fischer IU, Kellner H, et al. Reliability of the novel 7-joint ultrasound score: results from an inter- and intraobserver study performed by rheumatologists[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2012, 64(8):1238-1243.
doi: 10.1002/acr.21679 pmid: 22438306
[16] Zayat AS, Ellegaard K, Conaghan PG, et al. The specificity of ultrasound-detected bone erosions for rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2015, 74(5):897-903.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204864
[17] Di Matteo A, Mankia K, Duquenne L, et al. Ultrasound erosions in the feet best predict progression to inflammatory arthritis in anti-CCP positive at-risk individuals without clinical synovitis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2020, 79(7):901-907.
[1] GAO Chao,CHEN Li-hong,WANG Li,YAO Hong,HUANG Xiao-wei,JIA Yu-bo,LIU Tian. Validation of the Pollard’s classification criteria (2010) for rheumatoid arthritis patients with fibromyalgia [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(2): 278-282.
[2] PENG Zhe,DING Ya-min,PEI Lin,YAO Hai-hong,ZHANG Xue-wu,TANG Su-mei. Clinical characteristics of crystal deposits in joints and tendons in patients with gout [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1067-1071.
[3] SONG Zhi-bo,GENG Yan,DENG Xue-rong,ZHANG Xiao-hui,ZHANG Zhuo-li. Benefit of ultrasound in the phenotype recognition of psoriatic arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1061-1066.
[4] ZHANG Lu,HU Xiao-hong,CHEN Cheng,CAI Yue-ming,WANG Qing-wen,ZHAO Jin-xia. Analysis of cervical instability and clinical characteristics in treatment-naive rheumatoid arthritis patients [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1049-1054.
[5] LUO Liang,HUO Wen-gang,ZHANG Qin,LI Chun. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of rheumatoid arthritis with ulcerative keratitis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1032-1036.
[6] ZHONG Hua,XU Li-ling,BAI Ming-xin,SU Yin. Effect of chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 on bone erosion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1026-1031.
[7] LOU Xue,LIAO Li,LI Xing-jun,WANG Nan,LIU Shuang,CUI Ruo-mei,XU Jian. Methylation status and expression of TWEAK gene promoter region in peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(6): 1020-1025.
[8] Zheng-fang LI,Xue WU,Li-jun WU,Cai-nan LUO,Ya-mei SHI,Yan ZHONG,Xiao-mei CHEN,Xin-yan MENG. Clinical features of patients with Rhupus syndrome [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 933-937.
[9] Hao WU,Li-ping PAN,Heng LIU,Hong-bin WANG,Tai-guo NING,Yong-ping CAO. Effect of posterior tibial slope on the short-term outcome in mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 877-882.
[10] Cheng WANG,Ling-yu MENG,Na-yun CHEN,Dai LI,Jian-quan WANG,Ying-fang AO. Management algorithm for septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 850-856.
[11] WANG Gui-hong,ZUO Ting,LI Ran,ZUO Zheng-cai. Effect of rebamipide on the acute gouty arthritis in rats induced by monosodium urate crystals [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 716-720.
[12] WU Jun-hui,CHEN Hong-bo,WU Yi-qun,WU Yao,WANG Zi-jing,WU Tao,WANG Meng-ying,WANG Si-yue,WANG Xiao-wen,WANG Jia-ting,YU Huan,HU Yong-hua. Prevalence and risk factors of osteoarthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes in Beijing, China from 2015 to 2017 [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(3): 518-522.
[13] ZHAO Kai,CHANG Zhi-fang,WANG Zhi-hua,PANG Chun-yan,WANG Yong-fu. Therapeutic effect of gene silencing peptidyl arginine deaminase 4 on pulmonary interstitial lesions induced by collagen-induced arthritis mice [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 235-239.
[14] CAO Di,WANG Yan,WANG Liu-qing,SUN Xiao-lin,HUANG Fei,MENG Yang,REN Li-li,ZHANG Xue-wu. Expression of plasma Dickkopf-1 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and its correlation with peripheral blood T cell subsets [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 255-260.
[15] KE Yan,ZHANG Qiang,MA Yun-qing,LI Ru-jun,TAO Ke,GUI Xian-ge,LI Ke-peng,ZHANG Hong,LIN Jian-hao. Short-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of Tönnis grade 3 hip osteoarthritis in patients with spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 175-182.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Author. English Title Test[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
Copyright © Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd