北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 551-555. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.03.025

• 共识与建议 • 上一篇    

创伤中心医疗质量控制指标专家共识

黄伟,许庭珉,王天兵*(),姜保国*()   

  1. 北京大学人民医院, 国家创伤医学中心, 北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-11 出版日期:2024-06-18 发布日期:2024-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 王天兵,姜保国 E-mail:wangtianbing@pkuph.edu.cn;jiangbaoguo@vip.sina.com

Expert consensus on key indicators for quality control in trauma medicine center

Wei HUANG,Tingmin XU,Tianbing WANG*(),Baoguo JIANG*()   

  1. Trauma Medicine Center, Peking University People' s Hospital; National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2024-03-11 Online:2024-06-18 Published:2024-06-12
  • Contact: Tianbing WANG,Baoguo JIANG E-mail:wangtianbing@pkuph.edu.cn;jiangbaoguo@vip.sina.com

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

创伤是全世界的重大公共卫生问题, 是45岁以下人群第1位的死亡原因, 也是我国城乡居民的五大死因之一。创伤救治体系的建设是提高患者生存率的关键, 完善的创伤救治体系能够确保患者迅速得到专业医疗救助, 创伤中心的建设能够改善创伤救治效果。目前, 我国不同地区的创伤救治质量大不相同, 对创伤救治的医疗过程采用全面质量管理和对创伤的现场救援、院前急救和院内治疗进行标准化控制, 是提高创伤救治能力水平和创伤患者生存率的重要措施。医疗质量控制指标作为医疗全面质量管理的关键因素, 其可以引领创伤中心发展的方向。为进一步加强创伤救治的医疗质量管理, 规范临床诊疗行为, 促进医疗服务的标准化、同质化, 国家创伤医学中心医疗质量控制专业委员会结合国内创伤救治现状, 对国家卫生健康委员会2018年发布的《关于进一步提升创伤救治能力的通知》中创伤中心医疗质量的16项控制指标进行了细化和更新, 制定了新版19项质量控制指标, 包含名称、定义、计算方式、意义、质量控制对象等, 供各级创伤中心在医疗质量管理工作中使用, 为创伤中心的质量控制工作提供可循路径。实施这些质量控制指标能够引导医疗机构对创伤救治的各个环节进行严格监控和评估, 并及时解决存在的问题; 同时, 这些指标可以提升机构内部协作效率, 加强相关科室之间的沟通和协作, 从而提高创伤救治的效率与水平。

关键词: 创伤, 关键指标, 质量控制, 共识

Abstract:

Trauma is recognized globally as a great public health challenge. It stands as the predominant cause of mortality among those under the age of 45 and is also ranked among the top five causes of death for both urban and rural populations within China. This stark reality underscores the critical urgency in establishing an efficient system for trauma care, which is pivotal for substantially enhancing the survival rates of patients. An optimally developed system for trauma care not only guarantees that patients promptly receive professional medical assistance but also facilitates significant improvements in the outcomes of trauma care through the strategic establishment of trauma centers. At present, a considerable variation exists in the quality of trauma care provided across various regions within China. The adoption of comprehensive quality management strategies for the medical processes involved in trauma care, alongside the standardized management of on-site rescue operations, pre-hospital emergency care, and in-hospital treatment protocols, stands as a fundamental approach to boost the capabilities of trauma care and, consequently, the survival rates of trauma patients. Serving as the cornerstone of comprehensive medical quality management, key quality control indicators possess the capacity to steer the development direction of trauma centers. In a concerted effort to further augment the medical quality management of trauma care, standardize clinical diagnosis and treatment methodologies, and advocate for the standardization and ho-mogenization of medical services, the Medical Quality Control Professional Committee of the National Center for Trauma Medicine has undertaken a detailed refinement and update of the 16 key quality control indicators for trauma centers. These were initially put forward in the "Notice on Further Enhancing Trauma Care Capabilities" disseminated by the National Health Commission in 2018.Consequent to this endeavor, a revised set of 19 quality control indicators has been devised. This comprehensive set, inclusive of the indicators' names, definitions, calculation methodologies, significance, and the subjects for quality control, is designed for utilization within the quality management and control operations of trauma centers across various levels. This initiative aims to furnish a concrete and executable roadmap for the quality control endeavors of trauma centers. Through the enactment of these quality control indicators, medical institutions are empowered to conduct more stringent monitoring and evaluative measures across all facets of trauma care. This not only facilitates the prompt identification and rectification of existing challenges but also substantially boosts the efficiency of internal collaboration. It enhances the synergy between different departments, thereby markedly improving the efficiency and quality of trauma care.

