Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 444-450. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.03.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

China-PAR脑卒中模型在北方农村人群中预测脑卒中发病风险的应用

唐迅1,张杜丹2,刘晓非1,刘秋萍1,曹洋1,李娜3,黄少平3,窦会东4,高培1,△(),胡永华1,△()   

  1. 1. 北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,北京 100191
    2. Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, United Kingdom
    3. 北京市房山区疾病预防控制中心,北京 102446
    4. 北京市房山区第一医院,北京 102400
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-16 出版日期:2020-06-18 发布日期:2020-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 高培,胡永华 E-mail:peigao@bjmu.edu.cn;yhhu@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81973132);国家自然科学基金(81961128006);国家自然科学基金(81872695)

Application of the China-PAR stroke risk equations in a rural northern Chinese population

Xun TANG1,Du-dan ZHANG2,Xiao-fei LIU1,Qiu-ping LIU1,Yang CAO1,Na LI3,Shao-ping HUANG3,Hui-dong DOU4,Pei GAO1,△(),Yong-hua HU1,△()   

  1. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, United Kingdom
    3. Fangshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102446, China
    4. The First Hospital of Fangshan District, Beijing 102400, China
  • Received:2020-02-16 Online:2020-06-18 Published:2020-06-30
  • Contact: Pei GAO,Yong-hua HU E-mail:peigao@bjmu.edu.cn;yhhu@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Sciences Foundation of China(81973132);National Natural Sciences Foundation of China(81961128006);National Natural Sciences Foundation of China(81872695)

RICH HTML

 25   

PDF (PC)

242

摘要：

目的 在中国北方农村人群的前瞻性队列中,独立验证并比较脑卒中5年发病风险预测模型的准确性,对模型在一级预防中的实际应用进行评价。方法 研究对象为2010年6月至8月参加基线调查并随访至2017年1月的6 483例基线调查时未患心血管病的40~79岁北京房山农村人群,采用最新发表的中国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测研究(prediction for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in China, China-PAR)脑卒中模型和美国弗明汉脑卒中风险评分(Framingham stroke risk profile, FSRP)模型,分别计算预测的脑卒中5年发病风险。通过Kaplan-Meier方法调整获得5年实际观察到的新发脑卒中事件的发生率,并计算预测风险与实际发生率的比值,以评价验证队列中是否存在风险的高估或低估。采用区分度C统计量、校准度卡方值,以及校准图评估模型的预测准确性。结果 在本验证队列6 483例研究对象平均(5.83±1.14)年的随访时间内,共出现新发脑卒中事件438例。再校准后的China-PAR脑卒中模型和FSRP模型在男性中预测准确性较好,区分度C统计量及其95%可信区间分别为0.709(0.675~0.743)和0.721(0.688~0.754),校准度卡方值分别为5.7(P=0.770)和13.6(P=0.137),但在女性中高估了脑卒中的5年发病风险,再校准后的China-PAR和FSRP模型分别高估了11.6%和30.0%;China-PAR和FSRP模型的区分度接近,C统计量及其95%可信区间在女性中分别为0.713(0.684~0.743)和0.710(0.679~0.740),校准度卡方值分别为12.5(P=0.188)和24.0(P=0.004)。另外,只有China-PAR脑卒中模型的校准图显示其预测风险与实际发生率的一致性较好,特别是在男性人群。结论 China-PAR脑卒中模型对于中国北方农村人群脑卒中5年发病风险的预测优于FSRP模型,特别是在男性中更准确。

关键词: 脑卒中, 风险预测, 队列研究, 农村人群

Abstract:

