北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 81-085. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.01.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字化光纤透照法判断龋洞深度

于江利,唐仁韬,冯琳△,董艳梅   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,牙体牙髓科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2017-02-18 发布日期:2017-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 冯琳 E-mail:flinj@sohu.com

Digital imaging fiber optic transillumination (DIFOTI) method for determining the depth of cavity

YU Jiang-li,TANG Ren-tao,FENG Lin△,DONG Yan-mei   

  1. (Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2017-02-18 Published:2017-02-18
  • Contact: FENG Lin E-mail:flinj@sohu.com

摘要:

目的:使用DIAGNOcam系统体外研究新型数字化光纤透照法(digital imaging fiber optic transillumination,DIFOTI)判断龋洞深度的准确性。方法: 实验采用自身配对设计,选取74颗有1个邻面龋、边缘嵴均未破坏的离体磨牙(66颗)和前磨牙(8颗),在龋洞所对应的牙合面边缘嵴中央做标记点,将离体牙固定在标准牙列模型内,龋洞与另一离体牙的无龋坏牙面相邻接,用黏蜡封闭至釉牙骨质界(cemento-enamel junction,CEJ)上2 mm及邻间隙(模仿牙龈缘及龈乳头),然后将标准牙列模型放入仿头模内,使用DIAGNOcam系统对离体牙进行探照检查,通过系统的探头从牙合面拍摄获取投射照片。使用DIAGNOcam系统软件测量工具,在投射照片上,从标记点起至龋损最深处长度记为a,延长a至对侧边缘嵴处的长度记为b,b为光纤透照摄取图像中牙的宽度,然后在离体牙牙合面上得到自标记点至对侧边缘嵴与光纤透照图中b平行的线为患牙的实际宽度,其长度记为c。投射照片上光纤透照所测得的龋坏深度为d,通过公式d/a=c/b(数字化光纤测得的龋坏深度/图像中龋损深度=实际牙宽度/图像中牙宽度),推导得出d=a×c/b,计算出d值。取出离体牙,去净腐质,测量实际洞深,记为D,每个样本d与D的差值记录为Δd。结果用SPSS 20.0软件进行一致性检验,并用MedCalc 14.8.1.0软件对Δd进行Bland-Altman分析。结果: d与D的相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)为0.951(ICC>75%),P=0.263,两组数据差异无统计学意义,具有良好的一致性,且两组数据之间存在y=0.23+0.91x 函数关系(x为数字化光纤透照法测得龋洞深度,y为实际龋洞深度)。BlandAltman分析Δd显示,Δd的均值Δdmean为0.05 mm,标准差ΔdSD=0.308,95%置信区间为(-0.55~0.65),这种相差幅度在临床上可以接受,因此可以认为两种测量方式的一致性较好。结论: 使用DIAGNOcam系统体外检测牙齿龋坏深度与龋洞去腐后的实际深度基本一致,提示临床上可以使用DIAGNOcam系统来辅助评估龋洞深度。

关键词: 龋齿, 光导纤维技术, 透照法

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the accuracy of the digital imaging fiber optic transillumination (DIFOTI) on diagnosis of caries lesions depth using DIAGNOcam system. Methods: This experiment adopted self-matching design. Seventy-four extracted teeth (molar: sixty-six, premolar: eight) with one caries lesions in proximity which were not damaged in surface marginal ridge were selected. Dental calculus and dental stains were removed from the extracted teeth for standby application. A sign was marked in the middle of the occlusal surface edge at the side of decay. Then the teeth were fixed in the standard model of dentition and cavities were adjacent with the sound tooth surface. Sticky wax was applied to seal the level of 2 mm beyond cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) in the direction of occlusion and interproximal space to imitate gingival margin and gingival papilla. The standard models of dentition was seated in imitation head mold. The lesions depth degree was looked into and checked with DIAGNOcam system. Besides, the pictures on the occlusal surfaces were recorded and saved. The sign above could be seen on the picture. The measuring tool in DIAGNOcam system was used to measure the depth of the caries from the sign (as starting point) to the deepest point of caries in the pictures and its length was recorded for a. The line a was lengthened to the contralateral edge of occlusal surface in the photo and the length was recorded for b. A line from the marked point on the occlusal surface edge of the extracted teeth was draw parallel to the line b on the corresponding photo and its length was recorded for c. The depth of the cavities on the projected images was recorded for d, and calculated d/a=c/b (digital optical fiber measured decay depth/caries damage depth of the image = actual tooth width/tooth width of the image), and d=c/b×a inferred. At last, the teeth were taken out from the standard model dentition. The decay of the tooth was removed completely. The actual depth of the cavity was recorded for D. The difference between d and D was recorded for Δd. The software of SPSS 20.0 was used to test the consistency of the results, and the MedCalc 14.8.1.0 software was used for Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between d and D was 0.951 (ICC>75%), P=0.263. There was a function relationship y=0.23+0.91x between d(x) and D(y). BlandAltman analysis method showed that the mean of Δd (Δdmean) was 0.05 mm, the standard deviation of Δd (ΔdSD)=0.308, and the 95% confidence interval was (-0.55 to 0.65). The amplitude of difference was clinically acceptable. So the consistency of the two measurement modes was high. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the depth of caries lesions checked with DIAGNOcam system and the depth of the actual cavity, and the consistency was very good. The vitro study suggests that the DIAGNOcam system may be used to assess the depth of caries cavity as a useful tool in diagnosis and treatment.

Key words: Dental caries, Fiber optic technology, Transillumination

中图分类号: 

  • R781.1
[1] 陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[2] 赵思铭,赵晓含,张杰,王党校,王晓燕. 虚拟现实技术用于龋坏识别教学[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 139-142.
[3] 陈小贤,钟洁,闫文娟,张红梅,姜霞,黄芊,薛世华,刘星纲. 树脂冠修复乳前牙的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 907-912.
[4] 周琼,彭楚芳,秦满. 近红外光透照技术诊断乳磨牙早期邻面龋[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 59-64.
[5] 王潇,王欣,秦满. 唾液基质金属蛋白酶2、9与儿童龋病相关性的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 527-531.
[6] 潘徽,程灿,胡嘉,刘鹤,孙志辉. 聚乳酸可吸收根管桩与3种粘接剂的粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 990-993.
[7] 赵晓一,高学军. 渗透树脂处理釉质白垩斑的表面粗糙度及颜色稳定性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(1): 53-57.
[8] 任雯,陈峰,张翼飞,张倩,王晓燕,刘颖熠,袁重阳,马庆伟,徐韬,郑树国. MALDI-TOF质谱技术鉴定龋病患者唾液中的变异链球菌[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(1): 25-29.
[9] 夏斌, 秦满, 韩烨, 张笋. 儿童口腔科门诊治疗需求特征分析及对策[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(1): 92-96.
[10] 张笋, 陈涛 , 葛立宏. 应用Er:YAG激光治疗儿童龋齿的效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(1): 87-91.
[11] 凌征宇, 丁芸, 吕长海. 不同釉质处理方法对窝沟封闭剂微渗漏的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(2): 323-326.
[12] 陈小贤, 刘星纲. 玻璃离子窝沟封闭剂2年临床防龋效果观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(1): 157-157.
[13] 韩国嵩, 程俊歌, 张智玲, 李刚, 张祖燕, 马绪臣. 不同扫描参数下口腔颌面锥形束CT的咬合面龋诊断准确性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(1): 70-74.
[14] 李静, 葛立宏, 赵双云. 超声微创手机和工作头在儿童龋病治疗中的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(6): 752-755.
[15] 高学军. 龋病的多因素特征与发病的关键因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(1): 3-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!