北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 368-封三. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.02.034

• 综 述 • 上一篇    

创伤急救体系的发展与现状

陈逍堃, 林维成, 张鹏, 匡思杰, 黄伟, 王天兵△   

  1. (北京大学人民医院创伤骨科, 北京大学交通医学中心, 北京 100044)
  • 出版日期:2017-04-18 发布日期:2017-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 王天兵 E-mail:wangtianbing@medmail.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

     卫生部卫生公益性行业科研专项(201002014)资助

Trauma first aid system:development and present situation

CHEN Xiao-kun, LIN Wei-cheng, ZHANG Peng, KUANG Si-jie, HUANG Wei, WANG Tian-bing   

  1. (Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Peking University People’s Hospital; Peking University Traffic medicine Center, Beijing 100044, China)
  • Online:2017-04-18 Published:2017-04-18
  • Contact: WANG Tian-bing E-mail:wangtianbing@medmail.com.cn
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Specific Research Project of Health Pro Bono Secters, Minstry of Health, China (201002014)

摘要:

中国在过去的30年里随着经济的巨大进步,工业化水平的逐年提升导致了意外伤害事故也随之增加,中国每年因创伤死亡人数超过400 000,是继恶性肿瘤和心、脑、呼吸道疾病后的第五大死亡原因,是青壮年死亡的首要原因[1],同时创伤已成为和平时期一项严重的社会问题。目前,中国对于创伤急救体系的建设仍然处于起始阶段,投入还相当不足,也没有特定的政府机构来协同处理创伤急救相关问题,如决策的制定、急救基金的设立、急救的立法、创伤急救系统的建立、创伤医师的再教育和认证等[2]。
欧美等发达国家的创伤急救系统建设起步于20世纪60年代,发展到今天已经相对比较完善[2],而我国创伤急救系统的建设才刚刚起步,近年来姜保国教授团队也在大量研究的基础上提出了适合中国国情的创伤救治模式,但尚未形成规模,还处于试行与推广阶段。创伤救治体系从评价医疗服务质量角度分析,目前世界上主要有两大急救体系:即美英模式和德法模式。前者的特点是“将患者带往医院”,强调在现场紧急处理后尽快把伤员安全转运至医院再行有效治疗;后者则是“将医院送至患者身边”,强调医院抢救小组尽快到达现场进行救治,再转运患者至医院继续治疗[3]。目前采用美英模式的国家和地区有澳大利亚、加拿大、以色列、日本、新西兰、菲律宾、中国台湾、中国香港、美国、英国;采用德法模式的国家和地区有奥地利、比利时、拉脱维亚、挪威、波兰、葡萄牙、俄罗斯、瑞典、瑞士、德国、法国。中国目前的创伤救治模式总体上介于两者之间,下面对两种模式的代表国家德国和美国进行分类介绍,并阐述我国当前救治现状中的优缺点。

关键词: 创伤, 急救, 发展

Abstract: With the great progress of the economy, the level of industrialization has been increasing year by year, which leads to an increase in accidental trauma accidents. Chinese annual death of trauma is already more than 400 000, which makes trauma the fifth most common cause of death, following malignant tumor, heart, brain and respiratory diseases. Trauma is the leading cause of the death of young adults. At the same time, trauma has become a serious social problem in peacetime. Trauma throws great treats on human health and life. As an important part in the medical and social security system, the emergency of trauma system occupies a very important position in the emergency medical service system. In European countries as well as the United States and also many other developed countries, trauma service system had a long history, and progressed to an advanced stage. However, Chinese trauma service system started late and is still developing. It has not turned into a complete and standardized system yet. This review summarizes the histories and current situations of the development of traumatic first aid system separatedly in European countries, the United States and our country. Special attentions are paid on the effects of the pre- and in-hospital emergency care. We also furtherly try to explore the Chinese trauma emergency model that adapts to the situations of China and characteristics of different regions of China. Our rievew also introduces the trauma service system that suits the situations of China proposed by Prof. Jiang Baoguo’s team in details, and taking Chinese conditions into account, they conducted a thematic study and made an expert consensus on pre-hospital emergency treatment of severe trauma, providing a basic rountine and guididance of severe trauma treatment for those pre-hospital emergency physicians. They also advised the establishment of independent trauma disciplines and trauma specialist training systems, and to build the regional trauma care system as well as the standards for graded treatment, thus establishing a multiple disciplinary team (MDT) of severe trauma. In this way, we can reduce the mortality and disability risks of severe trauma, improve the quality of patients’ life, and save more lives.

Key words: traumatic first aid, present situation, situations in China, development

中图分类号: 

  • R641
[1] 黄伟,许庭珉,王天兵,姜保国. 创伤中心医疗质量控制指标专家共识[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 551-555.
[2] 司筱芊,赵秀娟,朱凤雪,王天兵. 创伤出血性休克后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 307-312.
[3] 陈逸凡,刘中砥,张鹏,黄伟. 严重创伤患者损伤严重度评分的一致性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 157-160.
[4] 闫晓晋,刘云飞,马宁,党佳佳,张京舒,钟盼亮,胡佩瑾,宋逸,马军. 《中国儿童发展纲要(2011-2020年)》实施期间中小学生营养不良率变化及其政策效应分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 593-599.
[5] 郭辅政,赵秀娟,邓玖旭,杜哲,王天兵,朱凤雪. 严重创伤患者早期外周血淋巴细胞变化与预后之间的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 552-556.
[6] 黄冰, 王洪源. 全球新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情发展趋势及严重程度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 536-542.
[7] 杨渝平,马骁,陈拿云,蒋艳芳,张晓伟,丁中伟,刘涛,敖英芳. 冬奥会雪场医疗站和近地医疗保障医院在滑雪运动伤救治体系中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 580-585.
[8] 罗冬梅,闫晓晋,胡佩瑾,张京舒,宋逸,马军. 1990—2010年中国女性早婚和生育的地区不平等性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 479-485.
[9] 杜哲,黄伟,王志伟,周靖,熊建,李明,张鹏,刘中砥,朱凤雪,王传林,姜保国,王天兵. 多学科协作诊疗模式在严重创伤患者救治中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 298-301.
[10] 陆林. 中国精神卫生学科发展的回顾与展望[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 379-383.
[11] 武阳丰,方伟岗. 论我国医科院校如何发展高水平临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 384-389.
[12] 李熠,徐莉,周彦恒,欧阳翔英,曹甜. 牙周正畸牙体联合治疗1例预后无望上前牙患者的长期疗效观察#br#[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 740-744.
[13] 徐啸翔,曹烨,傅开元,谢秋菲. 咬合干扰致大鼠咬肌能量代谢产物含量变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 25-030.
[14] 刘存瑞, 徐啸翔, 曹烨, 谢秋菲. 咬合干扰时间因素对大鼠咀嚼肌机械痛觉敏感的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 51-56.
[15] 陈茜,张雪梅,胡秀英. 芦山地震6个月后老年人可疑创伤后应激障碍调查研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 1046-1049.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!