Objective: To validate five-year risk prediction models for stroke in a contemporary rural Northern Chinese population.Methods: Totally 6 483 rural adults aged 40 to 79 years without cardiovascular diseases were enrolled at baseline between June and August 2010, and followed up through January 2017. Expected prediction risk using the China-PAR (prediction for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in China) stroke risk equations were compared with the new Framingham stroke risk profile (FSRP). The recalibrated models were applied by adjusting the five-year baseline survival rate and the mean score to our rural northern Chinese population, while keeping other coefficient parameters the same as the original models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to obtain the observed event (nonfatal or fatal stroke) rate for the five years, and the expected-observed ratios were calculated to evaluate overestimation or underestimation in the cohort. The models were assessed by discrimination C statistic, calibration χ2, and calibration charts and plots for illustration as well.Results: Over an average of (5.83 ± 1.14) years of the follow-up in this validation cohort with 6 483 rural Chinese participants, 438 subjects deve-loped a first stroke event. Recalibrated China-PAR stroke risk equations and FSRP well-performed for predicting five-year stroke risk in men, and had C statistics of 0.709 (95%CI, 0.675 - 0.743) and 0.721 (95%CI, 0.688 - 0.754), with calibration χ2 values being 5.7 (P = 0.770) and 13.6 (P = 0.137), respectively. However, both China-PAR and FSRP overestimated stroke events by 11.6% and 30.0% in women, and had C statistics of 0.713 (95%CI, 0.684-0.743) and 0.710 (95%CI, 0.679-0.740), respectively. Calibration χ2 values in women were 12.5 (P = 0.188) for China-PAR and 24.0 (P = 0.004) for FSRP. In addition, the calibration charts and plots illustrated good agreement between the observations and the predictions only in the China-PAR stroke risk equations, especially for men.Conclusion: In this validation cohort of rural northern Chinese adults, the China-PAR models had better performance of five-year stroke risk prediction than the FSRP, indicating that recalibrated China-PAR stroke risk equations might be appropriate tools for risk assessment and primary prevention of stroke in China.

Key words: Stroke, Risk prediction, Cohort study, Rural population

中图分类号: 

  • R181.2

图1

脑卒中5年风险预测模型验证的研究对象入选流程图"

表1

研究对象的基线特征与结局事件情况"

Characteristics Men
(n=2 215)		 Women
(n=4 268)		 P value
Age/years, x?±s 55.7 ± 9.0 55.2 ± 8.7 0.027
Current smoker, n (%) 1 310 (59.1) 430 (10.1) <0.001
Waist circumference/cm, x?±s 87.1 ± 10.5 84.2 ± 10.2 <0.001
SBP/mmHg, x?±s 128.9 ± 16.4 128.0 ± 17.1 0.037
DBP/mmHg, x?±s 82.2 ± 9.9 79.9 ± 9.1 <0.001
Anti-hypertensive treatment, n (%) 344 (15.5) 749 (17.6) 0.039
Total cholesterol/ (mg/dL)a, x?±s 180.9 ± 36.8 194.2 ± 37.8 <0.001
HDL-C/ (mg/dL) a, x?±s 44.5 ± 11.6 47.3 ± 11.4 <0.001
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 192 (8.7) 421 (9.9) 0.119
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 21 (1.0) 23 (0.5) 0.057
Parental history of stroke, n (%) 475 (21.4) 986 (23.1) 0.130
Incident stroke events, n (%) 202 (9.7) 236 (6.1) <0.001
Incidence of stroke /100 000 person-years 1 653.5 1 008.4
5-year Kaplan-Meier stroke rate /% 6.1 3.8

表2

研究人群中China-PAR和FSRP模型分别用于5年脑卒中风险预测的外部验证及比较"

Items Men Women
China-PAR FSRP China-PAR FSRP
Total participants, n 2 215 2 215 4 268 4 268
Actual stroke eventsa , n 202 202 236 236
Kaplan-Meier-adjusted eventsb , n 136.1 136.1 163.5 163.5
Predicted stroke eventsc , n 130.3 125.6 182.4 212.5
Expected-observed ratio 0.957 0.923 1.116 1.300
C statistic 0.709 0.721 0.713 0.710
95%CI 0.675-0.743 0.688-0.754 0.684-0.743 0.679-0.740
Calibration χ2 5.7 13.6 12.5 24.0
P value 0.770 0.137 0.188 0.004

图2

外部验证队列中5年脑卒中事件发生率与China-PAR和FSRP模型预测值的比较"

图3

China-PAR和FSRP模型用于5年脑卒中风险预测的外部验证校准图"

[1] GBD 2016 lifetime risk of stroke collaborators. Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016BD 2016 lifetime risk of stroke collaborators. Global, regional, and country-specific lifetime risks of stroke, 1990 and 2016[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018,379(25):2429-2437.
[2] Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990—2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2019,394(10204):1145-1158.
[3] Lloyd-Jones DM, Braun LT, Ndumele CE, et al. Use of risk assessment tools to guide decision-making in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a special report from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology[J]. Circulation, 2019,139(25):e1162-e1177.
pmid: 30586766
[4] Dufouil C, Beiser A, McLure LA, et al. Revised Framingham stroke risk profile to reflect temporal trends[J]. Circulation, 2017,135(12):1145-1159.
[5] Xing X, Yang X, Liu F, et al. Predicting 10-year and lifetime stroke risk in Chinese population[J]. Stroke, 2019,50(9):2371-2378.
pmid: 31390964
[6] 唐迅, 何柳, 曹洋, 等. 基于农村社区人群的心血管危险因素相对效应和性别差异的分层研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2011,43(3):379-385.
[7] 唐迅, 张杜丹, 何柳, 等. China-PAR模型在北方农村人群中预测动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病发病风险的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017,49(3):439-445.
[8] Alba AC, Agoritsas T, Walsh M, et al. Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users’ guides to the medical literature[J]. JAMA, 2017,318(14):1377-1384.
pmid: 29049590
[9] Cook NR, Ridker PM. Calibration of the pooled cohort equations for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an update[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2016,165(11):786-794.
pmid: 27723890
[10] 中国心血管病风险评估和管理指南编写联合委员会. 中国心血管病风险评估和管理指南[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2019,53(1):13-35.
[11] Flueckiger P, Longstreth W, Herrington D, et al. Revised Framingham stroke risk score, nontraditional risk markers, and incident stroke in a multiethnic cohort[J]. Stroke, 2018,49(2):363-369.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018928 pmid: 29311270
[12] Bos D, Ikram MA, Leening MJG, et al. The revised Framingham stroke risk profile in a primary prevention population: the Rotterdam study[J]. Circulation, 2017,135(22):2207-2209.
pmid: 28559499
[1] 任国勇,吴雪梅,李颖,李婕妤,孙伟平,黄一宁. 大血管闭塞性脑卒中亚急性期磁敏感血管征的表现[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1133-1138.
[2] 刘晓强,杨洋,周建锋,刘建彰,谭建国. 640例单牙种植术对血压和心率影响的队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 390-395.
[3] 刘欢,何映东,刘金波,黄薇,赵娜,赵红薇,周晓华,王宏宇. 血管健康指标对新发心脑血管事件的预测价值:北京血管健康分级标准的初步验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(3): 514-520.
[4] 孟文颖,黄琬桐,张杰,焦明远,金蕾,靳蕾. 孕早期血清维生素E水平与妊娠期高血压疾病发病风险的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(3): 470-478.
[5] 唐雯,高峻逸,马辛宇,张超贺,马连韬,王亚沙. 循环神经网络模型在腹膜透析临床预后预测中的初步应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 602-608.
[6] 贾子昌,李选,李小刚,曾祥柱,栾景源,王昌明,韩金涛. 机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中单中心研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(2): 256-259.
[7] 林鸿波，陈奕，沈鹏，李小勇，司亚琴，张杜丹，唐迅，高培. 社区糖尿病患者慢性肾脏病的发病率及其危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 416-421.
[8] 蔺轲，谢俊卿，胡永华，孔桂兰. 支持向量机在ICU急性肾损伤患者住院死亡风险预测中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 239-244.
[9] 孙卓男，孟秀丽，王军，郭向阳，韩金涛，齐强. 有麻醉科参与的卒中单元有效救治围手术期脑卒中1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(6): 1090-1094.
[10] 唐迅，张杜丹，何柳，曹洋，王晋伟，李娜，黄少平，窦会东，高培，胡永华. China-PAR模型在北方农村人群中预测动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病发病风险的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 439-445.
[11] 杨志凯, 董捷, 左力. 腹膜透析总水清除量下降速率快是患者死亡的独立危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(6): 844-848.
[12] 唐迅, 何柳, 曹洋, 王晋伟, 李娜, 田君, 刘建江, 于立平, 许海涛, 刘武军, 温苏申, 窦会东, 胡永华. 基于农村社区人群的心血管危险因素相对效应和性别差异的分层研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(3): 379-385.
[13] 何耀. 队列研究设计在临床研究中的应用和相关方法学问题[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2010, 42(6): 713-715.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部