Key words: Trauma, Key indicators, Quality control, Consensus

中图分类号: 

  • R641
1 World Health Organization. World health statistics 2023: Monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals: 2023[EB/OL]. (2023-05-19)[2023-12-02]. https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1502907/retrieve.
2 国家统计局. 2018中国统计年鉴[EB/OL]. (2018-10-24)[2023-11-05]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2018/indexch.htm.
3 国家统计局. 2019中国统计年鉴[EB/OL]. (2019-10-12)[2023-12-20]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2019/indexch.htm.
4 国家统计局. 2020中国统计年鉴[EB/OL]. (2020-09-20)[2023-10-10]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm.
5 国家统计局. 2021中国统计年鉴[EB/OL]. (2021-10-09)[2023-12-20]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2021/indexch.htm.
6 国家统计局. 2022中国统计年鉴[EB/OL]. (2022-02-15)[2023-12-25]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2022/indexch.htm.
7 Moore L , Champion H , Tardif P A , et al. Impact of trauma system structure on injury outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42 (5): 1327- 1339.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4292-0
8 Nathens AB , Brunet FP , Maier RV . Development of trauma systems and effect on outcomes after injury[J]. Lancet, 2004, 363 (9423): 1794- 1801.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16307-1
9 Dijkink S , Nederpelt CJ , Krijnen P , et al. Trauma systems around the world: A systematic overview[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017, 83 (5): 917- 925.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001633
10 国家卫生和计划生育委员会办公厅. 关于进一步提升创伤救治能力的通知[EB/OL]. (2018-06-21)[2023-12-27]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2018-12/31/content_5435172.htm.
11 Yin XF , Wang TB , Zhang PX , et al. Evaluation of the effects of standard rescue procedure on severe trauma treatment in China[J]. Chin Med J(Eng), 2015, 128 (10): 1301- 1305.
doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.156768
12 王天兵, 李明, 杜哲, 等. 创伤中心建设中的医疗质量控制[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35 (3): 4.
13 Stelfox HT , Straus SE , Nathens A , et al. Evidence for quality indicators to evaluate adult trauma care: A systematic review[J]. Critical care medicine, 2011, 39 (4): 846- 859.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820a859a
[1] 司筱芊,赵秀娟,朱凤雪,王天兵. 创伤出血性休克后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 307-312.
[2] 陈逸凡,刘中砥,张鹏,黄伟. 严重创伤患者损伤严重度评分的一致性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 157-160.
[3] 郭辅政,赵秀娟,邓玖旭,杜哲,王天兵,朱凤雪. 严重创伤患者早期外周血淋巴细胞变化与预后之间的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 552-556.
[4] 杜哲,黄伟,王志伟,周靖,熊建,李明,张鹏,刘中砥,朱凤雪,王传林,姜保国,王天兵. 多学科协作诊疗模式在严重创伤患者救治中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 298-301.
[5] 黄宇亮,李晨光,毛凯,武建安,戴甜甜,韩媛媛,吴昊,王海洋,张艺宝. 引导螺旋断层放疗用兆伏CT图像质量定量分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 525-529.
[6] 李熠,徐莉,周彦恒,欧阳翔英,曹甜. 牙周正畸牙体联合治疗1例预后无望上前牙患者的长期疗效观察#br#[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 740-744.
[7] 陈逍堃, 林维成, 张鹏, 匡思杰, 黄伟, 王天兵. 创伤急救体系的发展与现状[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 368-封三.
[8] 徐啸翔,曹烨,傅开元,谢秋菲. 咬合干扰致大鼠咬肌能量代谢产物含量变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 25-030.
[9] 刘存瑞, 徐啸翔, 曹烨, 谢秋菲. 咬合干扰时间因素对大鼠咀嚼肌机械痛觉敏感的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 51-56.
[10] 陈茜,张雪梅,胡秀英. 芦山地震6个月后老年人可疑创伤后应激障碍调查研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 1046-1049.
[11] 寇玉辉, 殷晓峰, 王天兵, 姜保国. 严重创伤救治规范的研究与推广[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(2): 207-210.
[12] 安帅, 王天兵, 张培训, 殷晓峰, 范达, 张进军, 姜保国. 北京城区院前救治的道路交通损伤特点分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(5): 777-781.
[13] 刘宁, 何峰, 满立波, 黄广林, 王海东, 王海, 李贵忠, 王建伟. 尿动力学检查中伪像的曲线特征及影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(5): 817-820.
[14] 黄广林, 满立波, 王海, 王建伟, 翟建坡, 朱晓斐, 周宁, 徐啸. 使用尿道旋切刀治疗女性尿道闭锁[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(4): 574-577.
[15] 宋哲,薛汉中,李忠,庄岩,王谦,马腾,张堃. 浮肩损伤的手术治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(5): 757-760.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 田增民, 陈涛, Nanbert ZHONG, 李志超, 尹丰, 刘爽. 神经干细胞移植治疗遗传性小脑萎缩的临床研究(英文稿)[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[3] 郭岩, 谢铮. 用一代人时间弥合差距——健康社会决定因素理论及其国际经验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[4] 成刚, 钱振华, 胡军. 艾滋病项目自愿咨询检测的技术效率分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[5] 卢恬, 朱晓辉, 柳世庆, 郑杰, 邱晓彦. 白细胞介素2促进宫颈癌细胞系HeLaS3免疫球蛋白G的表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[6] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[7] 袁惠燕, 张苑, 范田园. 离子交换型栓塞微球及其载平阳霉素的制备与性质研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[8] 徐莉, 孟焕新, 张立, 陈智滨, 冯向辉, 释栋. 侵袭性牙周炎患者血清中抗牙龈卟啉单胞菌的IgG抗体水平的研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[9] 董稳, 刘瑞昌, 刘克英, 关明, 杨旭东. 氯诺昔康和舒芬太尼用于颌面外科术后自控静脉镇痛的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[10] 祁琨, 邓芙蓉, 郭新彪. 纳米二氧化钛颗粒对人肺成纤维细胞缝隙连接通讯的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .